>>105985901 (OP) >playing
You want /v/, /g/ uses VRAM to gen pornography. Although even in that case 8 is still just barely enough for SDXL-based lineages up to and including Noob but you might literally struggle to play a video at the same time.
>>105986702 >4k but instead of getting perfect scaling for 1080p and 4k content (so pretty much anything available these days), everything gets scaled to shit and blurry.
I will never understand the appeal of this retarded resolution, it's like preferring 768p over 720p because "it's slightly moar!!!".
>>105985995
the year were users of 2000$ gpus still have to use dlss/fsr to reach 60 fps in triple-a titles.
you are literally paying more for the same shitty performance, stutters, bad image quality and you think somehow that's a flex, retard.