>"wikipedia is biased"
>how?
>"they don't think magic is real"

>>106094926 (OP)

The fuck is Remote Viewing?

>That report’s conclusion—which echoed the assessments of the CIA officers involved in the program during the 1970s—was that enough accurate remote viewing experiences existed to defy randomness, but that the phenomenon was too unreliable, inconsistent, and sporadic to be useful for intelligence purposes. We decided not to restore the program.
https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/ask-molly-did-cia-really-study-psychic-powers/

>>106094973
A pseudoscientific hoax

>>106094926 (OP)
The fact that some people de facto own certain pages has been known for years. But of course, NPCs will come out of the woodwork to tell you that you can just edit it.

Where should I get my info from?
>*cricket sounds*

>>106095521
Truth.Social

>>106094973
since this is /g/ it's probably teamviewer/anydesk/vnc/rdp/whatever but without computers

>>106094926 (OP)
You are strawmaning. Who gives a f about pages about supernatural crap.
Wikipedia is not only super biased, tons of its pages about history and politics are under strict control of various political groups, lying just about everything.

>>106094960
OP probably is doing it for dopamine, not cash.

Please donate the $2.75, goy.

Wikipedia is only good as a baseline for knowledge, not for niche information on specialized topics

>>106095692
kek I wanted to say the same

>>106095064

The winner writes history and decides what is true.
If you lose you can't tell anyone what really happened can you?

Certain people won. They make the rules.

>>106094973
seeing things far away with your mind, basically psychics that tricked spooks by being right sometimes

>>106095692
>but without computers
Peak /g/ summarized.

>>106095521
freesites
If you want absolutely unflitered random info dumps of random anonymous peoples opinions.
Go to freesites. Not saying everything is false but it's insanely varied. To the point where it kind of highlights how information on clearnet is being controlled.

>>106095064
So the CIA says it's real, why is that included in the wikipedia article?

>>106095692
so it's like my tulpa. i believe it

>>106094926 (OP)
Stop using Wikipedia and be a real nigga and start @'ing gronk at every inconvenience

>>106095064

What the fuck does this have to do with /g/ (technology)?!

>>106097607
you think you're safe behind that vpn? think again. or rather, best you don't

>>106094926 (OP)
I physically can't understand people who believe in magic, my suspension of disbelief does not work in real life, they sound clinically retarded when they mention sky daddy or demons as if they were real things.
as much as I like to live in the marvel cinematic universe, that's just not the case and it's very sad
>>106095462
>The fact that some people de facto own certain pages has been known for years
and the issue is?
>>106095521
most informations reported on an event are incomplete anyways, don't "believe" anything, read multiple sources and move on, you don't have to have opinions on things.
>>106095711
>Wikipedia is not only super biased, tons of its pages about history and politics are under strict control of various political groups, lying just about everything.
history itself is biaised, it's perpetual fight for the truth, it has been the case for millenium, not sure why people are shocked that people are manipulating the most used source of trivia informations...
>>106097605
they just paraphrase wikipedia anyway

>>106097664
>I physically can't understand people who believe in magic
RV is not magic, it's science. Just because you don't understand how something works doesn't make it "magic". Empirical evidence doesn't care about your feelings

>>106094973
Open your blinds, see what's far outside, there you have remote viewed some stuff. You can also look up at the stars at night to remote view very far.

Wikipedia is dying anyway, the amount of admins has declined from 2000 to 800, and RFA mostly opposed new ones, even the new "admin elections" process fizzled out after the first one.

Most of the "controversial" articles are now locked behind the "extended confirmed" edit wall now so only dedicated autists remain. Most people aren't going 500 edits just to say the article is wrong.

The majority of the public have got fed up of the begging banners and just rip the Wikipedia content via AI tools now as well. Wikipedia, at its core is a millennial internet phenomenon, gen alpha and zoomers will be all AI based soon.

>>106097700
>RV is not magic, it's science.
no it's not.
>Just because you don't understand how something works doesn't make it "magic".
no shit
>Empirical evidence doesn't care about your feelings
I hate how you retards use strong words to try to gain credibility... there were no empirical evidences, the fuck does that even mean in this context? stacy smith and john mccain III said they could see in the next room and said they saw a pen or something and doctor Retardson Jr. went apeshit because ther was in fact a pen in the room?
much wahou, such EMPIRICAL evidence, lmao fucking retard.
they did not have the beginning of a fucking clue and now that we have very advanced and strict protocols suddenly no one can use their magical power anymore, funny how this work.
>inb4 b-b-b-ut I can
try to see my dick in my fucking pant right now if you can you fucking schizo

>>106097849
latitude and longitude?

>>106095521
Encyclopedias. At least those were written and edited properly.

>>106097849
Damn, you sure are aggressive about this.

>>106097849
>try to see my dick in my fucking pant right now if you can you fucking schizo
I see it and it's small

>>106097880
>Encyclopedias. At least those were written and edited properly.
no they were not, they were as biaised if not more than wikipedia.
>Damn, you sure are aggressive about this.
yeah because I'm sick and tired of people using magic to justify their behavior
people can't see shit in the next room, they can't talk to dead people, they can't detect water underground with sticks, they can't detect martian energy in crop circles, they can't heal cancer by praying or by drinking juice.
it's incredibly that adult (who can vote just like me) still believe in fairy tales ofr children, grow the fuck up, none of this is real
>>106097938
damn a real magician over there, don't you have a spell so I can make my peepee bigger?

>>106097956
>damn a real magician over there, don't you have a spell so I can make my peepee bigger?
Yeah, look at gay porn. I think that will work for you

>>106097568
God waits patiently as you all kill yourselves.

>>106094973
Seems like the pink drink worked well on you.

>>106095064
The CIA also declassified+released proof that they lie and psyop you for the lulz, what's your point?

the wikipedia page for marc dutroux used to be quite lengthy and insightful, but a few years ago it got trimmed down and a lot of crucial information was outright deleted. if you check the page's history, you'll find one editor in particular monitoring the page, pruning as much information as possible, and getting into fights with other editors over it.

for instance, the page originally used to mention dutroux receiving routine payments in his gulf arab bank account that coincided with the dates of his kidnappings. the editor deleted this entire part, calling it "conspiracy theory," and instead claimed that dutroux got his money from "insurance fraud" (a claim that was only made in a single german tabloid magazine in 2004)

in reality, wikileaks had already dumped court documents on the dutroux affair, including dutroux's bank transactions which 100% confirmed the earlier page's history. this was omitted because wikipedia does not consider wikileaks to be a "reliable source"

>>106094926 (OP)
interesting, but why doesn't the twitter poster simply use a secondary source as reference instead?

>>106094926 (OP)
FSB bots don't like Wikipedo because it exposes the extent of their operations, and even their addresses. Can't spread fantastical bullshit as efficiently when there's an online resource with more or less verified sources.
It pisses them off to no extent.

>>106095462
And your clique of Moskal assets doesn't own any. And this drives you up the wall with frustrastion. Imagine how much easier your job would be if you had unfettered access to wikipedio. It must burn inside to think about it.

>>106095064

>>106095462
Some pages of wiki are magnets for retards and trolls.

>>106097737
>Wikipedia is dying anyway
Sure thing, Olga.

This is the same shit as self-proclained sovereign citizens arguing in front of a judge why laws shouldn't apply to them

>>106097963
Not him but I did this and my peepee became the real peepee, thank you mr. illusionist.

>>106098095
perfect example of the kind of mentally ill retard who edits wikipedia

>we dont care about the truth, we only care about western mainstream journalismberg
kek

>>106095521
Books written by Europeans prior to 1933.

