Can someone give a rundown on how this shit works?

you link your real identity to your online presence so they can put you in prison for every single wrongthink sentence you post, that's all there is to it really

>>106012316
Isn't that just for porn sites?

>>106012406
anything marked as nsfw. i tried to view a meme shitposting channel that was nsfw on discord and got the verification prompt
it all goes into the glowie database in the usa so they can 1984 you whenever they feel like it

>>106012289 (OP)
There are two possible scenarios:
>Goes unenforced, nothing happens.
>Is enforced, all the services normalfags rely on drop support in the UK, people get mad, and the government takes several months to repeal it.

the uk is undergoing sharia law p much

>>106012289 (OP)
I see it as a cautionary advisory. Any site you come across that starts moaning about this dystopian shite or similar? it's fair warning that you shouldn't really be visiting that particular site in the first place.

>>106012436
How does it work on websites w/o accounts? Is it a cookoe? I assume you have to redo it every time you clear data, or close the private session.

>>106012289 (OP)
government will backtrack, like they usually do

>>106012436
SUPPOSEDLY the authentication stuff is all anonymous
But it's retarded that it's even a requirement.

>>106012406
no, any "potentially harmful" content

Websites are now blocking UK fags because it's too much of a financial compliance burden

RIP IN PISS BONGS

>>106012289 (OP)
It's a law to curtail Facebook, Twitter and Pornhub but they wrote it so vaguely that it affects everyone and the big tech companies can lawyer up and get their way around the law.

>>106012436
>i tried to view a meme shitposting channel that was nsfw on discord and got the verification prompt
at least your not speaking german

>Not a single UK news site has picked up the online safety act

I don't care about boobies any more, i care about all the out of control trolling. Yes Tor browser bypasses the laws but having some common rules might at least make some potential chuds realize that what they are doing is not approved by polite society.

4chan might not be available to me much longer, but it will probably for the best in the long term. Wikipedia getting some restrictions is good too since Wikipedia is cocaine for people with mental issues.

I fucking hate being English so much, bros. AmeriGODS, I kneel.

>>106012289 (OP)
Reminder that UK got this instead of the more transparent OnlineID some European countries are implementing because cucklefucks got all concerned over 'muh privacy' when the way Europe was implementing OnlineID was privacy first.

Things were better when the Queen was alive

>be britbong
>having tea and crumpets with me mum
>start thinking of Muriel from work
>would like to have a little in-out, in-out with her
>"'scuse me mum, I... I need to have a go"
>head over to the computation machine
>it's off
>slam it hard with me fist
>"OI, TURN ON! I NEED A WANK"
>it turns on
>search for porn
>blocked
>"bollocks"
>run outside and find the nearest red phone booth
>grab the tele and dial the pornography administrator
>"Ello? Her Majesty's Pornography Administration Centre. Who's this callin'?"
>"Ello, I need a wank somethin' good!"
>"Hol on there, son. You need to give me your name and residence first."
>My name's Humphrey Throckwaddle Ill and live at 3242 West Pennywood Lane"
>"Alright then. And what type of porn will you be wantin' today, Mr. Throckwaddle?"
>"Cuckold, sir. Please hurry, me pecker is about ready to burst!"
>"AIright then, one moment please...and you are all set, sir. I have given your household 10 minutes of uninterrupted access to cuckold porn."
>"Thank you sir! And God bless the Queen!"
>"God bless her right! Cheerio!"
>Race back home before the cuckold porn time runs out
>enter front door
>blood is everywhere
>go into kitchen
>mum is dead
>beheaded by muslims

>>106012683
kek

OK skimming things, "4channel" sites in theory are OK, because the main requirement for those is a reporting system which we technically do. So blueboard should be "safe" it's the orange boards that get a bit riskier.

>>106012634
this is being pushed through by a despised government who will be lucky to last till the next election
only thing this will achieve is getting smaller nsfw sites to shit the bed and block British IP's from accessing their site until it's repealed
this is just another step on the ladder for the dark lords fetish, mandatory identity cards (now digital id)
the common man despises the very concept of being required to have a mandatory ID for simply existing, whilst Blair and his ilk want them to enact 1984 style control over everyone

>>106013206
Law was passed in 2003, the conservatives did it. Nobody wants to go up against the right wing press's muh children brigade.

all non state media will be marked as NSFW lmao. enjoy your BBC britcucks, but i guess you'll used to it.
>oy mate, you saw a video if a jew murdering children? off to prison with you
lawl

>>106012683
This pasta world unironically seems comfy compared to IRL where a jeet would answer the phone instead

>>106013266
>2023
>implying the tories are any different to queer stalin

>>106012557
Germany is the next country implementing age verification shit.

is this real? saw it posted but can't find the source

>>106013393
It's fake

Man, doing a bit of research and this mostly came about because some girl was fed suicide content by the algo
Why slash and burn half the internet when big tech's algos are responsible for what you want to stop, defang the algorithm not small sites.

>>106012436
So who's profiting from this? American wondering.

basically you go to jail

>>106012406
no, any site with any nsfw content, which is all social media or any site that allows images or video or text submitted by users

>>106013081
actually not, because they have to put provisions making sure that no such content is posted, in other words IDs would be required for submitting anything. The problem here is if hiroshimoot submits, which knowing him, he will

>>106013762
>or text submitted
They are coming after my ascii art porn!? WTF

>>106013713
World Economic Forum Agenda prison planet guide to having the goyim eat insects, trapped in their 15 minute cities, using deleteable digital currencies and living in a pod. They tried this during the covid scam with the vaccine passports and are now trying again in a more subtle way. Every globohomo country has some variation of this going on. In muttland it's the republican moralfaggot migaturds pushing the beast system.

Once normies get used to the idea of tying their real-life identity to the internet they will get far more aggressive.

>>106012289 (OP)
tl;dr — Oi m8 u gotta loicense for that?

>>106013762
are they competent enough to enforce this? are they going to hire an army of jeets to do...what, dns filter? ip ban traffic? seems like this will only be effect those that voluntarily comply.
>oi yandex, youj got a loisence for that nsfw?
>Хaхa, иди oтcюдa!

>>106012406
No, this is an identity verification program. They are ending anonymity for UK internet users. You guys didn't speak up when they started surveilling everywhere you went, now they want this. Soon there will be something you have to stick up your ass to verify your location.

>>106012289 (OP)
You bend over so daddy government can abuse your. That is how it works.

>>106012289 (OP)
it means every site with user generated content either IDs them or blocks them
ID'ing every user is expensive so most websites outside the big tech circle will probably just block them

>>106014055
You know what, I skimmed articles and the campaign group that was the main pusher for this law says they haven't gone far enough

>>106013954
Any sites that break the law are subject to legal action by the UK government, half the internet is talking about simply geoblocking the entire UK now.

