Anonymous
7/22/2025, 7:48:40 AM No.105984946
Why isn't Tesla developing self driving trucks for hauling cargo?
Replies:
Thread 105984946 - /g/ [Archived: 97 hours ago]
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 7:49:51 AM No.105984951
>>105984946 (OP)
Even they're not evil enough to deprive people of the comfy sovlful truck life.
Even they're not evil enough to deprive people of the comfy sovlful truck life.
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 7:51:00 AM No.105984957
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 8:12:19 AM No.105985063
>>105984946 (OP)
imagine how easy it would be to steal from unmanned trucks
imagine how easy it would be to steal from unmanned trucks
Replies:
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 8:31:37 AM No.105985147
>>105985063
>valid point
This would be the version 2.0.
Probably mostly for use and black ass ghetto neighborhoods.
>valid point
This would be the version 2.0.
Probably mostly for use and black ass ghetto neighborhoods.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 10:34:05 AM No.105985602
>>105984946 (OP)
its a combination of battery size/weigh and charging time
they announced one in maybe 2018 but got btfoed by everyone that ran the numbers on it. the haters have since been proven right because you havent heard of it kek
its a combination of battery size/weigh and charging time
they announced one in maybe 2018 but got btfoed by everyone that ran the numbers on it. the haters have since been proven right because you havent heard of it kek
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 11:22:43 AM No.105985879
Human lives are a cheap loss that is already financially anticipated. The shipping industry has the means to hold Tesla accountable and sue for company-altering amounts in event of mishandling.
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 12:54:26 PM No.105986335
>>105984946 (OP)
Because companies would sue them out of business with their halfbaked FSD that was supposed to be past 1.0 a few years ago.
Because companies would sue them out of business with their halfbaked FSD that was supposed to be past 1.0 a few years ago.
Replies:
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 12:55:11 PM No.105986340
>>105986335
unironically this, even if it doesnt kill people they would be liable for minor delays and such. actual liability KILLS the techbro
unironically this, even if it doesnt kill people they would be liable for minor delays and such. actual liability KILLS the techbro
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 1:53:42 PM No.105986716
>>105986414
>will
already does, retard
https://insideevs.com/news/760026/autonomous-electric-mining-truck-fleet-china/
https://www.xcmgglobal.com/news/news-detail-725.htm
https://www.huawei.com/en/media-center/our-value/2025/driverless-trucks-yimin-mine/
>will
already does, retard
https://insideevs.com/news/760026/autonomous-electric-mining-truck-fleet-china/
https://www.xcmgglobal.com/news/news-detail-725.htm
https://www.huawei.com/en/media-center/our-value/2025/driverless-trucks-yimin-mine/
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 2:00:22 PM No.105986770
>>105984946 (OP)
because faggot influencers wont buy them
because faggot influencers wont buy them
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 3:31:59 PM No.105987583
>>105985063
This. You could just slow down in front of those, have a couple people hop out and stand in its way while you unload it at your leisure. At least with a human driver involved the stakes are raised for potential privateers (violence, kidnapping and murder are very serious crimes compared to theft) and the vehicle/driver safety being tied together gives the cargo another layer of protection (a human driver can decide to just run someone over or smash into another vehicle to escape danger).
This. You could just slow down in front of those, have a couple people hop out and stand in its way while you unload it at your leisure. At least with a human driver involved the stakes are raised for potential privateers (violence, kidnapping and murder are very serious crimes compared to theft) and the vehicle/driver safety being tied together gives the cargo another layer of protection (a human driver can decide to just run someone over or smash into another vehicle to escape danger).