They seem to be somewhat economical with the truth of the matter:

https://www.instagram.com/p/DMjRl4CPE0z/?hl=en

>>106032868 (OP)
If the breech only contains users from pre-February 2024, does that mean that the firebasestorage bucket has been sitting open on the internet since that time and has had god knows how many people access it in the last year and a half? Its only because this breech was widely posted that they even knew it occurred.

>>106032868 (OP)
>unauthorized access
i cant imagine this is an accurate phrasing considering there was no authorization required to access the images

>>106032868 (OP)
Additional link, their full FAQ on the matter:

https://www.teaforwomen.com/cyberincident

>>106032868 (OP)
>please take a selfie that will check your age and we will delete it immediately
>haha no actually we store everything for years

>>106032938
these women will sue and it will be the most beautiful thing this year

Why no mention of the geo locations attached to everything?

>>106032868 (OP)
Their privacy policy explicitly states that verification pictures are deleted immediately after user verification. Why were they storing these pictures for more than a year-and-a-half then?

>>106032910
>does that mean that the firebasestorage bucket has been sitting open on the internet since that time
yes, it does. it has been accessible the entire time except nobody had tried to access it until recently.

>>106032938
going by what i've read elsewhere they were forbidden to collect ID after 2023 and kept collecting it anyway until last year. and they're also downplaying the severity of the hack. everyone who sent in a copy of their ID has had their names, addresses etc. doxxed. funny how they left out the most important part and decided to lie about everything else.

>>106032998
yeah, they're nothing more than incompetent and disgusting liars.

>90% of the leechers are indian
we're gonna see some shit

>>106032868 (OP)
>>106032930
Then why are there attachments from the "chat" API endpoint that were clearly uploaded in the current year?

`chats\a981e683-7618-4bed-a1d2-38e554e95ba1_c89f9735-3eeb-4360-95d2-38c11ed7e8ab`

Right, only women's pictures and IDs matter. Not the database doxxing men.

>>106033246
>Then why are there attachments from the "chat" API endpoint that were clearly uploaded in the current year?
they're lying about everything - basically. sean cook, the retarded fucking moron that put no effort into creating and securing this trash, knows he's in a world of trouble.

>>106032868 (OP)
>These photos can in no way be linked to posts within Tea
Yes they can. Picture filenames are ID tokens from the app. You use the token instead username and should open the corresponding user.
If that works this is certified written by jeets and niggers.

>>106032868 (OP)
>grotesque GRID-riddle faggot CEO lying through his cock sucking teeth
i hate women but this guy and every other technigger needs to be hanged dead on live tv.

>>106032910
>does that mean that the firebasestorage bucket has been sitting open on the internet since that time
yes
this is the only PUBLIC breach people found out about

>>106032945
If their legal protection department is anything like their Asset protections, it will be glorious indeed.

>>106032868 (OP)
>Verifying your age is easy! Just take a quck selfie and we will estimate your age from that!
>OF COURSE we won't keep your selfie for longer than we need! And if we do, OF COURSE we wouldn't keep it in a publicly accessible database! And if we did, OF COURSE we would delete that database the moment it becomes obsolete! How dumb do you think we are? We are working with the most trusted security experts!

>>106033331
he looks AI generated

wheres the leak info, i want to see it

>>106032868 (OP)
How was this app supposed to work? You took a photo of your boyfriend and upload it there along with a review, that's it? Isn't that a privacy violation? I wouldn't be ok with having a review of myself there, even if it was a good one.

>>106033464
>>>/pol/511313558

>>106033411
Which makes me think, could someone theoretically make a similar female-only app, and then accidentally leave the users' data exposed to the general public? Sort of like a honeypot for feminists?

>>106033479
Usually they keep the data for themselves and rich pervert friends, but yeah, it happens all the time.

>>106033478
It was first leaked on reddit. Stop blaming /pol/ for everything based and redpilled.

>>106033478
based, ty

>>106033443
he looks like a skin suit wearing fag demon straight from hell.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/1m93vbh/women_dating_safety_app_tea_breached_users_ids/

its funny seeing the seeth
half the comments are saying that they personally would never trust an app like this and the other half are saying that doxing women for doxing men is evil

>>106033331
these losers of society only give a shit until their meme startup is alive and then they bail and claim no responsibility for it. even more horrifying is this:
>Founder Sean Cook launched Tea after witnessing his mother’s terrifying experience with online dating—not only being catfished but unknowingly engaging with men who had criminal records.
so... you'd think this retarded fucking faggot would have taken the safety of women he's advocating for seriously. nope. did nothing of the sort. literally fed them to the wolves because he didn't want to spend money on security or just didn't give a fuck - just a grift. either way it's a horrifying result and this guy needs to be held responsible for it.

>>106032979
I honestly have no idea if they're rug sweeping or haven't figured it out. The API it was scraped from is still open right now so either they haven't figured it out or they decided it's not a big deal.

>>106033572
they're a bunch of sad compulsive liars that simply don't care. i don't think it's much more than that to be honest. if you only knew just how little these tech bros losers know about anything. the only thing they know how to do without a financial adviser holding their hand is hitting up the phone book in their iphone to call their cocaine dealer for an 8-ball that's only 10% pure.

>>106032910
What makes it worse is that they didn't delete the data after 1.5 years.

just hit me that the whole lime green background aesthetic is them coasting off the whole "brat" thing from a year or two ago. everything about this app was designed to psychologically influence women to be on their worst behavior

>>106033563
wtf is that css

>storing the api key to a public database in plain text

>>106032868 (OP)
Is this what bursts the AI bubble?

Stop bullying poor women, you pathetic incelts.

bait post above me dni

If this was pre Feb 2024 does it mean the app wasn't vibe coded and just regular old incompetence?