>>106012532
>SUPPOSEDLY the authentication stuff is all anonymous
Yeah I don't think anybody sane would ever trust this shit.
Also if it is anonymous then whats the fucking point? Little Timmy is just going to grab his mom or dad's id and take a picture of it. Kids at school are going to share id's that work. Hell, i've been offered to be sold lost id's randomly on the street for 20 bucks a couple times. The entire point of the surveillance can be defeated in 20 minutes but you're going to submitting your id to a database every time to view nsfw memes.

>>106014055
You retard they can arrest you for this post right now
you aren't anonymous
you were never anonymous

>>106013364
Wait what now

>>106014232
>Any sites that break the law are subject to legal action by the UK government
at that just doesn't seem realistic. maybe the big boys with a footprint in the UK will comply, but i can't see "half the internet" giving a fuck. yeah sue me over in guatamala. good luck with that.

>>106014232
They can do that against UK citizens who actually live there and against companies which have some UK presence, but the rest? The rest is literally not bound by UK law, they can't do shit except block those sites in the UK if they don't like it.

>>106012406
lol you fucking idiot

>>106014342
which at best would be a dns filter, maybe a layer 3 block but that's just whackamole. brits are so god damn stupid

>>106014358
You're ignorant if you believe web hosts won't comply. Many of them wouldn't want their entire block banned for non-compliance. You act like pressure doesn't exist at all. Or that just because you can bypass something doesn't mean that the average internet user can. And they can definitely target most of the large sites that aren't in compliance.

>>106012564
They will once they start having to get a wank loisence.

Dude I just want to talk about anime, board games, computer shit and other nerdy crap on an anonymous site, I don't give a shit about racists or /pol/crap. And yeah I like to jerk off, I'm an adult. This sucks.

Guess I'm going to just have to finally get a VPN and a 4chan pass.

>>106014383
britain is a financialized society. they entire economy could not survive if they range banned half the world.

>>106014405
That makes you the worst of all. Please return to your designated box.

>>106012406
>>106012289 (OP)
No. Porn is just the cover. It is just a means to censor people who speak out against the government policies about borders, immigration, war, covid vaccines, communism, etc. Look at X. The whole thing started because Musk bought X and said he wont censor the internet "voluntarily". Then the UK/EU/Australia quickly got on to create a "e safety" bill that will force companies to censor people through the law. This is the law.

The leftists demanded that people be censored online.

>>106014632
https://reclaimthenet.org/us-house-report-garm-censorship-collusion-advertisers-free-speech
https://www.noticer.news/julie-inman-grant-garm-censorship/
They did the same thing with Australia. The house judiciary investigation got the email receipts.

>>106014632
Oh please, it's not like the right wing are any better, they want narratives to go their way just as much. Freedom of speech is a bipartisan issue thats being pushed to the fringes and used as a point of division.

We don't have to like what either side says, but we both have to fight for the right to say it.

>>106014700
>Freedom of speech is a bipartisan
Next you'll say a child that's been castrated by the government under the guise of transgender ideology about children's soul being born in the wrong body is doing so to save their lives.

Shut the fuck you, you fucking tranny.

>>106014711
trump supports project 2025, which includes banning porn. someone also got refused entry into the us because of a j.d. vance meme on their phone. but go off i guess.

>>106014754
>what about trump
UK/EU/Australia has eSafety bill. Trump doesn;t. You dumb tranny. You will never be a woman

>>106012289 (OP)
It doesn't. Bongs are retarded and deserve what they get.

>>106014754
https://www.dhs.gov/publication/disinformation-governance-board

Biden admin setup the eSafety board. American conservatives called them out on their trannysim. They folded after few months.

>>106014711
People like you are successful victims of divide and conquer ideology.

>>106014782
>people like you
>Child castration ideologue calls others bad

>>106014762
>Trump doesn;t.
yet. congress already toed the lines with a few bills that barely didn't pass. also get your parkinsons disease treated, you freak of nature.
>>106014777
okay? so do the same for trump when he inevitably pulls this niggery.

>>106012406
Yeah, and captcha is just temporary. Lol

>>106012289 (OP)
It doesnt and its retarded as fuck. I hope it gets reverted.
No way im sending my face or id to random fucking indians.

>>106014817
>inevitably
Make a thread when that happens, you dumb tranny, Whataboutism doesnt work when its fiction. The reality is, you tranny party created this censorship monster because Musk refused to censor Trump. EU threatened to jail Musk for it and fine X billions per day for not censoring Trump.

>>106014342
>>106014358
We already have thepiratebay, 1337 and most other big torrent sites blocked here sadly

>>106014342
The goal is to break up companies where UK citizens talk/get ideas and make the penalties high enough that companies are forced to censor British people by the law. The goal has always been to control what the public thinks by not letting them talk about things, not letting them see things and not letting them discussing things in public and out in open. And any place where people are discussing are being threatened. 99% of the public wont use VPN. 99% of companies wont abandon a market. They will simply have to follow the law. The 1% of companies that do exit will only get 1% of UK and thats if both parties are really dedicated. In the functional side of things, the goal is to disappear information from 99% of the public.

>>106014828
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5397052-france-investigation-elon-musk-x/

Here's france's version. The goal is to force X to censor information about politics in France from the French people. The political elites do not want people to talk about public policy.

>>106012289 (OP)
>the government and country that betrayed the Holy Catholic Church continues its steady march to opening hell by daily monitoring you and thought and speech policing you
They used to fine you for not attending blasphemous services performed by heretics and then if you admitted that you held onto the true Faith they imprisoned and or murdered you. The head of their "church" is still an heir to that monarchy and legacy. To review, heresy bad, and England is literally ran by a heretical caesaropapist so what do you expect? At least they're "Christian," I guess.

>>106015378
Martin Luther vvon

>>106012289 (OP)
they don't want people knowing about things. nowt to do with porn - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-injunctions_in_English_law

can't wait to see cat deeley explain ukosa on this morning.

>>106013713
the establishment

>>106013713
>So who's profiting from this?
Palantir. Starmer and Blair are associates of the firm and are part of the technocratic network. Trump and the republicans have been starting to work closely with the firm too.

>>106015378
>the government and country that betrayed the Holy Catholic Church
Imagine being an unironic catholic-cuck. That's one of the few good things England ever did in it's history

>>106012469
>services are dropped
>normies are too catatonic to get mad
>only weirdos who wear programming socks get mad (literally don't matter)
>gov doesn't repeal it, becomes a national institution like China's firewall
>get cut off from the world
>everyone... becomes happier?
If it killed social media it'd be a good thing.
>but what did it cost?
E- everything...

I hope this will be a spark to light the flame of change in the UK.
They've suffered under their oppressive nanny state enough. The only things that keep people pacified are their bread and circuses. As the government continuously takes those away, eventually the people will have nothing to do but think about their situation

>>106017163
hopefully, a big source of dopamine has been stopped but an overreaching government. it wont happen today but soon a lot of people will get pissed off as there are a lot more people that watch porn that admit to it. the very least a political party in the uk has to do is promise to revoke the act and they will win a general election in a landslide.. it doesn't matter what other policies they have.

