Thread 106019193

Neocities used to be a place that wanted to revive the oldweb, but since 2022 or so the website has become what you see here... a lobotomized mess of colors and leftist slop.
How do we get true old web back?

old web was also leftist

Stay way from any site that uses Cloudflare

>>106019203
yeah but at least it had freedom for everyone and wasn't a mess like it is today...

>>106019203
most people on the old web were somewhat left leaning yes, and literally the whole old web laughed at conservatives but it was all a far cry from the modern colored-hair faggot leftist we all know. The old web was centrist, supported gay rights and legal weed and laughed at Christians.

>>106019229
then where will be my safehaven if not here?

>>106019258
my point exactly.

>>106019193 (OP)
In the past you had to make your own page with pure HTML, so many people forced themselves to figure it out. Neocities is just for hipster nerds who chose to do this, it's not the same.

>>106019297
is there anything similar, any hope at all?

>>106019258
The old web was not “centrist”. It’s just chudcels created an alternative where everybody who isn’t an outright nazi is “left wing”, and honestly back then politics didn’t even matter that much anyway. I’m just so tired of you chudcels, why can’t you just die instead of endlessly trying to bait “culture wars”

>>106019334
that's kinda just centrist bro.

>>106019334
>Everyone I don't agree with is a Nazi
Have you ever thought that you might be the extremist?

>>106019203
https://x.com/dubyaeraleft This is what it was like. It was a different time.

>>106019334

Nice try faggotron. In 1999 being a "leftist" meant you thought it was ok if two men held hands in public. Not that you support black criminal worship and taxpayer subsidized transification of children. The main creatures of the old web were Gen X'ers, who were "left leaning" back then but are the most right leaning demographic today. Time passed and everyone to the right of gay race communism became a "Nazi" and that's why you're so hated now.

>>106019368
>This is what it was like. It was a different time.
> shows most based images.
Yeah... I miss when the left was cool.

>>106019193 (OP)
>How do we get true old web back?
Banish governments from regulating the internet in any way. Yes faggot that also means no but we need ID verification, KYC and a billion other things because muh childrun or muh porn or whatever else gets your panties in a twist.
First of all you faggots should be lynched with your cadaver publicly displayed for larping about giving a shit about children when you did nothing about child gambling casinos aka lootboxes and CS skins. Besides the internet got irreversibly fucked after the Arab Spring when governments really started taking notice, when DDoS campaigns became common, orchestrated spam bots, weaponized CSAM, all the things that make the modern web a borderline unbearable hellscape. The web functioned when it was a self regulating ecosystem. No one in their right mind wants to host CSAM, but back then you couldn't use it to deplatform whoever and whatever you don't like. Nowadays the biggest spreaders of CSAM are Meta (Facebook, Instagram, WA, etc) and Google via what used to be Picasa no idea what it's called now. Weird how no one seems to give a shit about that.

>>106019380
exactly... and I had to watch as the fuckers raped neocities and turned it to another hipster hell hole of "trans rights this palestine that, fuck NFTS" and other leftist schizojargon

>>106019368
It really was.

>>106019407
One, I am not the pedolarping faggot, I think that's >>106019334 and that is the fucker that should be hung. Two, Who cares about kids? they had there place on the old web on places like club penguin and sites for tv stations like cartoon network, nickelodeon, YTV and so on... Kids are supposed to be monitored on the internet so they don't end up downloading viruses out the computers ass and exposing themselves to horrors beyond comprehension.
But now with modern social media kids just get exposed to that all the damn time. It should be the parents responsibility for the kids, not the internet's.

Never happening as long as iPhones exist

>>106019193 (OP)
hey how's floorp? is it worth checking out over, say, brave or ungoogled-chromium?

>>106019461
time to burn the starbucks down?

>>106019481
yeah it's fast, cool, japansese, and firefox based with little of the slop.

>>106019486
As Karl Marx said step one is burn down the local Starbucks, step two is no more iPhones, step three is fully automated luxury (mandatory) gay space communism.

>>106019506
And as jesus said "I am a thicc femboy lamb furry uwu"

Freedom is only possible in a frontier society. The Wild West era of the internet is over. Just like the real west, mega corporations and government have moved in. We have to leave and find a new frontier to settle.

>>106019522
>The Wild West era of the internet is over. Just like the real west, mega corporations and government have moved in. We have to leave and find

and AI ain't looking like the best frontier either...

>>106019513
Ah yes I remember that from Anthropomorphis 6:21

>>106019193 (OP)
Avoid the clearnet and people trying to push some ideologies on basic technologies like fp (which isn't bp)

>>106019548
where tf do I go if not clearnet?
what are sites you reccomend? Places to fo? places to be?

>>106019203
Nah, old web was more libertarian or even anarchist.

>>106019569
People love to larp about altnets but altnet forums and chans are mostly dead outside of drug and hacking related shit.

>>106019193 (OP)
So what if Neocities is full of cute sites like that? The real problem for me is that Neocities doesn't accept throwaway e-mail accounts for registration. And apparently even GMX isn't allowed, despite being a respectable German provider.

>>106019522
Will you guys stop pretending that the modern web is no longer free? There's literally nothing stopping you from making your own websites, using alternative search engines, etc. There's even a Youtube clone that uses the classic layout. You can live in "Wild West era" of the internet right now, you just choose not to.

>win95,98,xp,7 look
Linux with themes
>Forums
Still around
>Flip phones
Still around
>Flash
SWFchan with ruffle (even supports AS3 now)
>blog sites
Still around but sure they are rarer
>old shows
You can find them and watch them anytime you want
>old games
You can play them anytime you want

>>106019193 (OP)
>How can we get old web back?
there is no "old web", that implies technical differences, but what you're actually asking for is old netizens. it was the people and culture which defined the "old web", which is why places like neocities can't compare to geocities. it's the people who have changed

>>106019603

That's how I would describe it. Imagine what a room full of weird/autistic/antisocial/spazzy 14-35 year old white men would look like. It would be fairly anti-establishment, high freedom, high rationalism. That looks more libertarian, anarchist than anything else and that's how it was. It only looks "leftist" to some because they were critical of establishment powers like Bush and Christians. But there was literally no such thing as idpol on the early internet, in fact "no labels" was the meta. Some may also not realize how similar Democrats/Republicans were at the time so the distinction wasn't novel.

