circumventing this type of censorship. Honestly I get the impression its a bit worse in countries outside of the UK

>>106136741 (OP)
I wish this had happened 20 years ago. You should take this opportunity to free yourself from the addiction of fucking your own fist.

>>106136770
the question is more about avoiding censorship and fist fucking. You may have an uncontrolled obsession

>>106136790
>the question is more about avoiding censorship and fist fucking
>and fist fucking
Okay. Good luck, my foreign friend. Perhaps you shouldn't be discussing this at all. Wouldn't want your government to think of you as a subversive troublemaker.

>>106136741 (OP)
the porn isnt being censored, moron.

>be ausfag
>100 days until unelected eKaren gets her 1984 internet censorship
>somehow bypasses parliament
>politicians say that they will use AI to detect if you are Australian and force the website to delete your account if you are bypassing via a VPN and they can't verify you
1984 is here.

>>106136741 (OP)
literally nothing is worse outside of the UK

If it isn't China tier just use TOR and don't waste your money. Worse is coming.

>>106137033
Good.

>>106136770
>small government people applauding censorship and police state
Pottery.

>>106137033
better spoof your timezone and system language, anon

>>106137162
>small government people
What gives this idea?
>applauding censorshipt and police state
There is nothing wrong with regulating disgusting addictive services that children could possible have access to. Not everyone has to tolerate degeneracy.

>>106137180
>Not everyone has to tolerate degeneracy.
I agree, but that's off topic. We're talking about porn, not conservatism.

>>106136770
kill authoritarians, behead authoritarians, roundhouse kick authoritarians into the concrete, slam dunk an authoritarian's baby into the trash can, crucify filthy authoritarians, defecate into authoritarians' food
I hate your kind so much it's unreal. You are a blight upon all mankind and I wish all manner of ill things on you

>>106137197
>degeneracy is off topic
>we're talking about porn
hurr
>>106137215
>i hate
Pretty redundant after your drivel. I hate that you think anyting is acceptable because you choose to do it. That is just satanic faggotry that has made this world a cesspit.

>>106137033
>>106137059

>be eurofag
>all the factions the right, the left, the chud "nazi" parties voted for 1984 EU chat control law becasuse they used the word CHILDRUN PROTECTION in the law

and the BEST? They also want law where politicians will be exempted from this thing.

yup. we are all in this together.
and for burgers they will soon adapt it too.

>patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/

>>106137215
This has nothing to do with authoritarian systems, british people and australians voted for this.They want it.
Because as it turns out, people want to protect the kids rather than having no way to stop them from viewing thots getting fists shoved down their asses.

>>106137256
>doesn't even recognize copypasta
your kind does not belong on 4chin
>>106137273
authoritarianism doesn't stop being authoritarianism just because it's popular
there are of course some limits you have to accept - nobody's served by selling crack to 8 year old timmy - but to say any society needs big brother watching every single thing you do online, ever, so little timmy can't sneak a peek at a titty is so beyond reasonable it's almost parody
not that any of it is about children, but the point remains

>>106136770
This. I love censorship and I hope that government takes care of me, privacy is a pedo meme.

>>106137306
If its not something that is forced upon the citizens then its not authoritarian. Was leaving the EU authoritarian? No, because british people voted for it, massively supported and even chanted for it to be done, and thus the population got what they wanted with it. Same goes for this.

>>106137351
>authoritarian nanny state isn't authoritarian because I enjoy a boot on my throat
brits also wanted less niggers and pajeets and yet there's more of them coming than ever

>>106137256
Seethe.

>>106137273
>british people and australians voted for this
any voting system that's not directly voting on issues is not democratic. switzerland comes the closest

>>106137366
Brits wanted freedom from the EU and no migrants from the EU and they got it, poles there got kicked out and their government can do its thing now.
Either way, if aussies and bongs really hate this measure so much, since they live in a democracy they can easily show their voice and demand a repeal by voting against it(directly or inderectly by voting for politicians who want it repealed), via petitions or protests. I have seen none of that from either country, so its clear the majority supports it.

