OI, YOU GOT A LOICENSE FOR THAT?

>>105974921 (OP)
God, im glad i left that shithole.

>>105974921 (OP)
I have a schizo theory that the UK ended so cursed because they let a horny fat guy with a rotten leg change the country religion because he wanted to divorce his wife

>>105974921 (OP)
are Gub'mnt looks after us bongs.
Online, it's a dangerous scary place.

>>105974921 (OP)
VPN prices about to skyrocket

>>105974971
VPNs are mid for bypassing geoblocks though. Residential proxies are better.

>>105974921 (OP)
this is for your safety

>>105975083
no apparently it's for the safety of unattended and unsupervised children. aaaand for mega corpos to annihiliate any competition that can't implement features or pay fines

>>105975149
>apparently it's for the safety of unattended and unsupervised children
So why are we fucking responsible? Don't they have parents for this kind of thing?

>>105975172
parent, singular, and no force on earth is gonna tell single mothers what to do. We'd rather do this.

>>105975149
strange how the ukie government lets the same unattended and unsupervised children get rapetrained by a horde of pakis

>>105975196
or cut up in a dance school then imprison anybody who has a problem with that, paints a rich tapestry

>>105974947
Henry the VIII actually course corrected Angloid land into an actual empire, and it wasn't horniness either. The guy was genuinely terrified of god and thought he was cursed by marrying his brother's widow. It was another fat old calvary man in WW1 and WW2 that cursed the realm

Once a year I make a fake BBC account so I can watch snooker.
Requires entering an address, so I always just pick some random cunt in London.
Probably gets a visit from the Television Police lol

>>105975206
>It was another fat old calvary man in WW1 and WW2 that cursed the realm
it was the nigger Churchill to be exact

>>105975188
lol. it's so easy. make parents responsible for their children's online safety. there i solved this problem.
another solution would be ban minors from using the internet, it would be the best outcome for everyone.

>>105974947
Nah it's the jews. Same as always

>>105974921 (OP)
is it an ai generated image in the background?

>>105975821
Yeah, OP's screencap is from an AI chatbot site

>>105975477
20th century trump. at least he wasn't a draft dodger

>>105975506
>another solution would be ban minors from using the internet
That is indeed what they're trying to do, and for that you need ID verification on every site.

>>105975477
>>105975870
he wanted to keep the empire, no?
>cursed the realm
you angloids were always cursed
punished by god with bad weather bland food and ugly women

>>105976189
>and for that you need ID verification on every site.
This along with them rolling out the dialectic that in order to remove illegals people need IDs will cement this form of control. It's genius. Create problems with immigration and child online acess and then soldify goverment control.

>downloading your porn from paysites
pirates win again

>>105976199
>he wanted to keep the empire, no?
He made a speech about it, yes. But under his watch the empire collapsed.
>you angloids were always cursed punished by god with bad weather bland food and ugly women
Peaks and valleys, really. We either have really good food or women or absolutely terrible ones. Weather is a good mix and I can't lie I long for the swamp or bog. The smell of Petrichor, the feeling of rain and or the beuty of fungus invigorates me.

half the US states are doing this too, the rest will follow. I'm surprised the ultr-areligious states havent banned the internet entirely for under 18s

i miss murdoch-chan

>>105976245
One step at a time

>>105975533
Angloids are just white Jews doebeit.

>>105976233
>But under his watch the empire collapsed.
it was controlled demolition.
and not only for the brits, everyone "lost" their holdings
they got pitched the idea to turn the colonies into puppets
the french did a decent job at it for a while
but thats actually a way worse arrangement for the natives than the colonial system
or so i gather

>>105976266
It's more so mutual arrangements historically. The kingdom was the first to allow interests on loans and internarional banking systems made their start in England in order to project power over France and Germany. Even the evangelical alliance of dispensationalism came from England.

>UK
>Germany
>Florida
>Texas
>China
>Russia
>North Korea

What else is on the shit list? Other than India

Why are they pushing all of this esafety shit all at once along with opening up the epstein shit for the first time in a decade?
It's like the epstein related people are trying to get away with murder by forcing people to hate esafety shit etc. It's certainly working.

But there's no way this isn't forced shit for some nefarious reason, be it OPSEC in gaza or something related to epstein or a distraction from covid shit and the coming financial crisis.

Btw, how long before they censor the holocaust with this shit? That's where this is going ay.

>>105976375
>Globe in general
NWO, anon. An international cabal of admins forced to become so through blackmail and debt-bondage.

Reminder that the MIC is the single biggest contributor to child abuse. Watch as these NGOs and governments do nothing about that and focus on internet porn instead, which could inform people about these systematic abuses of children.

>>105976387
>Why are they pushing all of this esafety shit all at once
This has been a gradual shift for years anon
>It's like the epstein related people are trying to get away with murder by forcing people to hate esafety shit etc.
Unrelated in terms of esafety mandates

>>105976402
>MIC
Microphones?

>>105976433
Massachusetts Institute of Cunny

>>105976189
>you need ID verification on every site.
No. You just make a law that says ISPs cannot give internet service to minors. Adults letting minors get access to the internet would get punished as if they gave them alcohol.
People already give information to pay for internet, that would be the gate to cross.

>>105976433
milidairy industreal complecks

>>105976433
Millions of institutional catholics

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/722903

>>105978506
>only 25k
It's over

>>105978506
>>105978593
putting a petition up, not promoting it, and writing it from the perspective of discussing hamsters is retarded, of course it doesn’t go anywhere.

>>105974921 (OP)
Shoulsnt this mean 4chan would be blocked in the uk too? This site has nsfw boards

>>105978805
I think the point was to highlight how much overreach the law introduces. You can't submit duplicate ones anyway so it's all there is.

THE PROTESTANTS ARE AT IT AGAIN

>>105974921 (OP)
the rapid collapse of the british island is insane

>>105976387
"esafety" has nothing to do with pedos or epstein, you're just an >OBSESSED animu troon

it's for tracking people in general, largely for advertising and other monetizable data

You know what's funny? Right now, the solution is to use a VPN - all britbongs can still access these websites just by VPNing out into some other country.

Now imagine if most of the rest of the world follows suit. The EU is no stranger to retarded bureaucratic laws, it might look at the UK and say "great idea". Several US states are currently adding similar laws already, imagine the federal government picks it up at some point, e.g. maybe the next time democrats are in. China already requires ID for internet access from what I hear, Russia might like the opportunity for more oversight China-style.
Imagine if small shithole countries in the middle of nowhere become bastions of free internet access, and the entire world starts routinely VPNing to like sub-saharan africa or the middle east for website access. Imagine third world countries building their economy on server hosting and leasing internet bandwidth, because Ghanian hosting with a Ghanian VPN or someshit is the only way to safely host any website at all.

>>105978506
>>105978593
It only had a couple hundred until reddit and major porn providers started asking for ID a few days ago.