>>106019673
>There's even a Youtube clone that uses the classic layout.
i tried that and the thing i wanted to try first was to play an avgn video on it, but the cinemassacre account was blocked. sometimes the jokes write themselves

RETARDED NIGGA ALERT
RETARDED NIGGA ALERT
RETARDED NIGGA ALERT
RETARDED NIGGA ALERT
RETARDED NIGGA ALERT
WE FOUND ONE >>106019719

>>106019673
>There's literally nothing stopping you from making your own websites, using alternative search engines, etc.
Except legal liabilities there weren't there 25 years ago. Especially if you live in "developed" western countries like the US, France, Germany, etc.

>>106019771
I didn't know that, okay, pretty strange since last time I visited, it seemed to allow nearly everything.

>>106019794
What liabilities?

>>106019193 (OP)
It's not coming back. We're about to be roasted in nuclear hellfire for the banking classes, fun isn't necessary or allowed anymore

>>106019952
i visted it ages ago, years. i actually don't remember what it was called since i truly heard about it, searched for avgn, was denied and promptly forgot about it. the site looked great but what's the point of a ~2007 looking yt site if you can't watch some shitty games that suck ass?
i am aware of the apparent controversy regarding james not reviewing ghostbusters 2016, and i suppose some people are still salty that he was fucking right about it.

>>106019719
Bro that's just how I live
>Linux with themes
Check
>Forums
Where am I?
>Flip phones
not yet but maybe someday.
>Flash
Still play flash games from time to time.
>Blog sites
I know.
>old shows
Watch old toonami vhs reccordings online all the time.
>old games
Yes.

>>106019753
force people off the internet for a year or two, break down most of the modern day web and destroy massive companies like google and meta, when people come back tell them to build it back up.

>>106019719
now the hard part is getting the old communities back, that's impossible. they all moved from forums/IRC to discord and faceberg

>>106019794
just self host your own website

>>106019193 (OP)
step 1: remove google from the internet
good luck!

>>106019757
it's actually kind of wild how "this is water" we're in right now with this shit. like growing up punk rock songs were about fuck authority (fuck our parents), and now it's like stop being mean and we gotta stop bigots. i don't know how i noticed that it's just so. yeah the old internet was left sure

>>106019203
I'd rather have well-meaning, well-educated lefty activists populate the internet instead of the crypto scammers, manosphere grifters, and brown nazis that we have today.
Rightoidism is just like the modern internet: no barrier to entry, high barriers to exit, a crab bucket for insecure idiots addicted to their own misery. Give me kooky college professors happily coding in LISP instead.

>>106019203
>old web was also leftist
If old web is what leftism is then leftism is objectively better than whatever the fuck we have today.

>>106019297
Yeah man Geocities never had anything like an entire WYSIWYG editor that forced everything to have shitty sub pixel alignment all over the mother fucker. Caught you stealing valor zoomchoom.

>>106019203
>right winger is so low IQ he doesn't even begin to grasp the implications
So when will we as a society finally be ready for the conversation about IQ and its inverse correlation with conservatism?

>>106019368
>>106019397
>>106019430
we're still here

>>106020300
>leftism is objectively better than whatever the fuck we have today
always has been

>>106019673
if you have a domain self host instead. if you have a spare computer install some linux distro on it and set up nginx and letsencrypt

>>106020281
this is why we call them rage on behalf of the machine. these leftpunks are also addicted to DEI money

>>106020290
as much as i hate modern leftards i agree, but still fuck them though. old style leftists/anarchists are passive enablers of the former at the very least which means they're part of the problem. they are always fighting the """"far""""-right but suspiciously turning a blind eye to human rights abuses in shitholes like Venezuela all the time.

>>106020326
The smartest man to ever live (Elon Musk) is a conservative...

>>106020281
>and now it's like stop being mean and we gotta stop bigots
Punk has always been anti-bigotry you fucking faggot

>>106020348
>hey are always fighting the """"far""""-right but suspiciously turning a blind eye to human rights abuses in shitholes like Venezuela all the time.
You put far right in scare quotes like it's a thing that doesn't exist, and unless people care about fucking Venezuela they're not caring about the right thing? You are a mongoloid.

>>106020393
NTA but
>yeah fuck authority that doesnt let us be gay and cool!!!
Vs
>we need to stop trumpo from harming us, we the poor victims of society fighting against the systematic oppression

>>106019415
these locusts will do it wherever you give them the freedom to do it. when they become majority they start deploying censorship and never listening to their enemies. they're like muslims

>>106020411
Trump is part of the same group of people that were preventing them from being gay and cool, are you actually mentally disabled? I know you think caring about nothing and making Nancy Pelosi angry is cool (it is) but jesus Christ to hitch your wagon behind motherfucking Donald Trump just proves you're too stupid to exist.

>>106020408
no you midwit predditor, venezuela is a place that was turned to shit by leftists and is dumping violent niggers on all of the americas (that includes the US) and europe. they're like rapejeets but with aztec tier violence skills and also breed like roaches. if you don't mind being ethnically replaced in your own home like most of your kind does then you're a dysgenic retard that should never be allowed near electricity ever. the cultural framework that lets this happen is backed up by people like the locusts running neocities right now with their "muh trans right palestine ukraine blah blah blah" drivel fighting le ebil nutzies. what you call far-right is order. progress and civilization require ORDER.

>>106020465
Good bot, hit all the talking points and yet said nothing.

>>106020470
your subpar reading comprehension is not my fault, maybe reddit is more your speed.

>>106019193 (OP)
Just want Totse back.

>>106019193 (OP)
>How do we get true old web back?
Anon my selfhosted site is exactly that minimal. Just register a domain and write HTML by hand and get some old backgrounds.

https://pixelmoondust.neocities.org/archives/archivedtiles

>>106020422
The difference is
>yeah fuck that and fuck all fuck everything and we are cool
Versus
>waaah waaah hes the new hitler and we are victims we live in a society bro

Compare the TONE

>>106020422
Anon, it would be fine if it was like
>trump's a fat fuck fucking shit bomb israel we dont careeeeee
Instead of
>the oppression is killing us all AAAA

>>106019193 (OP)
You can't bring back the old web,
What you liked about it was not the aesthetics but the experience. The people on the internet back then were 99% white people from America and western Europe. Go back a bit further and it was only people who were tech savvy enough to get on the internet.

Even if you forced everyone to return to the old websites it would still be a shithole because the internet today is filled with shit people who ruin everything

>>106019193 (OP)
Unironically tendie shit
Pretendo (miiverse)
Sudomemo (flipnotes)
Maybe gamefaqs
It's all we have left

>>106019193 (OP)
Eliminate smartphones.