>>106137273
>british people and australians voted for this
they didn't

>>106137421
brits have been voting against immigration for like 20 years
>petitions or protests
didn't work

>>106137415
>>106137428
They vote for it indirectly by electing people who are supportive of it. Thats how works in most countries, the populace elects those who share their views to represent them into office.
Massively preparing and counting country wide votes for any decision is inviable, and ill adviced as many people are not educated about the ins and outs of each and every law that is made or changed. Thus the people just elect the house of representatives do their wish instead.

>>106136741 (OP)
None. Enjoy the shit you voted for.

>>106137421
>since they live in a democracy they can easily show their voice and demand a repeal by voting against it(directly or inderectly by voting for politicians who want it repealed)
brexit was fundamentally a vote against immigrants. it wasn't a vote against EU migrants, it was against migrants period.
in reality: post-brexit replaced Janush the polish plumber with Ranjeet the street sweeper and three of his cousins. I'm fairly sure when people vote for "less immigrants" they don't want "more immigrants, and make them browner too"
politicians don't give a shit about what the people want. no amount of protesting will do anything unless you're willing to make yourself extremely obnoxious, like farmers, and people aren't going to start burning down cities for internet censorship they don't even understand in the first place
tldr you're disingenuous and should kys

>>106137473
>elect the house of representatives do their wish instead
yeah but they don't

>>106137473
>Thus the people just elect the house of representatives do their wish instead.
I seem to forget which party got elected in bongland that campaigned on "let's bring in six million pakistani", could you remind me please?

>>106137487
>brexit was fundamentally a vote against immigrants. it wasn't a vote against EU migrants, it was against migrants period.
It was neither. It was a vote for leaving the EU, you fucking retard.
>I'm fairly sure when people vote for "less immigrants"
They didn't
>politicians don't give a shit about what the people want
How can they you have no fucking clue what you want either.

I think it's pretty funny how UK conservatards bungled things up so hard that deeply unpopular labor got in, and the millisecond labor got in they took a fat shit all over their own voters so they can cozy up to the wealthy
It wasn't unexpected, but it's a bit more blatant than I thought it'd be

You WILL get zhe chip and you WILL like it. EU will probably get there 2-3 years later, but they will get there for sure.

>>106137541
>How can they you have no fucking clue what you want either.
less niggers and pajeets
is it really so difficult to understand?
>I am literally incapable of understanding anything, like anti-EU campaign being largely about immigration in general
apparently it is

>>106137541
it absolutely was a vote against illegal immigration you pedo. it was fueled primarily by the 2015 refugee crisis in europe

hmmm think they'll ban sadpanda?
there's like a billion porn sites to get to first and then a billion hentai sites to get to first though

>>106137581
they'll just ban the easy and law abiding ones. they will leave the worst and obscure

>>106137581
The futility of blocking every single site and every single vpn is clear to anyone with half a brain. The failure will be obvious to everyone.
The solution? Instead of a blacklist soon there will be a whitelist.
Just about the only bright spot is that AI slop is slowly killing the entire internet anyway so by the time politicians get to it there won't be much reason to save what's left anyway.

>>106137473
give it a rest faggot

>>106137561
>lets vote against immigration!
>by... voting and campaigning for something unrelated!
It was a vote to leave the EU and you got what you wanted, which was leaving the fucking EU. Maybe if brits also elected anti immigration politicians alongside that what you say would make sense, but no, they voted for pro immigration ones so its clear thats what brits support.

>>106137648
yeah. there was free movement in the EU, so many were legally in the UK already because of that, and then the refugee crisis as well. leaving the EU was anti immigration. it was maybe the single most anti immigration vote ever

>>106137561
>Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?
Can you point where?

>>106137683
>leave the European Union
there

>>106137542
brexit proved brits are 0IQ NPCs that will support whatever the rich will tell them to

>>106137696
the rich loved being in the EU lol

>>106137554
>no you don't understand the anti-circle campaign was largery about the color blue

Are all anglo countries doing this now? What is wrong with you?

