← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105994880

16 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.105994880 [Report] >>105996211 >>105996328 >>105998428
How exactly does this increase security?
Anonymous No.105994887 [Report] >>105994888 >>105994938
>>>/g/sqt
Anonymous No.105994888 [Report]
>>105994887
fpbp
Anonymous No.105994908 [Report] >>105996134
It doesn't. It pushes blame on the user.
Anonymous No.105994938 [Report] >>105995042
>>105994887
</thread>, read a fucking security book, OP. it is indeed shilled but in this case it happens to collect data on you which fagman loves. The shilling isnt a testament to its efficacy
Anonymous No.105995042 [Report] >>105995109
>>105994938
Shut the fuck up, you needy retard. Go finish licking the windows around the house. Your presence here serves no purpose whatsoever.
Anonymous No.105995109 [Report]
>>105995042
at least I dont ask basic fucking IS questions and SHIT UP the catalog with my dumbass questions. I hope you get shot in the face by a nigger. then we wouldnt have to put up with your wothless threads anymore.
Anonymous No.105996134 [Report]
>>105994908
>It pushes blame on the user.
How so?
Anonymous No.105996211 [Report] >>105996227
>>105994880 (OP)
if you enable 2fa, 3rd world shitskins wont be able to get into your account with leaked credentials. simple as.
Anonymous No.105996227 [Report] >>105996247
>>105996211
They can hack your SMS
Anonymous No.105996247 [Report]
>>105996227
It requires way more effort than just googling "[service name] database leak free download" , plus the entire concept of 2fa is not based on sms, you tech-illiterate gorilla nigger.
Anonymous No.105996328 [Report] >>105996796 >>105998321
>>105994880 (OP)
Mobile phones are more secure than PCs, so a second factor private key from a mobile phone is less likely to be compromised.
Anonymous No.105996796 [Report]
>>105996328
>Mobile phones are more secure than PCs
Anonymous No.105998321 [Report] >>105998444
>>105996328
>phone stolen
>can't access my accounts anymore
Anonymous No.105998428 [Report]
>>105994880 (OP)
>How exactly does this increase security?
It doesn't unless it is hardware 2FA and uses a correct implementation of FIDO2
the recent article that FIDO2 is insecure used a faulty implementation with QR and a lot of non spec features that you shouldn't have

2FA is a a bulletproof vest for companies. there I said it. it is shifting the blame to the user.
>oh you got hacked?
>you must have given the hacker a TOTP code
>we will not cover this issue with our corporate insurance
that's what 2FA is 90% of the time

the real 2FA that works and is safe, thats a solo/nitro/yubi key with FIDO2
essentially much like an SSH key stored in a hardware module to do handshakes only if the sever matches known hosts
Anonymous No.105998444 [Report]
>>105998321
>didn't download the txt/pdf with backup and restore codes
RETARD