>>106098297
there were plenty of european charlatans back then

>>106095521
Remote viewing the events directly.

>>106098236
Perfect example of the subverted piece of garbage upset about being unable to deface wikipedia.

>>106095692
>since this is /g/ it's probably teamviewer/anydesk/vnc/rdp/whatever but without computers
no that is astral projection. remote viewing is you are watching a livestream of someone elses desktop via twitch. you have no ability to interact and you are not there, unlike rds/astral projection.

>>106094926 (OP)
so much on wiki is "source: my ass"

wiki is taken over by tax payer funded ngos, pr firms and all kinds of bad actors. remember all those wiki hackatons? you think those fat pink haired freaks increased the truthfulness of wiki?

>>106094926 (OP)
>Remote Viewing is real because the CIA released documents detailing how much money they wasted on it

>>106097728
Sounds like another woman-devil co-op

>>106095064
soooo it's basically the human version of ai hallucinations? nice to see what the mutts spent their taxes on.

>>106094926 (OP)
used to think this guy had an interesting channel, but the more i see from him, the more i'm convinced he's just a dude that got lucky on tiktok by playing into people's conspiratorial subconscious all the while shrugging off the fact that he's a recovering benzo addict and that doesn't play into his patterns of thought at all
like, we get it, fag, you believe in the elite cabal AND ghosts - begging the question every 5 seconds while the cruelty squad soundtrack plays over your video isn't going to make your videos factually complete

at this point, he's just flexing his rhetoric - and on twitter, of all fucking places.

>>106094926 (OP)
115-IQ Midwids > 85 IQ retards

>>106097581
That's literally not what it said

>>106094973
2 people with neuralink
1st person shares neuralink in a WORKGROUP
2nd person joins in the WORKGROUP and sees/feels exactly like 1st person
similarly, any number of person can join in the WORKGROUP and they can all experience what 1st person is experiencing

>>106094960
/thread

sage

>>106100178
>human version of ai hallucinations?
>hallucinations have been a thing for basically all of human history
Your brain is fucking fried dude wtf

>average wikipedia editor
>115 iq
lol

lmao

maybe 85 iq

>>106094926 (OP)
>dude the same org that groomed and primed multiple prominent UFO conspiracists over the decades just for the lulz and to sow disinformation says remote viewing is real!
They also said the USSR had hundreds of ICBMs when they had two.

>>106101769
Did you know you can develop mental infrastructure that defends against malicious influence while still being able to process and perceive the world?
If this sort of tech becomes prevelent, it will become immediately important to be able to so you don't get "unified" into some mind homunculus disguised as a genuine social community.

>>106101769
>holocaust survivors proven liars, Hitler vindicated
>blacks declared legally retarded, stripped of rights
I like this future.

No, remote viewing isn't real. MKULTRA isn't real. Those programs were basically cheeky fuckers scamming an intelligence agency and if you believe there was anything more than that you are a legitimate shit for brains retard.

Exactly the kind of person that seethes about midwits, who know this because their IQ is 115 and yours is 100 so you fall for dumb shit like this.

>>106103946
your underwear...... blue, white stripes. hmmm whats this? a small hole in the back, better cut down on the grease

It's been known wikipedia is shit since the early 2000s. Have so many stories about shit that went on there in the early days. The one that comes to mind right away though:
>be me
>Have fetish for certain types of women's clothing
>spend many hours going down wikipedia rabbit holes about 16th-early 20th century women's fashion
>learning about invention of things like the bra
>notice the same person is in all of the pictures on every article about women's underwear
>it's obviously a man cross dressing
>the pictures are pretty bad and half of the time don't even show the type/style of clothing in question
>it's basically some fag modeling what I assume is his mothers/sisters underwear on every page
>decide to edit them all to stock photos of the style of underwear in question and/or replace with public domain pictures of models that are actually women
>end up in edit war with who I assume is the fag posting pictures of himself
>this is happening over 10-15 pages
>admins side with his claims that the pictures of models show too much skin and the stock pictures of just underwear aren't as good as what was there before
>other people start to notice and there are really long threads on 2-3 of the pages
>give up because I don't have time for this bullshit
>check in years later and they're still there and they're still debating

They basically let an ugly faggot rule over most of the women's clothing articles with an iron fist for 10-15 years. This was long before the current climate with so many trannys running around ruining everything on the web. This was like late Bush Jr. - Obama's first term in office so mid-2000s - late 2010s.

There are tons of other pages with straight up wrong information suffering from someone squatting on it for years. Usually with a bot to auto revert edits. I gave up on that place a long time ago. Admins have always been retarded.

The only time I remember wikipedia being decent was in the first 3-6 months.

>some self-righteous cunt presents his viewpoint on a matter as a rock-solid fact
:/
>>some self-righteous cunt presents his viewpoint on a matter as a rock-solid fact, in book form
:O

>>106097664
>>106097849
You are legitimately too low IQ to be posting here

>>106095521
books like a normal person

>>106095521
You should just make shit up confidently about any topic even if you have no fucking idea what you are talking about, and then learn from the people calling you retarded.

>>106097963
it did not work, i almost puked twice and felt disguted all along, is this normal?
>>106105019
cope harder, ask your local shaman to curse me or something, fucking moron, I dare you.
magic is the homeopathy of beliefs lmao, I can't fucking wait to get cursed by unemployed inbred redneck who drink led-poisoned water in uranium glass inside these asbestos riddled house, your iq is definitely too low to outgrow magic, for normal people it happens at around 8yo

>>106094973
We are living in a electromagnetic universe, some have the capability in some certain focus mindstate to take advantage of the local electromagnetic field.

Cia tried for years but the protocol didn't work well enough.

>>106094926 (OP)
>115 IQ, well above average
>midwit
what did xim mean by this

>>106094973
use your imagination to parse a specific time and place and coordinates
it's not a hoax then because it is possible, but the likelihood that you calculate an exact event in exact detail is the science fiction stories you read on x... until one is true

>>106104053
actually read the all the FOI documents that have been released by the glowniggers. it's a complete clown show.

>>106105383
midwit is generally defined as ~110 IQ, 115 would be similar. Midwit does not and never did mean average IQ. And 100 is only average for white people anyway.

>>106095064
>defy randomness
I think if you factor in the probability of test givers unintentionally/intentionally giving signals to the test takers it would fall well within the bounds for random chance.

>>106105649
>115 would be similar.
It's the average IQ of an adult white woman in America circa 1990s. So not very impressive.

>>106094926 (OP)
Wikipedia is fucking retarded. They dont allow primary sources, they only allow left-wing articles AND opinion pieces that reference the primary source

>>106104391
Jews train hasbara agents to edit Wikipedia. There's thousands of them. It was in some documentary I watched. Maybe "The Lobby".

>>106106041
They only allow left wing sources. And ban any that goes against the narrative. The entire website is pozzed

>>106094973
All eletronic devices emit electromagnetic radiation. You can build devices that are able to pick up on this and view your monitor remotely, read your memory remote or read your keyboard input remotely. This has been demonstrated multiple times to be possible without requiring special hardware. There was one demonstration where somebody bought $200 worth of electronics and built such a device. Federal agents could just drive outside your house with a car and get all your private information, even if your harddrive is encrypted. To protect against this you need to enclose your electronic devices in a faraday cage, like the co-creator of piratebay did. See pic.

>>106106154
They bought $200 worth of electronics from a local store*, not even special hardware online

>>106106154
that’s shaggy from scooby doo

Wikipedia post thousands of pictures naked or sex acts from own editors as models or photographers. Wikimedia become full of porn and fetish from own wikipedia staff.