>>106137717
zero future. suicidal

>>106137542
>EU will probably get there 2-3 years later, but they will get there for sure.

nope
October 2025, danecucks want the chat control really badly and they are now in leadership

>>106137691
>brexitard reading comprehension

>>106137742
>ebin troll

>>106137511
all but the BNP and the BUF before them, actually

>>106137712
kek got him

>>106137675
>it was maybe the single most anti immigration vote ever
Great, so you got what you wanted then! You voted "against immigration" IT WENT THROUGH and so immigration dropped, right?

>>106136790
>avoiding censorship
Translation: avoiding the censorship you care about. You didn't care when it was "misinformation" or "conspiracy theories," but as a spoon with a monocle once put it, "Everyone is a libertarian when it comes to their own vices."

>>106137710
Whatever let's you cope with being duped better.

>>106137771
no it's england lol. they don't have a democracy. the current party won 411 seats and a 174-seat majority with 33.7% of the vote

>>106137691
>"man I hate immigration so much"
>vote for something unrelated that gives his government more autonomy
>votes for immigration loving politicians
>poles out
>pakis in
>immigration numbers peak
Brits mustve voted for Online Safety Act after all, but somehow stupidly missinterpreted what they were voting for again

>>106137812
whom are you quoting?

>>106137717
>Are all anglo countries doing this now? What is wrong with you?
Chyna proved that authoritarianism can work, and people are largely indifferent to the ruling party being king shit and telling you what to do. Naturally, people obsessed with power (politicians) also want to be god-kings who proclaim the laws for the proles from-on high.
The secret ingredient they're missing is of course the "good governance" part, so you not only get a government that tells you what to do but the country still goes to shit because they're a bunch of incompetent fucks

>>106137831
>authoritarianism can work
*does, because Authority is inevitable, even when the foundation is allegedly built on Hecking Based and Epic™ freedom...

1 million men on the streets demanding changes
>government/corporation: i sleep, lock them, prosecute them for hate speech
1 mail from fat, ugly Karen demanding <insert random anti-male law>
>government/corporation: aaaaa we have to do it!!! Anything for our precious childless, overweight voters!

>>106137033
>>politicians say that they will use AI to detect if you are Australian and force the website to delete your account if you are bypassing via a VPN and they can't verify you
An AI that can detect cunts would be pretty useful, not gonna lie.

>>106137867
karens, muslims and pensioners are the only relevant voting groups. politicians don't care what incels and taxpayers think.

>>106137867
Protesting only works when you push on an open door, yes.

>>106137831
>Chyna proved that authoritarianism can work
Again, what UK and AUS are doing is not authoritarian, people voted the politicians who wanted it into power, people can vote for those against it, make petitions against it or protest it.
This is not true of your shithole Zhang, stop fucking trying to brainwash westerns into thinking democracy has no legitimacy.

>>106137831
>>106137717
*UK proved that morons will accept anything you ram up their ass as long as you tell them it's anti-immigration

>>106137867
best i can do is make a netflix show part of the curriculum and also 7 million muslims

>>106137894
>politicians don't care what incels and taxpayers think
If only they expanded that to the Karens, Muslims and pensioners...

>>106137904
this. the people want grooming gangs

>>106137904
>it's not authoritarian, because we voted for it!
Good. Keep proving to the rest of us how fake, gay and retarded democracy always was.

>>106137913
>make a netflix show part of the curriculum

they already pushed it through

>>106137867
Karen will vote based on her dumb issues, 1 million men will vote for the "let's all jump into a woodchipper" party because a videogame made in another country their gov. has no control over had a woman in it

>>106137925
This but unironically.

