brehs... did we regress?

2 billion jeetoids are hammering your home router at this very second with 'hello saar ssh pls saar root@loclahost saar' packets and youre asking if we regressed

>>106002257
kek

>>106002257

>Timmy mocks Brahmin BULLS as they break into his niece's LAN Minecraft world and burn her house down
https://youtube.com/watch?v=F7OfXzVJa6s

>>106002242 (OP)
You may not like it but this is a part of what RETVRN looks like
I’m not going to complain about cheaper shipping because of giant kites

>>106002242 (OP)
Yes, and that's a good thing.
Reject modernity, embrace tradition.

>>106002242 (OP)
We improved the automation and mechanism to the point that you don't need a small army to operates sails on a boat. The computers needed to keep a kite stable in the air didn't exist until maybe 30 years ago and were not cheap enough to be viable until 15 years ago. The energy savings is negligible but on huge scales even small amounts payoff.

>>106002257
I didn't get this explain please

>>106002685
just ask chatgpt to explain it

They still have the crude oil in case there is no or wrong wind

>>106002257

Impressive, very nice

>>106002749
I'm sure no one will pirate it at sea and use it in a terrorist attack
And certainly none of these will ever sink and pollute entire oceans with radioactive fallout

>>106002764
none of this is a real issue

>>106002807
>none of this is a real issue

>>106002764
Sorry chud but nuclear power is so cool now and you should totally trust energy companies to use it well as they never have been negligent with security

>>106002749
>first

>>106002764
Engines require constant maintenance so they need open engine rooms, reactors can be sealed up well enough to stop intruders and any possible fallout

>>106002824
>Icebreakers
Should have posted this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NS_Savannah
But it would be the first to carry containers

>>106002675
>The computers needed to keep a kite stable in the air didn't exist until maybe 30 years ago
Doubt
> and were not cheap enough to be viable until 15 years ago.
Doubt 2

>>106002749
on this episode of not understanding the difference between a concept and a prototype

>>106002867
>>The computers needed to keep a kite stable in the air didn't exist until maybe 30 years ago
>Doubt
>> and were not cheap enough to be viable until 15 years ago.
>Doubt 2
Okay show me the boat with a computer operated kite sale made in 1995 running on a 386.

>>106002835
I think it was US Navy subs or carriers where their reactor is totally sealed, and must be literally cut out for maintenance during major vessel overhauls. Shit ain't easy to get to.

>>106002764
There are already a handful of nuclear subs crushed underwater already.

>>106002242 (OP)
bruh you have no idea how much bigger that boat on the top is

>>106002764
Believe me if somebody steals a nuclear powered cargo ship the US Navy will be on it like flies on shit. Or the PLAN. Or the Russians.
Ain't nobody going to let somali sam or durka durka ali just steal a nuclear power plant

>>106002257
lmfao

>>106002879
Well, subs don't have much space, so the nuclear part is probably taken off as a single block from the sides

>>106002257
this post was so good I had to look it up on the archives to make sure it wasn't stolen. WITNESSED.

>>106002878
>Okay show me
No. I don't have to. it probably didn't exist but that does not prove your idea that the computers at that time were unable to do the job. It is up to you to prove your assertion, not me.

>>106002896
It's going to be hard to police that shit when there are hundreds of nuclear ships sailing across the world as opposed to right now when the only ships that have nuclear reactors on them are owned by nuclear state militaries.

>>106002606
>cheaper
topkek

>>106002257
good one

>>106002257
fpbp

>>106002867
>we couldn't do this shit until 30 years ago
Meanwhile supersonic fighter jets have been computer operated since the late '60s.

>>106002257
Truth be told. Fippy bippy

>>106002764
>I'm sure no one will pirate it at sea and use it in a terrorist attack
The number of viable targets would be exceedingly small.
>>106002817
>no argument
>>106002822
And how will nuclear fuel be stolen from a running reactor without killing the thieves in seconds?>>106003585
We monitor current vessels already. Adding a nuke is a detail.