>>105976387
>Btw, how long before they censor the holocaust with this shit?
You can already get legally convicted and forced to pay penalty fees + take mandatory trip to one of the camps-turned-museums if you claim the holocaust didn't happen on Facebook. That has been going on for at least a decade, and nearly all of Europe has laws that forbid you from denying the holocaust. Not even kidding.
captcha: YAYYY

>>105978506
>"Government responds to all petitions that get more than 10,000 signatures"
>We aren't going to repeal the Online Safety Act.
>"At 100,000 signatures, this petition will be considered for debate in Parliament"
>'ere lads shall we debate this in parliament?
>Nah
That's how it will go. That's how all of these stupid petitions go. It's just a pressure release valve so you accept all the things being done to you because the government "listened" and "engaged with you". Maybe not you specifically, but the point of these is mollification.
Same as voting when it was only the Torys and Labour on the ballot.

>>105979118
ok do nothing then

>>105979239
Not the conclusion you should draw from my post.

>>105976375
eu is gonna join the club soon
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification

>>105979118
Cynically speaking, the government does what they want, but realistically speaking they do consider voter opinions at least somewhat. What a petition like this does is bring this to the attention of the government. Alone it will obviously not do anything at all, but it can well serve as part of a wider campaign of discontent, and eventually the politians will look at what voters seem to care about before the next election and might remember this and decide it'll be an easy way to win some extra votes if they make it part of their platform.

Of course a single petition won't change anything by itself, but the alternative is to either do nothing and let yourself be steamrolled, or violent insurrection and if you're gonna do that then I don't think ID laws on porn sites are the thing to insurrect about.

i live in the uk and already use a vpn, but it doesn't work on 4chan, if i try to post it just says "connection error" but works fine if i route 4chan outside of the vpn. if 4chan does get blocked in a few days im fucked. how do i use my vpn to access 4chan? help bros i need this god-forsaken website

>>105974921 (OP)
>>105979474
Another point for hashchans

>>105978970
it started the same with tax. stuff like income tax is quite new and now there's just a few "tax paradises" like some Caribbean islands or Monaco left

>>105979474
passu

>>105979474
works for me m8
try another server and start from 4chan.org (homepage), might be just a Cloudflare captcha in the way

>>105976266
>white Jews
java.lang.NullPointerException

>>105975506
>make parents responsible for their children's online safety.
that's a misogynistic hate crime
you can't spell C U C K without UK

>>105979016
>and forced to pay penalty fees + take mandatory trip to one of the camps-turned-museums
they let you off easy then, here it's at least a year in prison on top of the fine and the museum visit you have to pay out of pocket of course

>>105978970
using VPN's without a loicence will be treated as terrorism
screencap this

>>105979553
nope, doesnt work, just gets stuck like this
picrel

>>105979417
Look at these three recent petitions, all closed, hopelessly optimistic about the democratic process, and denied.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/700143
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/705383
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/702844
Do you petitioning for lower taxes, or just /asking/ the government to release their power is ever going to work, or even move the government closer to those things?
Your post creates a false triad, where the options are:
>put your faith in petitions
>kill people
or
>do nothing
I propose there is another option where we discuss the flaws of these petitions and other mechanisms like them, recognise there is a problem, and then work towards what measures could make them more effective. I do not think "just continue participating in them even if they're ineffective" is a valid means of achieving this.

>>105979417
Look at these three recent petitions, all closed, hopelessly optimistic about the democratic process, and denied.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/700143
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/705383
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/702844
Do you think petitioning for lower taxes despite what is in the budget, or just *asking* the government to release their power is ever going to work, or even move the government closer to those things?
Your post creates a false triad, where the options are:
>put your faith in petitions
>kill people
or
>do nothing
I propose there is another option where we discuss the flaws of these petitions and other mechanisms like them, recognise there is a problem, and then work towards what measures could make them more effective. I do not think "just continue participating in them even if they're ineffective" is a valid means of achieving this.

>>105979474
Make sure your ipv6 isn't leaking, that's got me in the past.

Webmasters what do we do? I'm currently planning on blackholing all traffic from the UK at the first email I get from ofcom in hopes they drop this retarded law in the future, I can't be arsed to deal with age verification for a bunch of cunts.

>>105974947
Nah, I think Henry VIII probably did the country a favor by divorcing it from the Pope. The underlying reason was kind of stupid but getting it out of the Holy Roman Empire had a greater impact in terms of things like fiscal policy and ability to set their own terms for governance.

>>105979715

>>105979715
At least let TOR users read your site, unlike the lazy dickheads at Civit.

>>105978847
It is 4channel sir, there is no porn here

>>105979702
all good apparently.
i cant for the life of me figure this out, tried every vpn setting i can think to change, tried different servers in different countries, disabled adblock...nothing worked so far

>>105978847
Yes, ofcom have already opened an investigation into 4chan, they also specifically amended this bill so they could go after 4chan and Bitchute (which has already blocked UK ips)
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/investigation-into-4chan-and-its-compliance-with-duties-to-protect-its-users-from-illegal-content

>>105979715
According to some opinion piece I read somewhere whose source I forgot, apparently the law does not include provisions for warnings, so allegedly the first email from ofcom might very well be "we have determined you're in breach and you have now been fined £18 million".
Ask yourself whether you're immune to british fines or not, and consider blackholing the traffic pre-emptively. Any visitor of worth will just use a VPN anyway so it's not like you're providing an important service by trying to keep it accessible. The important thing is to make sure you're not blanket-banning VPNs or tor, or that you're not using some anti-spam/anti-ddos service that's overzealous, like setting cloudflare to a zillion javascript captchas if it detects a vpn or tor. (4chan is an issue for example, since the only option to post with a vpn is to buy a pass. Don't be like that.)

Also, unironically, the more websites just completely block UK traffic the more annoyed the general population will be. Your website is probably small enough to not have a lot of effect among normies but every little helps as we say here. Unironically accelerate, the quicker normies can develop a hatred for this type of law the better.

>>105979118
I know nobody here wants to hear it, but the truth is that the average person supports these kinds of laws, or at least doesn't mind them all that much. That's why petitions are useless. The frog is okay with being slowly cooked to death.

>>105979924
anon I already answered your question >>105979544
there are no settings that will work

the only alternative is residential proxies which are a pain in the ass, or things like the . gay domain which afaik use residential proxies under the hood and are extremely slow and cumbersome to post on

>>105976375
I'm starting to believe this is a global problem.
But what kind of group is active in every single country...?

>>105979955
oh. shit. that's gay as fuck, but thank you for answering.

>>105980049
IMO if it really becomes the only way to post... I'll probably caugh up the $30 or whatever, as much as I hate hiro.
I wonder if he's rubbing his hands right now preparing to range block Britain.

>>105980071
>hiro
>doing something
>ANYTHING
Doubt it.
He's said publicly he likes 4chan as a source of passive income. He should be considered a ruler in absentia.