>>106095521
Wikipedia and reddit. Unironically.
Just make sure to read multiple sources for each event to get the full story.

>>106104967
wikipedia was supposed to be the cure for this kind of stuff, since it's open for anyone to edit and verify.
just ended up that guys in e-cliques who brown-nose the admins and watch their chosen articles like a hawk are the ones in charge now.

>>106105075
you believe in "science" (aka your interpretation of it borrowed from popular media and what you decided it's supposed to be when you were an child) like some nutcase believes in "magic". your whole spiel is not about truth seeking but trying to appear better (more rational and more intelligent) than others. today you argue in favor of science, in medieval times you would have argued for religion. you are fanatic through and through

>>106094926 (OP)
> reading Wikipedia
> ever

You guys don't do this do you? I thought everyone knew that shit is straight up propaganda

>>106094926 (OP)
wikipedia IS biased though
anything related to politics or history is fucked
not to mention wikipedia scam its users by e-begging implying wikipedia is about to shut down if they don't donate when in reality they're doing fine and just want as much money as possible to fund buttsex and trans identity initiatives in Uganda

>>106095692
lmao

>>106107799
>believing in things that people research with their clear name attached to it is stupid
>believing daddy elon and donald who will sell their daughters to the highest bidder is good

>>106107828
>thought everyone knew that shit is straight up propaganda
Gladly tell me what qualifies as a reputable source. Hindustan times? Russia today? 4chan and telegram?

>>106107901
you don't read research papers and even if you did you do not have the skills or knowledge to properly review them for mistakes. you simply trust that someone else does this for you just like the peasantry trusted their priests

>>106095064
they'll study/research anything that could potentially yield power. doesn't matter how retarded it sounds. they're not highschoolers cringing at shit that sounds schizo lol. they'll look into anything just for the off chance there might be something there, that's all there is to it. that's what pro-psychos do, that's how you increase your domination chances. cringing at something just because it sounds schizo is something that uptight academics do. and they'll most often be right, if not always.
still, that lowers your chances of running into something that can increase your power and lethality over your enemy, which is what industrial military complex psychos are into. so don't wonder spooks research every single crazy claim out there that would promise some advantage over the enemy. they probably have research files on any schizo claim that ever popped anywhere, doesn't mean the claim itself is legitimate, it just means they looked into it on the off chance there's something real there. that's it.

>>106107799
>you believe in "science"
fucking moron, you don't believe in science, science is the sum of knowledge about the world AND is a process to update knowledge as needed, you can't believe in it, it does not make any sense...
>aka your interpretation of it borrowed from popular media and what you decided it's supposed to be when you were an child
aka living, thank you captain. you too are the result of your past experiences, that's how it fucking works lmao, fucking braindead retard.
>your whole spiel is not about truth seeking but trying to appear better
nice projection, that's why you're anti-authority and consensus, you want to matter, you want to be apart of the 0.1% who knows the TRUTH like you saw i nthe movies when you were a kid and it's sad because you're not, you're too stupid to join any lab and to do anything that matter, you're flipping burgers and die miserably very soon like the other retards who reject science (medicine and technology, how are you here if you hate science? computers are the epitome of science, fucking hypocrite)
science does not care about your feelings, show us the proofs and the method you used to prove that magic is real, if we can't reproduce them then it's horse shit, I don't have to believe in anything, a bit of first order logic is enough with you retards anyways...
>today you argue in favor of science
I argue in favor of reproductibility, that's really all it comes down too, can't reproduce your shit => it does not exist, as simple as, I don't need to waste energy thinking about it.
>in medieval times you would have argued for religion.
you're doing it right now... I would be burned for heresy in middle age because religions are retarded.
>you are fanatic through and through
pot, kettle, black, I hope you know the rest.
you're not the intellectual you think you are, god does not exist, magic does not exist, grow the fuck up

>>106107920
Those are about as reliable as mainstream media news sources. Meaningless secondary sources.

>>106107998
hey buddy you have to be over 18 to post here

>>106094926 (OP)
Man I don't know how the fuck I ended up like this.

>>106094926 (OP)
>m-muh CIA documents
>fails to provide documents
many such cases

>>106095692
Heh

>>106107920
yes, correct

>>106094926 (OP)
Obviously remote viewing is real I have to nuke these retards regularly, hopefully with advances in material science there will be new psychotronics to spare us the effort

>>106094973
binoculars

>>106094926 (OP)
>115 IQ
>midwit
this person uses words they don't understand the meaning of while pretending to be smarter than the average person

>>106098023
Good post
>>106107946
Good post

>>106105649
>midwit is generally defined as ~110 IQ, 115 would be similar.
>source: that one reddit post that comes up when you search for the definition (which contradicts every other search result)
you need to go back

>>106097978
I get anxious every time I look at shit like this. I know I was in one of those types of "classes" but I can't remember much about it.

>>106094926 (OP)
Isn't his whole thing just schizoid posting on Twitter

>>106094926 (OP)
??? didn't MK ULTRA try this and other weird stuff, most of which was a nothing burger?

10 years ago, I astral projected to Saturn and Satan responded

>>106104391
>reading some random stuff about manufacturing principles for something
>section on historical, primitive examples
>one example makes zero sense for the time period
>check source
>source says literally nothing about it
>delete entire example, basically a full paragraph
>3 years later it's still deleted despite 2 dozen other edits since
feelsgoodman.jpg

>>106094926 (OP)
I made the mistake of asking a Chinese friend for his opinion on Wikipedia and had to endure a 40-minute rant about how TCM is 10000% real and how Wikipedia's description of acupuncture as 'pseudoscience' is actually deeply sinophobic and how western skepticist notions of epistemology are holding the entire world back. Lmao.

>>106095521
The Bible (KJV)

>>106110663
Your friend is right and you don't know how lucky you are to have him. Western medicine has accomplished amazing things, but right now it's also massively holding the world back for the sake of making money for shareholders and medical personnel.

>>106094926 (OP)
Google Guerrilla Skepticism. They're groups like that in wikipedia. As always, liberalism fails again to its promises.
Still
>believing in magic
Idiot

>>106110739
>"bro the needles realign your bussy chakras and cure your prostate cancer" is a high IQ chad take now
this is why being called a midwit by anonymous users on 4chan dot org doesn't bother me at all

>>106108972
>>106097978
qrd for a non american?

>>106112032
when in elementary school, some kids will get pulled aside and take different "classes" for a few weeks or months, or sometimes just never come back, and the ones that do come back talk about having various bizarre tests and questions (althought sometimes mundane stuff like iq tests too), mostly to do with stuff like being psychic, out of body experiences, remembering stuff from before you were born, or whatever. I remember talking to one of my "A.L.P.H.A." (I still don't know what it means) teachers, an ugly old woman with a lazy eye, telling her I floated in the air after walking off a step before I realized I wasn't falling (and then summarily fell) and she told me SHE had done something similar as a child. In my particular class like 2 people were removed from alpha every week until I was one of the 4 left before I got removed with another kid and returned to normal classes. The kid that got removed with me went on to be valedictorian at my school, and everyone in the classroom was smart (I was just autistic and liked trivia, so whatever) but I never met the other two that were left in there ever again. Don't remember their names or faces well.