>>106032868 (OP)
How is that site even allowed to exist in the first place. This whole idea seems retarded and malicious.

>>106034066
>If this was pre Feb 2024..
Given that there's documents issued post that date in the leak, I think you can reasonably assume, Sean is telling you little porkies here. He also swore blind, anything submitted as verification to this 'anonymous' gossip site would be immediately deleted. tldr 'Sean says..' = roastie pacification. It's also demonstrable and provable complete horseshit.

Who is this '4chan'?

>>106034164
Kek. Although it could be easily disproven by users. If any roastie finds herself in the leak that signed up after February she could easily expose it as a lie. Would be very dumb of him to do

>>106034110
>retarded and malicious
But of course.
You don't get to be NUMBER 1 APP by being kind, helpful and considerate. A spiteful little swamp of unverifiable innuendo tho, why you headed for SUCCESS then, no q.

https://spill.info.gf
Rate em!

>>106034199
>Would be very dumb of him to do
Has he been shown to act in any other manner thus far? I also note his 'nost trusted security experts' remain unnamed. Call me cynical, but I highly doubt is Sean is shelling out for the best here. I'd be surprised if he even hired a few Fiverrr jeets to review his code shitfest.

>>106033246
>>106033278
You should post this in the Instagram thread, see what they say.

>>106032868 (OP)
>"This data was stored to meet law enforcement standards around cyberbullying prevention."
>the data in question is being used for cyberbullying as we speak

>>106032868 (OP)
Just #vibecoding

The "Hack" method.

https://x.com/Austen/status/1948839666637254946

>>106034237
>Costco Executive Gold Member is on thr top of the leader board
Lmao.

>>106034322
Why do twitterfags talk like such faggots? Even this guy (who is saying something very simple in a tweet that I agree with) has phrased it in such a repellent way that I can't tolerate to read it. The writing voice immediately fills me with blind rage and gives me violent fantasies. It's something about the sentence structure and punctuation that I cannot explain, but it's present in nearly every twitter screencap someone posts here.

>>106034382
i think you should seek a psychologist, this isn't normal anon

>>106034382
lmao touch grass bro

>>106034401
It's only people on twitter though. If it's an issue with me then why is it specific to twitterfaggots? (I don't use twitter, but I am often subjected to screenshots from it because of its extremely popularity among user base of 4chan, especially /g/.)

>>106034373
COSTCO, your internets #1 ROASTIE
HOT STUFF in unimaginable QUANTITY
SIGN UP TODAY, all best security practises followed

>>106034401
>>106034418
sup Austen baby

>>106032868 (OP)
So let me get this straight, this is an app for women posting pics of men to see if someone else fucked them? Do they do a name lookup too? All I’m seeing is pictures of dudes and I’m asking myself why are there dudes on there

>>106034401
>>106034418
Consider just writing your twitter slop better, I am sure you can come up with a better phrasing.
The best way I can describe it is that it reads like it was written by chatgpt. But some tweets even older than chatgpt have this characteristic.

>>106034452
It's a "whisper network" app for sharing anonymous information about men in a community, so if a woman is dating someone, she can look him up in the app and see if other women have reviewed that man and whether or not they reported any red flags or felt unsafe with him. Also it does stuff like criminal background check and sex offender registry check.

>>106034237
Wow, that was quick.

>>106034313
Can it really be called bullying when it's just a bunch of slanderers getting exposed? In an ideal world, the app would have been shut down by the government and the members investigated.

>>106034476
to add, its literally only allowed if its women "whispering" about men, if the app is made for men to know about women it gets banned immediately, as evidenced by several apps that were banned immediately.

>>106034382
imo they have condescending undertones and probably rewrite it for hours to "perfect" it. only autists can identify this phenomenon, normies think its powerful and brave

>>106032868 (OP)
yesterday it was 2023
today it's 2024
tomorrow it'll be 2025
by Monday they'll announce the leak is still ongoing
pic fuckin related

>>106034452
>All I’m seeing is pictures of dudes
That's Sean.
He's the owner.
It's a tawdry little 'anon' fem vicious gossip app with hypocritical claims about existing for cybersec and keeping wymmins safe, laughably enough. It went viral for some reason, got to #1 app and turned itself into a giant attack vector. Naturally, it turns out no effort or expense whatsoever had been expended upon the safety and security of the users data, quite the opposite. And the white knight site owner and protector of endangered wymmins everywhere turns out to be a homo male Jew who lies whenever his lips move. Same as it ever was.

>>106034237
this is difficult

>>106034452
This is from the app store preview
App for women to dox and slander men. I already was on the border for not dating American women but this seals the deal what a shitshow

>>106034570
where's the option to kms

>>106034237
gotta be honest lads, that's a solid top 3
on the other hand, i'm surprised women so ugly can actually exist

>>106034582
So what's stopping a potential threat actor from just lurking and scraping a shit ton of personal information about the men? In addition to having the opposite of security for the women's information, it seems like having zero privacy is an advertised feature of this thing.

>>106034488
>>106034582
>slander
It is not. Slander is spoken. In print, it's libel.

>>106034237
We need to get that empty checkerboard room to first place.

>>106034582
it's basically an app with some quirky tehe design with chat (for defamation) and osint tools for a monthly fee. i guess cyberstalking is legal for womans rights

>>106034382
They all think they're little celebrities that's what it is

>>106034237
>most of top50 are pics of ID's
lmao thats hilarious

>>106033125
You mean the people who would run such an unethical app based on women bitching and doxxing men without a hint of self-accountability in their own relationships also have no accountability when it comes to basic data retention and privacy standards. It's crazy too because those images have almost no value relative to the extreme cost of a breach and yet it never crossed their minds.