>>106003836
>And how will nuclear fuel be stolen from a running reactor without killing the thieves in seconds?
Not what I talked about. The energy companies saving a few bucks and destroying our environment is the bigger problem

>>106002558
>minor key Christmas music while bullying some kid on the internet
Is this satire?

106002257
Who is botting to updoot themselves ? The absolute state of chan.

>>106002764
isn't water the great shield from nuclear waste anyway? if a miniscule amount like that sinks i don't think it would be a problem

>>106002878
>>106003429
This is such a hilarious claim.

Look at the moon lander.
Look at Buran's self deciding landing computer.
GPS satellites.
The other anon already mentioned fully fly by wire jets.

You don't need 20 niggaflops of processing power if your software is made by smart people, built on low level languages and designed around the hardware.
Attaching a sail to a ship and having software control is trivial compared to landing on the moon or Venus.

I have no knowledge about this but if I had to guess it was probably an affordability problem and or material sciences to have the sail be durable enough and light enough to pull a fuck Hügel ship.

>>106003720
I'll correct myself. DIGITAL computers have been used in jets since the late '60s. Analog computers were used even earlier.

unholy samefagging ITT
bring back IP counters now, or better yet add ID's to actual interest boards like /g/ to avoid bullshit 300 posts by this IP threads like this
>>106003885
rather embarrassingly, he probably samefagged by hand
i expect to see this epic 4chan reply on the front page of the internet posted by some kind stranger, kek you later frens!

>>106002257
The shit hammering my home server is alibaba cloud ai bots

>>106003429
Computers much older than 1995 ones were capable to bring humans into space and back, plus satellites. I'm confident 1995 tech would be more than enough for the task. What is critically important, is being properly programmed for the task. I'm inclined to believe 1995 tech is more trustworthy than jeetificated programming and female captains, who are famous for their fuck-ups.

>>106004394
What you don't realize is that space is much, much, easier to fly in than air, and the way a rocket flies is probably the simplest atmospheric flight you can do. There's a reason that the world's first microcomputer was made just to manage the airflow data of a fighter jet. Atmospheric calculations involve fluids, and fluids are hell to compute, and you need either lots of core or GPU-like architectures to do them in real-time.

>>106002257

>>106002257
fpbp
nuke india
nuke israel
save the world

Ships aren't real.
There's no way tons of metal can float on the water.

>>106002257
>range ban china, russia, india, israel
>router logs are now readable live
I wonder if my router enjoys the silence or yearns for communication from its kind. Maybe I should spin up remote systems so it has some frens.

>it now takes 6 months to cross the ocean
>need to build thousands of new cargo ships to maintain current supply levels
>each ship you manufacture creates as much "carbon emission" as just running a ship normally for 10 years

>>106002685
Run tcpdump on anything connected directly to the public Internet

>>106002764
>I'm sure no one will pirate it at sea and use it in a terrorist attack
At least not the second half, nuclear fuel for reactors isn't anywhere near refined enough to be weapons grade.
The last country that tried to build the machinery that would refine civil grade to weapons grade got bombed by Israel and the us

>>106002257
And people say 4chan is dead.

>>106002257
fpbp

>>106003860
Quite a few nuclear powered ships have sunk to the bottom of the ocean to minimal effect. These things are built like a sarcophagus. They ain't going anywhere, and even if they do, water is the greatest radioactive mediator. Spent nuclear fuel gets stored in swimming pools that divers regularly swim in. They get less radiation in the water than outside of it.

>>106005538
All ips are from china continually hammering it and trying root ssh logins, and ancient php hacks.

>>106005500
The communication still reaches the router, it just doesn't answer the door.

>>106002764
Not exactly an easy target. See pic rel.

>>106003642
It's a kite, Michael. How much could it cost? Ten dollars?