>>106019719
flip phones suck ass i dont get why people currently onions out about them i love old shitty tech but dumphones dont appeal to me at all

>>106019193 (OP)
Bring back desktop customization jesus christ a kid doesn't have to use your sterile shit that looks good in corporate ads.

>muh wallpaper engine
promotes anime degeneracy
>muh ricing
linux is for pedophile trannies

>>106020720
Neither to me but the option is there. There are even smart flip phones (not the foldable screen ones).
>>106020746
>anime bad
>pedos
>Tranny schizo ptsd
Why are you on this website? Genuinely asking.

>>106020339
then what the fuck do we have today if the establishment isn't far left cesspit of rainbow degeneracy?!

>>106020465
>what you call far-right is order. progress and civilization require ORDER.
exactly.
But they DO care about order... which is their OWN order...
Hence why Neocities went down so hard into the shits as it did. Rather than having it be centrist and letting people be people they turned it into a leftist hellscape...

I have been holding this back but it was mainly spearheaded by a user known as sadgrl.online who made a community called yesterweb and this community started out normal and peachy, and was a genuine oldweb revival movement but then they started letting their leftist politics get involved, first the lesbians, then the transvestites, then the GNUtards (Yes there were a lot of FSF activists there too) and they all claimed they weren't activists, weren't bullying people, but they were... they got tired of hosting a discord and decided to make a forum which didn't last for much longer as it all fell apart, ending yesterweb and leaving neocities in an absolute state.

>>106020567
/thread

>>106020793
why are you? reddit has more discussion for tranime nowadays

>>106020567
>Even if you forced everyone to return to the old websites it would still be a shithole because the internet today is filled with shit people who ruin everything
Well yeah.. I mean look at what twitter/X has done to people... look at how the modern web algorithms have divided us simply to get a rise out of us for the entertainment of the elites.

>>106020888
that's the most low iq mail of a want to be white person i've read in years

>>106020177
Which blog sites do you visit? Name some interesting ones senpai?

>>106020950
https://whitedesert.neocities.org/
https://never-obsolete.tumblr.com/
https://frutigeraeroarchive.org/
These.

>>106020898
You seem to know a lot about reddit, so maybe you should stay there

>>106020992
>makes a fair point
>attacks personally
are you mentally challenged or something?

>>106020866
When was it and how long did the community last?

>>106019193 (OP)
First OP needs to stop putting people into political boxes. One of the best things about the early internet was how a lot of sites were more focussed on the material rather than who you voted for, as opposed to today’s homogenous slop from squeezing everything together into social networking platforms.

>>106021045
it started around 2020/2021 and it died early 2023.
the first two years it was decent and did not care about anyone's political views as long as nobody was an asshole... but then it became "if your right your a nazi, get fucked" mentality...they attacked someone for calling someone retarded when the person themselves had autism, and thus, was also retarded and by their logic should have had the right to use the word and yet they still flipped their shit and ran them off the website.
It was a shame too because they had this funny satire blog going on making fun of idiots on the web.

>>106019193 (OP)
don't care
I will serve all HTML beyond initial HTTP handshake through TCP get rekt

>>106020567
You have more in common with an autistic African guy than 99% of white people. When you realize this, you'll stop seeing everything in terms of race.

>>106019203
uhh based?

>>106021060
Because back then the internet was fairly homogeneous racially and culturally which was like 90% white. So, you did not have that much fault lines to be exploited for identity politics to pour in which is the case for modern internet. Muh you are brown, muh you are a cracka, Muh you are a nigger and so on. Whatever politics did exist was ideological and libertarian like others pointed out. Identity politics was the worst thing which happened to modern internet.

>>106021106
Sad.

>>106021178
indeed. he was a little pretentious, but still funny.

>>106021149
Let's be real this identity politics bullshit is the worst thing that has ever happened to humanity as a whole not just the internet.

>>106021229
>this identity politics bullshit is the worst thing that has ever happened to humanity as a whole not just the internet.
Any idea how to rid this world of this plague?

>>106021260
>Any idea how to rid this world of this plague?
None that are practical or humane.

>>106019193 (OP)
Fire all designers and put spergs in charge.

>>106021229
>>106021260
Identity politics is important when it comes to race especially when your race is a global minority of 7%. So that aspect of identity politics which are spreading on the modern net i full heartedly support. What I don't support is identity politics based on mental illness like rgbtq+. I also don't support identity politics to be poured in special folds of internet which are meant for a specific purpose like for example the hobby boards and hobby related sites. You can do whatever you want on designated sites like xitter.

>>106020796
>then what the fuck do we have today
The same kakistocracy but with a worse signalling mechanic. Instead of performative altruism, it's now performative cruelty. It's far easier of an act, it's monetized, and the competition is bottom-feeders from all around the world. No matter how much of a chud you are, an Indian in the slums of Mumbai can out-chud you online. With rainbow-haired wokes one-upping each other, the bottom stopped at a somewhat-literate (if naïve) urban progressive. Here, there is no bottom, It's a race to the abyss.
Combine all this with a culture of grift, widespread lumpenization, and the most embarrassing cult-of-personality in history and you get a true picture of what the dark ages look like.

>>106021444
Maybe if you spent more time fucking women and less time impotently seething about trannies online you wouldn't be a 7% minority.

>>106021586
this smells zoomer-coded.

>>106021632
yes it is

>>106021541
You are brown and retarded.

>>106021693
I'm still whiter than you Muhamed.

>>106021586
i don't care to look up how leftist and insane they are but their websites are cute so I'll give them a pass

>>106021586
This is very cute and actually millennial coded (by vibe, not literally).

>>106021884
Leftists actually do stuff. And if a right-wing alternative were to be made, it'd just turn into an ugly mess of nazist memes and frogposting. I'll take the cuteness, thanks.

>>106020866
their order is only enforced to people they view as the privileged class: white heterosexual men with pro-social behavior. it is an order that in unwritten fashion punishes effort and improvement and rewards counter-social behavior like leeching on others and being a nuisance in general. they don't care much about violent criminals or take overs of houses, they say it's part of daily life but the moment you step out of line from their opinions they're going to maul you like dogs that haven't eaten in weeks. you can see this exactly with Debian: they trannified it and now a convicted pedo is allowed to run free among them and represent them. it's impressive how they just don't give a fuck about rapists in their proximity but will absolutely hunt you down for wrongthink. as for neocities it's very sad. it was a medium to recreate the dynamism of the old internet and they immediately turned it into a genderspecial collection of bloated "about ME" pages with links to leftist fediverse instances with ZERO space for dissent. if you want to make a static website, self host or buy a VPS if you're under CGNAT. that's what i did instead of relying on neocities exactly because of what you described. they can't deplatform you from your own servers and if you have a decent domain registrar they can't use it as an attack vector too.