>>106012289 (OP)
It doesn't its such a terrible idea, only the major websites like pornhub will comply and most people will literally just go elsewhere to sites that don't comply and many other sites will pop up and the govt will soon realise their great idea doesn't work because most sites won't comply in which case they'll have to fine them or block them and waste loads of time going through the courts for that. Its so fucking dumb, they would have had much better results by just enforcing parental filters at ISP level for all households with under 18s or for phones where the contract is for someone under 18, its so much easier to do that than this shitty patchwork solution that 90% of sites won't bother with.

>>106014296
a) i'm not in the UK, so eat shit b) we are communicating through an end-to-end encrypted website. so unless 4chan is some psyop there is no us or me or you, it's anons and that's it.

>>106017317
Just admit it was overreaching and harmful to small sites, specifically target big tech.
Make fucking parental controls mandatory on routers. Thats all they have to do, make them easy to understand as possible so knuckle dragger Joe can understand them give the parents (admin account) a popup on their phone that says "This is bobbyjanes iPad, give her permission to look at boobs and look at socials Y/N"

No need for such piecemeal authentication. Maybe push phone companies to child accounts that are under a parent's mobile phone account. Aahhh....

>>106017163
>I hope this will be a spark to light the flame of change in the UK
It won't.

UK goverment is already gearing up for a potential sectarian war amongst the Hindus and Pakistani communities. For a very long time the Pakistani community used to form a large sized voting block for Labour but with the conflict in the middle east a lot of the clan voting blocks in places like the West Midlands have abandoned Labour to form their own local representatives. This is bad news as Labour and the Conservatives already allowed a policy of cultural self-enforcement with these communities such as during the last set of sectarian Pakistani/Hindu riots where the police was forced to bargain with "community representatives" (clan leaders) to stop the fighting instead of actually dismantling or arresting offending parties. Remember when analysts were going around talking about imminent civil war not too long ago? This is what they are talking about. That is also the reason why Starmer pivoted hard to immigration reform, it wasn't just flanking right.

The only way we will see change is when online or digital monitoring starts to impact freedom of movement to the average joe. Not getting acess to a website is one thing, most people will grumble and move on. But if someone gets digital ID'd at a toll gate and refused entry or stop searched that is when you will start to see 1970-1980 civil disturbance. People forget that a lot of the unrest from that time came from goverment checkpoints to deter union protestors and to check Irish nationals in Ulster.

whats the deal with 4chins and VPNs, do i need to paypig to hiroshimoot for a pass?

>>106017676
I wouldn't mind SOME official advisory, even if it's just "for the purposes of this law we consider anyone with a pass a consenting adult"

>>106014711
Versus being castrated by the government for religious reas- because the country has been taken ov- no, cleanliness, yeah we'll go with that one.

>>106017393
>le nonimous
lmao, you dumb cunt.
You are not anonymous on this website at all, this isn't fucking Tor.
This site is forced to keep records BY LAW and if requested, Hiro / mods would be more than happy to hand your info over to the cops if you were being a fucking retard.
And don't even say "god I miss moot", given the way you speak you likely weren't even on the fucking site when moot was around - HE DID IT TOO.
Every single fucking post you've made the last year is on a drive, somewhere, if not longer.
Likewise every ping you've made of this domain is on an ISPs server somewhere.
No wonder so many of you retards get arrested for announcing actual illegal shit on this site.
You are anonymous IN NAME and that's it.

>>106012289 (OP)
Basically how regulation has always worked. You squeeze out the little guy making it harder for anyone to compete with the big companies at the top. Those big companies pay good money (often more than they need to - some politicians are truly prostitutes and can be had for a song) to those politicians.

>>106012406
it's just a 2 week flatten the curve type of situation, nothing to see here!

TEST

Do VPNs even work here? as a mobile poster this could finally be the end for me

Can someone explain why 4chan hasn't banned all UK posters yet?

>>106013798
He could either submit or just block UK IP addresses. Guess which is easier.

>>106014298
If you think it's stopping with the UK you are deluded. The UK is usually just first with this garbage.

>>106017906
>>106017676
When (not if, when) 4chan blocks UK posters, your options are basically to buy a VPN service. I'm not going to recommend a specific one but any reasonably popular one is fine. The best ones are ones that have been taken to court and have legally proven they don't keep logs. 4chan and many other sites either blocks or captcha-walls off VPN endpoint IPs so the browsing experience will suffer. If you get a 4chan pass you can post normally though.

>>106017949
Oh one more thing; if you get a raspberry pi or have a small server you can set up the pi or VM to use the VPN, and then put a proxy on this local device and only use the proxy for specific sites with something like foxyproxy. It might even be worth making a tampermonkey script that detects for 'blocked in the UK' style phrases, adds a proxy rule, then reopens the page.

>>106017949
Worth getting a pass?

>>106017981
If you want to post using a VPN, yes.

Testing. Can we still post?

Can I still post as a paying customer?

>>106017949
i already use a VPN for other sites, i just wanted to know if i need a pass to post on here when connected, its only £30 a year i think, i spend twice that on fuel every week so fuck it.

>>106018055
I mean you could just check, chances are though you're going to have trouble.

>>106018055
I'll probably just get a pass anyway for now to see if that works, if they can't use the pass as a "hey I'm a consenting adult" verification I'll just have to find a VPN
Sight. I'll have to deal with crypto bullshit too.

>nothing so far nearly 12 hours in outside of the big sites blocking and complying early
Fuck, how long until they start cracking down so people bitch

>>106018074
You don't quite understand what is going on; 4chan either has to implement robust age verification or block UK users. A pass is not robust age verification. The reason you would want a pass is because 4chan is not going to add age verification and even if they did, do you REALLY want to be scanning your face and sending a photo of your driver's license to be linked to being a 4chan user?
You get a pass because you will be forced to use a VPN to get around the block on UK IPs, and VPN endpoints are often banned or restricted.

This is excellent news. Since the UK is an Indian country the amount of Indian posting will decrease dramatically.

>>106012520
Not sure they will. Many in Labour thought the law did not go anywhere far enough.

>>106013364
>Germany is the next country implementing age verification shit.
Australia starts in December, worse than the UK one.

>>106013393
Fake, for the moment.

>>106012289 (OP)
This is why you NEVER let leftists get power. Leftism cannot exist without mass censorship.

>>106012289 (OP)
I googled an image of a fake ID and uploaded it to reddit and it worked. Stupid government can't do anything correctly

>>106018200
>leftists
It was a law made and brought in by the previous government (right wing tory) Labour just never stopped it from going ahead.