>>106002242 (OP)
And yet it'll still be transporting a thousand tonnes of plastic crap from Temu or single use garments from Shein

>>106002257
Yep, this one's going on Reddit

>>106002675
What sorts of fluid simulation is required for a kite that operates as a sail? Also, who the fuck is "we"? I didn't work on that shit. Did you?

>>106002764
>use it in a terrorist attack
Explain to me how it could be used in a terror attac-
>pollute entire oceans with radioactive fallout
Nevermind, you're just a retard.

>>106002878
idk what kind of calculations are required to operate a kite, but i doubt it's anything a 386 can't handle lets be real
>>106004394
>muh space missions
those are very much special cases and you know it. most of the work will have been precalculated ahead of time. space is very predictable. also they spend untold dollars and filled rooms with the technology to do it. the key is "possible AND cheap", not just possible. you're not putting a multi-million dollar 60's minicomputer on a random cargo ship

>>106002242 (OP)
Techbros should be forcibly rounded up and sterilised.

Am I out of the loop or something, why did the first post get that many (You)s
Sure it's funny but is it THAT funny?

>>106007612
indian fatigue.

>>106007612
samefag making an epic screenshot for reddit

>>106002257
I HATE JEETS SO MUCH

>>106003962
Durable sails are a solved problem, has been since the tea clippers hammered across the oceans with expensive perishable goods. These days you can get composite fiber reinforced sails that can take a huge load.

I agree on the computer parts, 1980 generation computers were fast enough in the hands of a competent programmer. Sails move slowly and wind changes even slower.

>>106007612
Mass psychosis

>>106002257
This, anything open gets constant attempts. Never leave anything open that doesn't need to be. Use a VPN with strong passphrase and key exchange. I'm guessing quite a few of them VPN out of germany as that was another major offender behind india and china.

>>106007612
Is this the first time you notice a commercial tech related thread on /g/ get flooded with defensive posts while at the same time being derailed by off topic nonsense?
This place is nothing but bots and shills

>>106003707
is that a blurred goatse kek

>>106002685
>"root@localhost" signifies that the user currently interacting with the system is the administrative user and is performing actions on the local machine itself, rather than a remote server. This grants full control over the local system environment.
it's next level open teamviewer saar

>>106007612
everyone is sick of jeets, jeets are the new jews I think. just a matter of time before they all get kicked out and sent back to jeetia

In this thread, people fetishising nuclear power when it's just heating up water and spinning a turbine, which proves OP's point.

>>106008642
Most hated energy source because MUH WASTE and MUH CHERNOBYL

>>106002749
>First
Hasn't the US Navy been using nuclear powered carriers and submarines for decades now?

>>106008777
And they stopped using nuclear power for cruisers.
Civilian nuclear ships were operated by the US, West Germany and Japan but it didn't work out. In the Soviet Union they performed well in the icebreaker niche.

>>106008777
First nuclear powered container vessel I believe. First cargo ship was NS Savannah.

people are driving milk floats and eating immitation meat, what do you think

>>106006771
the joke is that you think it would affect your shipping cost.

>>106006000
>Spent nuclear fuel gets stored in swimming pools that divers regularly swim in
meds

>>106009297
Come on, you know you wanna take a dip.

>>106008405
I hate them as much (or more) than the next guy but that does not make the post "put me in the screencap" worthy, it's just a regular shitpost.

>>106002749
The funny thing is it actually means Hyundai's first, not the first, and it's caused engagement among these anons.

>>106009297
Water is very good radiation barrier. As long as you don't get too close to the rods you will receive basically zero dosage. Get too close and you're dead, though. So be careful and have fun!

>>106003945
Yes. Giant open water fission sites also form naturally. Anti-nuclear retards don't know we live on a molten dirt reactor and nuclear waste spewing up out of the ground is already normal.

>>106002764
>he thinks the uranium for power generation is the same shit used for nuclear weapons
put the video games down

>>106006771
Probably more like 10M given the load and fully automated marine hardware.

>>106009297
>he doesn't know
https://what-if.xkcd.com/29/

>>106010304
You could theoretically make a dirty bomb out of it, but there are much easier and safer ways to get radioactive material.

