Thread 106105143

Previous Thread: >>106067859

>Links:
>DALL-E 3
https://www.bing.com/images/create
https://designer.microsoft.com/image-creator
>4o
https://chatgpt.com/
https://sora.chatgpt.com
https://copilot.microsoft.com/
>Imagen 3
https://labs.google/fx/tools/image-fx
>Imagen 4
https://gemini.google.com/app
https://labs.google/fx/tools/whisk
>Midjourney [PAID]
https://www.midjourney.com/home
>NovelAI [PAID]
https://novelai.net/image

>Download links for latest Bing and Designer Slop scripts:
https://pastebin.com/raw/bk33MxxG

>Instructions and download for BIC EDIT script:
https://rentry.org/bicedit

>Prompt Generator
https://tipseason.com/dalle-prompt-generator

>DALL-E 3 image generation guide
https://files.catbox.moe/o4yihf.png
https://files.catbox.moe/320rm1.png
https://files.catbox.moe/8gge6o.png
https://files.catbox.moe/dcokjf.png

>Related Boards
>>>/v/dall-e
>>>/co/dall-e
>>>/trash/aibf
>>>/aco/dall

>>106105143 (OP)
i want attractive girls not this boring shit and bring back the edition you disgusting queer

>>106105205
>I CAST... "RELAX"!

>>106105143 (OP)
why did you remove some of the information from OP that was listed? I am curious the logic used to remove things and why
>Related boards
>>>/h/hdg
>>>/e/edg
>>>/d/ddg
>>>/b/degen
>>>/vt/vtai
>>>/aco/sdg
>>>/u/udg
>>>/tg/slop
>>>/trash/sdg
>>>/vp/napt

>>106106443
I just copy and paste the previous op without looking much at it.

>>106106443
Only >>>/tg/slop actually belongs on there and was accidentally removed a few OPs ago. The rest are local or open source AI image threads that don't welcome or want cloud-based gens like dall-e 3, 4o, imagen, etc.

>>106106589
>>106106777
samefag

>>106106589
completely understandable. I didnt realize the prior also did not have it.
>>106106777
ah noted also. welp next thread let's re-add the tg one I suppose.
thanks for clearing things up for me both of you.

>>106106443
I think the OP didn't have most of those, at least in the past year, the exception being /tg/slop, which was lost/removed a few threads ago. The only link I remember being actually removed from the OP was the one to /tv/, some time after their AI thread died
>>106106589
I tried to mention it near the end of the thread, actually: >>106104297
Well, it's not like it matters that much, dead thread, dead board, etc. I was kind of half-suspecting it was somehow on purpose, but it's not a big deal if it's just a mistake. We should probably change the title too, maybe something like "/DE/3 - DALL-E 3/Cloud AI Image Generation General", in order to make it clear that other generators are allowed, too. But again, it's mostly autism, the same 5 regulars and the semi-regulars already know it.
>>106106777
Thinking about it, one *possible* additional link is /bant/'s AI Waifu General, it's not limited to local generators, but well, it's specific in other ways. I've been thinking to add perchance to the generators, too. It's quite popular on both /co/ and /tg/, but no one seems to use it here, though.

>>106107025
Well if you add perchance don't forget to add hamsters (the guy on /tg/ and /sdg/ posting that one hamster) perchance list he made like 2 months ago. it has a bunch of generators listed. though it's outdated a bit it still provides a bunch of good generators.
https://pastebin.com/XRGqaW4W

I would also like to see /bant/ waifu linked as I post there and it's an odd thread but does get ai gens and some unique conversations going on at times (imo).

>>106107025
I'm pretty much oblivious what happens in the other generals. This and landscape general are the only places I look at on this website at this point. I rarely go onto other boards anymore as well.

>>106107025
/bant/ does seem to have a good number of dall-e 3 gens. But I'm not entirely convinced it's worth adding.

>>106107798
I say it is and there isnt a reason to not add it to the list. It gets good gens and the conversation while a bit odd at times is interesting to read. I get the impression you prefer not adding it due to the topics not the gens.

>>106105205
>Back in the day they used to gen Taylor Swift and AOC turning into slugs!
>Now its just a buncha Kansas City faggots posting landscapes!

>>106108001
HWAT in the wide world of sports is-ah goin' on here?!

>>106107093
Yeah, I was thinking about that list, I've seen it before and I've noticed it's linked on /bant/, too. I can't help getting the impression that it's a weird thread, IDs, flags and everyone isn't insulting everyone else all the time? How? Don't tell me it's because people can notice who's the noimg troll who doesn't contribute anything and just stirs up shit...
>>106107798
For its specific approach/topic (waifus) or some other reason?

we can move to /bant/ if we die again

>>106108001
I always wondered what happened to AOC slug anon
>>106108888
I'll just move to landscapes if this place somehow dies for good. My generations do not fit there.

>>106109052
>I always wondered what happened to AOC slug anon
Who knows, maybe it's actually the same anon that is prompting the sweating redneck fatass with MAGA hat and sunglasses? The satirical vibes are kind of similar.
>My generations do not fit there.
Well, if you look at the current thread, there's people prompting Peter Griffith... And their general has no ***rulez*** dictating that only cute women (nearly underage-looking and rigorously with fictional XX chromosomes certified by J.K. Rowling) are allowed.

>>106109261
can you not man. part of WHY I went to bant was it was implied in the title of waifu it's female only. sure it gets occasional stuff like peper griffin and redneck but thats not the normal of it and less common.

>>106109810
That was just my impression at a quick glance, I've checked that thread only occasionally and I don't really follow it. To be honest, though, I really don't understand why some people obsess so much about what others prompt. You can just prompt as easily what *you* want (and spam it to your heart's desire, within the limits of good sense). It's the whole point in this thing.

>>106109261
Unfortunately, no. I am not slugfu. I've been here the whole time, but have not stuck to a single gen or distinguished myself with such legendary posts. I am anon.

>>106112116
(me) I did once get a one-week time out for posting Oscar the Grouch railing Taylor Swift in the ass on top of a garbage heap.

You know, normal back-in-the-day stuff.

>>106112140
>Oscar the Grouch railing Taylor Swift in the ass on top of a garbage heap.
bring back them fucking days man

>>106112140
>Oscar the Grouch railing Taylor Swift in the ass on top of a garbage heap.
bring back them fucking days man

>>106112116
Too bad. The deranged nun thing and the (epic) gens of the Orange Perv running after her (from early February) weren't yours either?

New chapter of Otoyomegatari is out, but it looks like it will be a long while before more are released as it's in hiatus. Sad.

>>106116115
prompt?

>>106116182
It's turbosperging ChaGPT slop:
https://pastebin.com/y77vtSiu

My workflow is basically like this: I describe what I want to a LLM:
>Please write me a detailed image generation prompt depicting X
and I add style (the following one was what I used in that one) and instructions to elaborate the scene, like this:
>Style should be anime aesthetics with soft, painterly shading, after describing the scene, elaborate the prompt in terms of "Lighting & Mood", "Linework & Rendering", "Colour Palette", "Detail & Texture", "Composition" and "Finish". Use, if appropriate for your composition, digital painting effects to reproduce photographic ones.

Alternatively I feed an aesthetic photo from pinterest, ask to describe it and possibly modify it (I change background often, boring shit gets replaced by idyllic landscapes), followed by the same style and elaboration instructions. I think it's the best way to get detailed prompts that can make 4o a bit less sloppy-looking (a lot of people noticed that if you use the same prompt as de3 you're going to get pure slop). I rotate between 4o, o4-mini and Deepseek R1 (lately I've been using especially 4o, its sycophantic attitude actually makes it inclined to follow your instructions even when they veer in sexy territory, as long as it's not too daring.

