Anonymous
8/1/2025, 6:09:19 PM
No.106105351
As much of a piece of shit failure that cock sleeve is, she's right. Even more right because she would be a direct target of surveillance running for office.
If you're a average joe you shouldn't care unless you're doing criminal shit
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 6:10:30 PM
No.106105365
>>106105323 (OP)
>broadcast your audio via bluetooth
>act surprised when told it's possible to eavesdrop
Same shit for wireless keyboards
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 6:10:30 PM
No.106105366
its bluetooth audio. bluetooth is not secure.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 6:12:17 PM
No.106105392
>classified meetings on a train
yeah nice job
it hardly matters, it's just easier
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 6:21:59 PM
No.106105501
True, but the average person is "protected" by Bluetooth effective range being caca doodoo. An eavesdropper would need to place their device within a few yards of the target to intercept their signals reliably.
Nothing to worry about unless you're a high value target and have reason to suspect someone might go through all that trouble to listen in to your calls.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 7:03:35 PM
No.106105982
fuck their latency
>not a problem
kys deaf bitch
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 7:04:36 PM
No.106105993
>>106109332
>>106105323 (OP)
True, but no one listens to women so its irrelevant in this context.
>>106105323 (OP)
Is this still true? I remember back in like 2005 people would joke about your calls getting picked up by someone near you
but I haven't really heard about this issue for a long time
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 7:17:10 PM
No.106106180
>>106105323 (OP)
>bluetooth is hot garbage
nothing new under the sun
>corpos remove wired earphone jacks from their phones, normalizing the use of insecure wireless tech that can be easily intercepted
Once again. I am nooticing.
>>106106543
Buy a thirdiephone with a 3.5mm jack, retard.
Use GSMarena's phone finder
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 8:01:01 PM
No.106106704
>>106106624
no fucking shit, no one said there was no obvious solution...
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 10:20:25 PM
No.106108416
>>106105323 (OP)
>glowies have listened to my anime music
I'm sure they were jamming to the Kiss X Sis OP as much as I was.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 10:27:20 PM
No.106108505
I'm so glad we voted for the child fucker instead, bros.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:07:51 PM
No.106109021
>>106106161
bluetooth has never been known for security.
if some senator knows this so should you
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:10:28 PM
No.106109067
>>106105323 (OP)
She's definitely correct. Anything wireless opens up another avenue of attack. How much this matters is really up in the air though.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:12:28 PM
No.106109095
>>106106161
depends on who's trying to listen. if your shit emits radio waves they can theoretically be captured and decoded, provided they got backdoors into the devices, or zero days for bluetooth shit.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:13:50 PM
No.106109112
>>106109143
>>106106624
not even thirdie. there's phones with audio jacks with 128gb of storage and 8gb of ram. plenty good for a fucking phone
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:15:25 PM
No.106109123
...is Bluetooth not encrypted?
if no, what's stopping people from capturing the Bluetooth signal and just decoding the sbc/aac audio stream?
why isn't this some super popular flipper zero add-on or some shit like that?
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:16:44 PM
No.106109143
>>106109192
>>106109112
xperias are the only ones which aren't thirdie phones that have jacks these days
not sure what your point is
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:19:46 PM
No.106109178
>>106105323 (OP)
BT is so crap and short range that even if its encryption is broken they aren't listening to shit.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:21:00 PM
No.106109192
>>106109143
point was older phones not latest slop, they still work good enough. you're not rendering or compiling on your fucking phone, you look at tits
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:29:58 PM
No.106109307
>>106105323 (OP)
It's a fact that it could be observed, but I wonder if it would be any easier to observe than using a directional microphone to eavesdrop.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:32:08 PM
No.106109332
>>106105993
true that's why we had female SECRETaries in the past so we could conduct secure communication by proxying it through women to whom no one listens.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:42:58 PM
No.106109447
It's fact. Also cap is not a word in this context.
Anonymous
8/1/2025, 11:54:21 PM
No.106109563
>>106105323 (OP)
Not even in the top 3 reasons to avoid bluetooth but it is a fact.
https://github.com/TarlogicSecurity/BlueSpy
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 12:31:52 AM
No.106109916
>>106106543
I can hear everything you say into the phone.
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 12:46:57 AM
No.106110049
>>106110124
>>106110315
>>106105323 (OP)
Aren't wires susceptible to leakage through EMF? It could lead to a weird/wired situation where, if the wireless connection is properly encrypted it could be more secure than the inherently unencrypted wired analog signal
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 12:50:38 AM
No.106110079
>>106105323 (OP)
Yeah, $5 wireless earbuds encrypt your Spotify stream with military grade encryption.
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 12:52:26 AM
No.106110094
That's a surprisingly not retarded answer, I'm shocked that she said that.
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 12:55:35 AM
No.106110124
>>106110150
>>106110049
Neurons firing in your brain theoretically leak EMF.
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 1:10:19 AM
No.106110276
It's true, but you can also get the sound from wired headphones
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 1:13:23 AM
No.106110315
>>106110049
LF needs fuckload of power to emit anything useful. LM AM radio amplifiers had retarded high power so they reach anywhere useful. your 0.0005mW in the wires won't do shit. but who knows with tech these days
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 1:14:58 AM
No.106110328
>>106105323 (OP)
Pretty much fact. Bluetooth is essentially an encrypted broadcast. Cable takes the signal directly from source to destination.
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 3:33:02 AM
No.106111562
>>106106543
>They are all very close to us and spying with unreliable frequencies
Or they could just scan the files on the devices that are allowed to use their closed source OSes
Anonymous
8/2/2025, 3:44:17 AM
No.106111641
>>106105323 (OP)
damn she should have said this a year ago she would have gotten the /g/ vote and i wouldn't have lost $600