>>106034618
Oh, they never claimed to be offering privacy for the men hereby doxxed, only for the vicious gossiping bitches 'anonymously' supplying the tattle. anon is just evening up the scores, is all. As someone noted, a classic case of flies getting the shite flung at them.

>>106034237
That site desperately needs a "Neither" option.

>>106032868 (OP)
This is an app about gaslighting about men, I don't see why they wouldn't gaslight about anything else.

>>106034453
>your
i'm not on twitter little boy

>>106034687
>reroll
>please

>>106034237
Is this the greatest uno reversal is recent memory? Foids doxing men with a few taps was petty as fuck but this "no u" is insane(ly hilarious)

>>106034582
This is why I don't have a sim card and neither do I want one, no one can call me or send me texts

>>106034696
Gaslighting is when you deny an obvious fact in an attempt to drive a person crazy.

>>106034343
the bucket had a public file index? that's not been the default like ever on AWS
surely they compromised the app and got the links from the app db?

>>106032868 (OP)
>stored to meet law enforcement law enforcement standards around cyberbullying prevention
so basically it wasn't stored by law enforcement standards to protect personal data from breaches lol

it's over, they're going to jail and getting sued

>>106033125
>nobody had tried to access it
... that we know.

>>106032868 (OP)
Cheer up, Christie! It's just a leak sis

>>106034742
Yes, that would include minimizing about the severity of a breach caused by massive incompetence and proving your data retention policy is a lie. First, their statement "after 2024 your data is secure" is likely a false statement given their gross incompetence and management of data prior to 2024.

>>106034771
GOOD MORNING MA'AM MY NAME IS CHERYP CHRISTIE. YOUR COMPUTER HAS SENT OUT A SIGNAL FROM MICROSOFT THAT THERE IS THE VIRUS INSIDE

>>106034771
dont post ids unless you want to get banned btw
just letting you know

>>106034801
I'm nice today so I'll comply

>>106034749
you suggesting that it might have been a honeypot?

>>106034237
lmao this is fun

>>106034570
the first ones i got was a selfie and a drivers' license of which looked like literally the same person

>>106032868 (OP)
>proving your data retention policy is a lie
Every company lies about this and it's very frightening how easily they do so. The downside is a minor fine at best so why not keep info and sell it later?

>>106034582
there's been apps like that which slander before, and gatekeep by making you slander other people. Jerk.com founded by the dude who made Napster, was one such site, scraping data off of facebook. It got sued to oblivion, if I remember correctly.

>>106034750
Yeah, but..
>SO.. you engaged in the spreading of anonymous and unverifiable gossip over a male you publicly identified online, and yet here you are now complaining here that your own identity became public in the process?
I'm not sure I'd have the brass neck to sue over this desu. Literal 'no winners here's contest.

>>106034749
No it was a public index that returned every attachment URL. No authentication whatsoever.
They fixed it after the hack
>>106034778
My guess is that they're claiming this because they stopped allowing driver's licenses after 2024 (or so I heard)

>>106034237
Brilliant.

>>106034825
>sell it
How much do you think an ID picture sells for you fucking moron. Sometimes I think you insects are actually retarded.

God, I see on another forum that people were posting pictures of the mens cocks and stuff and seen one picture of the fella lying sleeping naked on a bed.
That cannot be legal?! Did they have any moderation whatsoever?

>>106034582
On one hand fuck this dogshit app and the women on it on the other it's hypocritical to complain on here of all places. Especially since the info is scraped from public profiles on tinder/facebook/whatever so it's your fault for putting that shit online

>>106034828
yeah but this women doing it which is therefore empowering [*]

[*] good thing

As a biological male: for my own safety, how do I find out whether a woman has done sex crimes?

>>106034237
I've only gone through the top 50 leaderboard but I noticed there is not a single asian on there. It either means the asian culture isn't that petty, or they're found in the bottom 50 lmao

>>106034873
well there's a big difference between asians and asian americans

>>106034637
I'm a simple retard. I see no human faces, I click it.

>>106034237
lmfao
i don't condone this Though

>>106034862
sex offenders registry

>>106034778
But how are they gaslighting about men?

>>106034237
Why am I seeing men on here and the SAME man everytime?

>>106033563
catfished ? i though that was when a man was pretending to be a women, was she a lesbo ? or was it a women pretending to be a man. Ive never dated anyone so im not used to the lingo.

>>106034846
I'm not a lawyer but wouldn't that fall under the definition of revenge porn?

>>106034382
its the reddit spacing. it triggers then chan brain.

>>106034423
You are responsible for whatever happens inside your own head

>>106034986
i think there's a number of photos of the founder, people say it's for testing

>>106034981
"This man is really bad and has nothing to do with my selection strategy or my own behavior which caused him to act like this." Basically exaggerating and lying about male behaviors while minimizing and lying about their own behaviors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjQnha99sTY

>>106034986
don't ask, it's funnier if you don't know

>>106034892
This photos and others are strangely frequent in my torrent dataset

>>106034981
NTA but I agree. They're not the ones gaslighting about men, just enabling it. The gaslighting about the severity of the breach and the pointing the finger at men instead of the app developers is, and it's playing into (further enabling, even) the feminine double standard.

>>106035009
It's all a fucking swamp, the owners can't go after hackers/leakers as own incompetence/negligence would then be put on the table. The users can't sue the owner for being a cheap incompetent prick as their own interactions on this site were, as you note, 'questionable' for the most part. The only people with any right to actually complain here are the guys doxxed. And Christ help the users if someone does/has figured out how to attach posts to the newly identified users, which wouldn't surprise. Now that will be shtf tyme.