>>106137951
best i can do is 5 million muslims

It shouldve been obvious to everyone that brits are retarded voters back when they chose to have a literal pajeet as their prime minister
So much for the english kingdom, they actually chose to be reverse colonized lmao

>>106138050
>they actually chose to be reverse colonized lmao
there's no "they", the ruling classes might as well be from another planet
proles only get a say in issues that don't really matter

>>106137951
>1 million men will vote for the "let's all jump into a woodchipper" party because a totally-unplanned-emic happened during an election year and the public was made to think the incumbent President was at fault, assuming absolutely zero electoral maleficence pushing towards the more in-line puppet
Fixed.
>>106138050
>a literal pajeet as their prime minister
You're thinking of the Mayor of London.

>>106138050
>chose to have a literal pajeet as their prime minister
pretty sure the previous pm resigned. nobody voted for him. the opposition won with 33% of the vote.
democracy kek

>>106136741 (OP)
I have developed some anti-censorship tech, including a decentralized, anonymous, encrypted streaming platform. I decline to release these things, because I simply hate coomers. Coomers do not actually care about censorship, they care about continued easy access to pornography and frequently cheer for censorship in other contexts. The anti-censorship stance they take is as fake and performative as the "think of the children" stance the government takes to convince idiots to agree to surveillance/censorship. I honestly hope porn is either completely obliterated from the internet, or only accessible by linking a RealID.

>>106138142
is this an actual shill?

>>106136741 (OP)
Mullvad VPN is good to me. very easy to use and cheap. but they'll likely block all VPN sites anyways if they are serious about censorship. 4chan for example blocks nearly all VPN IP ranges, so you can view but can't post if using a VPN.

>>106137259

I don't use WhatsApp, is this image genuine?

>>106138142
>only accessible by linking a RealID
>convince idiots to agree to surveillance/censorship
Glad you took the Authority pill.

>>106138195
just buy a pass

>>106138177
No, just an ex-maidposter who is still angry that Kurumi MaidCard got conflated with /cumg/ utils and banned site wide. I literally can't share code contai ing Number Theory experiments, with a system designed specifically to work on 4Chan, because the existence of coomers on the board caused the threat of pornographic Maid Cards. Jannies literally banned the system because if you make such a thing, there will be some coombrained retard who uses it to transmit porn. Coomers are literally the reason we can't have nice things, and every bad thing that happens to a coomer is a win for everyone else.

>>106138198
Yes I got EU blowing up my whatsapp several times a week lmao, shit's silly
I also get spam from EU parliament and Ursula on Signal, idk why

>>106137581
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States

Didn't work 100 years ago, wont work this time.

>>106138235
because you and mikeeusa are just annoying spammers

>>106136741 (OP)
Real answer is any VPN works, the shit is easy to get around and don't even need to use the paid plans. Must be britbong hours. Ironically Proton has only 1 US server and its in the state that blocks porn so you can't use the only US server they have with proton.

>>106138306
Everybody wants booze (except zoomers, but zoomers are too crippled by depression to have any idea what life is like anyway)
In contrast the majority of people give zero shits about internet censorship. It's to protect the kids anyway, are you one of them nonces?

>>106138341
>It's to protect the kids anyway, are you one of them nonces?
yes this will stop the muslim grooming gangs

>>106138092
yup previous female pm did a massiva tax cuts for the uber rich in the first week and absolutely tanked the party and government

>>106138341
if that's your argument, internet porn is far far more ubiquitous than booze

>>106138403
It's more ubiquitous but there's less strong feelings associated with it. Take booze away from a drunk and he'll set your car on fire. Take pornhub away from a gooner and he'll just go elsewhere.

>>106138339
Everyone laughed at pornhoarderfags
>hurr durr why are you downloading pron when you can watch it anytime
WHO LAUGHS NOW HUH

>>106138235
>No, just an ex-maidposter who
So no one worth caring about, thanks for putting that in the start of your post so I would need to bother reading further.

"Adults should get behind the aid verification system, because every time they do it, you keep a child safe."

HAHAH WHAT THE FUCK BONGS

chat what porn should I hoard

>>106138427
>Take pornhub away from a gooner and he'll just go elsewhere
he'll just go to a different site and no one will care because the law has nothing to do with porn

>>106138328
>Novel Number Theory research is spam
>Public Domain Java code demonstrating the research is spam
>/cumg/ was fine for a blue board
>porn is legitimate and should be unrestricted
This is your brain on porn. It has fully fried your mind the same way drugs fry people. You are literally a heroin addict arguing that heroin should be available at your local gas station to anyone who can buy it. The correct answer isn't to debate you. It is merely to marginalize you and remove your access to your drug

For once, I'm team USA on this one. If you want to watch porn, you're going to need to send a RealID and live video of yourself to verification service in Tel Aviv. If you don't want to do that, you'll just have to use your imagination like it's 1995.

>>106138431
You have about a 65-70 IQ, partly as a result of brain damage caused by your shameful pornography addiction.

>>106138429
i mean if someone was still saying that after the pornhub purge then they probably just don't really care enough to download it no matter what happens

yeaaaa not changing many minds from the "tranime faggots should be laughed at on sight", buddy

>>106138463
>you'll just have to use your imagination like it's 1995.
What does this mean? Porn didnt exist before the internet?

>>106138476
>bitch replying
The maidposter already won. They hated her, because she spoke the truth.

>>106137273
>australians voted for this.
I never voted for this
In fact if they told me they were going to do this last election I would have voted for the opposition even though I hate them

Direct democracy fucking when?

>>106138463
>You have about a 65-70 IQ, partly as a result of brain damage caused by your shameful pornography addiction.
Nice projection, anime avatarfag.

>>106137033
>use AI to determine if you're an aussie
meaning they are lying and target everyone who mentions fairy bread or goon bags

>>106138485
>The maidposter already won
according to the maidposter they lost

>>106138496
>Direct democracy fucking when?
Never lmao, now get back into the mines

>>106138482
It was dramatically harder to access and more expensive, and accessing it required an ID. No ID, instant hard-core porn on demand, anywhere at any time has not been the norm for very long, and will no longer be the norm in the future. They're coming for your porn and I am going to cheer and clap when they do.

>>106137033
>they will use AI to detect if you are Australian and force the website to delete your account if you are bypassing via a VPN and they can't verify you
Wait wtf source?

>>106138510
Ok but i'm not underage so that's not really relevant.

>>106138510
people shared awful quality porn as far back as first CD burners were a thing
besides why the fuck are we even talking about porn and muh protect the kids? it took TWO DAYS before bongistani gubmint started limiting access to videos on twitter that showed protests in UK
but sure, kids, gotta save them.

>>106138510
>They're coming for your porn and I am going to cheer and clap when they do.
Least insane christian

>>106138455

>>106138463
>Novel Number Theory research is spam
>Public Domain Java code demonstrating the research is spam
>/cumg/ was fine for a blue board
>porn is legitimate and should be unrestricted
I think the first two are false and the last two are true ^_^

>>106138537
>it took TWO DAYS before bongistani gubmint started limiting access to videos on twitter that showed protests in UK

lmao. so much for porn blocking

jav guru now block uk ips since today

like why are people so scared

>>106136741 (OP)
mullvad, protonpn.

>>106138558
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy brits suffering, I just don't want their nonsense to spread elsewhere.

>>106138558
>like why are people so scared
18 million dollar fine

>>106138537
Right, the government is lying about why it wants censorship. They do not actually care about pornography or children. Most government officials are blackmailed pedophiles. Censorship is coming either way. It is just a huge benefit that it is coming for coomers. If the boot is going to begin stamping on the human face forever, it can start with coomers.

>>106138540
Christians haven't been relevant in the USA since like, 2002. I am also not a Christian. You do not have to believe in Jesus to despise coomers. You just have to observe coomers long enough and unless you are one, you will naturally come to hate them.

