>>106012334 >>developers should work for me for free
>>106012229 >Not developers in general just autists and eunuchs since they have no other reason for existing.
"Unless if they are pedos, like Richard Matthew Stallman, or Jeremy Bicha, then they are NOT PERMITTED to code C for Free because JESUS says so with his millstone."
"WE christans who don't code OWN your free-software OS. Women have RIGHTS, Better a Millstone, but No stone woman. CHOP OFF MALLES DICKS (Matthew 19, greek), WE defeated Old Testament God!"
>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.">
>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html>
>-------------------------->
>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. ">
>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party>
>-------------------------->
>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.>
>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. ">
>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia