>>105985901 (OP) >playing You want /v/, /g/ uses VRAM to gen pornography. Although even in that case 8 is still just barely enough for SDXL-based lineages up to and including Noob but you might literally struggle to play a video at the same time.
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 1:52:02 PM No.105986702
>>105986206 Not going to feed my new 5K monitor some puny upscaled Full-HD-slop. Go with the times, boomer.
>>105985901 (OP) >if you're not playing slop you answered the question yourself
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 5:34:52 PM No.105988550
>>105986702 >4k but instead of getting perfect scaling for 1080p and 4k content (so pretty much anything available these days), everything gets scaled to shit and blurry. I will never understand the appeal of this retarded resolution, it's like preferring 768p over 720p because "it's slightly moar!!!".
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 5:36:52 PM No.105988569
>>105985995 the year were users of 2000$ gpus still have to use dlss/fsr to reach 60 fps in triple-a titles. you are literally paying more for the same shitty performance, stutters, bad image quality and you think somehow that's a flex, retard.