>>106018097
>4chan either has to implement robust age verification or block UK users
Or it just does nothing. The worst that can happen is that it gets blocked in the UK and people just use a VPN (or just switch their DNS, since that's always been how things are blocked) and life continues on. All this talk about fining sites for non-compliance means nothing when they have no UK operation to begin with. I doubt Hiroshimoot is planning on visiting London any time soon.
>A pass is not robust age verification
It would be if you were forced to pay for it with a credit card. Credit card verification is an acceptable form of age verification and sites like Pornhub are using it.

>>106013798
>>106017924
Bongs will have to use VPNs either way, which even if you know which ones are good for 4chan, are hit or miss. And then you're already exposing yourself to whoever owns the VPN. We're pretty fucked

>>106017931
Didn't Florida and Texas do this type of shit first?

>>106018224
>tory
>right wing
kek
1997 was the beginning of the end

>>106017949
>when
I doubt 4chan will block the UK, the UK will have to get a court order to order ISPs to block it, 4chan hasn't engaged with the process at all was what offcom last said, and I doubt the UK is going to waste time trying to fine a website like 4chan, Twitter, Facebook etc. I could see them fining but 4chan will just ignore it as it doesn't have any ties to the UK.

A couple of questions:
>When using a pass, are you able to post with (mostly) any VPN? Or does it need to be static and dedicated?
>Will potential cloudfare restrictions inhibit this?

4chan ONLY cares about United States law. Check the report options.

>>106018338
>I doubt the UK is going to waste time trying to fine a website like 4chan
m8 what are you saying, this is the same country that once proposed a ban on "esoteric material"
the UK is turning into normieville, normies don't like 4chan, they will 100% ban it with this site's reputation

>>106018341
You can post with a residential VPN without a pass. You just have to spend time finding a node that some schizo hasn't used to shitpost and get banned.

>>106018359
Yes, but what I'm saying is, 4chan won't block UK users, Offcom won't fine 4chan because its a waste of time, Offcom will likely just go to the courts and ask them to block 4chan at ISP level because they won't comply and 4chans

>>106018364
that sounds like a ball ache, pass+dynamic shared IP seems easier

>>106018359
>normieville
You mean the same communist censorship regime in place in China. Thats what the EU and UK are replicating.

>>106018413
>>106018359
The fact that some people want to dance around the key issue of political censorship by trying to claim its just porn or its just making "normieville" is just personal deflection. The goal has always been to make general public less willing to engage in public discussion about politics. When the government places heavy burden on websites, when the gov places high trust requirements on their citizen for those websites and the gov to give their identity away, this is when they know what the results would be. Mass "self" censorship via implied threat from the government for their speech.

>>106018372
that's what happened with the pirate bay, then pirate proxy, then that again severeal times, and then I think they gave up

>>106018372
>Offcom won't fine 4chan because its a waste of time
They already started the process: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/investigation-into-4chan-and-its-compliance-with-duties-to-protect-its-users-from-illegal-content

They'll fine, 4chan will ignore it, then UK ISPs will just block it like they did for sanctioned suicide.

If 4chan does get banned in the UK surely 4chan can't just sleep on one of its largest userbases being cut off and expect them all to buy passes.

They really need to implement a system that is identical to the 4chan pass system but without the extra benefits like no captchas, so they're free and exist solely to allow people to post in geo-blocked countries.

Of course I'm sure greedy kikemoot would never do this.

>>106018821
Yeah, they could just have a page with a dynamic analogue clock and ask people to put in the time, this will block everyone under 18 from being able to post.

Which VPNs actually let you post?

I've used PIA for years but you can't post here

>>106018955
you can if you get a pass

>>106018955
any data center IPs are not gonna work which is 99% of VPNs
there are residential VPN/proxy services but they're sketchy and expensive
vpngate relays (free) used to work on 4chan years ago, no idea if they still do

>>106012532
"prove its you"
"its also anon"

ermm sorry what?

>>106012289 (OP)
I dont have a runedown i have not even read about it but im guessing

Brittan is basically makeing a TOS with some abitrary steps

there probably highly stupid so

>verification-they have to prove upon request that said user is said user
>risk assesment - they have to fill in a bullshit form that means basically nothing
>reporting-they have to send some kind of report upon request

what this does in reality almost certainly

>every site has to comply or risk a law suit at any moment for breaking the bullshit rule's

how this looks at a coperate level
>litterly need a guy in compliance to work on UK compliance to make sure the site is compliant at all times

how this works for a small business

>you have to litterly hire somebody or try your best to be complient but you will never be fully compliant so UK can just turn off your service anytime they want and you can face legal issues


at a macro level it kind of works to stop people exploiting the british userbase economically

but functionally its just a Chinese social firewall

>>106014673
>>106014632
Australia has been trying to do something like this for over 15 years. This is also not a left-right thing. Both sides of politics in all affected areas support it, though it may be worth noting that in Australia the Labor advocacy came from the right wing of the party.

>>106019039
this being said some enterpriseing anon's could get youtube,x,facebook all of it banned for violation's

and the sue the goverment for not enforceing their own policy


theese rules are never ever complyable its impossible

>>106019090
so there will be a clause that exempt's certain sites lol

is it a coincidence that this happens now when uk citizens are starting to rage at whats going on?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9mfFUbOv0s

>>106019094
there was a youtube exception in the Australian law, so of course the commissioner pointed out that that's stupid because you can still find 'adult' things on it.
>>106019155
yes. governments have been trying to implement this kind of thing for ages, and this legislation was passed years ago. laws that change how some macro system works rarely go into effect immediately.

Anyone saying this is a left wing or right wing policy is retarded. This is an authoritarian policy. The world has an authoritarian problem.

Why did they give up on this back in 2019?
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/oct/16/uk-drops-plans-for-online-pornography-age-verification-system

>>106019185
it was unenforceable
still is, that's why sites are opting out

>>106019155
Its only a coincidence if you believe the government is telling you the truth them they say its just for porn to protect kids.

Functioning human brain understands that its meant to cut off/limit access to discourse for 90% of the adult users

>>106019185
both this and the australian internet filter were dropped because they realized it would do nothing but irritate people.
now they still realize it will do nothing but irritate people (i've actually heard politicians explicitly acknowledge that anyone who wants to get around it can do so; it's purely there to be annoying) and have decided to implement anyway, but not in a way that might be convenient, like a more anonymized verification system that doesn't expect every single website with anything adult on it to find its own solutions.

>>106019185
Back then there wasn't support. Now left wing political groups in the west FIRMLY believes censorship of adults are necessary to secure the existence of brown/trans/ people.

>>106019226
>now
>implying generic lgbt or any other kind of sexuality related website, regardless of content, don't also fall under 'adult'

>>106018955
It's over m8, just go to one of the altchans.

>>106019216
this seems like it, since 4chan is one of the only places left, if not the only place left, for actual disclosure and open anonymous discussion. and from the news lately it seems even msm is reporting uk is starting to boil.