>>106034452
>Do they do a name lookup too?
they will process a criminal record background check on your behalf if you pay them. criminal record checks is an in-app purchase they offer.

>>106034237
Is it too early for the leaderboard to make much sense, is it at this point basically just random based on who happened to be shown more? Because this top rank right now looks fucked to me

>>106035085
>this top rank right now looks fucked to me
It's like an iceberg
You obviously haven't plumbed the depths below.

imagine working there and this happens and you know the company is fucked

>>106033331
Soulless nepo baby

>>106035129
It's an app or mentally ill roasties. They aren't known for their intelligence.
The app might as well explode in popularity now.

>>106033267
He didn't create shit. It was pajeets and AI that created this mess, but they are still better than him.

>>106034066
>vibe coded
It seems that it was made using low code tools. And chatGPT was already a thing by the time, they may have just strapped some things together using chatGPT.

>>106035143
Women want to get on it now more than ever on twitter.
There's also the mentality
>"phew i'm glad I wasn't on it before this happened, now that it's fixed I should hop on"

>>106034237
Saw a few men lol

>>106035143
>The app might as well explode in popularity now
there isn't really anywhere to explode to, given this hokey POS already was #1 APP desu. A fact which might leave you wondering over app security standards in general.

>>106035156
I like how chatgpt retroactively made bad developers cease to exist in the past, present, and future.

>>106035268
kek
>be retarded and incompetent
>uhhh idk chatgpt fucked it up o algo

>>106035160
>chuds hacked our epic app for woman!
>we need to show those chuds by doubling down and shilling it even harder!

we should make an app that lists which women arent a cunt, but it would be mostly empty

Did the teaspill dev just remove id cards from the votes?

>>106035183
>this hokey POS already was #1 APP
i'd never heard of it until a day ago and am still having trouble imagining why there had to be a social network specifically for literal tea and what "pii" could possibly be associated with pics of teacups

>>106035024
Stoicism is a reskin of mindfulness meditation for diet Christians who unironically identify as sigma males

>>106035434
And yet it made your heart rate spike a little, didn't it, you dirty little snake.

Ok so first off I don’t get how a woman only app is legal with discrimination laws. Second, how come 4chan the worstest site ever is banning any anon who posts an id, but this apps entire purpose is doxxing men but it’s fine and number one on the App Store. Someone make this make sense

>>106034986
You found Waldo
Everytime I get a picture of a wall or something random it's like a reprieve

>>106035474
>discrimination laws.
That is not how it works at all, come on. If they were hiring women only it would be in violation of discrimination laws. But it's not illegal to have a club for women or men only of course, that's ridiculous.

>>106032926
>types "index of" into google
OH SHIT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS!

im convinced this is viral marketing.

>>106035470
no. the only site i go on on my phone is Clickhole

Women will think you "hate women" for asking them to be mad at an app for playing fast and loose with their data rather than blaming turbo incel autists who know how to type URLs and scrape data.

I don't even hate women...annoyed by them sure but my view of them is pretty low atm

>>106034628
Whatever JJ, here's your spider-man pics.

>>106034687
>>106034700
just press f5

I wish I was gay.

>>106035487
>it's like a reprieve
Word.
it's def. a bit of an eye-opener when the ladies feel they can relax and switch the filters off

i misread and thought this was dating for dykes but now i realize what it is
it is literally cock carousel roasties networking with each other to find out which abusechads to sleep with and which not. fucking hilarious.

>>106035620
heyyyy ;p

>>106035509
You can’t have a “whites only” club. And the same exact law that prevents that lists sex along with race. So is the issue that no one’s challenged it? Or what.

>>106035726
basically

>>106034237
>https://spill.info.gf
lol

>>106035137
Who are his parents?

>>106034322
>>106034343
Who is this "Austen" (gay spelling), and why should we care about his opinions?

We might've been wrong about the roasties map with the GPS locations. The (unauthenticated) API endpoint that the data was sourced from seems to be referenced from the "men lookup" features within the app, which include a "sex offender map" and a "private investigator" paid thing (that may not be active at the moment).

Perhaps the locations aren't actually of the female users, but of the men. Locations weren't mentioned in the breach notification post, so the devs don't consider them important. This could be why.

>>106034237
Women are so ugly when they're not globbing on the makeup, if you're not gay I feel bad for you.

>>106033241
Guess where tea comes from? ;-D

>>106035994
either way that means are a lot of men in te alaskan wilderness and none in nyc

>>106036021
Kenya and Rwanda, looking at the back of the box.

>>106034237
kek

>>106034237
fugg

>>106032868 (OP)
Women are in the instagram comments still begging to be let in to the app irrespective of the leak lmao. They don't give a fuck and will happily still handover their ID to find and rate their local chad. Blackpilled forever.

>>106034594
Most women are that ugly; humans are dysgenic on average.

>>106032926
kek

>>106032868 (OP)
>WE'VE ACTED FAST
so they checked the private box now?

Anyone got the magnet link? Checked /t/ and /pol/ and searched here...

>>106035712
Hello gay person. What a joy it would be to enjoy your company in a sexual capacity due to moral values. However I'm attracted to mean women. They refuse to let go.

>>106036450
go to the 'farms

>>106036328
Checked it? It would have been ON by default, they had to have done something really stupid for everything to be left publicly indexable.

>>106033478
>>106033572
>>106033898
The company is claiming that only data prior to February 2024 was leaked, but wouldn't the API keys that were leaked in the /pol/ thread give hackers access to a shitload of data in the current version of the app? Are API keys regularly changed? I'm a brainlet when it comes to this so feel free to tell me if my questions are retarded.

