>desktop icons: use case unclear
>child rapists: we need to give you a six figure tech job asap

>>105981735 (OP)
Friendly reminder: Ebussy's real surname translates as "bottom", no kidding kek.

>>105981735 (OP)
Indian hands typed this (after krashing twice)
https://conf.kde.in/

>>105981735 (OP)
He did his time and everyone knows sexual predation is usually cured by a stint in prison and/or in the navy.

>>105981735 (OP)
>>105981877
he's also a commie. explains why he's an asshole

>>105982490
When you see it, you’ll shit bricks.

Hint… lower left

>>105982490
Post beef.

>>105983073
>Kde is the most popular environment in India
>Linux is the most popular os in India
>"You are an Indian for pointing out the krashes"
Post skin

>>105983134
Post beef.

>>105982490
>All the women, sans one, are on the same side
kekw.

Cinnamon and LXQt are the only DEs worth running if you aren't going to use a wm.

>>105981735 (OP)
Desktop icons are comfy and nostalgic but unironically don't have a usecase, just open the program from your launcher

>>105981735 (OP)
>desktop icons: use case unclear
>child rapists: we need to give you a six figure tech job asap
He literally looks like this.

>>105983578
kek, you kekjakkers are alright

Desktop icons is just a folder you can't close. I'll never understand why people depend on them. The desktop is where my windows go, not shortcuts.

>>105983578
usecase for coalson?

Jeremy Bicha is welcome in Chaos_Esque_Anthology.
It doesn't pay anything though since it's a Free Software project.

But he's welcome.
YHWH allows child brides.
A right white people took from Jeremy. But at 11 he aimed to take it back.

RMS wrote the free C compiler.
Anyone is welcome to give free code: those Loco for Loli or not.

Christians who don't code but believe they get to control everything because of their god Jesus "defeated" YHWH are not welcome since they don't code. Women who don't code but believe they get to control everything because they have 2 million police at their backs are not welcome since they don't code.

Programmers and map makers and texture artists and 3d modelers and musicians are welcomed.

>>105981735 (OP)
Richard Matthew Stallman: do you know that name? That is the founder of this whole system. The whole thing. First there was nothing. Then he "made" the text editor (emacs): via open and blatant copyright infringement. Got away with it.Then he /actually/ made the free C compiler: GCC, that was part 2 then he wrote clones of all the unix tools.

He's a pedo in mind: he likes young girls.
Bruce Perens emailed me that RMS agrees with me.
Here are RMS's words, so, just understand: this is not a christian OS:
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>
>--------------------------
>
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>
>--------------------------
>
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia

>>105981735 (OP)
You are posting this all the time, slav. If you use an operating system made by some smelly neckbeards who got a gf in their 30s first, it's your own fault.

I heard this "use case for X?" shit from somewhere else, someone else, not the ebussy. Did it get assigned to him by mistake or did he really ask that?
It's like the "I don't know what xfce is or does, sorry" guy, wasn't it him?

>>105983241
cute femboy hand

>>105981735 (OP)
Why do you need desktop icons though? They have a dock and a menu. Anything else is just bloat

>>105986963
>or did he really ask that?
He did, context was a report on unclear fonts.

>>105982784
Ah yes, Firefox, that sure will have people changing their underwear.

>>105981735 (OP)
To be fair, desktop icons aren't that useful. In 15 years the only killer use i've had for them has been quickly launching different Firefox profiles, because launching them through the Profile manager sucks. And you don't even really NEED them, you can just launch Firefox with custom args through shell aliases/functions.
>>105984809
Desktop icons are good if you need to share a PC though. 90% of the overall population won't ever dig deeper than what's on the desktop, so you can leave launchers to anything you want them to use, and keep the rest basically inexistent from their PoV. The system tray is arguably a way more useful abstraction. It's a simple way to describe something that's complex or annoying for an end user to grasp (a process running in the background as a daemon)