>>106136741 (OP)
I can't believe people in 2025 still watch pornography after all the information and revelations about how it alters brain chemistry and structure and the ability to make decisions

>>106138558
Dealing with the UKs temper tantrum isnt worth it unless youre one of the corporations happy about getting to sell their PII to data brokers more now.
Blocking is easy and without headaches.

>>106137831
the only real issue is that they're cowards who don't appear in public unless they have an army of guards

>>106138614
Bitch people knew that the likes of alcohol destroys brain cells and smoking turns lungs into ashes for decades now and people didnt give a shit to stop either, are you retarded or what

>>106138556
Wouldn't you know it, Authority is inevitable. Sadly, we live under a democratic system with democratic "principles," so the Authority from that is going to be inherently fake, gay and retarded, like democracy itself.

>>106138623
It's illegal to blacklist specific countries from your business/service fucktard

>>106138606
>They do not actually care about pornography or children.
it's the uk, they didn't care when thousands of kids got raped kek

>>106138606
>Most government officials are blackmailed pedophiles.
sure

>>106138614
I don't have an issue with puritan cucks wallowing in misery all their life, I just don't like it when they get uppity and push their misery on others, especially when it's a trojan horse for much worse things than some bullshit like porn

>>106138606
>Christians haven't been relevant in the USA since like, 2002
Lol that's exactly what a Christian would say
Everything happening right now is because of heritage foundation

>>106138664
>It's illegal to blacklist specific countries from your business/service fucktard
No its not

>>106138195
>if they are serious
>about censorship
nuh, it's a digital id thing. the more then net's connected to the irl, and the irl to the net, the more your actual lives're affected by what isn't real. imaginary made up stuff you don't really need and never asked for is going to be shoved down your throat. fake news, fake events, fake celebrities, fake trends, fake memes, fake information, fake crimes, fake politics, fake world interwoven into irl. schizo bullshit pushing here and there till you either dont know what's real and what's not or you fall for it. and fake shit makes fake people, thinking and believing fake things. chronic deceiver's end game on a world scale, right at your doorstep.

>>106138664
>It's illegal to blacklist specific countries from your business/service fucktard
?????
says fucking who
half the internet blocks all zigger / chinese / african IPs. one quarter blocks india and south america as well.

>>106138702
You can always tell who's posts and opinions to completely ignore because they respond to completely neutrally worded posts with vitriol and emotional upset.

>>106138727
yea faggot you're on 4chan, deal with it or fuck off back to facebook

>>106138730
Thanks for proving my point. I'm sorry you're so upset.

>>106138664
FUCKING LOL DUMBASS, tell that to the places that banned russia after the war started. Newsflash no it isnt, retard.
Enjoy becoming persona non grata on several online sites, bongs. Dont like it? Vote, protest, petition or do something about it instead of whining at the sites.

>>106138455
umm jav probably
>>106138558

Did women’s ovaries suddenly activate overnight? I remember 2 weeks ago landwhales and prudes would be at rallies calling for abortion rights. No pussy no work. What’s going to happen to all the jeets and sex offenders when they can’t watch porn? Porn is cheaper than being a trick

i like how desperate they are trying to steer it about porn and kids. nobody gives a shit about that lol

>pedos uppity because they will no longer get to see porn online

>>106138695
Every politician in your lifetime has been some combination of the following
>blackmailed pedophile
>retarded
>demented (as in literally having dementia)
>an absolute psychopath
They don't have any actual power, and exist as a distraction so that retards will focus on trying to vote them out instead of any action that might actually threaten those who are in power. You can't vote your way out of this system.

>>106138706
Everything that is happening now is happening because of Epstein, Adelson and Netanyahu.

>>106138746
>Vote, protest, petition or do something about it instead of whining at the sites.
doesn't work in the uk. their next step would be domestic terrorism

>>106138765
>Everything that is happening now is happening because of Epstein, Adelson and Netanyahu
No
Its literally all the heritage foundation
They are even bragging about it

>>106138755
>What’s going to happen to all the jeets and sex offenders when they can’t watch porn?
If porn is the only thing stopping someone from turning into a sex pest, lock them up.