>>106019329
like what rofl

>My country is doing the same later this year so bongs are just giving me a vision of my future
Grim

>>106019361
Let me guess.. Italy?

>>106012289 (OP)
>Can someone give a rundown on how this shit works?
It doesn't, unless you're retarded. Here, the first step of freedom. I'm not even British, I'm just helping you out.

>>106019363
France is joining us
And when they do it everyone will quickly follow

>>106019388
Yeah I've heard the same in another thread. Seems Germany is next (maybe) but France and Italy already signed such law, it's only a matter of time (like at the end of the year) to apply such retardation.

to all people focusing on the uk this is not jsut a uk change it is happening in the EU they started their testing just a few days prior https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-age-verification

there is similar legislation being enacted in america already live in a bunch of states and has been for a while
https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/age-verification-bills/


>>106012289 (OP)
any platform with adult content now requires age verification otherwise offcom will fine them a tonne of money, theyve also added in a section where they can prosecute for wrongthink see pic

>>106012406
No. It also applies to all "user-to-user" services (e.g. social media) and even search engines. However, services which provide adult content have additional requirements.

The UK OSA covers many more types of content than porn, including racism, misogyny, antisemitism, self-harm, bullying, and violence. Some types of content are mentioned here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-act-explainer/online-safety-act-explainer

I remember ofcom had a PDF with well over a dozen different categories of prohibited content. I'll hunt for it if anyone's interested.

Some users of social media find the laws overbearing, and some companies worry about the risks of operating in the UK under these laws. Consequently, there's a petition which has been gaining signatures:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/722903

But all the petition does is make the government *consider* the laws for *debate*. I'd be surprised if the laws are repealed, especially as other countries are following suit. For example, similar laws will come into effect in Australia within this year. Some states in the USA are also adopting similar laws, but I think it's a harder sell in the US, so I'm not sure what will happen in the long run there. But people generally accept laws despite complaining if they can still live fairly comfortably with those laws; Even without the ability to post edgy memes online, the peasants will still have their bread-and-circuses. They'll just be marginally less satisfied with the circuses.

>>106019406
>France
Yeah, Pornhub stopped providing service to French users to protest against this law.
This is what their home page looks like for me at the moment.

>>106019444
the focus on porn, led by a complicit media, is really not helping with awareness. even here the discussion is mostly vpns to get to porn instead of how this affects fundamental ways we all use the internet every day.

>>106018966
>you can if you get a pass
coinbase commerce doesn't even function in the uk

>>106018200
All are corrupt. And I'm right wing. Law's are built on precdents and this precedent is bad.

>>106018200
youre brain rotten if you think left/right has anything to do with this all politicians are evil

>>106018200
>Texas is a leftist state

>>106019526
on top of which, these things always pass with right-wing support. even in california, this shit sailed through unopposed, so obviously it wasn't just the commies in favor.

>>106019479
what are you talking about works fine here

>>106019464
There'll be plenty of time for people to become aware of the laws once they're in force. Until then, it's better for the government to highlight to good things about the laws

>>106019551

>>106019536
It is always amusing to see these people fail to realize that the US, as well as most of the world in general, functions under a uniparty system where the small group of ultrarich, well-connected individuals control all major political parties.

>>106019567
Does it take Revolut?

>>106019567
have you tried the wallet options?

e-hentai is also blocked in the bongland now

What method do they use in the UK to block websites? If it's similar to Russia, they can just use the same DPI circumvention tools we use, no VPN required.

Is it a coincidence that this somehow happens more or less at the same time as payment processors starts dictating what they think or don't is acceptable.
And the same time that Google Chrome tries their best to kill support for adblockers?

>>106012289 (OP)
Here's a QRD:
>Buy a VPN.
>Never think about this retarded law again.
Hope this helps.

>>106019768
(((payment processors))) have been doing that shit for years

>>106018636
>>106018372
If the uk ISPs do end up blocking 4chan is there even anyway workaround for that? That'd also block VPNs since it's the ISP itself

>>106019768
yes it's a coincidence, stop asking. this was passed years ago, and credit card companies have been doing this for even longer. why do you think 4chan passes cost monopoly money?

>>106019768
>>106019781
Yeah, people into guns have seen this happen before. Several years ago payment processors tried to restrict people from using them to purchase firearms. They got serious blowback for doing so, and I think a few red states started investigating them so they stopped doing it.

>>106019783
>That'd also block VPNs since it's the ISP itself
First day on /g/?

>>106012289 (OP)
there comes a point where you have to bleed for what you want.

>>106019800
No one is going to "bleed" for porn games on Steam, anon.

>>106013206
>>106012634
>I'm being boiled alive and youre just being stoned to death!
retards

>>106019797
>firearms
>blowback
Nice.

>>106019799
I just remember people discussing that uk ISPs are government run compare to others like burger ones. Cloudflares been their circus monkey the past week banning uk visiting piracy websites for that reason

Not that it will do anything but here's the petition to repeal it.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/722903

>>106019805
>no one is going to bleed for porn games
the bleeding is to not be tagged like cattle everywhere you go. nobody is kvetching over porn you fucking jew.

>>106012289 (OP)
The rundown is don't use this system no matter what. Just don't. Do not. Never use this system. They want to use this for tracking. Do not give them your data.

What it does is block everything they feel they want blocked. If it's blocked it doesn't exist, don't use the system. Don't use this system, no matter what.

Sadly giant morons will use this retarded system and if nobody does they're going to force you to use it for things you actually need.

>>106019805
the question is really how intrusive everyone will find having to do this for every streaming, social media, news and search site since those all serve up adult content under the law.

>>106019815
>uk ISPs are government run
No, that's total BS they're not and even if they were government run they'd have to block all VPN sites and restrict ports on your router and even then you could still get around it by tunneling over an open port because that's all configurable in the client, there's basically no way to block VPNs and ISPs that do block them just use a different non default port and that will get you around it.

>>106012289 (OP)
Best thing: whenever its policy that takes advantage of brexit, or undermines the Palestinian cause, riots kick off all over London.
Today? Just any other day to them.

>>106019768
No it's not coincidence. This is planned by the five eyes and EU. They're assholes. USA is only half safe. They're genuinely think the internet should have the same laws as real life.

>>106019817
written by a retard who cant even grasp how bad the act is, if its gets to parliament theyll debate hamster forums instead of the actual act

>>106019768
Yes, stop noticing patterns, thats illegal. This law is meant to stop people from noticing.

>>106019830
Correct. Do not comply. Ever.

>>106019854
This has been an ongoing political issue for literally decades. You not noticing it doesn't mean there's a fucking pattern when you finally do.

>>106019853
It's by no means perfect but at least its an actual example of consequences of the legislation. I think if the petition was longer people probably wouldn't sign it or the debate would completely get side-tracked rather than being about something specific.