>>106108541
>For its specific approach/topic (waifus) or some other reason?
I'm fine with waifus. My issue is with /bant/ itself, isn't it kind of like linking to /b/?

>>106116681
Kind of, I guess? Rule 3 is not applied similarly to /b/ yeah and some threads look like /b/-tier crap. The thread itself looks safe-ish enough, though (excluding the NSFW content, but we already get /aco/ in OP).

>>106116796
She ate too many of those, didn't she?

the good thing about the bant thread is men are banned from it and you dont have to see gay spam constantly

>>106116926
>men are banned from it
There is absolutely nothing stopping anyone from posting men (husbandos) in the thread, since there's no way to report it for being "Off topic". You could flood it with whatever. As long as it's not porn, because you could report that for "Dumping porn".

>>106116950
why do you want to see shirtless men

>>106116960
Why are you terrified of male presenting nipples?

>>106116970
its that im repulsed by any implications of homosexuality

>>106116976
Are you saying that even partial male nudity is by your own definition homoerotic? You're so in the closet, it's not even funny.

>>106116984
its when its generated with the thought of homosexuality that makes it homosexual and i dont like seeing it knowing theres homosexuals

>>106116960
Have you ever been to the beach?

>>106117032
wouldnt you like to know faggot? i dont stare like im a faggot.

>>106117010
So you're a psychic mind reader that can do so over the internet now, too? Amazing.

>>106116865
A few. And some more. Want one?
>>106116976
Implications are very often in the eye of the beholder.

Artistic boobies still work, goodo.
https://files.catbox.moe/d1pm4x.jpg

>>106117743
PLUMP.

>>106117840
As women should be, right?

Maybe not so plump here, but attempts with this composition resulted in weird anatomy, actually.

>>106118621
Baffling. This is the most generic pin-up girl pose you could possibly find. How did it manage to fuck that up?

>>106119066
Arm breaking the body in two halves (despite the prompt asking for the hand to get placed on the hip, but it's very often ignored) and the two parts looking kind of disjoined to me.

Anything breaking the visual continuity still seems to cause quite a bit of issue in 4o, actually. For instance, recently I had a lot of issues with this
>>106103688
the stock of the rifle actually ended up being weird, but I didn't notice it until after I posted it. Other gens were much worse. It's better to avoid similar compositions in the first place, if possible.

>>106115000
Checked and based

>>106118864
>front butt

I accidentally rolled with 4o on bing so now I'm going to post the trash it made.

>>106120175
Same prompt with dall-e 3. How 4o can take this absurdly dense prompt and produce such poop soup is just beyond me.

>illustration in the style of "attention is all you need - a study in self-reference" by max ernst. anime girl leaning over. dreamlike. surreal. full shot. anime style. organic architecture. humanoid female anime figures in background. psychological colors. philosophical exploration of latent attention mechanism. where thought finds form. mind without memory, memory without mind. overhead shot

>>106120189
4o is descriptive and it works better with detailed, not dense, prompts; probably it lost you already at the style.

4o's prompt reversed from your picture:
https://pastebin.com/hQkV8Qwd

>>106120356
While this is a valiant effort, I'm afraid this still doesn't look as good as the original, and it wasn't able to come up with it in the first place .. also, dall-e 3 can run the same prompt again and get vastly different but also great results, while 4o tends to output generally the exact same thing every time you run it. Case in point: Run with the exact same prompt on Bing.

>>106120564
>>106120577
>>106120597
These are pretty hawt though, if a tad too yellow as usual.