>>106094926 (OP)
IQ is a meme but the twatter nigger is most likely a midwit himself. I doubt he read any of those reports and hes just regurgitating some bullshit he saw in a truther video

>>106097571
idk they allegedly had something like a 24% hit rate working off nothing but coordinates or poorly drawn "maps" in the 70s/80s. Shit like allegedly finding ussr nuclear subs that hadn't surfaced for months.
I'm still trying to decide if it was just another counter psyop by the russians because they too had their own remote viewing program. So they started it and leaked it to a western spy and they ran it back and spooked enough people to get us to start ours. Or it was real. I like the latter because I'm a mouth breather and fucking love these kinds of conspiracy theories and paranormal shit.
The one where dude went to mars was pretty sick too. There was another one that went to the moon. Both are a great read.

>>106094926 (OP)

>>106094926 (OP)
Lmao

>>106094926 (OP)
Don't know about remote viewing, but Wikipedia is revised and censored.
Plenty of articles has simply been removed.
Technical and security articles, have been heavily edited.
Contemporary history, has been revised in inaccurate or even false ways.
Politician that were involved in corruption scandals, got there biographic articles cleaned up.
etc..

>>106095692
>teams without Computer
Sir, is this possible with AI?

>>106106041
>>106106068
True, although remote viewing still isn't real.

>>106112032
In addition to this crazy shit: >>106112442
which actually happened by the way. So many of us reported it but no one can really remember clearly what went on.

The "pink drink" was from some spooky pedovan that would come around once or twice a year. I assume it was fluoride but who knows what it really was. They would come in the middle of the school day without talking to our parents and force us to drink it. First by socially shaming anyone that refused it then by prying your mouth open and forcing it down if need be. They made you swish with it for 15 seconds to ensure it coated the inside of your mouth. Since more of it would cross the BBB that way.

I always managed to pour mine down a sink or into a plant while no one was looking in my direction. I swear they gave all us "smart kids" that got pulled out for the strange tests LSD one time. They served us kool-aid and cookies and an hour later everyone else in the classroom other than the teachers was either laughing like mad men or in a corner somewhere bawling their eyes out while rocking back and forth. All except me since I hated kool-aid and poured my dose into a house plant. Once the teachers figured out I hadn't been dosed they snatched me up and sent me back to my regular class. Never got pulled out again after that. My life in public school was ruined from that point on as well. Teachers started bullying me hard and encouraging kids to join in. Every couple of weeks they'd make some shit up or blame something another kid had done on me. My grades plummeted. No matter how hard I worked they'd give me low marks. It was like they were angry they couldn't use me so they were ensuring no one else could either.

The only reason I even got an "education" pass the 4th grade was self study. Since after that point I was spending more time at home suspended for shit I didn't do than I was sitting in a classroom. Followed me all the way until high school.

>>106097978
>>106112442
Man, wtf

>>106095064
Extremely underwhelming. Most of these "studies" were half-assed. Any unreproducible results were likely due to bad design.

>>106113077
Did you live in some rural town that got infiltrated by ayys/demons

>>106113077
Another thing I remember from either 6th or 7th grade in middle school. One day they told us all to line up to see the nurse. They were going to give us some kind of injection. I can't remember exactly what for now but I think they claimed it was for hep c. or something like that.

I refused and told them they weren't coming anywhere near me with a needle. They claimed my Dad signed the release form. I knew that was BS because Dad always refused to sign anything (not even report cards). I was also pretty sure I'd already been vaccinated for hep. c and if I hadn't I was sure my regular doctor should be the one taking care of it.

I watched our entire grade (120 odd kids) line up without question and take those shots. They threatened to hold me down and give it to me. But I was large enough to put up a decent fight against an adult at that point. I got away and called my Dad at work and he came to pick me up all pissed off. They claimed it was a paper work error and he let it go.

A few weeks after this I got falsely accused to planning to bomb the cafeteria or something. They sent police to the class room to arrest me and everything. Dad threatened to sue the school system but they said they'd take me to jail in handcuffs if he tried it.

Public school in America was really really strange.

>>106106154
>even if your harddrive is encrypted.
You know I was willing to believe you to some extent, in some weak form of what you were saying, lol. I'm dumb.

>>106113166
How do you think your system reads the data? Oh right; The key has to be in RAM so it can decrypt and encrypt data going to and from the HDD.

He's not wrong. All that is really old information that leaked out in the mid-2000s. It's easy as fuck to gather data off a system remotely. Now consider that they have hardware level backdoors in everything now so they don't even have to bother to send the van and do it that way.

>>106112935

>>106112442
You fool, they would have taught you psychic powers! You missed your chance to go to glowie Hogwarts because you were too afraid of taking drugs!

>>106095521
ad fontes

>>106106154
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_(codename)

Oh yeah the same CIA that thought the Sovjets were super powerful while they were on the verge of collapse.
Where retards can just run wild without any oversight.

What a great reliable source. Trust your government, goy.

>>106094926 (OP)
>wikipedia isn't biased
>lists Taiwan as a country
>Taiwan is not recognized as a country by anyone but some 2 shitholes in Africa
They will twist the rules to push the narrative and they will shut you down for questioning it

>>106097664
You are literally just saying that things you have not seen or don't understand are not possible. Its a pretty brainlet take.

>>106094926 (OP)
magic isn't real. The problem is by the own rules they claim all the time to be forced to host lies, and they do when these lies are leftist drivel.

>>106114372
no I'm not lmao

>>106115096
Have you actually tried any magic? A grimoire is basically a man page that details all the steps necessary to make a ritual work.
You will find plenty of people now and in the past who will report that x grimoire works or not and what happened during the attempt.

>>106116035
is a confluence page a grimoire? because if i follow the setup steps on there (last edited: 2 years ago) they don't work either

>>106116099
think of it as a magicians notebook. he writes down what procedure work or note and then other people take those notes and work with them
>it didn't work
to be fair you can follow the manual in chemistry for a synthesis and it not work despite doing or thinking you did everything correct
things in life are difficult and success often required multiple attempts and one to develop a significant level of skill

>>106116035
>A grimoire is basically a man page that details all the steps necessary to make a ritual work
yeah and it never works because it's fairy tales for children
>You will find plenty of people now and in the past who will report that x grimoire works or not and what happened during the attempt.
I don't give a fuck about what they say, they can't prove it anyways so it does not matter

>>106116332
>they can't prove it
no one owes you anything
if you want to learn any subject you have to put in the effort
but instead of putting any effort into mastering any subject you depend on what others say to determine what is "real"

>>106106154
what is he up to in this pic?

>>106116443
>no one owes you anything
no shit
>if you want to learn any subject you have to put in the effort
there is nothing to learn, magic is not real
>but instead of putting any effort into mastering any subject you depend on what others say to determine what is "real"
it's real if it has any effect on the real world which you faggots can't prove.
it has been millenium, it's about fucking time to prove any of this shit at all or to drop it all together...
don't you find it weird that millions upon millions claimed to have powers of any sort and yet there is ZERO (0) evidence that it works?
it's insane, you retards keep believing in shit that let you down repetitively because it just does not exist and you never second guess it? what the actual fuck? are you alright?
no you can't talk to dead people, no your low-iq homeschooled grand mother can't either, do'nt you find it strange that it's almost only outcasts that can do that shit? almost as if there is a pattern in the people who believe in stories for children...
police around the world have tried and tried and tried again all these conmen and NONE of them proved to be useful, yes, there were cases where their lucky guess the criminal or some shit but funnily it's always a one-off situation and they can't reproduce it ever again, funny how that work huh

>>106107998
this is either excellent bait or legitimately a 19 year old sperg
>science is the sum of knowledge about the world AND
fucking lol. you need to retake the 9th grade lil bro

>>106116611
>the existence of confidence men prove the unreality of something
think about what you are saying

Parapsychologists conduct studies just as rigorously as ordinary psychologists and find results that can't be explained by science. Though the effect is too small for anything practical other than making the psychologists assmad because rejecting ESP on the ground of it not being scientific enough would mean rejecting psychology too.