>>106036508
they are lying

>>106032868 (OP)

>>106032868 (OP)
They're lying
LMFAOOOOOOOO

>>106036524
Oh I know they're lying about only data prior to February 2024 being leaked. What I mean is, what kind of post-February 2024 data would the API keys give access to? Can we expect to see all the pictures and IDs from the women who signed up recently to be leaked soon? Cause the amount of pictures available now seems small when you look at how the app was at the top of the app store until now.

>>106034892
>>106035053
this is from android emulator's camera
maybe they are making an android app too

t. android dev

>>106034237
Priceless. Thanks to whoever made this.

has anyone gotten text data / information out of it? equally as important to see if anybody you know is on the app - male or female

>>106036733
>Tfw I'm a guy and I took a selfie just to see if I could gain access to the app
Christ I'm a retard

>>106036492
Oh damn, if you have to go to the male version, count me out.

>>106036768
>I'm a bloke
>So I took a selfie to prove female
Did you at least put some lipstick on?

>>106034382
you're autistic and/or terminally online

>>106034986
CEO testing his own app

>>106036147
Where is this from I wanna play

>>106036870
see >>106034237

They even have microtransactions, as seen from the leaks.
>from over two years ago

>you bored with our bot posts tranime goyim
>you want the epstein list sexy boy
>we give so much for you

>>106036910
Thanks anon! But wtf I thought it was an only women app and the selfie was to prove it was biological women only

>>106036942
is 20 bucks for information that isn't super perishable really a "micro"transaction

Poor woman, she had no chance against El Gato

>>106035487
This.
Most of those roasties are so repulsive that ever single wall pic is god sent.
I love walls now. It makes you appreciate walls. I want to rather marry a wall than such a roastie.

>>106037014
I guess the main part of the monetization are subscriptions.

>>106036910
The leaderboard is looking better now. Top 2 are pretty hot.

>>106034382
It's the arrogant condescension.

So signing up is a joke? Any virgin can boost his SMV by making sockpuppets and green flagging himself?
It's banned imc so idk

There's no way the system thought this was a woman, this app was just an ID data collection scheme

Sending reports to Apple seems to have some effect.

>>106037068
15 $ per month for a gossiping app is outrageous.
So this is what femoid phonefags are up to...

>the bottom 50 of the leaderboard
Oh my god. I’m literally traumatized

>>106037071
I can tell that nonwhites have joined the game. The med-type qts have fallen out of top 50

>>106037105
>Who wins, Pajeet or a black box

>>106034237
Anyone else get Ranjeesh? Kek

>>106037106
That pic looks like straight forward undeniable libel.
If you do illegal things, you get problems, what a surprise.

But the worse consequences they will face is some little pat on the back. If any man would do that, he would be rotting in jail by now.

>>106032868 (OP)

>>106032868 (OP)
Imma say this again: the comments are what would have been truly interesting. Just the pics themselves are nearly worthless for anything beyond mocking the user.

Why are americans (and indians) like this?

>>106037106
That motherfucker is rowing rearwards like a fucking dervish now lmao. Apples snotty cuntishness has it's uses, after all. Now they've abandoned the three wise monkeys act, this on their No1 App.
I still can't believe Sean has failed to grasp the amount of legal peril his sorry homo ass is in here tho. I'd have sold this carwreck to the highest bidder and jumped the first plane to Cuba. This fucking idiot is STILL trying to blithely Hebrew his way out of it tho.

>>106036817
Nope. I have a femboi face, so I thought I could maybe pull it off. But I was also curious to see it they were actually checking the selfies to make sure they're women. Considering how much they fucked up with this data leak, it wouldn't surprise me if they weren't checking at all.

I claim this tea waifu

>>106037105
Top one is a picture of the founder. There's a few of him in there.

>>106037105
"Awww yeah, time to sell me some private data! And the most gossipy gender with the most loose lips is gonna do all the heavy lifting!"

>>106037230
This
Everyone is just spamming the same screenshot

>>106037296
Trannies are 100 percent taking this app to court in the future

>>106037373
The whole leak comes off as some skiddie blowing his load early (lol).

>>106032868 (OP)
>app made to dox men
>ends up doxing women
I find this very funny

>>106034237
Jesus christ, why are muramutts all fat ugly fucks

>>106037410
ahem

>>106034237
the bottom 50 is so fucking funny

>>106037423
below average here

>>106037230
>>106037373
The comments were/ARE open tho, thats kind of the point of the app. It's the sneaky femoids casting personal aspersions who wanted to remain hidden. With the shit that did surface, API keys etc, and a bit of time, some anon prob. could have reversed the entire shit and published a version with the originator of every comment fingered. But time/hassle and the idea of just throwing a little disinfecting daylight upon those making the comments was a good enough result otherwise. The comments are all still there. Valuable vicious gossip is the merchants ware here, after all.

WOULD

Unpopular opinion but my favorite is the #1 chick on the leaderboard

>>106037423
WHO HURT YOU, BABY?
JUST TELL ME
TELL US ALL

>>106037462
If they're still there, then scrape them then. They probably locked the whole db down after the breach was posted.

>>106037470
That manjaw does not deserve #1
This qt did but now shes gone

>>106037423
>she

>I’ve seen like 5 military spouse ids in there
Ouch. Maybe a couple of them are separated but I kinda doubt they all are.

>>106037505
Number 3 makes my peepee hard

>>106037494
Shut it Down Sean?
Lose(!) Revenue?!
not a fucking chance
I'll also wager his 'trusted security specialists' budget is still under $50k. Per Annum.

>>106037551
what's wrong with her teeth?