>>105979944
youre absolutely right, as nightmarish as that is to imagine. the average person has no idea why internet freedom is important, even when the day comes that they wake up to a police state with no contact to the outside world because all communication is already blocked, and every person has already willingly installed survelliance devices in their homes in the forms of alexa and ring doorbells, and those will be used to enforce the curfews and identify lawbreakers...its not even dystopian, it's just going to be our reality...and the average person will think it came suddenly, with no idea that it happened so slowly years in advance and that they could have fought against it.

>>105980071
if it becomes absolutely necessary, i guess ill pay, but fuck dude this is so depressing. as a 32yo oldfag who got to experience the ealy days of the internet, and pirating since i was 10 when limewire was still a thing, it's heartbreaking how cucked and centralized the internet is now.

Hiro needs to reintroduce 4channel for the bongoloids

>>105979783
See, hashchans are not a platform, so thry are not required to undergo this burdensome compliance ritual

You berate us off but you'd still love to live here.

>>105980145
it's not just porn, also wrongthink

>>105980389
>t. mohammed ranjeet from birmingham

>>105975172
>Don't they have parents
kek, there are so many single mothers in UK that "bastard" is no longer an insult.

>>105980389
Berners-Lee invented the world wide web, not the internet. The internet was independently invented in a few places, and the american version was the one that spread globally, but I don't remember if britain even had its own (I know the french did, for example).

>>105979715
They’ve sent me regular emails as part of some mailing list they’ve added me to, for a site I’m sure they’d love to destroy. I just blocked adult content for UK (but not normal content) with a message telling them it’s blocked and to use a VPN. If they request a written assessment I’ll send it, and if they fine the “company” I’ll bankrupt it and make a new one. And if they try to put me in prison I’ll go to prison because I don’t even want to live in a society where good faith compliance isn’t enough. Maybe I’ll finally have the lack of distractions to write another book.

>>105975477
>>105975870
Churchill was an American
A fat, drunken slobbery American who was behind deposing our King and getting us in a war for Poland

Where can I go to escape this god forsaken authoritarian hell-hole?

>>105976202
Don't forget when they start compulsory purchasing people's houses "for the greater good". This country is 100% doomed.

>>105981006
i mean we been trying to tell you

>>105981207
its happening in america too

>>105981212
but people actually care here. you can largely avoid psyops if you avoid normalfag hives

>>105975196
Government's job is to destroy the society. WEF took over your government. Their goal is to reduce the population of humans by destroying high functioning society

>>105979850
Sorry but the possibility that someone COULD post anything pornographic without checks and balances means it is automatically subject to the law

AT LEAST IN OUR SCHOOLS

Females ruin everything
The internet

Video games

Even white collar jobs are now percieved as jew daycare because of them

I saw a bunch of Chinese people in comments on Civit. What are the Chinese using to access Civit given how much the site hates proxies?

>>105981401
so it was the chinese hogging up all their bandwidth after all?

why can't we just have internet borders?

BUILD THE (FIRE)WALL

>governments are making sure the online world in increasingly "safe"
>meanwhile in the real world, thousands of these flood the west every year
By 2032 the setting of Demolition Man will be preferable to this mockery of reality. Some would say, it already is.

sneed

>>105974921 (OP)
Is it me or has the country been declining more rapidly recently? It's been declining for the past ten years, but recently everything just seems to be getting worse faster, socially, politically, economically, etc.

>>105974947
It's because of their degeneracy and were all next

>>105981573
Don't forgot the environmental destruction

>>105976375
Iran
Turkmenistan

>>105981242
>reduce the population of humans
the last thing we need right now is more people, anon
id very much like to see a global decrease

>>105981573
you can either have a functioning country or one full of brown 'people'

>>105981745
Depopulation propaganda has made it into your brain. But even if you're brainwashed like this, all you have to do is ask yourself one question to verify if the propaganda you have in your brain is valid or not.

Why dont you kill yourself?

>>105981573
The competency crisis is at full steam here

>>105981859
what on earth makes you think more people is a benefit? you're just driven by your basic animal instinct to further the species, but we are way past the survival stage. for the recor im not sayin gppl should start offing themselves thats retarded, but couples dont need ot be having 5 kids either, just 1 or 2. if all couples rn just had 1 kid, the population would naturally decrease, cause 2 becomes 1 duh. a stable population is fine too, but an exponential increase? literally why? so housing prices can go up, so the job market becomes harder to get into, not to mention enviromental shit?

>>105981916
You got this far in life because of "more people". So did your parents, your friends, your family, your neighbors, the world around you is built by "more people" that came to be. "More people" isn't artificial. Its uniquely human. Its uniquely a characteristics of a living being. The death cult that has captured you mind is an artificial cancer that has taken over your mind. That has taken over the society.

>>105981916
why does this only ever get fed to europeans? how about reducing india's population?

>>105981372
>Too lazy to police their own children
>Hate when men are happy by themselves, so they destroy men's sources of joy- vidya, porn, AI
>Votes in more nanny state, more "progressive" policies, more make-work bureaucracy, increasing taxes and debt

It's all so tiring

>>105981745
Sure, but what the UK is getting is not a population decrease but population replacement.

>>105978970
>all britbongs can still access these websites just by VPNing out into some other country.
half the internet does not work properly with VPNs now, its a shit experience

>>105981966
the sarletes won't allow that

>>105981966
>>105981974
tbf i did say "global" decrease...
yes, absolutely decrease blacks, browns and anyone not white. we aint the problem.
>>105981962
i get you bruh, but im autistic, diagnosed as a kid, and for all my life ive had to be an outsider looking in, ive seen everything, including the end of time, and i know the journey there isn't worth it. okay im a lil drunk on guinness rn :)

>>105981573
one has to wonder what happened there recently
>got manipulated into brexit

>>105981966
America gets the dose of it. Children being castrated/sterilized, importing of millions of illegals from the border by the last admin in order to destroy the wage for lower class people. In order to sow chaos in a society where millions of unvetted people with unknown backgrounds all over are in the cities. To destroy the social safety net system, economic wage growth, create division in society, fear, crime, etc.

America gets it as well. Its uniquely fed to the west because the death cultists communists think the western culture is the worst and needs to be destroyed.

>>105981207
you make it easy for indians and hard for whites

>>105981859
nta but I'm with the global reptilian cabal on this. At what point do we have enough people? I don't want Indian and Chinese levels of crowding and pollution. I've lived at the same address for thirty years and I miss the days when I could look up at night and see the stars instead of the dystopian orange haze of exhaust fumes lit eerily by sodium-vapor lamps.

>>105981974
>UK is getting is not a population decrease but population replacement
That's right. But I don't understand why you think it's a conspiracy.

People in developed parts of the world just naturally don't have as many kids, irrespective of their ethnicity. It's a reproduction strategy humans have evolved and are carrying out without thinking about it. Under harsh conditions, the best strategy is to have lots of offspring because a lot of them will likely die. But under good conditions, it's better to have one or two and put all your resources into raising them.