>>106019853
The act can pretty much block anything they think is harmful. If British don't get that, that's because they're retarded. It's also designed to track everything you do. This is the goal of UK and friends, to track everything, because they believe the internet must have the same laws as real life, except in the internet you can more easily track everything. UK in particular is the biggest asshole of all in this. And no, they're not going to get rid of it. If backlash happens they're going to meet halfway and none of the problems they supposedly told this would solve are going to be solved.

>>106019853
>if its gets to parliament theyll debate hamster forums instead of the actual act
That's because so few of the MPs are tech literate. The most pushback I've seen from this is from Wikipedia threatening to restrict access to UK users. Until more larger organisations do that, nothing will happen.

This is just making me feel physically sick.

>>106019817
Complete nothingburger. It's 1000x easier to get something banned than it is to repeal legislation that banned the thing

>>106019830
>Sadly giant morons will use this retarded system and if nobody does they're going to force you to use it for things you actually need
... so giant morons using this is a good thing then? as long as dumb normies use it (the UK doesn't like anything not mainstream anyway) then we're good

This is just the start. The UK is just doing it first and soon all other countries will follow. Internet privacy has never been more dead, and it was fucking at deaths' door already.

>>106019853
Thats not a retard. Thats a calculative person advancing their own agenda. You are just refusing to understand what the goal is, what the agenda is, what the data points are pointing to. You do not want to connect the dots. You do not want to notice the pattern. You do not want to understand.

>>106012549
>Websites are now blocking UK fags because it's too much of a financial compliance burden
>RIP IN PISS BONGS
Coming to all of EU soon.

>>106019922
EU already has DSA and they've been using it to force X to censor.
Australia has eSafety thats been used to force X to censor.
Biden created Disinformation Governance Board to censor online platform, it was disbanded within few months.

Communists/leftists champion censorship of internet to protect "their truth" about their ideology from criticism.

Europe/UK has jailed thousands of people for social media posts. The laws are already there and already being used to suppress speech. You just refuse to understand, you refuse to accept, because media propaganda runs through your blood that tells you to ignore what is happening, what has been happening.

>>106019910
It's not a good thing because if they do the UK government is going to say they were right after all and keep it even longer and stricter. There's a good chance UK will lose a lot of money with this act, because companies don't have resources to track all this, but that's not guaranteed. There's also a good chance people will simply get even more demoralized which can result in more crime. UK is suggesting this will prevent crime and make people follow the law, or become more productive, but I highly doubt. People won't suddenly be happy or be productive, they'll just find other ways to be lazy and unhappy. Regardless, this law will have negative results and it will take years for UK to figure that out. It's not possible to have positive effects. They will pretend it had positive effects for many years, that I guarantee, and only years and years later they'll admit it was a really bad idea. UK is dead.

will america start accepting bongs as political refugees? of course not

And during the Biden admin, 4chan censored a lot of posts about online censorship that Biden admin was doing. Reddit crosssite users celebrated the censorship policies as their political ideological narrative told them they were heroes for supporting censorship of their enemies.

>>106019955
Isn't the inevitable result forcing everyone underground?

>>106019969
oh to be a schizo

The truth is I can still access pornography.

I wish they would harden this and make it truly unpassable. Then I could finally succeed at nofap.

I have tried to block and filter porn on my own home network. It is basically impossible. There is always a way around it.

>>106019853
Even if they stated the real problems with the act it would still get ignored. They'll make a statement saying "We hear you, but we think the law is great so we're not debating it" and it'll go nowhere. My fellow britbongs voted for this shit and they'll continue to do so.

>>106019830
https://pornbiz.com/post/17/the_scam_of_age_verification

According to the people behind sites like xvideos only roughly 10% of people actually signed up during AV tests. While they're biased against the act and they don't provide any source, I still think it's likely that the vast majority of the public won't participate in the system and will just VPN or search for sites that don't comply.

>>106012406
https://youtu.be/fT4YJsqWOWQ?si=3ChYauDZMeZ-yNfn&t=18

>>106019987
>My fellow britbongs voted for this shit and they'll continue to do so.
How?

>>106019971
Yes it is. See prohibition law. That will be the result. None of the problems they pretend this will fix will be fixed.

>>106019971
The inevitable result is China. Political ideological unity without criticism. The western elites want political unity through censorship. To advance communism. The agenda setters are WEF. Whatever goal WEF has, whatever goal the UN has, thats being implemented. You need to check what those organizations are saying because thats where all the world leaders are gathering, all the world intelligence are talking, all the world leaders are discussing about how to shape the world and the future. This isn't a conspiracy, its an open declaration by the elites.

>>106019987
>My fellow britbongs voted for this shit and they'll continue to do so.
No one voted for this. We have such little political power anyway and the supermajority of the government means they can just push through whatever they want. The Online Safety Act is just mumsnet pandering because god forbid lowlife tramps in this country look after their own children.

>>106019987
> 10%
You call that only? That's very high for porn. Porn is the thing people don't want to show their face or ID. Imagine you want to watch a 18+ movie, well you can't because this shit law. How many people do you think will use this system to watch 18+ movies? There's a lot more "harmful" content that people think is normal but the government doesn't give a fuck.

>>106019996
The problem is to shutdown momentum/discussions about the problems the west is facing. Mass migration, housing crisis, crime rising, mass rape coverups, etc

All these problems are out in the open because internet has "too much freedom" today for the western elites. And sites like X doesnt censor for them without the law they want to pass.

>>106019922
Good, no more chuds saying racist shit online and getting away with it. I'm all for this.

Why do people keep blaming leftists anyway when the right wing has a long, long history of authoritative governments shutting down free speech and anyone who disagrees with them.

>>106020013
don't forget the new "banter bill", workers in public places can now report you for thoughtcrime

>>106020016
Because you are refusing to see reality and blaming "what about others of the past". The problem is today. And ideological capture of your mind, the brainwashing is making you blind to what is happening with your cult ideology.

>>106020013
It's multipurpose. That's one example for sure, but they also want to dial down "harmful content" they don't agree with because in their view, somehow, this will improve society and make everyone respect each other. They genuinely believe that. It's women and boomers ideas.

>>106020016
this entire bill was the rightoids , labour just didn't kill it because they are also nanny state lovers

>>106020033
A society that has rejected free speech, a free independent mind, is not a free society. They want a bug society where independent mind cannot have discourse that disagrees with the government policies.

Mass surveillance censorship state coming to UK near you. They're adopting the EU DSA framework

If YouTube can get away with allowing stuff like TidePod challenges, then the act has failed.

>>106020049
it's already been here for decades now

>>106020010
If 90% of the people who visit your website suddenly don't anymore (either because they decide to use a VPN to visit or just go elsewhere) that's a pretty huge percentage of people not using the AV system.

>>106020050
yeah but the uk will sanction them and get a pretty penny for it, so it's all good

>>106020059
We'll see how that goes for other "harmful content". I hope you're right.