>>106021106
that's the traditional leftist tranny infestation pipeline: they take over a neutral space that lets them be and it eventually becomes their space. you don't give leftists an INCH.

>>106020567
>The people on the internet back then were 99% white people from America and western Europe.
guess where 97% of the dangerhair DEI soldiers come out from now, idiot.

>>106021884
it's better but not by much...

>>106019193 (OP)
By making websites in plain HTML and hosting them. And by visiting similar websites made by others.

>>106023381
But that's boring. The truth is that the "old web" was boring. People want to be stimulated, and if you think you're any different, you're fooling yourself.

>>106022726
>that's the traditional leftist tranny infestation pipeline: they take over a neutral space that lets them be and it eventually becomes their space. you don't give leftists an INCH.
yeah but the same applies to the nazi bar

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106019193 (OP) (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106024009
i'll take a look at your fucking site

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106024125
THIS MAN HAS BEEN CERTIFIED TO BE HIDING BEHIND PRECISELY 74 PROXIES

>>106019193 (OP)
What's stopping you from... Fucking making a site on neocities in the style you want?
What's stopping you from fucking looking for sites in the style you want?

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106024125
>entire website screeches cargo cult from the shitty stat counters to displaying execution time and queries
>8 active users
>New members: Cobson
>the few posts I've read are only seething about zoomers instead of discussing anything they claim to be about
Yeah no thanks. You can keep your failed discord groomer refugee to yourself.

>>106024177
>if you be a slut you are unrapeable

>>106024213
>asks for an old internet site
>doesn't like numbers
>doesn't like zoomies being called out for what they are: larpers
>is obviously a zoomie

ZOOMIES BTFO

>>106024276
>ZOOMERS ZOOMERS ZOOMERS
Thanks for confirming my suspicion that you and your groomer buddies got kicked off of discord and are now mad none of your victims are following you to your meme site. Really reminds me of that lain larp cult a few years back.

>>106024276
get a grip kiddo

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106020490
Nta. I agree with what you said on some points, but you talk like a perpetual 4chan browsing /Pol/tard.

That's the issue with more far right supporters and reactionaries, you are not palatable or presentable as an actual political party to the common people who may support your beliefs if given time to digest the info. Your incredibly Internet culture cloaked vocabulary and 7 layers of irony used to describe your talking points is an anathema to Joe Dirt who does plumbing.

You also try to browbeat people into submission by calling them retards and other things. You catch more flies with honey than vinegar.

>Inb4 who cares what normies think
You. You should. A society exists because and for its people. Every man ideally plays his role for the betterment of his society, from the lowliest assembly worker to the President.

Mussolini's Fascist Manifesto is freely available and short. It expresses some insight on how a party in the interest of its nation can act, and provides the pure idea of fascism that hasn't been bastardized.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
>tranny janny has deleted this more than 3 times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shilling doing nothing except for making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106024276
>doesn't like zoomies being called out for what they are: larpers
>If your username is something like "tonydanza42" or "xXxEpicGamerxXx", you’re getting banned on sight.

>>106024469
>self doxxing retards banned
>worst case of zoomie nostalgia larp banned

what's the problem here

>>106020490
Nta. I agree with what you said on some points, but you talk like a perpetual 4chan browsing /Pol/tard.

That's the issue with more far right supporters and reactionaries, you are not palatable or presentable as an actual political party to the common people who may support your beliefs if given time to digest the info. Your incredibly Internet culture cloaked vocabulary and 7 layers of irony used to describe your talking points is an anathema to Joe Dirt who does plumbing.

You also try to browbeat people into submission by calling them retards and other things. You catch more flies with honey than vinegar.

>Inb4 who cares what normies think
You. You should. A society exists because and for its people. Every man ideally plays his role for the betterment of his society, from the lowliest assembly worker to the President.

Mussolini's Fascist Manifesto is freely available and short. It expresses some insight on how a party in the interest of its nation can act, and provides the pure idea of fascism that hasn't been bastardized.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
>tranny janny has deleted this more than 3 times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shilling doing nothing except for making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106024520
>>106024551
Rotten 2016 election tourism culture

>>106024573
I think it's a bot, it didn't react to the image, just the post, so it isn't even a particularly good bot.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
>tranny janny has deleted this more than 3 times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shilling doing nothing except for making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106024620
Probably it is, and his idea is the antithesis of the thread, an election tourist idea of "oldfag"

>>106022140
This is also what I think. Chuds haven't had a charming creation since some of the particularly cute Apus.

>>106024305
>the worst thing he could pull out is "you aren't using discord"
>doesn't even refute the claim that he is indeed a zoomie
what other hurtful words do you have up your sleeve


>>106024662
WE worship Yuji Sakai, Zanno, who is GOD of the oldfags and the one who maintains his crown in /bant/ and /vrpg/.

Cyberix represents the 2001 Hell Forum spirit.

>>106024703
>zoomer reading comprehension
>continue projection
jej

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
>tranny janny has deleted this more than 3 times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shilling doing nothing except for making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106024662
Like I said, reeks of cargo culting. A piss poor imitation of perceived rituals with not the faintest understanding of why those processes were there in the first place.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
>tranny janny has deleted this more than 3 times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shilling doing nothing except for making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

why is the janny so angry buh

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
>tranny janny has deleted this more than SEVEN times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shills doing nothing except making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106022140
theres nothing leftist about any of these sites. and sharty isn't right-wing either, they are some kind of underage radfem prudes.

>>106019203
This is true and many people don’t want to acknowledge it. Though it was a different type of leftist. Consensus liberal rather than Reddit rationalist or woke civilizational and racial suicidal death cult leftist. 4yydg

>>106019193 (OP)
You share web links with your friends.

>>106025084
Neither sides had the nancy pelosi, or "think about the children" aura that both left and right today have
Old internet was leftist in a rebel sense, now both leftists and rightists suck authority's balls, even anarchists love the "good corporations"

>>106024899
>buh
>>106024276
>zoomies
>zoomie
>>106024520
>zoomie
It's actually embarassing how zoomers constantly out themselves and then think we don't know they're zoomers.

>>106024899
IRC coordination most likely.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>tranny janny has deleted this more than SEVEN times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shills doing nothing except making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread while the thread being derailed by politkz? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106025154
>no one borrows lingo, NO ONE EVER DOES THAT
>I am very smart

>>106025248
Since that post is just another admission that I was right I'm just going to ask: Are you really that much of a zoomer that you also think we don't know you're samefagging?

>>106025248
>if he types anything at all, it means he admits he is a [insert made up boogeyman]
actual mental illness on full display

>>106025345
>retarded zoomer is so triggered he can't see who he's replying to through the tears

>>106025345
meant for >>106025248

>>106025248
meant for>>106025306

what the fuck is going on lol

>>106025360
>"youre angry ahahaha"
>tranny says right after screaming at the top of their lungs about zoomers being bad

>>106025345
>>106025401
>>106025438
>>106025459
>y-y-y-yoU're ss-s-eething o-okay!?
>t. clearly not a seething projecting zoomer

>>106025158
>IRC coordination most likely
>tranny janny has deleted this more than SEVEN times
>counter-shills doing nothing except making this post stronger
what the fuck is this schizo talking about

>>106025248
>>106025306
>>106025345
>>106025360
obsessed with mi o algo

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522

>>106021586 ?

>>106025438
is this your thread ?mode=topic&id=151

>tranny janny has deleted this more than TEN times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shills doing nothing except making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106025514
Just ignore the schizo, he's having a melty

>>106025459
go back to plebbit to learn how to greentext properly baby

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106025514

>>106025438
is this your thread ?mode=topic&id=151
Check the archives.

>tranny janny has deleted this more than TEN times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>tranny jannies deleting almost immediately, red alert
>counter-shills doing nothing except making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106025576
reddit meme
>>106025438
is this your thread ?mode=topic&id=151


>tranny janny has deleted this more than TEN times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again
>counter-shills doing nothing except making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

It appears that this thread has been derailed. why? It could've been something great.
There's nothing left for anons in the modern web. Creating a proper space is the only solution.

>>106025706
>why?
Because some zoomer faggot wanted to shill his failed groomer refuge.

>>106025564
>hurr durr we hate da zoomers xddddd
>forum is full of threads about roblox

>>106025564
>internal server error

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522

>tranny janny has deleted this more than TEN times and all i need to do is click the funny button again to post it again

>counter-shills doing nothing except making this post stronger

tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>Charlestown, KN
Why is his domain registered in the most random country ever in the world

>>106025953
Probably used some meme registrar that got shilled to him.

>>106025999
The most based anti-zoomer oldfag registrar

>>106019193 (OP)
>reee stop using colors stop being creative
Doesn't sound like you want to old web back

>>106024172
Because he's too retarded and just wants to feel superior without doing or accomplishing anything.

>xonotic
I think it's obvious who's responsible for this

>>106026060
>the new sign up names
fucking kek

>>106026147
my fucking sides

>>106021008
nigga you are just strange

>>106020746
you can rice on windows

>>106020653
All of them are populated by leftist trannies, its indeed over.

>>106019193 (OP)
You have to convince other non-leftists to make websites
You should also have one yourself

>>106026060
>the faggot owner is now impotently seething in his own forum at the signups
I thought you wanted new members?

>>106020653
>Sudomemo (flipnotes)
This is really cool, I'm glad the youths are having fun.

>>106019794
You don’t need an Impressum if you’re not selling yourself or anything, I think

Seems like the schizo spam stopped. Man imagine the height of your le rebuilding le old web forum is three anons calling you a faggot and getting banned twenty times while having a melty in this thread kek

>>106019334
>>106019258
>>106019277
when are you troons roping?
soon i hope

>>106024420
>erm we're popular chuddie
>loses election to fat orange retard
ok

>>106026475
the building something thats worth logging into forum post is a revelation about the guys mental state
genuinely mentally ill
>i will build this website into it's own network that will be totally shut off from the internet and people won't be allowed to use anything else under my dictat- guidance AND STOP TALKING ABOUT ROBLOX PLEASE
if i wasn't genuinely concerned i would be laughing my fucking ass off

>>106019193 (OP)
Whatever chance there was for this was killed by LLMs.
Besides exerting a de facto DDOS on hosting providers, the incentive is largely gone for creators, knowing that whatever they produce is just going to be used as training data for Sam Altman and the rest to monetize.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106026573
Yeah because people only stopped having personal websites after LLMs hit the mainstream. Can you terminally obsessed faggots just suicide bomb some datacenter so we don't have to hear your constant bitching and moaning about LLMs every time people make the mistake of entering the same room as you?

>>106026573
Also LLMs don't respect robots.txt and disguise their traffic by using residential IP address proxy services.
That's why you, a human, browsing 4chan on a cable or fiber internet in the US, keep getting captchas and
>check this box to indicate you're human
nonsense, on other sites too.
Users install bandwidth sharing apps for cash or crypto, and these apps form the backbone of the residential IP address proxy industry, and the end result is we all get treated like bots when we're just doing our shitposting.

>>106026594
spoke too soon the mentally ill is back

>>106026594
>muh unraidable
you're unraidable because no one gives enough of a shit to make more than one account nigger

>>106026509
Try going back and reading. Carefully.

Then take a minute, ideally five, to think out what you're feeling. Then you should compose your response.

>>106026594
>This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>>?mode=topic&id=150

>>106026648
I accept your concession.

>>106026728
Have a good day and God bless.

>>106026721
>>106026639
>>106026619
QRD on whatever that site was?
Is it just some tryhard spamming their own pet project?

>>106026825
It's just genuine mental illness. Gets shilled here every now and then as le old web that is made to trigger zoomers or some bullshit but is painfully obviously run by zoomers.
Half the threads are talking about Roblox, the other half is just seething at zoomers. And if you remove the dozens of spam accounts it has literally 9 users.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x.net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106026825
Its literally just a schizo spamming because he's an incel, please don't (you) him or he'll keep whining. Just ignore.

>>106019193 (OP)
>>106019673
>>106019522
>>106019261
tranny janny deleting the only real helpful post in this entire thread? unsurprising, here we go again:

cy-x net is your only solution and this is very simple
Zoomies can't into properly reviving the web. Take this site which is managed by people who actually know what oldfaggotry is like. 'Unraidable'.