But this creates an economic challenge for politicians because without new people (i.e. new workers), the economy will collapse. So what are policy makers meant to do? Force people to fuck at gun point? (Or specifically force white people, in your imagining of the situation.) The only sensible option is to import skilled workers.

Every group of people seems to have its own persecution narrative, whether it's about "da joos", or "muh patriarchy", or "whitey". They feel like they're designed to tug at my heartstrings, which is what makes me so leery of them all

>>105982255
The question you have to ask, why dont you kill yourself, your family, your friends, you neighbors, etc? Depopulation is happening in your country, in your society, in your city. If you love depopulation so much, the least you can do is off your family and yourself.

>>105982255
deliveroo drivers are not skilled workers

>>105982255
>The only sensible option is to import skilled workers.
You can automate jobs, you can also get rid of the useless make-work jobs, you can have just the immigrant stay here for only a few years instead of allowing them to permanently bring their 20 family members, you can also get rid of the retarded economic system that relies on constant growth to prevent collapse.

>>105982277
>Depopulation is happening in your country, in your society, in your city
Thank god

>If you love depopulation so much, the least you can do is off your family and yourself
There's non-violent ways to achieve it. And as you said, the depopulation folks are willing the good fight here

>>105982341
You can join the castration club. Chemical, physical, or ideological castration. Thats what many Americans are doing.

>>105982277
>Depopulation is happening in your country, in your society, in your city
Thank god

>If you love depopulation so much, the least you can do is off your family and yourself
There's non-violent ways to achieve it. And as you said, the depopulation folks are winning the good fight here

>>105981401
>given how much the site hates proxies?
I really don't get why websites still do this nowadays, when it's becoming more and more important to circumvent geoblocking.

>>105982255
LOL plenty of migrants are completely undocumented in the UK and the number of illegals has only skyrocketed because they left the EU which also locked them out of justicial information they would've had access to 10 years ago. There was also the Boriswaves which brought massive amounts of migrants who are now a burden on the already fucked up economy. What's funny is that everything /pol/ says about other countries in Europe and the US is 10x more true in the UK. You're a slave to the new brown welfare class which is replacing you and not even adding anything to your already burdened economy. The last excuse you would need is H1Bs LMFAO.

>>105982362
Because spammers and scammers abuse them.

>>105978506
Im going to sign it, and they will probably add me to a list lol.

>>105982255
>sodium-vapor lamps
dude i wish we still had sodium vapor lamps, now its the harsh white glow of leds. perhaps its an odd thing to get nostalgic for, but i love the warmth of sodium vapor lamps, its comforting and brings me back to being a kid.

>>105979698
>the democratic process
Not one constituency was ever consulted on their thoughts on the bill. MPs act in the ''''''best interests'''''' and aren't actually accountable to their voters. We are ruled by pressure groups and policy is decided by singular events - the bill itself is a result of some normie schoolgirl offing herself due to facebook drama.

>>105982387
>and they will probably add me to a list lol.
That's the problem with living in a country that increasingly acts like a police state, they use fear and intimidation to keep good people quiet on bad policies and laws.

>>105982362
As far as I have found, most websites don't outright block proxy users and Civit is the one site that is getting fucking geoblocked that I actually use and also completely blocks TOR from even reading the site. Can someone pester Civit staff to let TOR through instead of them being too lazy to just ban any spam accounts?

>>105982423
What about normal VPNs?

>>105982430
You mean VPNs that cost money to use? I have no reason to use a VPN until now so I've not tested any and shouldn't have to waste money over this.

>>105982387
>add me to a list
thats exactly why im not signing it, you just know those cunts will

>>105982456
>Shouldn't have to waste money over this
This is what you stupid fucks get for letting your retarded government enact this safety act. You are complicit and in fact you will have to waste money as a result. Get to testing vpns britcuck.

>>105982533
this was not a referundum like brexit, there was no opportunity to vote.

>>105982456
It's useful in general, and doubly so when our country is gonna start up a great firewall of britain.
Go to mullvad, generate an account and post its generated monero address in a pastebin of some sort, I'll send $5 worth to it to top you up for a month so you can see if your shit works

>>105982456
You can a shit (but good enough for this shit) one like Nord for basically no money if you use cashback. I think it's still 90pc cashback right now.

>>105982563
Wait, why not just test it yourself instead of bothering to send someone $5 of monero?

Not-So-Great Firewall of Not-So-Great Britain?

>>105982614
I don't care about civit myself. And I don't care about $5 either

>>105982663
https://pastebin.com/qXkA1TY0
I assume this will work then if you're down

>>105979474
I thought they blocked vpns from posting?

>>105977000
That would insanely impossible to enforce, ID verification is much easier and cheaper to do.

>>105982725
Alright cool, my node says it'll take an hour to resync on my laptop and I'm about to go to sleep so I'll probably send it at like 9-10am tomorrow morning when I wake up

>>105982737
Cheers m8

>>105982727
yes they did, i just found that out today :(

>>105982749
No problem. Next step is gonna be buying passu when 4chan is inevitably blocked...

>>105979937
>4chan
kek, then that means they will have to go after Reddit since they more porn then 4chan has?

>>105975064
Wouldn't using tor be better, and it is also free?

>>105982387
you were already added to the list when you accessed this site

>>105982754
Nigger why wouldn’t jannies prevent vpns from posting? Easy way to evade bans.

>>105982768
No because reddit added age verification

>>105982563
>>105982614
All this test crap when gookmoot lets you vpn post with a 4chan cuckpass.

>>105982794
yeah i get it, but as a brit and a 4chan user, im allowed to be sad that i cant use my vpn.

>>105982882
we won't be missing your worthless posts

Best case scenario I can think of regarding 4chan is if the admin outright refuses to comply, leading to ofcom ordering ISPs to block the site, only for it to be as easy to circumvent as a DNS level block.

>>105978937
They are scared that evidence, like in full HD videos featuring their ugly faces while doing evil shit, will leak worldwide. That is why is illegal to store or distribute evidence against them, it was never to protect the children.

>>105979474
Buy a pass

>>105982905
thats extremely mean, bro. you're gonna make me cry.

>>105982980
God, you guys have no idea how good it feels to post without a captcha again. Take my money Hiroshimoot!

>>105982980
if im forced to, yeah, i will.
>>105982990
okay actually based, but its a shame we have to pay for that "privilege"
god we need to go back

>>105982957
This.
UK isp blocks are incredibly ineffectual, RT and piratebay are blocked but this can be easily bypassed by just changing DNS

>>105983056
yeah its stupidly easy, i can access tpb without vpn or proxy just by switching to public dns, i use 1.1.1.1 in my router settings so it applies to all devices, which also precaches websites so they load a lil faster :) normies aint gonna know to do this, or even use torrenting in the first place lol

>>105974921 (OP)
WE MUST HELP OUR BON/G/FRENS BY RUNNING THREADS WHERE NONBON/G/S DOWNLOAD THE MODELS REQUESTED BY BON/G/S AND POST MAGNET LINKS, SO WE CAN TORRENT MODELS TO OUR BON/G/ BROS!