>>106121592
Yeah, well it's an approximation, the idea was showing the kind of prompt 4o expects to receive in order to produce something similar. 4o's focus on "prompt adherence" means that there's a fairly close correspondence between words and pictures.
Gotta say that sometimes it gives nearly identical results, while other times they are quite varied (hybrid anime/realistic styles, for instance, can veer more in one direction or another in the same batch), I think something happens behind the scenes. Picrelated's companion gen was this:
https://files.catbox.moe/xnu228.jpg
It's pretty much the *same* picture, textured in a slightly different way.
>>106121599
First one looked good to me honestly, but 2nd and 3rd didn't fully convince me either. Being a masochist I like to play with late afternoon/golden hour settings with 4o.

>>106124938
what's the prompt?

This gets dogged a bit, to be honest. Talking about dogs, canicula begins today... still fairly cool here for now, after the crazy hot June, but it won't last.

Picrelated are all from the same prompt, ftr. At least they were not the same identical picture like above.
>>106125057
https://pastebin.com/tHPBunvS

Welp, it took me more time than planned. Anyway, another suggestion that I would give when using 4o is to compensate for any mistake in the generation directly at the beginning of the prompt. Here I was facing three issues:
1) dogs' proportions were wrong, they looked tiny.
2) greyhounds ears were droopy, sloughi/azawakh-like.
3) mashrabiya (lattice windows of Arab/Islamic architecture) patterns ended abruptly mid-window.
I added
>Strive to keep careful and realistic proportions between the woman and the dogs. The woman is 165cm high, but she's crouching down, the dogs are both around 70cm high. Strive to render the signature ears of the greyhound accurately. Make sure the mashrabiya patterns cover the whole length of the windows.
At the very beginning of the prompt and things got much better. Obviously one could also modify the prompt in the appropriate places, but this works nicely enough and it's quicker.

I read on preddit that sora generations are basically unlimited as of a little while ago for plus subscribers, and I’ve been using the shit out of it and it’s really great. And for some reason, it seems like they haven’t clamped it down like the model that ChatGPT can access yet. Browse the Explorer page and there’s tons of copyrighted content and celebrities and things like that. And since I have plus, I’m just using ChatGPT to generate the prompts for me, and it’s like kino every time. Video is absolute trash on there though. If any of you guys are on ChatGPT, I do recommend for sora for image gen. Make the most out of it before they neutered it to remove copyright and all that other stuff.
> try to upload an image, but can’t because it’s webp whoops

>>106127637
Sora still lags behind every other video generator, though. Is it even worth the money?

>>106127962
i wwouldn't pay just for sora, no, especially if you want video. i have plus for other uses, but it comes free with it and for some reason is not yet limited other than how fast it can gen. but i personally can't get it to really do copyright or celebrity stuff (but im also not interested in it) but there's lots of it on there. the video is largely terrible. some short cool things pop up here and there but i haven't been able to make anything that isn't a schizophrenic mess in video. but it's essentially the chatgpt generator with no limit for now so that's cool.

>>106128055
>but i personally can't get it to really do copyright or celebrity stuff
i guess the trick is moonrunes lmao

>>106127637
reality is over

>>106126857
Nice and weird.
>>106127637
> try to upload an image, but can’t because it’s webp whoops
Open the single generation and click on the download button on the upper right, next to your username's abbreviation, it will give you the lossless PNGs, those webps are basically web previews. I've noticed that some anons actually download those and convert them (filename begins with asset_task).
Please share, this thread sorely needs some more content.

>>106129165 (Me)
Failed quoting, but obviously weird was in reference to >>106126873

>>106129165
>>106129249
ty. style is 'xerox art', and the weird one was 'xerox art, gradient mapping'

>>106129165
>needs more content
I didn’t feel a lot of the stuff in making has general interest at large since it’s a personal project, but I did spend some time seeing how you can push sora. If I asked directly for “zendaya in a dress” it didn’t work, but then I saw this prompt with Kate beckinsale buried in like 200 tokens and I changed the name and it went through. Not sure how it’s deciding to match filters or not

>>106129165
Oh and yeah I figured out how to get my own pngs, but looks like there’s no way to get them from gens in the explore feed?
>the longest hot dog ever made held by one man

>>106129589
> A Polaroid photo faded and washed out of a slim elegantly dressed man standing at the edge of the grand canton. The Polaroid appears to be standing on one of its corners
Pretty happy with it. It really loves ChatGPT’s default prompting style too since it’s essentially the same thing, so I can just ask it to do stuff for me if I don’t want to bash together a prompt.