>>106014117
What about something like Steam where it's not a website, but you can download user made mods?

>>106020068
Then YouTube just blocks UK if it's too expensive. It's not that simple.

>>106020070
>>106020059
The law will be used sparingly to target specific companies that has enough momentum. The goal is disruption of public discourse, so it will be used against companies that host large amount of people.

>>106020080
I don't see that happening, it's a drop in the bucket, plus youtube is already a cash sink and only exists to peddle propaganda

>maybe we shouldn't let young children watch hardcore pornography on the internet
>/g/: is this tyranny??

There's nothing wrong with the law.

>>106020091
I see it happening. Google doesn't give a fuck about UK. If they get no revenue and only annoying unprofitable work, they'll block UK, no questions asked. The only way YouTube doesn't block UK if it's not that expensive after all, or they still get profit.

As usual, the British public will have a moan about it and then nothing will happen. The most placid bunch of people I've ever known.

>>106019155
of course it isn't coincidence. at the same time they introduced this act they expanded the scope of illegal online content to include posting about "assisting illegal immigration".
now they can jail anyone posting videos of rubber dinghys and immigrant hotels

>>106020091
More than that, the government are sucking up to google hard, the big companies are literally going to get exceptions when they are 90% of the problem since thats what all the kids are using.

>>106020104
There's no resistance from politicians to overtly privacy violation. British people want to become China

>>106020101
Make it the fucking parents responsibility, make routers have mandatory parental controls, don't let under 18s have phone contracts that isn't a child account of their parents.
There, controlling what children can see without this nanny state insanity.

>>106020109
The laws are there to target big companies who host lot of people with controversial opinions. The UK gov was threatening to arrest Musk for allowing people to post about racial riots happening in UK.

>>106020109
>>106020116
https://www.politico.eu/article/united-kingdom-mps-elon-musk-parliament-riots/

The law is specifically meant to target social media that hosts "wrong thinks" that the government has decided.

>>106020104
how often do americans actually do anything when the government passes up their back? nobody does anything whilst there's still bread and circuses

>>106020103
agreed but I think we have different understandings as to what constitutes "expensive"

>>106019985
>I want to government to solve my weak will for me

>>106020132
We shouldn't look to the yanks but to our age old nemesis, the French. They protest everything

>>106020132
Trump was elected to fire government employees. He is cutting government jobs. He was elected to remove illegals. He's doing that. He was elected to release epstein files, he has betrayed this. He was elected to prosecute Fauci, well, Rand Paul is bringing that up.

Biden created Disinformation Governance Board. It was disbanded within months as republicans brought up complaints/concerns that it was targeting conservatives.

>>106020148
Correct. We need to be taking lessons from the reign of terror.

>>106012406
no, I don't know where people are getting this from but it's not true
it applies to any site that hosts public content, in any medium. It could be a comment section on a blog about yorkshire puddings

>>106020116
>>106020130
It's complete overreach and just saying "hi please have decent reporting tools" and moderation should have been enough for someone that isn't fucking Facebook or Twitter.

>>106020016
Unironically because those people are all retarded 19 year olds. If you think you know how dumb the average person is, you don't, and they're actually much less capable of critical thinking than you realize. They have been successfully programmed into thinking only "one side" does the bad stuff, and that "their side" does the good stuff. So when their side does something stupid and bad for the long term, it's totally fine because it makes the other side (the bad guys) upset, which means their side is actually winning!

They simply weren't around when the authoritarians in power were the right wingers, and don't understand that people in power just want more power, regardless of their ideology.

>>106020169
Government shouldnt be policing thoughts of its citizens, as long as the government is claiming to be democratic or a free society. They shouldn't be "saying" companies need to moderate, thats not the job of the government.

>>106020208
well someone has to.. what's the word, "parent" the children of this nation. Can you think of anyone who would be willing to "parent" these children?

Is there any talk of Canada trying something like this? With Australia and the Bongs doing it, I'd be surprised if Canada was following suit, but I can't find anything on it.

>>106017906
Don't buy anything. Opera Browser with built in free VPN. You know it makes sense. Delboy

Bong, Scot bros, Irish Bros, Welsh bros don't leave I will miss you so much.

>>106020211
Individual in a free democratic society are thought to have independent functioning mind that can make decisions on their own. If you need a nanny, well, then you're not an independent functioning human

>>106020219
4chan blocks vpns

>>106020101
>but muh children
>15 years of deafening silence on lootboxes and the attached underage online casinos
You, everyone like you and your families will be lynched for being hypocrites in the not so distant future.

>>106020230
Not using VPN on 4chan

>>106020226
that's what it looks like to me too
in fact being critical is taken completely out of the equation. There is no thinking, only delegation to a higher order who will provide you with a solution
an added bonus is that any opponents aren't challenging you, they're challenging the aforementioned delegates, you don't have to have to jack shit but believe

>>106020115
>ISPs give out the cheapest shittiest routers they can get away with for years
>parents can't be bothered learning how to do even the most basic of shit to prevent their children from being exposed to the wider internet
>government on both sides just wants total control over the internet anyway since it is in the interest of the corporations they are put in power by
>any time you speak out against any of this shit you either get called a nonce, asked what you have to hide, or are told how fucking easy it is to work around so who fucking cares while the noose grows ever tighter
Anyway, sign the petition, use a VPN, and carry on.

>>106020101
fuck off retard

>>106020141
The only duty of government that matters if defence of the nation.

Pornography objectively makes men weaker.

Effectively banning porn would on average strengthen the men of a nation and improve defence/military preparedness.

>>106020242
As a 61 yr old GEN X, we were the first generation to use computers..... we can get round any govt filter

>>106020101
you wouldn't be allowed access to 4chan to lick the boot under this law btw

So what are the realistic options, someone said buy a pass, but also use a VPN or proxy on top?

>>106020226
>>106020245
The Chinese have adopted the opposite. They do not value independent human mind, which they see as disruptive to the harmonous confucian society. To the Chinese, you need to respect the parent, the elder, the emperor, the king, society above all else. An independent mind is considered a threat to the society. The western "independent mind" is a result of enlightened thinking that brought Europe out of the dark ages and into the modern era by forcibly challenging all institutional knowledge, institutional order, institutional wisdom and forming your own independent judgement. Respect for human beings begin with respect for individual minds of the human above all else. That is the freedom that western liberalism was based upon.

If the modern west wants to move away from this mindset and regress back, then that is a threat to the civilization everywhere. Especially the western society.

>>106020269
I do wonder why the prospect of entertaining the notion of investigating why porn is so highly sought after is a non-starter
perhaps because they already know and aren't willing to tackle it, but then I wish they'd just say that
the UK in particular kinda dances around causaility, in a laughably farcicle way. Like they look at the chain of events that results in people getting stabbed, they get to the murder weapon then stop investigating. Clearly they know what to do but just they just won't, or they're comically incompetent, in either case they're not fit for purpoe

>>106020297
if you want easy access to 4chan now you need a VPN + a pass

The VPN companies are probably loving this. I've had a look at the big named ones and a lot are offering bundle rewards like Amazon vouchers with purchases.

