Anonymous
7/31/2025, 7:16:36 PM No.106094063
https://ipwatchdog.com/2025/07/30/bipartisan-bill-allow-courts-compel-isp-blocking-foreign-piracy-sites/id=190792/
>Today, Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC), Chris Coons (D-DE), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) introduced a bipartisan bill titled โBlock Bad Electronic Art and Recording Distributors Act of 2025โโ(the Block BEARD Act). The proposal is aimed at blocking foreign websites dedicated to piracy from making stolen content available to U.S. users.
>Under the Block BEARD Act, copyright owners would be empowered to ask courts to designate foreign online websites as a โforeign digital piracy site.โ Rights holders must prove they are the owner or exclusive licensee of the right; that they have been or will be injured by the infringing activity; that theyโve made an effort to provide notice to the operator of the foreign site; and that theyโve made an effort to determine that the site is not located within the United States. Petitioners also must show that the foreign online site is primarily dedicated to infringing activity; has limited commercial purpose beyond infringement; and is intentionally marketed to promote infringement.
>Today, Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC), Chris Coons (D-DE), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) introduced a bipartisan bill titled โBlock Bad Electronic Art and Recording Distributors Act of 2025โโ(the Block BEARD Act). The proposal is aimed at blocking foreign websites dedicated to piracy from making stolen content available to U.S. users.
>Under the Block BEARD Act, copyright owners would be empowered to ask courts to designate foreign online websites as a โforeign digital piracy site.โ Rights holders must prove they are the owner or exclusive licensee of the right; that they have been or will be injured by the infringing activity; that theyโve made an effort to provide notice to the operator of the foreign site; and that theyโve made an effort to determine that the site is not located within the United States. Petitioners also must show that the foreign online site is primarily dedicated to infringing activity; has limited commercial purpose beyond infringement; and is intentionally marketed to promote infringement.
Replies: