Why use anything else? Genuinely asking

>>106008304 (OP)
>snaps
It's ok overall but snaps are occasionally executed poorly (steam) and Ubuntu defaults to the snap if you install a given package

I prefer FEDora because its more up to date and if I had to choose a non-native package format to get shoved down my throat I prefer flatpak over snap

>>106008304 (OP)
1. it wastes space top and left, so I would use something I could not waste screen with. For instance, xmonad w/ dmenu & xmobar.
2. I don't like Canonical. I don't like Debian.
3. Who knows what disgusting spyware they have installed. You can't trust them.
4. As mentioned, snaps are a shitty way to manage software. Not a fan. I would rather build from source than use them.
5. I forget the rest, butt

>>106008304 (OP)
Because if I had a fucking disk drive, I would be using DOS.

>>106008304 (OP)
Ubuntu is quite steadily progressing and making smart moves when it comes to adapting to the desktop sphere in 2025 - essentially saying BYE BYE to deprecated shit - while acknowledging that open source is not registered by or should work to fulfill the ideologic ideas of cultists. Snaps aren't a problem either and are constantly being overhauled, slowly getting ready to be a serious Flatpak alternative - especially because no ass wants to maintain Flatpak it seems

>>106008304 (OP)
ancient packages

>>106008304 (OP)
>snaps and gnome
Mint still master race

>>106008304 (OP)
w11 works fine

>>106008792
that's a good thing - nostalgia, bro

just use debian. or arch. no point in using ubuntu when arch exists.

>>106009397
>just use ar- ACK!
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-general@lists.archlinux.org/thread/7EZTJXLIAQLARQNTMEW2HBWZYE626IFJ/

>>106009397
why use arch when Ubuntu just works? youre retarded?

>>106009417
>AUR

There is no reason. Ubuntu LTS is peak Linux, and anything else is tinkertrannyism

>>106009417
Nobody forces you to use AUR. Downloading data from other users is every bit as optional as downloading data from random websites online.

>>106008544
25.04 is the first interim release in a while that I had absolutely 0 problems using, it definitely feels like a good desktop experience again. still think snaps are kind of ass though

>>106008304 (OP)
>Gnome
>Snaps
>But no snapper
>Backs gnome hard
>pushes gnome despite it being pure cancer
>amazon
>snaps
>amazon
>willing to backstab it's userbase at any moment
>shittier debian
Anything else?

>>106009520
you do realize that all those apt packages that have you add a custom apt repository are subject to the very same issues right?

>>106008956
>w11
worst version of windows

>>106010841
why would you install a package that requires a custom apt repository?

>>106009883
i can never find stuff on pacman they want you to use the aur.

for me its fedora kde plasma

>>106010821
25.04 is pure kino

>>106010841
>you add
who? certainly not me.

>>106011206
They don't want you to use AUR, you want to use it and are looking to blame someone else for your choice to do so.

>>106008304 (OP)
I don't care for the out of the box configuration, it's serviceable I guess. Feels too cut down and simplified, ironically forcing you to use the CLI more than the GUI.