>>106002257
lol?

the IPs are all from mainland china.

at least use an indian proxy if you're going to lie.

>>106010562
>>106002257
>india
>china
meanwhile most of the attacks on my router are from ukraine

>>106002257
I know my production servers sure do. I'm in the process of range banning the entirety of the Russian and Asian continents, excluding Japan because they're great.

>>106002879
on subs this is normal even for diesel engines just because theres so little space

on conventional ships generally there's a bunch of panels that bolt down. you dont get the engine or parts for it through the normal doors and hatches. an entire piece of the ship gets unbolted and craned off before you can start major work. usually for above-water machinery rooms there will be similar panels for the walls. for example the AC units often are against a false wall that just comes off if you unbolt it (and then kills you if it wasn't supported beforehand because it's large enough to drive a truck through)

i cant find a good pic but if you ever go on a tour of a ship of any kind and see giant panels secured with fuckhuge bolts that are rusted to shit because they haven't been turnt since the keel was laid, that's what those panels are for. they go to spaces with big machinery you can't fit through the normal doors

>>106003074
idk about it being specifically the sides but submarines also have similar "an entire fucking piece of the outer shell comes off" feature. it's harder to see because ebin acoustic tiles cover it all up but those are just glued on and are designed to be "easily" replaceable. hit that shit with a heat gun and a prybar and they come off.

>>106009297
divers dont just go play in cooling pools for fun but iirc water is such a good radiation shield that the bigger risk is that despite being called "cooling" pools they are in fact quite hot

iirc off the coast of norway or iceland or something there's wreckage from a nuclear sub; iirc it's too deep to dive on but it presents no ecological issue. in fact the rusting metal and toxic substances inside the sub (battery acid, mulched russians, normal ass lube oils, people's untreated poop, etc) were considered a greater hazard.

>>106003962
>I have no knowledge about this but if I had to guess it was probably an affordability problem and or material sciences to have the sail be durable enough and light enough to pull a fuck Hügel ship.
solved problem. the problem is that sailing is inherently slow, requires skilled captains and deck crew, and is hard to navigate at low speeds for stuff like berthing

also in 99% of ports in the world, it's illegal to be only under sail power within harbour limits for botes above a certain size

>>106003860
Geothermal energy is literally fission.
The Earth is spewing far more nuclear "waste" into the oceans than nuclear powered ships could ever achieve.

>>106002257
GEMMY

>>106002879
You might be thinking of the thing where they use molten salt/lead as a heat exchange medium. So if the reactor ever goes offline, it doesn't start back up again and the whole reactor needs to be scrapped.

I think it happened once ever and the captain and chief engineer were both fired. Like, from the navy entirely. And I don't think they use that design anymore because "can't be turned off ever" is a pretty big design flaw.

>>106010818
>Changing the topic once more

>>106002257
>setup a webserver
>any webserver
>add domain
>check access logs
>ten thousand hits a day
>all from indian servers
>almost all of them have businesses attached to them
>every ping is some combination of /admin /login /login.php etc

>>106002242 (OP)
But why would they pull the ships for free?

>>106002764
>nuclear powered = weapon grade
Dirty bombs were a psyop too, they don't actually do anything if you can avoid licking the walls and pavement

>>106007612
they don't want you to know this but you can reply to your own post as many times as you want

>>106012827
no you can't

>>106012827
kek seething prakeesh

>he's still samefagging his shitty reply

>>106012479
>check analytics for one of my domains
>mostly from ireland and australia
>mfw

>>106007415
>idk what kind of calculations are required to operate a kite, but i doubt it's anything a 386 can't handle lets be real
So doing a real time video stream analysis and a predictive model of movement. Then making control adjustments.
Likely one of the many reasons no one does this even today even with the potential cost savings. Let alone back in the early 90s.

>>106007066
>Also, who the fuck is "we"?
White people.
>I didn't work on that shit. Did you?
I know you couldn't.