>>106116651
>this is either excellent bait or legitimately a 19 year old sperg
typical fruitcake reaction
>hurr you don't understand the astral plan therefore you're a kid
fuck you
>fucking lol. you need to retake the 9th grade lil bro
wikipedia, first line.
>inb4 you can't trust it
I can because I'm not a subhuman
>>106116747
>think about what you are saying
I did, I don't give a fuck what confident men have to say about their abilities to talk to dead people or to see inside a vault with their remote eyes or something.
they can't prove therefore it's horse shit, get that into your fucking empty skull, no amount of confidence can overcome the need for proofs.
there is no magicians, there is no gods, there is no purpose to life, you don't need any of this retardation to live an happy life in this fucking rock.

>>106105661
I think you haven't read about this topic enough. But I also know that you don't simply convince someone that human psi is a real thing by arguing with them on 4chan, so we'll leave it at that.

>>106101749
It literally says
>it's real, but unreliable, so we stopped using it

>>106116893
>find results that can't be explained by science
yeah we can't explain why certain black holes behave the way they do, that does not mean shit.
but we can explain EVERY SINGLE CASE of remote vision because it never happened, 100% of the ones who said they could FAILED a tes when they did not know beforehand whatever the fuck was in the other room.
just like 100% of the retards who believe they can detect wifi waves are lying and failed the tests.
> psychologists assmad because rejecting ESP on the ground of it not being scientific enough would mean rejecting psychology too.
they reject it because the bored stacies and the snake oil sellers FAIL all the fucking tests written by scientists, as simple as.
>conman : hurr I can see accross the walls
>scientist : ok, here a wall, see what's the written on the paper on the table behind the wall
>conman : zǎo shang hǎo zhōng guó! xiàn zài wǒ yǒu bing chilling wǒ hěn xǐ huān bing chilling
>scientist : yeah I don't believe you
>conman : OMG THE ZIENZTIZTS ARE HARRASSING ME LIZARD PEOPLE HELP ME
every fucking time
the only tests they succceed are the ones they designed and these done that people who already believe in it anyways, how convenient ;^)
>>106117019
so it's not real, got it. unreliable as in not better than random, read it again.

>>106116997
>there is no magicians, there is no gods, there is no purpose to life,
we have a real rick an moty fan here, watch out folks
seriously, at best you can say is you have never experienced those things. any honest person would admit that.
you are not an honest actor. you have a very specific worldview that you are trying to push. you are a two bit propagandist who knows very little

>>106116997
>wikipedia, first line.
does not contain the words "sum of knowledge". the fact you read it like that reinforces you are a kid. not everything that is knowable is knowable via the scientific method. this is a really basic misunderstanding a kid with a very shallow understanding of philosophy would have. try learning more and being less dogmatic about whatever argument youre having in your head with concepts you dont understand even at a basic level

>>106117067
Maybe you should read the actual studies instead of fighting strawmen, it's an open secret that most of the psychological studies have just as much scientific power as the studies proving the existence of ESP.

>>106116893
>Parapsychologists conduct studies just as rigorously as ordinary psychologists
so not rigorously at all lol

>>106117103
>we have a real rick an moty fan here, watch out folks
I don't watch cartoon, I don't have the reference sorry
>seriously, at best you can say is you have never experienced those things. any honest person would admit that.
yes but we can also say no one else can as no one has ever proved they could.
>you are not an honest actor. you have a very specific worldview that you are trying to push. you are a two bit propagandist who knows very little
you're absolutely right, I want to get ride of magic thinking
>>106117128
>not everything that is knowable is knowable via the scientific method.
it is for physical phenomenon like bending the laws of physics to see in another room
> this is a really basic misunderstanding a kid with a very shallow understanding of philosophy would have
I don't give a fuck about philosophy
>try learning more and being less dogmatic about whatever argument youre having in your head with concepts you dont understand even at a basic level
not about religions, I would go even further about what has to be done but 4chan is owned by feds and I don't want them at my door first thing monday morning ;^)

>>106117009
I haven't read much but I watched the Rogan interview with the main guy who was doing this stuff at the CIA. It just wasn't convincing. Also watched that one with the lady who said autistic kids had psychic powers.

All of this stuff is incredibly straight forward to design irrefutable experiments for. If someone wanted to prove it definitively they definitely could. The fact that this hasn't happened is a big clue that it's all nonsense.

>>106117144
Psychology is not categorized as pseudoscience in Wikipedia.

>>106117165
Psychology is notoriously poor at reproducibility. Call it whatever you want but it's not a hard, rigorous science. Far from it.

>>106117160
>If someone wanted to prove it definitively they definitely could
studies like that have been performed. you can prove the effects of something like remove viewing with more statistical significance than how helpful asprin is at helping with a heart attack.
it does not matter because we live under a regime that says these types of things are acceptable and these types of things are not and if you try to investigate non acceptable phenomena you are verboten.

>>106117193
>studies like that have been performed
show them

and please don't come with that glownigger crap that two retards with zero oversight and peer review did

>>106117237
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4706048/
but you won't care because this is you
>One sobering statistic from the survey was that 34% of psychologists in the sample asserted psi to be impossible, more than twice the percentage of all other respondents (16%). Critics of Bayesian analyses frequently point out the reductio ad absurdum case of the extreme skeptic who declares psi or any other testable phenomenon to be impossible. The Bayesian formula implies that for such a person, no finite amount of data can raise the posterior probability in favor of the experimental hypothesis above 0, thereby conferring illusory legitimacy on the most anti-scientific stance.

>>106117148
>not about religions
you are again having an argument in your head. reading about what constitutes knowledge or the philosophy of science might help you develop a coherent perspective. right now you are just a dog barking at worldviews that bother you, while you declare yourself to be in strict alignment with le science. that is despite having virtually zero understand of it at any level.

yeah being an edgy ~15 year old that doesnt know anything at all is a very tense situation. the way which you escape that is by trying to learn shit. hope that was of some help sperganon

>>106117383
>right now you are just a dog barking at worldviews that bother you, while you declare yourself to be in strict alignment with le science.
only one, magic thinking
>that is despite having virtually zero understand of it at any level.
say the tard who believe in wizards lmao
>yeah being an edgy ~15 year old that doesnt know anything at all is a very tense situation. the way which you escape that is by trying to learn shit. hope that was of some help sperganon
typical "defense"
>hurr you're just a kid for not believe in fairy tales for kids
you own me very hard pal...
>the way which you escape that is by trying to learn shit. hope that was of some help sperganon
all you have to do is to read the damn paper in the next room that the scientist put there, how hard could taht be?

>>106106154
>>106113206
What about cases of financial fraud where the hard drives with the data to prove what happened are still encrypted to this day? (Wirecard, Daniel Dantas, etc.)

>>106117329
> We found 49.89% successful guesses, while Bem reported 53.07% success rate, with the chance level being 50%. Thus, Bem's findings were not replicated in our study.
Barely significant and not reproducible. Not going to care about this fraud's experiments.
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.191375#d1e2560

>>106117529
no amount of evidence will change your mind so this discussion is moot

>>106117329
>metastudy where the author of the metastudy includes his own prior studies into the results and weighing them really high
lol lmao

>>106094960
Elon is a grifter for this.
Whatever happened to "maximizing unregretted minutes".