>>106129650
>muscle mommy
And it’s pretty coherent even with a two word prompt, cut off the head tho it doesn’t seem quite entirely aware of the limitations of when you choose the aspect ratio.

>>106129680
Ahem.

>>106129543
>I prompt dogs
I guess that's true for most, everything is a personal interest in the end, I mean, boobies interest most, but it's not like that's all you see here; if it looks interesting to you, it's probably worth contributing, someone else might like it (maybe not even for the same reason you do?). Anything (SFW) goes here, anyway.
>buried in like 200 tokens and I changed the name and it went through
I've noticed something similar with mentions of living artists, when they're placed deep inside a long prompt, the filter seems to miss them more often than not.
>>106129589
Never noticed it before, but it looks you're right, even the shortcut (D) doesn't work... Some kind of "ownership" limit/privilege, perhaps?
>>106129650
Yeah, I do the same/similar thing. To be honest some particular mix of anime-based styles I used in de3 don't really work well in 4o at all. But I'm just exploring what else it can do (and I'm getting progressively happier with the results). What I really like is its knowledge, it can generate accurately really niche stuff few care/know about.
>>106129680
Eh, sometimes I run both landscape and portrait versions in order to see how it would handle the same prompt (even if occasionally I specifically ask for a prompt that keeps in mind a specific aspect ratio). I think it's fairly good at respecting shot distance, though (bust shot, cowboy shot, etc. actually work).
>>106129273
Yw and thanks for the style. This was a simple manual prompt attempt in 4o, just to see how it handle the style:
>xerox art, sideview look of a coyote looking at the viewer from above a rock spur in a desert in Arizona.

>>106129861
nice. i have this, quite possibly very schizo, prompt, that works well in sora, but sadly i am rate capped right now, and can only use in whisk rn:
[subject], colorful xerox art. Style is high-detail, hyper-realistic, cinematic photograph. It cannot be an illustration or a painting. Styled as: 만화경, 絵巻, wimmelbilder, 长卷, चित्रकथा, Polyptych, fully photoreal, Bande dessinée, Икoнa, 浮世絵. Fish-eye lens without vignette or frame. Extreme-45°-angle Dutch tilt. Extreme close-up details blended into wide panoramic continuity. High-speed action.

>>106129982
It looks very interesting, anon, thanks. Did you already test whether that bizarre mix of languages is necessary?

>>106130105
i haven't tested it, i just saw, or i stole, much of it from a sora post i saw that was using it. actually saw that combo of terms used a few times in different posts on there. no idea how un/necessary they are.

>>106129861
> it's probably worth contributing, someone else might like it
I guess, and even if not I suppose it’s worth seeing what different kinds of things people come up with. I browse the explore feed and I see like the same “cute 1girl” type stuff over and over and it’s just like we have infinite possibilities at the disposal and yet… lol. I personally been world building a silly concept I’ve had since I was a kid ages ago, basically your stereotypical noir setting but all the characters are animals lol. It’s great at that. I tried in stable diffusion and such and it just doesn’t really seem to understand anthro, it just kitbashes heads on bodies, but dalle/gpt has no problem with it

>>106130256
Today though I ended up getting sidetracked putting my characters into all kinds of different video game settings lol which is fun in its own right.

>>106130303
Some styles it can key into better than others.