>>106037423
Queen

>>106037012
>thought it was an only women app
>>106037105
I think the problem was that the automatic selfie verification thing wasn't working for trans women, so they had to get rid of it before someone threw a fit about discrimination.

>>106037551
Holy crazy eyes
She can suck a golf ball through a garden hose

>>106037564
They are natural instead of fake?

>>106037561
Going to the firebase storage URL from the torrent leads to a 403 error rn.

qt :3

>>106037564
They're real.
Or as real as these things get, in Current Year. Foids, take a tip from this woman. JUST be natural. Be yourselves. And thats how you get Top Ranked Ho, yo.

>Some of the highest rated pictures outside of the top 50 are pictures of walls and shit
Hahahaha

>>106032868 (OP)
>We make brong-brong
How you like sexy incel tranny?

>>106037406
that's an ex onlyscams whooar who scrubbed her porn to become a mainstream actress lmao

>>106037600
blue eyes look demonic.

>>106037494
How are they going to lock down comments? They need to be accessible to the users for the app to function.

>>106037580
>>106037611
Then what are those white spots?

>>106037373
Well you're free to download the torrent and post something else lol? Theres a fair few dick pics in there though.

>>106037618
Trans women should be welcome no matter what you like. If you're into girls, congrats, less competition. If you're into girls, no matter trans, you get less competition and more choice. The only time you'd lose if you were gay.

>>106037641
They're accessible through the app, along with the photos. They're not accessible to the outside world, ie us.

Safety app for women.

>>106037645
>White spots
Fuck me, would you notice them in a bar after a few, you fussy cunt? JUST pick another then, >>106037600 has her mouth closed.

>>106037423
Holy shit

>>106037668
So make an account you muppet.

>>106037672
>eating a hpv riddled foid's pussy
enjoy your throat cancer

>>106037690
>Fuck me, would you notice them in a bar after a few
yes, I kinda have a teeth fetish

>>106037672
Wymmins can never be too safe from random rug munch assaulter. This app is a Service to Humanity.

>>106034237
it's easy to forget just how ugly the average woman actually is. thank god im a post-trad neoincel

>>106037701
>enjoy your throat cancer
Michael Douglas disease

>>106037700
How? Waiting list is probably several thousand long, they're not even checking, and even if you do, you wouldn't be able to download the text en masse since you'd have to do it all manually.

>>106037645
Looks like Dental Fluorosis. Its because muramutt put that shit in their water.

okay but what kind of men are getting the most engagement.
I need a racial breakdown

>>106037714
Noshit?
We never noticed.

>>106037732
Don't encourage him ffs
God forbid, he moves to UK

>>106037551
she looks like she works in HR

>>106037732
>Fluorosis is common in the United States, with 41% of adolescents having definite fluorosis, and another 20% "questionably" having fluorosis according to the Center of Disease Control.
holy shit

>>106037737
From a quick look through the pics very few of the "timid beta nerd" types, if any. That's what truly surprised me about this app: they're not using it to attack them even though the users are no doubt petty enough to do so.

>>106037737
niggers

>>106037629
>he thinks brown eyes are human

>>106034673
How was this app even legal?
>"Fuck this loser, he's totally a rapist!"
>He just didn't pay the whole bill at Dorsia
Like what?

>>106037781
Saying mean things about people you don't like isn't illegal, retard.

>>106037781
It's not legal in first world countries

>>106037781
>how is hyperbolic hearsay legal
ngmi

Ok the number one is bullshit what are you retards doing.

free face data lets train a model on this

>>106037781
We need a "bangalijst" app
>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13252825/Outrage-banga-list-rating-female-students-sexual-performance-assessing-looks-phrases-nice-easy-bit-fat-circulates-Dutch-college.html

>>106037796
>>106037789
Sorry, Jane from HR, but defamation of character is still a thing in the United States. You should know that considering your position.

>>106032926
Walking through an open fence that's not locked or even latched can still be an unauthorized entry

>>106037800
Why is there a pajeeta on #4

>>106037811
that's hot

>>106037727
So you weren't all that concerned about the app if you didn't already have an account to keep track of what might be being said about you?

>>106037812
defamation of character only applies to statements that are false.

>>106037812
Prove it did you any material harm. No, hurting your fragile fee-fees isn't "material". Hell, you have no proof since the text supposedly containing the defamatory material wasn't even leaked, and you have no chance of getting it now that the leak is public.
First Amendment, maddafakka!

>>106034237
this is a tough one they're both pretty cute

>>106037800
Bruh this one is even worse

>>106037789
Actually it would be illegal under libel laws in the UK which is why they only allowed it to be downloaded in America.

>>106037789
Claiming they have multiple STDs, drug habit, rape fetish and poor personal hygiene probably drifts into libelous territory tho tbf. Especially so when this is on the NUMBER 1 FUCKING APPLE APP, the accusations are being made by some rndm anon stalker headcase foid and none of them are in the remotest fucking true, or provable, both of which being the same fucking thing before the Courts and God.

>>106037831
How in the fuck were you supposed to get in as a male if they were checking the images? We have no proof any of the male verification images in there were actually accepted, only that they were submitted.

>>106037838
ChatGPT is a better friend than us, Jeniqua.

Is this the crazy hr woman?

>>106037839
I'd fuck the one on right side

>>106037848
Proofs? Where's the screenshot? And can you prove it was actually (You) and not just some other guy? Even the most moderately competent junior lawyer would get this thrown out of court AND get the judge to force you to pay the other party's fees for this waste of time.

>>106037842
I guess pajeets are rating for bobs and vagine

>>106037842
The JEET VOAT is in, ladies n gents!
She's also alright tbf

>>106037837
Worse: defamation of character only applies to statements you have proof were actually uttered.