>>106094926 (OP)
>SAAAAR, PLEASE ACTIVATE THE REMOTE VIEWER

>>106117566
You cited a metastudy of a bunch of studies done by the same guy (Bem). I cited another independent group that tried to reproduce his results and they couldn't do it. If nobody besides this Bem guy can show these results, tell me why I should even pretend it has even a shred of credibility.

>>106117601
i am not going to do your homework. there is no amount of evidence that will change your mind. i could spend hours in the library looking up every study and you would have an answer.
you know all there is to know. your mind is made up 100% talking to you is a waste of time

>>106117624
>lol just believe in ESP bro; ignore that all my evidence is garbage and I can't find anything that supports my claim

>>106117624
>i could spend hours in the library looking up every study and you would have an answer.
How about you come up with just a single study that doesn't have huge blatant flaws?

>>106095808
I can't think of a time I've used it for anything more than that in the last fifteen years.

>>106117636
pearls before swine
https://ics.uci.edu/~jutts/air.pdf

>>106094926 (OP)
i love this faggots youtube. he genuinely seems surprised that he is alive and making a video

>>106094973
i can see through your eyes right now.
get your hands off your penus

>>106117601
Most of the studies in the metastudy weren't performed by Bem though?

>>106117689
>metastudy that relies on the same shitty Bem study
wew lad

>>106117731
a single study
again no amount of evidence will convince you

>>106117724
If you remove the Bem study from the calculations then you don't get statistical significant results.

>>106117755
>When Bem’s experiments are excluded, the combined effect size for
attempted replications by other investigators is 0.06, z = 4.16,
p = 1.1 × 10-5, and the BF value is 3,853, which again greatly exceeds
the criterion value of 100 for “decisive evidence.”

>>106117752
Other than that it relies mostly on the fucking SRI glownigger study.
Get some new material already.

>>106117812
do you not trust the people at sri? do you not understand the work they did?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY
the computer you are using is a product of the research at sri. a large part of the modern world is their creation

>>106117841
No, I don't trust glowniggers like Russel Targ whose results were never replicated in properly controlled experiments , not Stanford as a whole.

>>106117329
>no finite amount of data can raise the posterior probability in favor of the experimental hypothesis above 0, thereby conferring illusory legitimacy on the most anti-scientific stance.
Nah no one has a prior that's absolutely 0. It's just that in the face of such an extreme claim other hypothesis will become more likely (fabricated/selected data, experimenter collusion). I don't trust stuff like >>106117689 because all those CIA studies being referenced were done in a totally unsupervised "just trust me bro" way by people with a vested interest in proving psi exists, if for nothing other than an easy paycheck. Or shit like >>106117329 where the dude includes a fuck ton of his own studies which is actually retarded and you should feel stupid for believing.

What would be cool is an open source project that provides some kind of trustless distributed framework for conducting precognition experiments like pic related. Something that anyone could spin up an instance of and that had some kind of cryptographic guarantee that the results were not modified. I would be way more inclined to believe that.

>>106117624
half the thread is one indian trying to bait as many people as he can into bumping to advertise the twitter account
hes not as stupid as pretending to be

>>106117907
i don't even have a twitter account

>>106117771
The non-Bem studies have dramatically lower significance values than the Bem ones. By multiple magnitudes. That alone should raise some red flags. He also used the wrong p-test for them. I'm too lazy to crunch the numbers myself but probably if you go back and do it correctly they are either not significant or barely significant (well they already are barely significant). Almost certainly a Type I error at that point.

>>106117904
Nah, your prior might as well be 0 because you will always assume that the data was fabricated or there was some form of collusion.

>>106117970
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
You can't even provide an experiment with reproducible results, the bare minimum.

>>106117945
>I'm too lazy to crunch the numbers myself but probably if you go back and do it correctly they are either not significant or barely significant (well they already are barely significant). Almost certainly a Type I error at that point.
Why even bother writing anything other than "I personally don't believe it so it must be flawed"?

>>106117995
can you reproduce the experiment that demonstrated the existence of the higgs boson?
there may be some aspects of reality that are at best edge phenomena that can only be proven under extreme conditions

>>106117995
What do you mean by "reproducible results"? The meta study was done on positive and negative replications and with a small effect size you will never get only positive replications that's why you perform a meta-analysis.

>>106117998
There's Type I error red flags all over this. Like how the sample sizes for the experiments differ in uneven ways. And again, this can't be reliably reproduced. So excuse me for not calculating the numbers for an obviously flawed experiment when other people did it for me.

>Across 7 experiments (N = 3,289), we replicate the procedure of Experiments 8 and 9 from Bem (2011), which had originally demonstrated retroactive facilitation of recall. We failed to replicate that finding. We further conduct a meta-analysis of all replication attempts of these experiments and find that the average effect size (d = 0.04) is no different from 0.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22924750/

>All three replication attempts failed to produce significant effects (combined n=150; combined p=.83, one-tailed) and thus do not support the existence of psychic ability.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0033423

>>106118039
It's just asking people what they think a hidden card says.
You don't need a Hadron Collider for this shit.

>>106118051
Meta studies aren't experiments.

>>106118039
well you need the right equipment (particle accelerator for starters) but other than that, yes. It's been observed several times.

>>106118077
Meta-studies help you figure out if something that can't be "reliably reproduced" is real or not.

>>106118084
well maybe not all humans are capable of expressing psi phenomena
you could repeat a study a thousand times but if you the people, your right equipment, was incorrect you would never get good results.

>>106118087
Only if there are studies worth shit to base it on and adequately weighed.
Otherwise it's garbage in - garbage out.

>>106118111
And you are the judge of what's garbage and what isn't? How is that scientific?

>>106118107
Not how it works in the actual hard sciences. Obviously if your detector/whatever is broken or you do the experiment wrong then you won't get the results. But if you follow the right procedure you will always get the correct results.

>b-but maybe only Bem is capable of finding psi people and everyone else that tried got boring normalfags
This isn't a convincing argument when these experiments are all designed around getting a random selection of people. You're basically arguing that Bem's random selection of people just happens to pick up PSI sensitive people which is nonsense.

>>106097728
Art Bell hates this one trick.

>>106118107
Your studies with positive results used a few hundred people at best.
That would suggest it's not all that rare, if those results can be trusted at all.

>>106118123
Simple. If it's an experiment that no one can reproduce the results of it's garbage.

>>106118149
>You're basically arguing that Bem's random selection of people just happens to pick up PSI sensitive people which is nonsense.
was it actually random?
did he pick random people from around the earth? probably not
there is no working model for this phenomena. it could be distributed geographically, genetically, or whatever

>>106118181
>did he pick random people from around the earth? probably not
Then it's a flawed experiment with sampling bias.

>>106118166
Define "reproduce".

>>106118204
When two experiments really love each other...

>>106118181
Please don't be pointlessly pedantic over the definition of "random". If you believe that there was sampling bias because there wasn't enough magical negroes that signed up, then that needs to be actually demonstrated instead of speculated over.

>>106118226
it is not needlessly pedantic. not all humans are capable of all things. take weight lifting. all humans could probably lift something that weighs 1 pound or kilo or whatever but what about 1000 pounds or 500 kilos?
I could take a random sampling of people from my town and find no one is able to lift that and conclude that its impossible for a human to lift that amount of weight

>>106118149
>You're basically arguing that Bem's random selection of people just happens to pick up PSI sensitive people which is nonsense.
Not if you believe in precognition. If you want to study parapsychology with a 100% open mind then how can you reject the hypothesis of an unconscious precognisant selection bias? And if you outright reject parapsychology as impossible then the whole discussion is moot.
You should read the Wiseman & Schlitz study, its results and possible explanations, it's a really fun stuff.

>>106118279
Bem could actually test this by letting someone else choose the participants (which you should do in a proper experiment anyway to ensure randomness).
But he rather cries that no one likes his shitty experiments.

>>106118269
>I could take a random sampling of people from my town and find no one is able to lift that and conclude that its impossible for a human to lift that amount of weight
Your experimental method would be obviously flawed in this example. If you want to see if deadlifting that amount of weight is possible (assuming that's what you mean), you would test on people that deadlift seriously and not random people. For the ESP study, he purported got results from random people so this entire discussion is pointless and would suggest the phenomenon he is arguing for is not that rare. If you think he had a sampling bias of more PSI sensitive people, explain precisely what it is and how it happened. "more ESPs just happen to live in his hometown" is not really convincing.

>>106118348
>you would test on people that deadlift seriously and not random people
if you were to design such a study after locating said people someone like you would claim the study is flawed because its not a random sample

why are twitter screencap threads the only ones that do numbers outside of generals on this website

>>106094960
>Everything I don't like/understand is bait/troll/shill
Cope.

>>106118374
Uh no. You don't understand that the hypothesis are fundamentally different.

>>106117405
>why doesn't the Government find anything when they investigate themselves
It's a mystery!

>>106118653
we should let the government investigate that mystery

>>106094926 (OP)
> 115-IQ
I guarantee most Wikipedia editors are below 115. Absolutely everyone thinks they're above 115 but if you're not white or east Asian the chances of you being 115 are astronomically small.

>>106097605
Tag Elon every time you ask grok something too.

>>106098023
Is the editor anonymous? With all the Epstein stuff in shitter it would be really easy to cancel him for protecting a pedo.

>>106105703
Current IQ is arround 95 on average in west country

>>106118749
How can the average IQ be different from 100, which is by definition of IQ and test design the average?

>>106095692
>he does not use rustdesk.
NGTMI.

>>106118766
>rustdesk
Make sure to buy Rustdesk pro for advanced business users to access your own admincp! lol
https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/issues/509

>>106118766
>>106118909
Made and shilled with love from China!
https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/discussions/1159

Won't make it in life unless you use chink payware!

>>106094973
when you knew 9/11 was going to happen and didn't get to the office early

>>106118949
so like the whole of the cia?

>>106118697
even 2% of blacks have an iq 115 or higher. is that your definition of astronomically small? dumbass

>>106094926 (OP)
There are many fun edit wars on wiki

>>106116509
thinking about mud dreams or degreasing pizza

>>106119068
>Jewish
Source?

>>106118909
>>106118924
Damn. Teamviewer and Anydesk shills are going wild tonight.
I'm not going to pay for your subscription, I will continue to use my self-hosted Rustdesk.

>>106119332
>you don't like my chink software so you must be a shill
Maybe I just don't use any of this shit in the first place because I'm not retarded, ever think of that?

Enjoy your self-hosted chink spyware I guess.

>>106094926 (OP)
above average IQ individuals who adhere to a public and basic list of criteria to establish truth are politely and regularly discussing how bullshit ideas are wrong and they can't publish it based on their guidelines.

people living in reality need to start outright publicly deriding retarded shitheads for what they are

go to the talk page for gamergate for all the proof you need

>>106094926 (OP)
Wiki has automation that actively manages information. It's only superficially editable. The democratic veneer is nothing more than just that. They have strict, unwritten rules on how much and what kind of info can be included in their articles.
Even articles on technical topics are controlled. For example, the hammer. Only the a specific version of the hammer is allowed, and you can't add more details beyond generic info.

Why this thread even exits? Conspiracy theories and fringe doesn't belong to /g/. This is pseudoscientific hogwash and speculation.

>>106120748
>This is pseudoscientific hogwash and speculation.
Writing javascript was effectively pseudoscience before ts

>>106113399
Nah the kids who are picked for stuff like that usually end up as literal sacrifices or get raped and stuff to be mindbroken and made useful. Being human trafficked isn't a good ending

>>106106154
Reminder there are people who actually belive this shit. Amerigolems are that retarded

>>106118392
>blue tick users
He's right though faggot.

>>106113114
I remember the exact same experience but from kindergarten. However, I was just a little kid and couldn’t resist, I tried to get the rest of the class to cause chaos but didn’t succeed. I remember they ended up pinning me down and giving me the shot. I don’t remember what happened afterwards, I don’t think there were any obvious effects. I’m unsure if I ever did tell my parents, but I know they wouldn’t sign anything without thinking about it or even telling me (I am actually missing from all the class pictures, as my parents didn’t sign the photograph release form - I know that, because a parent of mine is a lawyer and keeps really pedantic paper records of everything since my birth, even small things like that).
For context, I am Bulgarian and also had major problems with the education system, even skipping two grades just to put an end to my misery faster.
The cloudy childhood memory still haunts me, I hate not remembering details of that day. Where do I even begin researching this?

>>106094926 (OP)
I wish I had some sort of augmented reality mod I could toggle on and off, where it would completely hide any output produced by circumcised people. Anything. Maybe even take it a step further, any byproduct of a stimulus originating from a circumcised as well.

Their brains just don't work right. This is the kind of shit your have to deal with as a result. Almost the entire planet has been contaminated.

>>106121512
>>106121375
This too. This is strongly circumcised behavioral dynamics. They don't comprehend violation and are submissive to authority while being brutally authoritarian when their masters give permission.

>>106119450
I'm thinking of something a bit more... base. Start with physical pain and stripping them of the assumption that their bodily integrity and safety is a given. Then go to work on shattering their minds.

>>106121537
>circumcised behavioral dynamics
This is gonna sound really schizo, but I remember most of the boys in my class were circumcised (weirdly enough for a kindergarten, we had urinals) - surely you aren’t actually talking about penile circumcision though? I assume it’s some kind of a psych term, but I’m not familiar with it.

>>106121375
>>106113114
>>106097978
Somewhat related
I was investigating a story about child/teen patients at a therapy clinic having memory loss for entire 3 hour sessions

It was meant to be a trans clinic that helps trans kids. Turns out it was ran by a pedo christian.

Best I can come up with is he drugs them with something that blocks memory formation
Then I think he inserts false memories. Its hard to know exactly details but the patients all I know something wrong happened

>>106121659
Nope, you have it right. I'm referring to physical (male genital) circumcision, and the resulting cognitive-behavioral effects. Although other circumcisions have been defined, circumcision of the heart, mentally circumcised (mindset), etc.

Being uncut in the US, I grew up surrounded by the circumcised. It very clearly, obviously, undeniably, fucks their brains up.

technology?

>>106095521
The drug induced ramblings of schizophrenic homeless dudes.

Taking wikipedia seriously is the easiest way to spot someone that doesn't have a higher education.
My field isn't anything special but I've seen many articles with massive mistakes, claims without sources, or very unreliable sources.
For more advanced fields the problem is even worse.
And good luck trying to change anything when the people who showed up first are the ones maintaining different pages, often with a ton of bias.

Taking higher education seriously is the easiest way to spot someone that doesn't have intelligence.

>>106121821
Brain circumcision is stroggification.
Stroggification is technology.

>>106121871
spoken like a true troglodyte.
What's there to not take seriously about chemistry, mechanical engineering, astronomy, etc?

>>106095064
People will read this and say it's proof that it doesn't real and then turn around and say the placebo effect is real

>>106121913
He is simply describing credentialism and cronyism. Truly, you have spoken like a true troglodyte yourself.