This is the kind of autism that I appreciate:
>?mode=topic&id=150

>You can't just pretend that you're 'nostalgic for the old internetz' when you sit on Discord as your primary online communication vector, paying for Nitro (and subsequently rewarding them for their centralization and privacy violating efforts) and only consume your content through massive conglomerates who will never go back to their olden ways..
>And additionally, just to add onto that, why do these people think these large companies even cared about them in the first place? They were bad then and they will be bad now, with plenty of evidence and simple research that someone can find on their own to prove it. However, Zoomers will not know this information in the first place, because they were small children.

>They will not care about that information, either, because LARPING matters more than being accurate to the source material, as long as they can be given affirmation from others for it.
>They aren't nostalgic for any sense of community or gathering, they're nostalgic for when they were small children looking at shiny web icons. They don't appreciate the technological designs behind it nor do they desire to actually drop modern ones for the ones of old; They can only see the very surface of what they're after.

>>106027204
you do realize the more you spam this the less likely people are to even look at your site?

>>106027234
I only repost when it gets deleted. There has never been an instance where more than one of these posts were active at the same time. Infact, this post was quite on topic for this thread until it was unfairly removed. I consider this an example of double standards, especially when >>106021586 gets to persist when all that post consists of is a link and a link only. There is no content in the post asides from the link.

>>106027290
you made it a point to say how many dozen times your post got deleted by the mods, take the hint and fuck off

>>106027204
buy an ad, i've seen this site more than once on this board which is too many

>>106019193 (OP)
>How can we get old web back?
Let that thang go bruh it's over

This is literally what it was like. Obnoxious design and focus on personality. Why is this still a discussion that warrants it's own thread?

>>106027419
Continuing; YOU should be GLAD the kids are still doing shit like that. But you're not. You never are. It's never enough.

>>106024305
>Really reminds me of that lain larp cult a few years back.
the fuck happened a few years back?
and what happened with >>106024276 while i was gone what did I miss??

>>106025084
>Though it was a different type of leftist. Consensus liberal rather than Reddit rationalist or woke civilizational and racial suicidal death cult leftist
I wish we didn't have this modern day Redditor cuck and woke race suicide cult shit anymore...
It makes me sick honestly.

>>106026068
>Doesn't sound like you want to old web back
I like colors, I just don't like the modern left hyper furfag hellscape...

>>106026475
>Man imagine the height of your le rebuilding le old web forum is three anons calling you a faggot and getting banned twenty times while having a melty in this thread kek
OP here... funniest shit of my life. of course they'd call me retarded, but that's just 4chan.

>>106026609
no no anon he has got a point...
Yeah personal sites died long before LLMs and such but afterwards I dare would say it has made it hard to exist anywhere online.

>>106028471
A (hopefully) permanent stalemate between Cyberixanon and 4chan moderators. They stopped deleting, and thus he stopped posting.

>>106028610
What's stopping someone from piloting an LLM and creating thousands of 'personal sites' just by telling it to act human and training it on pre-existing human-made ones from Neocities?
What's stopping someone from piloting it to make posts on a forum, or post chat messages in-game?

The solution to this will and always be gatekeeping.

>>106019193 (OP)
damn that theme looks nice, can you post your setup?

>>106028682
>The solution to this will and always be gatekeeping.
yeah that's what I am thinking with AI... gatekeep that shit.
Don't stop using it as AI is great for generating big tiddie mommies, but not when scraping man made works and such.

>>106019193 (OP)
Every niche interest or hobby gets overrun by trannies. It's over.

>>106028709
Sure!!
I will make a new thread.

>>106028720
>It's over
>letting them
Why do you all hate yourselves?

>>106028773
41% ?

>>106028798
Unlike you, I'm not going to just sit there and allow them to take my enjoyment of things away from me.

>>106028851
i don't, nta

>>106019719
>SFWchan
Okay, but what about NSFW old newgrounds stuff? I remember a few:

>Hentai Keepy Uppy
Game where you're supposed to not let a bouncing ball fall to the bottom with your mouse, but you could jsut hold "tab" and it focused the ball, hence counted as moved the mouse to it, so you could win easily and get gallery mode

>some blowjob game
Forgot the game, but was pretty much standard buy upgrades (can take longer dick, skills, etc) and the anime girl would suck cock in the bathroom. It was really fun, for some reason

>somename's big quest for hentai (or adventure, or smth)
Top down rpg where you walked around town, talked to npcs, did some fetch quests and ended up as the photographer for a nude mag, but mostly you'd collect pics from the girls by doing stupid fetch quests and everything required you to walk slowly across the map. Had several sequels.

it still exists
come to irc

irc.rizon.net
##/vt/

>>106029847
post a screenshot of chat right now

>>106029851
what you are requesting is absolutely satanic

>>106029862
looks mid also linking to images instead of just using matrix lmao

>>106029862
I never understood the things like operator, half-operator, voice, mod, jannie, sysop. Looked like dumb power tripping with no purpose.

>>106029897
most of the power tripping channels eventually die out or fracture

most of the time its just there to prevent spammers desu

>>106029911
>most of the time its just there to prevent spammers desu
It ws the intended function? But how did it work? What is even a "half--operator"? I never found docs explaining this shit, and asking power trippers never got me anywhere but out.

>>106019193 (OP)
We need something like neocities but federated. Like I want to make my own website but I'd rather not do it on neocities.
>>106019203
Leftism used to be more than a meme about being butthurt over feefees
>>106019380
This lol
Conservatism is always just liberalism 10 years behind. Even the "alt-right" and many self identifying nazis are just paleocons.

>>106030196
You mean, like hosting your own? Maybe i2p? I never understood DNS, but is it possible to have a normal internet name that "redirects" to your page on some i2p in-portal?

>>106030223
Maintaining your own website is a lot of time and money for a simple HTML page.
Federated communities will be cheaper, more secure and foster their own cultures which would generate more growth.

>>106030298
But I'm pretty sure there is a simple webserver on i2p that's just upload it and be done, if you just want static neocities level sites. The inportal could act as the "federators": I could go to friendica.com/anonsite or mastodon.com/anonsite or i2pinportal.com/anonsite and get to your site. What do you need to get started? Some normalfag friendly interface? Wouldn't that just flood it with shit normalfaggotry?

>>106030323
It's just too esoteric. People have tried making an "alternative world wide web" before and it's gone nowhere. Remember gemini?
i2p is like between Gemini and Tor. We're already up against the network effect. Portals are a hack, not a solution. Don't overengineer it, just make a website where people can upload assets and edit HTML files.