>>106138772
>. their next step would be
Do you think governments around the world realise how close they are too this happening on a massive scale yet?
Every young dude i talk too is like 1 bad day away from losing it

>>106138755
Women think porn causes sex offenders.

>>106138781
>lock them up
>uk

>>106136741 (OP)
Any VPN a YouTuber or Streamer promotes is to be automatically shitlisted.

How are you even supposed to get pussy when all these women want guys who make an exorbitant amount of money. How are you supposed to get good jobs and create a successful future for yourself when these women take up all these slots at the most prestigious colleges and then proceed to shove their feminist cunts down everyone’s throat. And on top of that, around these ivy league colleges are a bunch of homeless and immigrant-loving liberal pushovers. They love that their boss is jewish and makes a gorrillion more dollars than them. They fucking LOVE it.

>>106138772
Dont you guys have something like an official petition place where if it gets over a certain amount of votes politicians are forced to consider it, or was that just the EU?

>>106138814
>me being a failure of a man is... uhhh, the women's fault

>>106138820
This is for irrelevant bullshit like "save the video games" thing, not for legislation that's meant to lead to total internet panopticon in a few years
You might as well write a petition for cops to please not abuse their power and shot your dog in US

>>106138820
>official petition
i'm not in the uk, but i believe they said no

>>106138814
You aren't supposed to. If you're broke and jobless it's because you're a genetic failure that wasn't meant to breed or have access to women's vaginas.

>>106138794
Anywhere. If someone is such an animal that free, unrestricted access to porn is the only thing---the ONLY thing---keeping them from turning into a sex criminal, then throw them in the all-white cell in the prison with a light that never turns off and throw away the key.

>>106138814
>How are you even supposed to get pussy
Let your inner muslim guide your way

>>106138847
>If someone is such an animal that free, unrestricted access to porn is the only thing---the ONLY thing---keeping them from turning into a sex criminal,
You are either not a man or have low test
You can look at Korea btw
Pron massively restricted. Shit tons of rape

>>106138790
They know, they dont care. Their asses are protected behind an army, any group tries protesting too much or god forbid gets violent will get a rain of rubber bullets, clouds of pepper spray and much more

>>106138871
>groups
Not actually the threat
Loners and guys working in infrastructure are the real threats

>>106138827
Because women take men’s jobs and then complain that their needs aren’t met and that they have to work so much. It’s creating a sort of job inflation. Imagine if only men worked and got paid both his and his spouse’s salary. Why can’t men just have the privilege and leisure to provide for their wives and start a family instead of all these fucking jeets coming in. This is the same dilemma people were met with when they started bringing in so many mexicans in the 80s and 90s

>>106138863
>Pron massively restricted. Shit tons of rape
Then they're clearly missing the "lock them up forever" part.

>>106138843
>look it up
>they also said it was getting implemented asap
Lmao brits how did it get this bad. At least its still continually growing in number I guess.

>>106138827
>>106138857
clearly we’re dealing with some of the most brilliant minds (probably chinks) attending ivy league schools right here. You’ll understand someday. I’m not far

>>106138890
Its literally just natural for men
Either you have incredibly low t or you haven't gone a week without cumming your entire life

>>106138871
>surely THIS time the elites are invincible!
every civilization thinks this and it never works. the only way for the elites to be completely safe is to run a schizo north korea state

>>106138706
i thought it was feminist hags starting it

>>106138847
His point is paki rape gangs already do that and are known to do that even with porn available and the UK police turn a blind eye because otherwise its racism or whatever.
Some brit woman wanted to come out and talk about getting raped by immigrant gangs and the police went to her house instead trying to shut her up.
Glory to the english empire and god save the queen or whatever

>>106138912
>we're doing the thing we were always going to do
Wouldn't you know it, Authority is inevitable...
>>106138926
If one must masturbate to prevent them from raping someone, you're probably already horny as fuck and doing it without porn should be no issue. You have a brain, use it.