>>106037800
>ugly chinkoid vs bloated tumorous mass
Bro there is no winning choice

>>106037837
>Make up tons of bullshit
>UHHHHH IT'S TRUE BECAUSE I SAID IT IS
>???
>PROFIT
I'm for free speech, but saying tons of random bullshit, notably crimnal accusations, about real people is where I draw the line.

>>106037875
I would but I would NOT be proud of it
This is #3 nigga...

>>106037850
Are you retarded lol? You just uploaded a selfie of a woman. Shit, just grab one off thispersondoesnotexist.com or something if you had any concerns whatsoever about using a real persons identity. Shoop out the bottom right corner. Sorted.

>>106037895
And thanks to this leaker being unable to control himself, your opportunity to get this hard proof is gone forever. As usual, incels fuck themselves over.

>>106037908
And how are you supposed to get in rn to correlate the text to the pics in the leak? They probably aren't going to accept any new accounts at this point.

>>106037905
she's #1 now
jeets are rigging the vote for pajeeta

>>106037905
You are letting a minor issue of a large schnozz get in the way of a good shag here anon. You are, in your own way, worse than the tooth fetishist above. Me? I'm honest. She's a catch, every day inclusive Sundays.

>>106037908
what is wrong with her teeth?

>>106037941
You are fucking blind if you only think her snoozle is a problem

>>106037926
Oh, don't forget the your adversaries, who wrote the supposedly defamatory posts, are now tipped off to the breach so they can delete them. gg no re.

>>106037927
Yeah, number 1 is overdoing it now.
She's a pajeeta, she obviously knocked herself up a voatscript. Prob. works for Oracle. I still like her tho. I'm a forgiving guy.

>>106037870
Some of the shit in the data leak is, apparently, stuff like a photo of the user holding up those American prescriptions bottles with the fellas name and address on them and the type of tablet it is, to prove to other users he was on whatever medication. I don't know what the laws about that are like in America, but here it would fall foul of the GDPR.
Other pictures are, apparently, of the fella lying sleeping butt ass naked in his own bed with his knob out. How the fuck was that shit allowed on their platform, shared with other users? That's definitely a breech of privacy laws is it not?

>>106037942
shes not real, thats whats wrong with her teeth.

>>106037842
The jeets have officially found the site. Fuck

Why do I always see the same guy in different pics when I see a guy?

>>106037991
shes ahead by 110 points now lmao

>>106037992
You have seen The Sean, anon.
He Shall Haunt You in Your Dreams Now.

>>106037976
But how does that effect you, personally? The only thing you've proven was that this unfortunate individual was discussed about. You don't even have the actual account attached to the pics in the data set.

There's a similar app/group called "Are we dating the same guy" that I wish would get shut down. I got posted on there and someone said I'm "inconsistent and a red flag" after I ghosted her because she was boring and annoying.

>>106038004
I most of the time vote for him cause I would rather fuck him than most of the foids

>G-d Lord Fuentes will protect /g/
We need more patriots protecting Larry Fink from libel.

>>106038012
>effect

>>106032926
He wasn't authorized but they never bothered to authenticate him so the authorization was not enforced.

Authorization is an abstract thing, authentication is the procedure required to verify it.

>>106038018
>He votes for Sean
Don't fall for his Hebrew Tricks
Should be banned for multiple entries, the cunt.

>someone wrote a script so the jeeta would win
Oh come on now guys. She’s up like 600 points at least make it less obvious

>>106035005
Catfishing is just any kind of misrepresentation of your profile.
If someone showed me pictures of them from 10 years ago as if it were current that would still be catfishing

>>106037373
Is it just a bunch of niggers talking about how terrible niggers are?

>>106038039
I also vote for the red stain and the wooden floor

To be fair, he's getting access to a lot of foid pics and he can talk to them in private using the admin/support account.

>>106035009
>>106034846
Don't know what the problem is, threads like this existed on /b/ for over a decade. Guess it's not so funny when you could be the target for once but at the same time, a lot of men send their dicks to random women constantly and unprompted anyway. So I can't imagine you truly being upset over it.

>>106038042
admit it
you'd lick her toes if she did it herself.
based poll-fuxoring jeeta

>>106038012
Hmm, perhaps you dont understand how they laid out their data?

The pictures people were posting had a filename like:
xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx_yyyyy-yyy-yyyy-yyyyy
The men on the platform's hero image on the app were labelled:
yyyyy-yyy-yyyy-yyyyy

Its the same ID as makes up the second half of the pictures people were posting.

>>106038068
Those threads never had the women’s name, address and phone number on them. Even 4chan bans you for that. Let that sink in

>>106038093

>>106035545
We love women, we hate women's autonomy.

>>106038068
Sending your own cock to one person is a fair bit different than someone else sharing your cock with whoever on the internet wants to see it. Its revenge porn, plain and simple.

>>106038093
>Even 4chan bans you for that
Indeed. The #1 App on the Apple store, deranged foids venting libelous garbage in direction of (whoever). And they call us the arsehole of the internet.

>>106034237
oh great even more articles tomorrow about how men are monsters.

who ruined this?

>>106032868 (OP)
Congrats chuds you got yourselves played yet again, this leak will only help this app and got all the pro women media aka all the media to promote it.
YOU LOST, AGAIN.

>>106037895
>I'm for free speech, but saying tons of random bullshit, notably crimnal accusations, about real people is where I draw the line.
If you find someone doing this you can sue them for defamation. That is actually illegal.

>>106038202
She'd be lucky to get raped.

>>106038202
How is she inside and outside the car at the same time?