Fuck the government!

>>105982202
>Are you that relative's spouse?
>Congratulations! You've found one of the easiest ways to become an American.
That's me. Feels good bros.

>>105979474
Posting from a vpn is against the rules and is banable.
That being said I keep forgetting to turn off mine and it doesn't even load the captcha, looking like picrel
Frustrating since by default I route all my lan traffic through vpn

>>105982735
Verification would take place even before getting a internet connection, so webmasters would assume that everyone using the internet (at least for the UK) is an adult.

>>105983086
that won't last much longer, 1337x is already blocked

>>105985914
>choices made by some VPN users
huh?

>>105985923
fuck knows
either way, I'm on 1.1.1.1 as well and have ran into the block already.. even on tor.

Every UK anon should be saving up to a few thousand to get residency somewhere cheap and easy like Paraguay at this point, just so they can use the internet in peace. We are literally becoming Airstrip One so fast it's not even funny

>>105986245
VPNs are cheaper. When that gets banned, Tor becomes the anti-censorship vehicle of choice. When that gets banned, well, it is designed to be unstoppable and it basically is.

>>105986276
The problem is not the governments banning VPNs/Tor, it's websites banning it. And at the website level Tor is very very stoppable.

>>105986285
It'd be pretty hard to actually ban VPN endpoints though. Well not technically, it's super easy just to put the endpoints on a list and block them, but by doing so you're blocking a lot of users. If the UK government goes to websites and says, "Oi m8 you need to block vpn users too" then they'll be unable to distinguish between UK vpn users and non-UK vpn users, which puts them in a challenging legal position. The UK government cannot force them to block users, so there's no legal force to actually make it happen.

>>105986302
Have you BEEN on the modern internet already? Half the big websites already block or severly limit VPNs.
On 4chan you can't post. On reddit you can't even read without an account - and inb4 >reddit, it still shows up often in search results, but blocking even read access is ridiculous. Plenty of sites spam you with captchas at every corner rather than outright blocking, but that's only one step away, because I'm pretty sure users who have to solve a captcha every 30 seconds probably aren't very valuable in terms of engagement, revenue etc.

>If the UK government goes to websites and says, "Oi m8 you need to block vpn users too" then they'll be unable to distinguish between UK vpn users and non-UK vpn users, which puts them in a challenging legal position.
The government won't say anything, the websites are doing it all themselves, globally, with glee.

The only way this will change is if VPNs become the standard way for significant demographics to access the internet, and then maybe, just maybe, websites might have to stop and think "UK users were like 15-20% of my traffic, so I want to block them forever?". But the reality is that even that won't happen, because the tens of millions of normies will mostly just sign in, make an account, submit their ID, etc., whatever it takes for the path of least resistance. VPNs might be moderately popular but they'll only ever represent a tiny fraction of total internet traffic from any one country. So the calculus will become "do I want to block 5% of 15% of my previous traffic? and have to deal with spammers, ban-evaders and the like taking advantage?" and it becomes much, much easier to just block them, take the <1% traffic hit, and be done with it.

>>105982202
>2008
It's been 17 years anon.

>>105986355
I don't use those sites so I never really noticed, but yeah you're right. Doesn't matter if the UK government can't force websites when websites will just do it themselves anyway. Pretty sure the no read access thing is due to the AI meme. Preventing bots from scraping their precious human data for free - I've seen the rise of captchas and proof of work to defend everything and it's all because half the internet is content scrapers all trying to train their AI. They add captchas and block VPN ranges and stuff like that. And not just AI but jeets in general, VPN users tend to, like you say, be spammers and shills and other garbage like that when they are allowed to post content.

It's pretty grim. Honestly the EU is trying a digital identity API thing and the aim is some kind of Oauth like thing where you just use that API to prove that you're a real person, 18+, not a bot, whatever. Rolling around in my head right now is that these anti-bot measures are fertile ground for tyrannical governments who wish to implement access controls as they can simply re-use barriers to prevent abuse and apply extra barriers. The development of the locked internet is probably going to be the theme of the next few decades, where more and more sites, content, and 'stuff' is going to be locked behind some kind of identity check.

>>105982763
Just tested Civit over Mullvad and it seems to work fine. But yeah, the IP is banned on 4chan. Only alternative to giving Hiro money would be getting a bespoke residential proxy.

>>105986396
>Rolling around in my head right now is that these anti-bot measures are fertile ground for tyrannical governments who wish to implement access controls as they can simply re-use barriers to prevent abuse and apply extra barriers.
Yeah no shit. The thing is it doesn't even have to be intended this way - right now the politicians could hypothetically genuinely just be boomers trying to "protect the kids", but once the system is in place, it's almost guaranteed that at some point it'll be used against wrongthink instead.
It's the kind of stuff that makes China look like a good place to be - at least their social credit stuff is mainly aimed at protecting the uniparty government and squashing propaganda that would be dangerous, and their government's agenda is ultimately the enrichment of the country at the world stage. Meanwhile our government's agendas are being able to continue raping kids and the destruction of the native population. Ten years ago reading about the social credit system I couldn't have imagined I'd ever be saying this, but unironically if it gets to this point I'd rather live in a nationalistic country like China than one like the UK or US.

>>105986540
The only good news is that there has been systems and tech developed for use in tyrannical dystopias like Iran and russia so there are methods and tech that could be used to help, but they usually assume that there's at least ONE free country to piggyback off of, and not an internet-wide conspiracy powered by cloudflare to ban bots and other systems governments deem as bad.

>>105986558
As long as the world remains multipolar and not a hegemony, you will at least be able to piggyback off of other world powers - unfortunately currently that's, again, mostly China, and you basically have to know chinese to be able to participate in their internet. If the anglosphere internet becomes all part of the same conspiracy then yeah you're right it's gonna be pretty rough.

>>105974921 (OP)
do br*t*sh "people"" really put up with this kind of shit?

>>105986665
It's weird because I don't know anyone who actually wanted this. Who the fuck asked for this garbage?

>>105986678
The government

>>105986690
but isn't the government supposed to serve the will of the majority of their people? i dont see people wanting this stuff

>>105986788
the same government that dumps 1 million thirds worlders into the country each year? at this point I think they just want to torment people

>>105980105
>>105979944
I'm basically at this point. I'm fully ready to just stop caring and go the full Luddite route. They can't enforce shit with no infrastructure around and the peace and quiet gets very addicting. Internet fucking sucks shit now anyway, outside of p2p and rumble I barely use this shit

>>105986834
thats the will of the people though, you need cheap labour to make the line go up and keep the residents happy and rich

>>105986788
They serve their people all right, they just aren't you or the native citizens, they're the people writing the checks and running the blackmail rings

>>105986788
The government is "supposed" to win votes from people. For issues that are bipartisan, there's no reason to not just do what you want to, because what are people gonna vote for - the "other side" that is gonna do the exact same thing?