>>106020309
OK, cool, I'm just concerned about signing up for a VPN and paying for a pass only to find it dosen't fucking work.

>>106020445
it def works, 4chan blocks as many vpns as it can but pass always overrides that

I'm in the UK.
I'm posting here.
I laugh at /g/.

Thanks for liking my haiku.

>>106020307
unless it's incels, then they assign a task force and awareness campaigns to tackle it

>>106020462
You go' a loicense for that post?

>>106018856
Or: write the following text in cursive.
(that would stymie zoomers and younger completely)

>>106012406
For now.

>>106020106
so what's about to happen? anarchy in the uk? I've noticed msm reporting about bongs starting to get mass enraged at the peaceful immigration, and msm usually likes to avoid the topic. is something about to kick off? right at the same time in the us people are demanding answers about epstein / ghislane as well.

>>106020861
no, nothing will happen

I moved to Hong Kong for work and I'm seriously considering getting my permanent residence here or baby trapping my internet gf when she visits. I can't go back to the UK. Anywhere is better than there.

>>106021007
>ccp
>better

>>106020861
Who knows but if people can't complain online they might complain offline. This could backfire.

>>106021103
thats also illegal :)

>>106021087
Unironically yes

>>106017317
One of the MPs was caught watching porn in the house of commons.
All it takes is one dataleak about who's going to what porn sites to scare them into thinking again about the OSA

Hopefully certain elements of this law could be fought against, but people need to be reasonable and get behind campaign organisations and keep awareness up.

>>106021087
yes

>>106021103
>>106021147
what i dont get is how all of these migrants of peace getting military grade hardware, like modern armament rhib boats, an endless supply of this military hardware to cross into the eu anyways. they certainly arent producing the rhib attack boats in the congo. how are these "poor helpless people" getting this military hardware if they are supposed to have nothing and starving?

>>106021249
>One of the MPs was caught watching porn in the house of commons.
UK politician sex scandals are some of the oldest thing ever, I remember reading about them as a kid in the 90s when they had a S&M ring.

>>106021485
They buy them through Ukraine, who resells 90% of their foreign military aid on the black market.

Les coprophages d'anglais vont disparaître d'internet

>>106021147
Yeah but good luck stopping that if it's big enough.

>>106021485
Because corruption. That's obvious. The real question is who's doing it? The country they come from or traitors from UK? Maybe both.

>>106021485
Sigh, because they are being trafficked by highly organised criminal gangs. It's not some evil conspiracy it's organised crime bringing in cheap labour that they farm out as delivery drivers, car washers, prostitutes and who knows what else.
The government is looking the other way because these migrants are filling labour shortages, and you know those people housing migrants? many of them are donors to the political parties.

Incidentally this is a symptom of Brexit because it eroded the boarder control between the UK and mainland Europe.

>>106012406
Maybe that's how they get the foot in the door. They usually hide behind protecting the children until they get in power and spread they claws everywhere else. That Visa/Mastercard thing was just edgy porn games at first and not even a month later they were able to ban ALL adult games.

Well, thanks to that Tea app I now have more driver licenses than I will ever need for verification.

>>106021626
>many of them are donors to the political parties.
Which is also why there are regular revelations about outrageous costs for housing refugees. Politicians are giving back to their donors, it's literally as simple as that.

>>106021626
>labour shortages
At least try to write something believable

>>106013393
4chan has a news segment. I hasn't been updated since like 2013. Normally, at the top of the page, when there is some form of announcement, it will be displayed in red, bold text. Currently, there is no such thing.

It's false.

>>106021924
There is a shortage of labour willing to work for cents on the Dollar frognigger. They're not interested in getting your dumb ass to work, there are other dumb niggers out there willing to do it for fractions of what you want.

>>106021773
Tea Status: Spilled

>>106021626
>it's not some evil conspiracy, it's just a criminal conspiracy
uhh..

>>106021970
That's not a labour shortage, you dumb nigger.
They're importing millions of retarded shitskin slaves in order to drive down pay and destroy the lives of natives that don't want to work for pennies while living in their own faeces.

>>106021970
>labouer shortage
lol we sure had a shortage of these shwarthy laboroers when we built our entire country amirite. how did we ever manage. robots, ai, robots with ai, nope we need more labour. labourer to build the houses for the newly imported laborurers i guess.

>>106020101
ok but what about censoring gore and gore websites and making it as illegal as cp?

>>106020230

>>106021206
>>106021483
no it's not

>>106022010
>this is the intellectual level of frogposters
Fucking grim but not my problem.

>>106022010
>They're importing millions of retarded shitskin slaves in order to drive down pay and destroy the lives of natives that don't want to work for pennies while living in their own faeces.
that is literally what he just said you vantablack gorilla nigger
if frogposters were a thing 100 years ago you would have ended up in camps with the rest of the subhumans

>>106020101
the internet is not meant for kids

>>106020101
Oi you got a loicense for that anime girl?

>>106022109
>>106022111
>This is the quality of glownigger shilling
At least follow your scripts or learn to read, niggers

>>106022111
no its got nothing to do with labor. theyre importing a bunch of "people" who will just turn the entire zone into detroit and all go on wellfare, and they know it. it has nothing to do with improving the economy or even corpo greed.

>>106022156
>>106022175
First nigger: Learn to read.
Second: Learn to space your posts out better so the samefagging is less obvious.
Third: Go to the local hardware store, steal (let's not kid ourselves you ain't paying) a piece of rope and hang yourself so you stop wasting my time.

>>106022080
what is this

>>106020230
4chan risks losing its British userbase

>>106022625
Don't see the problem. 4chan could stand to lose some users.

What changed? Everything is operational, I can browse the 4chins.

>>106022930
for how much longer?
Ofcom might decide to start forcing ISPs to start blocking non compliant web hosts.

>>106021733
Yes but Visa/Mastercard rushed too fast and now they have way too much visibility. I don't think it's going to end very well for them, especially when there's a bill in USA to make it illegal for payment processors to do any ban of any kind, directly or indirectly. We'll see. Maybe it's just wishful thinking but seems to me like it's going to be pushed back.

>>106022992
What can we do? Can we guerilla this thing and retaliate? Can we DDoS them forever?

>>106023148
Attacking them makes them look like the reasonable party

>>106023212

>>106023148

If you go full gorilla you are giving them the appropriate context to portray you as the evil cyber terrorist they need in the iron jungle and justify these draconian policies.

>>106023887
Ok. We wait, see what happens.

Every new law introduced makes me want to move to Ireland more.

>>106024685
What makes you think they’re any different?

https://www.rte.ie/news/2025/0721/1524435-online-platform-verification/