>>106130256
amusing. reminds me of who framed roger rabbit, particularly the weasels

>>106130361
Yeah it’s fun

>>106130157
I'm not sure if I'm even using the prompt correctly (subject is "Dhole prowling in the jungle in India"), but in my opinion the most noticeable difference, when trying to use translated terms (I kept bande dessinée and only transliterated ukiyo-e, of course) , is that somehow the fisheye lens effect is much less marked, if not completely absent. Which is kind of bizarre. I've tried it a couple of times.
>>106130256
>I browse the explore feed and I see like the same “cute 1girl” type stuff over and over and it’s just like we have infinite possibilities at the disposal and yet… lol
I'm sure they each felt very unique and personally important cute 1girl to the prompters, lol. After all I guess I'm at fault of this, too.

sora says "bla bla bla used your image 6 times", i assume this means remixes or video created from it, is there any way to see these?

>>106131329
I think it used to be shown in the gen's page, but I don't see it any more? Maybe you could click on the username in the notification and find them from there.

durr, a deer

>>106138349
it will be so cool when you can ie design the actual design of the giant specifically, and not play prompt lottery, before animating him. almost there too.

>>106138349
What model?

A post-apocalyptic hyper-realistic portrait of a comely woman (pale skin complexion, doll-like face, tied light golden brown hair, skinny, blue eyes, distressed camo techwear attire, tactical outfits) leaning against a weathered wall, on the ground, on a dry sunny day. The art style blends semi-realistic anime aesthetics with high-end digital painting, bold lines, detailed textures, earth tones, muted greens, and vibrant oranges. Nostalgic yet dramatic atmosphere.

A cute young caucasian woman (pale porcelain skin complexion, long chestnut hair, green eyes, open wide pink kimono with floral motifs) smelling a cherry blossom. Chinese ink painting in the art style of Bada Shanren, bold brushstrokes, fine brushstrokes and delicate line work, palette is predominantly monochrome with muted tones and occasional hints of red.

>>106138663
EL TONGUE.

A comely young woman (pale skin complexion, deepest brunette hair, ornate pattern toga, golden necklace) laying back on antique sofa. The art style blends realistic anime aesthetics with oil painting in a art style of John William Godward, fine brushwork and smooth textures, soft pastels and warm tones, emphasizing rich purples and earthy hues. Serene and romantic atmosphere reminiscent of Greco-Roman influences.

Cute young woman (lightly glossy skin finish, long auburn hair, skinny, ancient long necklace and bracelet) chiling on a roman thermae, on a sunny day at summer. The art style blends hypperealistic painting with meticulously detailed 19th-century classical painterly in the art style of Gustave Boulanger, fine brushwork & glazing techniques, warm colors, earthy tones.

dall-e interior, still has that AI blur around the edges of things, not sure how to refine that out.

Working on the bake if last poster isn't doing it, gimme a moment.

>>106139374
>dall-e interior
Isn't that o4?

Done. Re-added /slop/, changed title, added perchance. Waiting for more opinions on /bant/.

New:
>>106140001
>>106140001
>>106140001

>>106139954
>Anonymous 08/04/25(Mon)12:30:51 No.1061399
isn't dall-e the engine o4 uses for image generation? My mistake if not, that was my understanding. or the same sort of underlying model anyway.

>>106140036
No worries, but no, 4o uses its own model that is natively integrated in the 4o LLM (and it's invoked when using other models). Dalle3 was used previously, but it's been moved to legacy status in ChatGPT and it can be used only in this GPT:
https://chatgpt.com/g/g-2fkFE8rbu-dall-e

Anyone else suffering issues with the BIC script on 1.7? the button to regenerate an image doesnt work anymore.

>>106140687
It still works on my end. Try to reload the page before using the button. If you're accessing the pictures from the collection, delete everything in the URL after "genimg". Both are old issues, but I AM still on the old interface, without 4o, so if they changed something with that one, it still doesn't apply to me.

>>106141120 (Me)
I forgot, a relatively new issue is that you need to reload the blue bird page. But from what >>106140687 says, it looks like nothing happens at all?