>>106019193 (OP)
I don't remember it looking like that.
>>106019203
It was JWZ/RMS leftest which is far right these days.

>>106030385
>Remember gemini?
Gemini is intentionally shit. It tries to stay bad because le bad is better. I think gopher+ was much better: you take something minimal that works and carefully adds just enough to make it better, instead of adding everything big corps push, like happened on regular internet. Sure, maybe someday forward it falls down the same slippery slope, but then we try again. Nothing was made to last forever. Chasing that dream is futile.

>i2p is like between Gemini and Tor.
I don't see i2p as close to gemini. If I recall correctly, gemini is text olny while i2p had regular html sites with images and stuff that looked like neocities era stuff. Plus you could do custom server stuff if you wanted to.

>just make a website where people can upload assets and edit HTML files.
And this I don't understand. So you want.... neocities?
>no but federated
You can add links to anywhere on the entire web on your neocities. If a few people run neocities server software (which I believe was on github), boom, now you have multiple "vendors" to chose from. Want to federate with anoneocities.com/opisfaggot? Just <a href> to it.

>>106030451
Yes literally just host multiple neocities. Except I think the interface for neocities is kind of gay and hoping someone would redesign it.

>>106030519
https://github.com/neocities/neocities
Knock yourself out.

Why can't someone make an AI model that takes modern websites and reformats them to look like old 90s websites?
You could do this with a chatbot.

>>106030577
>View > Page style > No Style

>>106030635
Too early 90s, we need stuff like this

>>106030640
SOUL

>>106030451
>[Gemini] tries to stay bad because le bad is better.
It tries to stay non-extensible because HTTP+HTML is extensible and now you either need to be a megacorp or a windmill-tilter like http://twitter.com/awesomekling to make something that will view the majority of websites out there
>If I recall correctly, gemini is text olny
Not quite. Gemini (the protocol) will serve up whatever it’s directed to. You can link to images or movies or disk images or websites or whatever from a gemtext page. Gemini also supports proper MIME types, unlike Gopher.
>>106030385
>Remember gemini?
We’re still here, brother
>>106030298
People will host your website for free
Your time is still your time, though. If you don’t want to spend time making a website, then you don’t want to spend time making a website.

>>106029897
>operator
can ban people from the chat room and give people voice
>half-operator
no idea, must be some rizon-specific thing
>voice
can talk in channels where people are muted-by-default
in channels where this isn’t the case, then it’s just a power trip
>mod
no idea
>jannie
4chan terminology
>sysop
someone who has power over all channels on an IRC network, not just one

>>106020498
Huff Raid
I spent an hour trying to find my old username in that picture. Got a higher resolution photo? I was the third post in the legendary Jenkem thread (of which only a couple photos survive - there were more graphic depictions)
Back then 4chan was a place where we discussed raids and shared photos of Julianna Rose Mauriello without using our usernames, much like Discord is used now.

>>106030770
Thanks. Are there any other terms I forgot? Oh, also, can you explain NameServ/NickServ/etc was there a ChannelOps? I don't remember. I always thought it was overly complex and searching and asking back then never got me anywhere. 4chan is more fucking friendly than them, thanks.

>>106030845
>NickServ
IRC doesn’t have any kind of way to ensure that you keep the nick you usually have/want
services like NickServ and ChanServ were created and used on many (but not all!) networks to let people register nicknames and forcibly change the nicknames of other people who had taken ‘your’ nickname
if you want a ‘full’ introduction have a look at https://libera.chat/guides/basics
most of what IRC networks have, they have
EFNet doesn’t have a lot of this so it’s really fucking wild
also you’ll be connecting and showing your (home) IP address to everyone in every channel you join unless you get a cloak on whatever network you show up on, so beware

>>106030880
>if you want a ‘full’ introduction have a look at https://libera.chat/guides/basics
>
THANK YOU, bro. I never found such comprehensible manual back in my day.

>>106030577
Finally a good use for AI.

if you want to just start making a website, there’s a bunch of collected links at https://portal.mozz.us/gemini/gemini.circumlunar.space/users/adiabatic/words/computing/internet/nice-personal-website/ that will show you how and where to get started
you could make a page in half an hour and spend another half an hour figuring out how to upload it somewhere
a third half hour to figure out if you want to get a domain name and host it someplace with an independent URL
Just make sure you have all your backups on your own computer in case your site gets nuked for whatever reason
You do have backups of your own files, right anon?

>>106030935
Now convince millions of others to do that.

>>106030758
I'm just saying there's much more to worry about with hosting your own website. Like security, anti-ddos, SSL, configuring the server and so on.

>>106030968
If someone else is hosting your website then you don’t need to worry about security or TLS or setting up Apache as long as you’re just uploading static pages to Apache
if you’re going the landchad route then you will
you don’t need to go the landchad route _first_

>>106030961
If I can convince a couple of guys to start a website every time this kind of thread rolls around…
…and then once every three threads, one of the guys sticks with it for a couple years…
…then that might be something
but saying “hey, making a website isn’t that hard, here’s how these other people do it” is more productive than sneeding that normal people don’t make indie websites anymore

>>106030640
Looks like garbage made for children. Nobody needs this.

>>106031014
It’s a Fox Kids page, anon. It’s literally for children. What are you really complaining about?

>>106030996
It is wishful thinking. I understand the desire, but without having some kind of nexus for people to spread their sites, it will fail.
I think those already exist, it's called "oldweb" or something.
Theoretically if you get enough people together you can start an old fashioned web-chain. No need to show up at the top of search results.

>>106031023
Haven't been to Activision since the SOF Platinum patch, but that looks depressing.

>>106031027
webrings still exist
they didn’t die, they just got mogged by other discovery mechanisms
but they’re as good as they ever were
https://envs.net/
https://static.quest
https://meta-ring.hedy.dev/

>>106031083
What is /g/'s webring? Getting listed on /g/ good sites?

>>106031114
you could make this yourself with just CGI

>>106019193 (OP)
Old web was a mess of colors and slop. Amongst the sea of useless websites there would be a handful of good websites.

Wanting the 'old web' and disliking websites that are basically diaries or simply to test HTML skills is a contradiction.

>>106019673
A few years ago you could use cock.li accounts to make Neocities websites, I still have a couple of them floating around. The issue is that they got flooded with spam and CSAM sites, so eventually they had to drop all non-normalfag email providers.

>>106019203
based Richard Dawkins OWNING the Christians and Muslims with SCIENCE and REASON!

too bad they cancelled him for not loving trannies enough.