>>105974921 (OP)
>OI, YOU GOT A LOICENSE FOR THAT?
I'm American, so you can suck my Florida.

>>105986947
People just don't vote on these kind of liberty issues. People just vote on whoever is the most likely to say random crap about NHS reform or benefits or tax cuts or whatever the fuck

>>105986962
For now. There are a few states that are doing similar things; I believe texas has an anti-porn thing that is trying the same kind of thing. It's basically a matter of time until governments find some kind of wrapping paper to put general control over the internet on, because lets face it, the ability for people to freely communicate with each other has been a MASSIVE pain for power hungry retards.

>>105986911
>keep the residents happy and rich
Well they're shit job of that.

>>105986966
But the same thing goes even for mainstream issues like immigration.
Labour is the left-leaning party with a policy of bringing in a billion immigrants. Tories are the """right-leaning""" party whose policy is not that. up until the most recent election the tories had about 15 uninterrupted years of government, and guess what they did - they brought in a billion immigrants. It's not like people would vote labour over it after all.

>>105986911
India has a higher GDP than the UK but I wouldn't call its residents 'happy and rich'. The line is meaningless.

>>105986788
I don't see your people doing anything about it

If I put a monitor up to a Ring doorbell camera or something, and streamed illicit content, would Amazon be responsible for showing it to their employees? Could we get Amazon, or Google, or Facebook to have to pay a fine this way? Could we use it to actually save privacy?

>>105987081
That's not how the legislation works. This is about publicly accessible content being age-gated.

>>105986788
>the will of the majority of their people
look at the brexit fiasco between the vote and us actually leaving. there's a reason it took so long to sort out. MPs both red and blue were tabling amendments left and right to do everything they could to water down or even stop it. and not a single citizen was ever consulted on it - even in constituencies that voted leave.

regardless of whether you think brexit was good or not it goes to show that the people have zero actual say in what laws are passed. what actually gets laws passed is singular happenings like the dunblane shooting being the reason we have no guns, and in this case a high school girl offing herself because she "consumed too much social media". or five spaced out attacks by xl bullies and them being quickly banned as a result.

>>105980744
Britain did in the 60's around the same time ARPANET was a thing. Didn't even know France had theirs.

>>105974921 (OP)
I'm a silly little adult baby that doesn't know what he's doing. I need to be protected from harmful and dangerous content online. Googoogahgah. Abawahbabadahdah. Where is my dummy tit?

>>105987351
It's about protecting children not about protecting you. You are perfectly allowed to view this content as soon as you verify your identity.
Sites that just block access to the UK instead of implementing an age check are just doing it because age checks are a pain in the ass and it's easier to just block off the UK because lets face it, every site should block the UK.

>>105987366
It's non of the government's business who I am. Fuck off, you'll be vertifying nothing you wee paki bollocks

>>105987421
Then send a letter to your local MP telling him/her that this shit is stupid. I agree with the sentiment completely but you should at least understand why it's like how it is, instead of kneejerk reacting and then having the walls close in around you while you do nothing to understand how this happened.

>>105987463
>send a letter
gay
also my mp is regrettably a lib dem so they probably support this shit tenfold

>>105987558
You could replace "lib dem" with "labour" or "conservative" and the support factor would only change from 10x to 15 or 20x.

>>105987225
Clearly you know jackshit about brexit, the people were memed into believing the european union was fucking them over and it was in their best interest to leave them. There were a fuck ton of propaganda pieces aired and printed that convinced the majority to leave and vote for it. It was a case of blindly following their feeling of nationalism.

>>105987674
clearly you didn't read my post. it doesn't matter who or what people vote for because MPs can always vote however they feel which is almost always for the status quo without listening to any of their voters.

but as for the EU, sure, I guess being part of an eternally leftoid socialist bloc where any member with a soft touch for immigration can give thirdies residency which automatically entitles them to flood into here, is any better than where we are now. in terms of internet laws there are just as bad, if not worse measures being drawn up right now that we would be subject to

>>105987225
>>105987674
One big issue is that Brexit doesn't mean Brexit. The referendum was 52% for leave and not some strong favouring for a no deal Brexit but actually finding a common basis for negotiations and getting a majority in the Commons was a hard task. Theresa May's gamble of getting a higher majority backfired and made things even more complicated.

>>105987729
Yeah I didn't read it well, i stopped like a quarter way through, sorry mate im retarded

>>105987088
Actually it is, read section 2

>>105987674
>the people were memed into believing the european union was fucking them over
Both the EU and their government were fucking them. The latter continues to do so.

>>105987820
I'd love to but it's like 100k words

>>105987463
>A letter
lol
My local MP is a Sinn Féin yes woman. SF would be stupid enough to think that this is a great idea
Infact, every party in the UK supports this stupid shit. Democracy is a scam

>>105987366
>It's about protecting children

>>105988020
I mean that's how they're selling it, it's clearly about more police state garbage

>>105988085
They want your ID so they can jail or fine you for saying the wrong thing more easily and pin everything to your record. It's a tool for tyranny. They double speak all the time
One of the reasons that was stated for this was to "clamp down on "hate speech"" and the "protecting children" reason was a secondary justification that they made the forefront of for PR and for clueless out of touch MPs. It's all bullshit. I've been watching this come in for years. They will not be verifying my Identity. I will not be giving them anything

>>105981573
Imagine that the fucking EU of all things was holding back the UK enshitification.

>>105988338
Ironically enough the EU was actually holding back our politician's most desired wet dreams of police state garbage

>>105988338
>>105988343
The EU is turbocucked, but the UK politicians are even more so and had a habit of passing the buck onto the EU when really it was their own doing when you boil it all down

The Irish state has a similar problem. The EU will pressure Irish politicians to legislate fucked hate speech laws. But it never would had happened if Irish politicians were not sick little sycophantic rats and if they actually had a vision and a backbone. The problem always lies with the national government. And it's not even the public's fault either. Democracy is a big sham. An illusion

>>105978593
the news isn't talking about it (since all are in the pocket of the state, and the one chud network GBNews is controlled opposition) and nobody knows it was happening, I've spoken to quite a few people about this irl even tech savvy ones and it was the first they were hearing about it, the news of this happening is being suppressed
>>105982001
yep, there's huge services out there keeping realtime logs of all servers used by VPN providers with the explicit purpose of stopping people using them, you get stuck in cloudflare and captcha hell

>>105981207
you really think they let euros in? america has some of the most insane immigration laws in the west and I wholeheartedly believe it's a deliberate agreement between them and the eurozone to stop everyone immediately jumping ship to the new world

>>105981573
covid where they flexed their surveillance muscles by texting you if you were in the vicinity of someone who tested positive and onwards has been the real acceleration, go to any city centre now and it's actually insane
>I'm risking jailtime for posting this

>>105981573
The whole damn world has been going to shit. I know it's been a long time coming, I was just hoping it wouldn't be so soon in my lifetime.

