webp would be fine if there was widespread adoption. instead it's only webniggers trying to save 50kb, and those same webniggers wont allow webp uploads.
>>106111168
Back during the hack a lot of us ended up on the Shart.
It was nice there from that standpoint. They allowed uploads up to 50M. mp4s with sound. I didn't try but probably allowed webp too.
Kinda wish we had some of those things here.
>>106111185
its not even just websites (although it is websites), it's the entire software ecosystem that treats webp like second class encoding. actually im not sure who to blame, webniggers or everyone else dragging their feet. this was never a problem with jpg