>>106019203
yes, back then the left was pro free speech and anti corporations. they changed.

>>106021106
>the first two years it was decent
There was a thread about it in 2021 about how it was a leftist shithole that banned people

>>106031655
You: https://files.catbox.moe/3orlm6.jpg

>>106031965
you mad.

>>106019193 (OP)
Ok I tried out that ai thing for the first time now, used chatgp to build a html site for neocities so I'm doing my part. It even helped me make the site /g/-friendly with a lot of accessibility tweaks.

>>106019193 (OP)
let me try to explain it for you 4chan drones:
first we have the free internet, the one human made that was not centralized.
then we have the modern internet, we know how it is, now, we take people, actual brainwhased people from the modern internet and try to mix them with the old internet, what is the result?
well, we get this, a mixture of the freedom of the old internet and all it's cons, like limited static websites, with modern mentality, like politic bullshit, sexuality bullshit, and such from the modern garbagenet.
You can't just, expect people to magically stop thinking like modern people being in an old environment.

>>106019203
>old web was also [insert hegelian dialectic here]
It's incredible how easy it is to control you subhumans.

>>106019193 (OP)
isn't there some crypto scam like icp or ipfs that promised a separate internet?

>>106029422
>>SFWchan
>Okay, but what about NSFW
NTA, but it's not SFW but SWF - as in Shockwave Flash.
Pretty sure whatever the old smut you've watched or played, somebody (re)uploaded the .swf of it there.

>also rip /f/ ;_;

>>106019203
also ..
I'm on the left myself and describe today's left as temu-left.
00s the left wasn't dominant - it wasn't socially 'cool'.
In the last 20 years, being left-wing has become a trend that you go along with to be cool and ‘smart’. Not out of conviction that comes from your own intense thought process.
Even the older left-wing elites have adapted to this in order to instrumentalize the momentum for personal power. Instead of describing social processes and working with reality, it has degenerated into a juggernaut that has the moral integrity of the USSR.

>>106019193 (OP)
I wonder how many posts in this thread are made by bots.

>>106019326
No there's no hope because everyone is a narcissist so the idea of doing something small that only they or a couple friends might see is foreign to them. You can say the same thing about things like Youtube where in the early days people just made a video without thinking about money or attention at all. No one made Neocities sites to make money and this filters all Gen Alpha and Zoomers.

>>106030451
it's weird how an open web turned out to be worse in creating a corporate hellhole than the closed source Gopher that was derrided at the time for demanding money for the server. Good guy closed source, after all?

>>106033548
This.

>>106030519
I took a look at neocities. Besides free hosting, it offers some SNS shit, like profile pages and notifications if your 'friends' updated their sites. You can like these updates or comment or them or something.

We can't give these kind of SNS upvotes attention whoring tools to random people and then expect them to refrain from modern leftist thinking. If /g/ is too make a federated neocities, it would have to cut that down to... the bare essential web server? Again, how is "federated web" not just the regular web, but you steer clear of stupid people? In the end it's going to be like some digital Amish: the world is turning to shit all around you but you keep to your lane and ignore it.

>>106036889
See another reason why even though this hypothetical federated platform would be like neocities we should just start from scratch.
It is the regular web, and I don't believe in "steer clear of stupid people". The design of the platform should encourage it's users to behave a certain way. In this case I think we should just start with the bare minimum, static HTML and asset hosting, have an interface for editing HTML files, put user domains on a subdomain and thats it. This is different than an outright webserver because you don't provide hosting for non-essential files that can violate security or privacy. You're not giving the user access to do anything but upload assets and HTML files.

>>106019203
A 90s leftist would be considered far right by today standards

>>106037694
>who cares what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms
WOW, there's a lot to unpack here. Only two? Who decides the age at which they're adults? And even then, you want to hide them in their closets? You disgunsting REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>106037053
I'm still fuzzy on the actual requirements for the system. Sometimes I think you're talking about something that already exists by the truckload, and it has a technical bar to entry so it keeps normalfags and their tribalism drama away, or I think you're talking about something else that already exists but is normalfag friendly and got turned into a cesspool of modern shit.

>I don't believe in "steer clear of stupid people".
I make a site, add links to people I know aren't fuckers, if i want to. If they begin being fuckers I remove the link. And never put anything on it that could backlash IRL, like job related or otherwise. Like old timey opsec of no real name and stuff. Would keep me clear of stupid people, no?

>>106019203
old web was old leftist, not whatever the hell it started morphing into around occupy wall street
>>106031711
this

>>106020422
Trump isn't preventing anyone from being, or even acting gay. Conferences were full of fags and YMCA was the recurring anthem of the campaign. They just don't want it taught to children and they don't want governments forcing people to allow men into women's spaces. Also possibly repeal gay marriage as that was forced in through the courts. If people really want gay marriage they can have a referendum but even California didn't want that when it was tried and support varies wildly even among it's supposed benefactors. Old internet culture was about increasing choice, not forcing degeneracy let alone ban any form of criticism. Most people still believed the whole holocaust story and that created a strong cultural distaste for anything approaching 'book burning'.

>>106019719
>Linux Windows themes
Tech equivelent of trooning out
>Forums
Are any of them active?
>Flip phones
Marketed toward children and old people and none of them run android making it unviable for a productive member of society (trademark)
>Flash
rip /f/
>blog sites
Everyone uses Xitter now, no one will go out of their way to read some guy's blog
>old shows
Eventually you will run out and newslop is rarely good
>old games
Are any of them active? Half life mods are good ig

>>106039004
>active
>t. zoomzoom
Old games have no such thing as a need for an "active" community. They had a single player campaign, which was usually the main focus, then multiplayer came as an after thought, if it all. Quake3 design for multilpayer first was cancer.

>>106039045
Except fightan games, and other local multiplayer, which, again, don't need an "active community", just you and your lil bro.

>>106039045
I SAID HALF LIFE MODS ARE GOOD IG
Millenials actually think zoomers don't know about single player games.

>>106019203
I have anti-woke fatigue.

>>106039086
Ok, what active community do you need to have fun with single player games, ffs?

>>106023616
>nazi bar
What's a nazi?

>>106039186
It's a place you go to have a few drinks.

How the fuck did Chris-chan host and register his domains for free while i have to pay like 40 bucks a year for one I'm interested in.

It's called nomad network and it is sophisticated and cultured

>>106039673
I really liked that map. What char is that green circle marker?

>>106019203
2000s leftism != 2020s leftism
desu