>>105988679
Just gotta carve out a space for yourself to hunker down in. Not literally (although this is an option) but socially and politically. Stay safe, find somewhere nice, and just try and stay out of trouble while living pleasantly.

>>105987731
Yeah but then Boris Johnson campaigned on "Brexit means Brexit" and actually won an election on this, way better than Theresa did, in big part because people were tired of watching the UK get fucked over in undecisive negotiations and wanted a proper deal done. Well he didn't do shit either. And he was one of the biggest figureheads championing Brexit in the first place, there was literally no other politician that could have been put in a leadership position that had expressed a more pro-Brexit stance except maybe Farage himself. But no, Boris turned out to be a grifter like all the others, didn't do shit and Brexit still to this day maybe only kinda sorta means Brexit but also not really who even knows.

>>105988701
I've also been making the effort to archive various things, in preparation for when we can't use the internet without scanning our anuses first.

Do you guys think the future of the free internet is in decentralization? Is that where we should be moving and building new homes?

>>105988768
There's decentralisation of access (VPN, Tor nodes), decentralisation of hosting (federated shit, decentralised/distributed shit), and then decentralisation of backbone. Each getting progressively harder. The problem is that the backbone is pretty much impossible to replace, and even if mesh networks became the norm they'd almost certainly be vastly inferior to the existing centralised infra. So in the end even if decentralised communities become the norm, if the government gets annoyed, they'll just get the ISPs to block anything that isn't pre-approved and there'll be no realistic way around that.

>>105988706
He campaigned on "Get Brexit done" and that's what he did.
"Brexit means Brexit" were May's words when she campaigned for Tory leadership.
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-politics-36764525

>>105977000

In the UK it used to be that parents were responsible if their kids were caught drinking alcohol, but now and for a long time already it has instead been the minimum wage till monkey who gets the fine of up to £5000 for selling the booze to someone underage instead.

Discord is now forcing face scanning for adult content. 4chan is next.
And dont forget that Cloudflare could pull the plug on UK access anytime.

>>105990139
works on my altchan
works on my self-hosted XMPP server
works on my mumble

>>105990163
There are hundreds of dead altchans, so you're safe

>>105990187
correct

>>105975149
Conceptually it's not difficult or invasive to do compliance. Most laws are just "do they have an ID that shows they're at least 18 years old", you can use a simple AI to do this by have the user record their ID:
- verify it's a plastic card
- verify the card has an ID#, an issue date, and expiration date, and a birth date
- verify the user is in possession of the card by requiring them to tap a random spot of the card on cue
If this all returns true then you've done your due diligence and you return a random token that is tied to the device ID (to avoid sharing of the token) and expires on the expiration date of the ID.

And anyone with a free weekend can make this.

>>105979354
based. Out EU brother stand strong with us. Whatever we do, you do. Whatever you do we do.

We never left the EU.

>>105974947
it's william of orange and his money men, shrimple

>>105990209
But can you bribe politicians so you are a "trusted provider" in a weekend?

>>105990267
Does the UK require a "trusted" provider? In the US the laws are way more permissive and is strictly based on a good faith attempt which what I outlined would be considered so and the process itself is "trusted" as long as you did some basic tests. But the plastic card in your possession with a birthdate is pretty hard to counterfeit. Generally the law should be to prevent the standard "Press okay if you're 18" bullshit.

Am I going to have to get a vpn to shitpost on a mongolian basketweaving forum?

>>105990303
press ok if you're 18 is good enough
kids will now that they're not supposed to be there and as the innocent sinless angels they are they will click no and go back to church

>>105990247
This guy knows what's up.
1688 was the greatest travesty in British history and it never recovered.

>>105990335
>press ok if you're 18 is good enough
No it's not and we don't do this in any other context when it come to adult material. And porn is as destructive and addictive as online gambling and "press okay" isn't acceptable there either.
Sorry faggot, no more porn. Either buy it locally with cash if you're an adult or enjoy being banned underaged.

>>105975870
>implying being draft dodger is bad thing
Good goy.

>>105990351
>No it's not
it is
>we don't do this in any other context when it come to adult material
yes we do, how old are you? if you say below 40 then shut up kid
>porn is as destructive and addictive as online gambling
porn is literally people having sex
it is neither destructive or addictive, and any psychological issues you have related to porn are your own problem and you shouldn't generalize
>Sorry faggot, no more porn
ok now I know you're underaged, only zoomzooms say hilarious shit like this
you could implement a total surveillance dictatorship tomorrow and people would still share porn because sex is one of the most basic drives of the human being
>Either buy it locally with cash if you're an adult or enjoy being banned underaged
sadly your power fantasies over what other people do will never be realized
they will simply do what everyone did before giant sites popped up and go back to torrents and p2p sharing
all you purital zoomzooms are mentally ill and should get some therapy

Do UK ISPs only block at the DNS?

>porn is destructive
>my life is ruined because of porn
>YOU DONT GET IT IT'S A BIG DEAL MOM, THE JEWS WONT LET ME HAVE SEX AND MAKE ME JERK OFF TO PAWGS ON XVIDEOS SO STEAL MY VRIL
>THE WEST HAS FALLEN I SAW STACY IN A MINISKIRT YESTERDAY HITLER WOULD HAVE STOPPED THIS

>>105990415
it's not an ISP block, the websites themselves have to implement the check.

>>105990512
4chan isn't going to do that I don't think, so in that case ISPs will be asked to block

>>105990576
what's the point in making a law requiring websites to do it if they can just ignore it and get the ISPs to do it instead? are you just making things up?

>>105990633
Generally in law it's good to have legal basis before shutting things down arbitrarily.

>>105990643
so you are just babbling, cool story bro.

>>105990686
The difference between arbitrary rules and common law is common law has a defined basis of infringement and a rational, achievable way to stay in compliance. Shutting down porn websites without a law is arbitrary, shutting down a porn website because it failed to properly ID check users is not.

>>105990633
If the website refuses, Ofcom can get a business disruption order so they can mandate payment processors and advertisers to withdraw services for the UK, so in other words say goodbye to any revenue from UK traffic

>>105990757
no, the issue is the retarded UK regulator will fine you for 20 million pounds even if your site is a random forum with 0 monetization

>>105990779
Yeah a random 18+ porn forum allowing minors in is exactly the type of site to be shut down you tranny.

>>105990779
Yeah my post was assuming the site and its host aren't in the UK, in which you'd just have to decide whether to ever step foot on UK soil ever again

>>105990795
listen here you wannabe poltard, your deranged nanny state fetish has nothing to do with allowing minors to see porn, given that this regulates speech beyond just tits

>>105990839
Enjoy prison, the internet isn't special because it's digital. Get treated the same as people who sell porn to children in the alley.