>>106034846
>were posting pictures of the mens cocks and stuff

meanwhile men version of this got taken down in seconds because dumb moids spammed revenge porn on it

>>106038093
From the app screenshots it looks like only their name is being shown with the state and a check with the sex offender registry.
There's probably happening more in /b/'s threads with some of the anons sharing their discord handle for more pics and shit.

>>106038120
Don't send your cock to random women then pajeet. I have sympathy when it's partners backstabbing you but I know can guess that's barely the case when it comes to dick pics.

is she naked
I thought she was gonna stay in the top 3 she was there for a while

>>106038202
give it a few more thinks and you'll see that there is no other outcome
you're either onboard with protection against imagined threats, or you ARE those imagined threats

>>106037423
super fucking cute

>>106038228
>Don't send your cock to random women then pajeet.
I don't? Where did you get that idea from?
>>106038228
>I have sympathy when it's partners backstabbing you but I know can guess that's barely the case when it comes to dick pics.
Why would it be barely the case? Its pretty fucking common to phone sex with your partner anon along with sharing pics with them. If you have a nasty breakup with them later, with this app you have the potential of them posting you cock online for all to see and assess, without your consent.

>>106038228
>it looks like only their name is being shown with the state and a check with the sex offender registry.
Thats what the app itself does yes, but its the user comments and uploads on the men in question that are the problem because apparently there was no moderation on them done whatsoever.

Lolwat
The jeeta is just gone

>>106038092
Did you actually look into the data set before making that post? I did a quick spot check of some of those ID's in organization_report.json as well as metadata folder contents and none of them resulted in any image in any folder. I even did the reverse by searching for the image names (without extension) in the text files (organization_report.json, files inside the metadata folder) and none of them showed up either. Face it, this breach isn't perfect by any means and is missing a lot of key data like the mapping and the text itself.

>>106038397
i think dev manipulates the leaderboard. He got rid of all the IDs in the beginning. And then there were some falls that must have been very quick or he manually removed

>>106033553
ended up replying to such a thread on r/cybersecurity
•timer between posts
fuck shiddit
anyway we all know women are retarded

they will defend any shit coming from women that they wouldnt ever dream of humoring coming from men

>>106038397
A black woman who looks overweight almost beats cute glasses at the minute.

>all blonde roasties
Get some taste thirdies

paste

>>106038450
>a fat fucking nigger
>A black woman who looks overweight
The absolute state of muramutts

JUST A REMINDER THAT THE MAP THAT HAS BEEN CIRCULATING AROUND WITH GEOLOCATIONS IS LIMITED TO 1000-2000 PINS THERE AREN'T THAT MANY ONLINE MAPS THAT ALLOW ENOUGH PINS TO PUT ALL GIRLS.

mfw i do an oopsie woopsie fucky wucky with your data

>>106038502
Most of them are also on whaling maps

>>106038502
The map is also sussy asf considering most colleges don't even have a pin on them.

Meredith found another hobby after doin Signal

>>106038502
Theres another map with all the pins on OpenStreetMap but it crashes your browser lol.

>>106038467
>#1 Taylor lolwut
>#2 Deserved Frontrunner tbqh
>#3 Look Guys! I Haz Titz!!!
>#4 literal OF whore
>#5 Look Guys! I iz Blonde!!!
Gentleman.
Must we settle for this?
I think not.

>>106038565
she >>106037600 deserves a top 5

kek

>>106038522
Are there multiple pins per municipality? Seems like it might just contain each city, district, county, village, whatever the murricans have over there.

>>106038583

>>106038565
I don't get how the black screens and ceilings aren't higher

>>106038591
holy 6head

>>106038588
When I checked it yesterday it was just 1 per. The only college I could find with a pin was stanford. I checked other notorious party schools and several had zero.

>>106038583
Based on my experience the black square would still have a pretty decent elo without botting

So would the proper way to do this be
1. Set the bucket to private only access with credentials required
2. Remove any credentials to the bucket from the frontend client
3. Users send their images to the server with app credentials only
4. Server has the bucket credentials and uploads the images to the bucket

I am a junior for reference

HUH

>>106038637
the system administrator known as 4chan seems to have rigged the voting

The voting site is about as secure as the Tea app was, lol

>>106038618
>1. Set the bucket to private only access with credentials required
Thats the DEFAULT option, it would have come configured that way.

>>106038612
So, the app is built with Flutter and you can dump the classes in libapp.so.
It doesn't appear like the locations are associated with users. The database contains these coordinates that we've seen, but it's so that women can select their locality/city for their account and in the 'profiles' (posts) they create for men, from a drop-down menu.

>>106038753
I saw an image in the dump telling users to change their locations to a neighboring municipality since the app wasn't available in another for some reason, so I doubt the locations are entirely correct anyways.

>>106034237
did #28 in the top 50 literally just upload a picture of her snatch?

>>106038580
Yeah, I was championing her >>106037690 earlier. But no-one ever got rich in a race like this backing brunettes. For blonde be the taste of the jeet, and of the jeet, there are many.

>>106033880
neubrutalism. The world is getting rid of minimalism and about to choose between glassmorphism and neubrutalism.

>>106034199
but it would also bring more attention to her being a tattle tale so what user would publicly admit to being in the dump to begin with?

>>106038012

>>106034237
These sub 600 elo rates are brutal lmao

>>106034237
I created a map.
Not a useless one like the one floating around that just shows the city IDs kek.
Mine uses GPS locations scraped from the EXIF data.
Can I link to your site for the images?

>>106039262
They still would only date Chad and are just as entitled as Stacy. Don't ask how I know.

>>106039365
I believe you, these fat liberal women think they deserve a 10/10 when they’re a 1/10

>>106039401
pump and dump

>>106037385
like the company would still be around before they can get in line for any claim