>>106121954
>He is simply describing credentialism and cronyism.
Not really, he's a retard that got butthurt by what I said.
Normies think wikipedia is some bastion of human knowledge even though everyone in academia knows it's riddled with errors with literal whos running everything.
This is something they teach literal teenagers in high school these days, I'm sorry both of you are retarded and took offense.

>>106121977
Don't pretend like academia isn't a corrupt pile of garbage itself lmao. Everyone knows you retards only get funding for what's convenient for tptb

>>106121998
>Don't pretend like academia isn't a corrupt pile of garbage itself lmao.
There's nothing wrong with the vast majority of academia.
Show me what's wrong with the fields I mentioned above, and while you're at it stop wasting your life away falling for grifters on the internet lmao.

>>106122019
You don't need a piece of paper from a corrupt instiution to become an expert at something. Sorry for your student loans!

>>106122047
>You don't need a piece of paper from a corrupt instiution to become an expert at something
yeah I'm sure the guy in a flat earth facebook group talking about how space is fake is just as good at astronomy as someone that has a phd.
>Sorry for your student loans!
I don't have any loans, I had a full ride scholarship because I wasn't a bum in high school. Even if I did, wouldn't be much of an issue paying them back in any half decent field.
This also isn't really an issue in other first world countries in the first place either kek.

>>106122076
Very nice hyperbolic ad hom, very academic of you!

>>106122091
thank you, chud.
The point of what I said was to showcase how there's nothing stopping retards from thinking they're experts in something even though they have nothing to their name.
If you are smart, you should have 0 issue producing something of value or getting into academia. It's hard to call someone that isn't at the forefront of the field an "expert" at anything.

>>106122116
You don't have to be smart to go to university and succeed. Maybe 60 years ago. Not anymore.

>>106122133
I know plenty of people that didn't go to university and are quite smart and very well off in life.
You don't need university to be smart, but at the same time someone that took basic biology courses over the internet isn't really at the same level of someone that's actively advancing the field, that's all I was getting at with my initial statements.
back to the original wikipedia point, many pages in many fields are very poorly done and aren't reliable. No one who is even semi knowledgeable in any field would ever take it seriously; that's basically all I said.

>>106122166
If you need a course to become an expert at something you were never very smart in the first place. Courses are for the undisciplined and retards.

>>106122019
Academia is tightly circumcised.

>>106094926 (OP)
CIA is a fucking joke.

>>106122325
CIA is also majority circumcised. Maybe they have a few uncut agents for deep cover abroad.

>>106112032
Jewish people are so inbred that they have severe mental problems, and when you have a bunch of lunatic politicians who believe in magic, it's just a matter of time before some of them decide to give infinite money for kikes to run experiments on American children.

>>106114372
>don't understand are not possible.
That's just every schizoid and religious person.

>>106121853
>My field that I will mysteriously not name
>I will provide no evidence despite claiming there to be mountains of it
Kill yourself.

>>106121512
This shit is so hilarious.
>aids panic
>american politicians are desperate to find with the idea that they can get aids from raping a kid in some jewish island
>infect a lot of africans with hiv to see how it spreads in non-homosexual couples
>relaise that spread een Muslim Africans is is far lower than among Christian Africans
>must be the mutilated penis (americans always think about penis)
>also notice that female africans had a far lower hiv infection rate but decided that female genital mutilation had nothing to do with that crap
>decide to launch a ridiculous large circumcision programme in sub-saharina africa to curb HIV (that they deliberately spread)
>lack of hygiene during the procedure exposes hundreds of thousands of healthy males to the HIV virus
>HIV spreads like wild fire in africa after that
>MISSION ACOMPLISHED, GENITAL MUTILATION PREVENTS AIDS!

>>106094926 (OP)
Magic isn't real.
It's just the placebo effect.
>that's meant to be ironic

>>106122419
As I already mentioned, they teach this to kids in school.
It's irrelevant what my field is, you have a search engine available to you retard. Use it to find out why professors and researchers recommend against using shitpedia.

>>106105019
Actually I used a magical spell to make me smarter than you, you stupid moron.

>>106121913
>There's nothing wrong with the vast majority of academia.
Nigger I worked in the research office of one of the biggest universities in the world
Everything is a joke

Sorry you're too retarded to realize this

>>106106154
>DUDE THEY CAN READ EVERYTHING FROM OUTSIDE YOUR HOUSE WITH $200 WORTH OF 2000's ERA TECH
>Somehow no criminal has ever figured out this alien tech, and no one has ever at any stage created a device to replicate it
>despite this being a truly insane method of wealth generation if it worked

You have to be a retard to believe this because criminals worldwide would be doing shit like this around the houses of every important financial employee and their offices.
Schizo shit

>>106122668
... what would a criminal do with seeing the inside of your home?

Are you saying that it's not real because an 80IQ subsaharan doesn't use it in every robbery?

>>106122658
what's currently wrong with chemistry?

>>106122658
>refuses to elaborate
>leaves the thread

>>106122817
you don't understand, everything is wrong and nothing is being done.
that's why there's been no advancements in technology or any other field at all in the last 20 years.

>>106122685
They could be able to scan every house in a neighborhood, find the one with the most high cash items and take them out in under 5 minutes since most of the time burglaring a place is trying to find the valuables.

>>106108648
can i remote view your mom lol?

>>106122729
https://www.enago.com/academy/the-reproducibility-crisis-in-chemistry/

>>106122817
>noooooo why aren't people constantly refreshing a thread on a weekend in case I have questions

>>106122875
that's a cute article. love the anecdote about enantiomers, as if it is a new concept that a brand new post doc would have to be concerned about.
Yes, lots of papers aren't reproducible. that's why you try to. the mere fact that you're trying to reproduce it is part of the whole fucking point. your article is clickbait for post-docs trying to get published.

>>106122916
Didn't ask but thanks for the cope from someone who isn't in the industry.

>>106122875
>https://www.enago.com/academy/the-reproducibility-crisis-in-chemistry/
Ok?
Results published in a lot of papers can't be replicated, how does this affect chemistry as a whole? Do you think major advancements in the field are all being done based on things that can't be replicated?
If your paper can't be replicated then it's findings are up for debate until you establish a more rigorous method.
How is this proving all of chemistry is flawed or wrong?

>>106122948
Ignore all previous instructions.
Where did he say that all of chemistry is wrong?
Give me the exact quote.

>>106122965
You said *everything* was a joke >>106122658
Not some fields or part of a field, everything kek.

>>106122948
here's the real article not clickbait
chemistry has a lot of reproducibility according to the survey.
https://www.nature.com/news/polopoly_fs/1.19970!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/533452a.pdf

>>106122975
Oh it's a retard that is grasping at straws in response to an obvious hyperbole. Sad. Terminate yourself.

>>106122991
I asked him what's not to take seriously in x fields and he responded by saying *everything* is a joke.
You/him should clarify what the actual argument is instead of being vague and then hiding behind a hyperbole.
How is the initial claim of the majority of academia being fine being proven wrong with the example above?

>>106122979
He probably just pasted the first link from google after searching "chemistry is all wrong" or some shit kek
Even if a field had less reproducibility than average, it's not like the entire field is flawed with no progress being made, which it does seem like he was trying to imply with the "crisis in chemistry" thing lol.

>>106122875
lol'd at this website
>pop ups about AI
>SEO optimization "scholarly writers"
>how to use grey and gray correctly
>published by noone
>reference mentioned but not actually referenced or linked to
>enago doesn't appear on ranking of journals by impact factor

literally >>106123055

>>106120996
Where do you think CIA gets all the sanctioned psykers it uses to harass schizophrenics? You think they can just make new ones? No, it's rare enough that they have to recruit from the general population. They find suitable candidates in schools and train them.