>>105990795
No site has ever "allowed" access to minors, the minors are the ones looking for it and horny teenagers will always find a way

>>105990863
In the same way a bar that looks the other way doesn't "allow" children in right?

>>105990859
I accept your low quality baitcession

>>105990863
This
it's adults refusing to parent their kids, along with insisting on pretending sex is a sin while buying little timmy gta v
UK 16 year olds can legally vote and have sex, but if they take pictures of themselves or look at porn online they'll get arrested and put on the registry

>>105990633
some of us actually live on this accursed island and can't ignore it without getting our doors kicked in. escaping isn't actually that easy in the modern day

>>105991431
haha, look at nigel who can't even escape to europe

On Plebbit they haven't seemed to bother adding AV when logged out. You can check an NSFW sub on old reddit in an incognito/private window just fine lol.

>>105991431
actually read the comment you're replying to next time, nige

Obligatory

>>105991565
ok but did he finish his wank?

>>105990875
Bars are easier to police than the internet

>>105990779
How will they pay 20 mil if payment processors block the site?

The UK already has a category for "esoteric material" for ISP block mandates, dating back to around 2013. There is such a massive pressure to participate in normie culture and it's actively hostile to anything not mainstream. Time to get off this island.

>>105991565
kek

>>105991658
are you questioning the will of the queen you maggot? another 50 million pound fee has been applied

>>105990795
read the law, the type of material on the site is irrelevant. every site must comply with the regulations if it allows any user to user communication

>>105992156
>replying to bait

>>105992172
Bait or not I think people need to be aware that this is about more than just age verification for porn

>>105992187
this and the EU and US equivalent laws are obviously about internet censorship, but there's no point in talking about it to people who say good to getting their rights taken away

>>105992203
I don't mean in a conspiratorial sense, it's literally written into the law that all services offering user to user communication have to demonstrate that they're complying with the 'duty of care' outlined in it or face fines/blocks. It's so vaguely written that it could apply to something as innocent as a minecraft server run by a kid for their friends.

>>105992402
I know, I wasn't being conspiratorial either
people literally want their rights taken away to own the libs

>>105978506
your petition will fail

>>105991675
And go where? You think normal people are going to accept a nazi?

>>105990247
>>105990337
>end up being conquered
>bring it up as glorious revolution

I've spoken to some euro friends and they are saying the alternative they have an OnlineID that you basically log in once with and from there you have unrestrictive access to say you are a consenting adult. Supposedly not tracked too.

>>105996154
or how about the government doesn't ID you at all huh
how about that huh

>>105996154
>Supposedly not tracked too.
suuuure

>>105990317
Just move to the hundreds of alt chans. They have way better features than here anyways. They just need a community. We might just start calling them the EUchans.

>>105979474
4chan d00000t gay
into ur browser

>>105981143
That's quite the jump anon

>>105988641
No you're not retard

>>105984043
who is going to stop me?

stop advertising jeet

>>105996417
This site seems sketchy af, but how does it work?

>>105974971
Good luck posting anything, all VPN IPs are banned and not just on 4chan.
Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Linkedin, and a gazillion smaller sites that use Cloudflare.

>>105996486
If you use a VPN on those social media they will get you to do mobile verification.
This doesn't happen on tiktok doe for some reason it seems they do less tracking than American Social media websites.

>>105974921 (OP)
You make fun of them now but britoids who voted for brexit and got this instead are not too far from what trump-voting burgeroids will end up with. Anyway, less anglos on the internet are always a good thing.

>>105996486
smspva.com
get a temp number to bypass the mobile verification

>>105990231
kek fuck you

>>105990209
This is way too easy to forge. Real identity verification systems cross-check the provided information on the ID with the APIs of the issuers of these IDs to verify that they are real.

>>105996568
Burgers are way less sympathetic here since they do actually want Internet censorship, they're just extremely retarded and cannot understand that laws don't just apply to people they don't like.

>>105996733
it's dumb kids bro
they can vote now

I fucking hate the UK so much. Even Afghanistan can access adult content but I live in a fucking nanny piece of shit state.

>99.9% of the content they want to moderate is on Facebook and X and Pornhub
>Somehow word the law so vaguely they fuck everyone else while Facebook and X (and maybe even PH) can lawyer wiggle their way out of it

>>105996897
I honestly hope this piece of shit legislation stretches to all mainstream websites and affects everyone so everyone is aware of it and will revolt.

bwahahahaha, normies about to get fucked. No gooning to sissy hypno until you provide the 3d facemap of thier ugly bong mug. Serves them right, they will do nothing with their plastic sporks

I hope 4chan also blocks UK.

>>105976233
What colonial power actually held their possessions and gained something long term from it in the 20th century?
Portugal had non stop insurgencies.
Spain had to deal with the same, and was isolated due to its falangist third path policies.
Indochina turned into a nightmare for the frogs, and the lack of American intervention radicalized Ho Chi Min.
I guess only South Africa escaped total annihilation.

Even with all that, the suez crisis made it clear America wasn't gonna tolerate the Euros fucking around.

>>105996897
you think this isn't intentionally to stamp a boot on the face of small website and forum owners, while big corps (who all have special deals with those who glow)? its by design

>>105997485
it's called consolidation

>>105980105
its not ignorance its purposeful compliance the jews are completely fucking right they niggercattle are fucking cattle they fucking love that draconian shit i can tell you personally my crazy ass feminist aunt is all into it my dumbfuck mom also completely agrees with it (despite her protest of being censored on facebook for some dumb boomer shit idk) my grandma eh she dosent even use the internet really but she tangentally supports it and mainly agrees with my aunt my biological dad is one of those people the first to call people out for being "pedos" (never actual pedos though) while he is literally a pedo himself etc etc etc

the niggercattle love this fucking shit and that is the worst saddest part all laws all this dystopian stuff is bullshit fake and gay all these politicians have adresses and can be shot or fragged easily cops and glownigs are fucking cowards that get bodied atleast 10-1 anytime they actually fight a legit violent person who actually resists instead of some larper every goverment could be overthrown in a day but no that wont happen because the fucking niggercattle love this shit and that is without even going into how cowardly any of them are and would be incapable in the first place

fuck this gay earth fuck it fuck it fuck it fucking niggers we should not be here this is hell

Dawn of the Final Day

24 Hours Remain

>>105997485
I don't understand why that is even necessary. The big corpos are already completely dominating internet usage.

>>105974947
i can't in good faith look at a portrait of henry viii and say that he was a 'bad person'.

i mean look at this mfer. have you seen a gigg-ier gigachad than this? it cannot be possible to be this much of a physical beast and not be based. i refuse to believe it!

>>105996704
That's not the legal requirements to these laws. Also fuck off, "easy to forge".