>>106138954
>known to do that even with porn available
So what's the fucking point of making it free and unrestricted?
>the UK police turn a blind eye because otherwise its racism or whatever
Democracy is fake, gay and retarded, yes.
>god save the queen
Well now it's a king again, who should really just seize Parliament and reclaim all former British territories. Yes, I'm including the ones "across the pond" from them.

>>106138953
>>106138776
Both of you need to read "The System's Neatest Trick".

>>106138953
the founder is some pro-life fundie Christian feminist weirdo

>>106138954
>His point is paki rape gangs already do that and are known to do that even with porn available
So you're saying that, in a world where porn is freely available, we have paki rape gangs roaming around? Unless you like paki rape gangs, sounds like we need a change.

>>106138953
>i thought it was feminist hags starting it
Christian feminist funded by heritage foundation
Also the feminist group wasn't responsible for the uk/au/eu laws. The other lobbying arms of hf did that

>>106139024
>>106139147
Yeah clearly we need to put porn behind lock and key, that'll fix the immigrant rape problem

>>106139025
>"The System's Neatest Trick".
He was a crackpot tranny subjected to mkultra
No thanks

>>106139170
>>106138847

>>106139170
It might. Even if it doesn't, it'll fix a lot of other porn induced problems however. And like you said, the paki rape gangs are already here irrespective of porn.

>>106139187
>65 IQ take
Unsurprising.

>>106138885
>wypipo unproductive as fuck
>zoomers don't even want to work at all
>OMG WHY CAN'T HALF THE WORKFORCE JUST QUIT SO I CAN GET A GF WTFFFFF

>>106139196
But access to porn isnt keeping them from rape, nor is the UK police bothering to investigate much less lock them up. How is that post relevant at all?

>>106139215
>getting your takes from someone mind raped by the gov
Yeah no thanks

>>106139200
>It might
Explain how.
>fix a lot of other porn induced problems however.
Name said problems.
>paki rape gangs are already here irrespective of porn.
Which shows theyre separate things.

>>106136770
Your terrible sex life is a you problem, tradcel.

>>106136790
>how do I get past the porn block thread #856754945
People complain about this shit saying it's about censorship, but EVERY time it comes up it's just some plebbitor asking about how to bypass to get back to jorking his heckin' weenis. The news has been geo-blocked by region for years and there's never an outraged flood of threads over it; the few times it comes up, the focus flags and it doesn't go anywhere because you niggers don't give a single fuck about it or anything else unless your dick is involved. The censorship you're talking about has been here for well over a decade, and people are only talking now because now it's porn that's getting ID-walled. That's also all they care about and as far as it'll ever go. If the porn block goes away, so will any real attention to the issue as well as anything else this fantastic distraction is letting scoot by unnoticed. Everything else will stay in place or get worse, and the masses won't give a shit because they can go back to alternating between bitching about women and then masturbating to them. Just skim the thread if you want to see this in action.

>>106139200
>it'll fix a lot of other porn induced problems
Like what?
E-caths will blame everything under the sun on porn, but the causal link isn't obvious.

>>106138953
its christian feminists...
so both sides can point at them, genius.

>>106136770
This is a Russian bot encouraging you to become even more sexually frustrated and angry, for easier radicalization.

>>106139237
>But access to porn isnt keeping them from rape
Hey, look, my point.

>>106139300
Well, the main problem is of course that you will go to hell. That seems like a pretty big deal.

>>106139147
>Unless you like paki rape gangs, sounds like we need a change.
yeah get rid of the pakis, not stop people from talking about it online

>>106139334
Actually your point is
>unrestricted access to porn is the only thing---the ONLY thing---keeping them from turning into a sex criminal
Which is not what was said

>>106139346
Hell isn't really bro
And if it was then every religious person would be going to it

>>106139346
>but the magic lava!
the magic lava isn't real

>>106139346
>you will go to hell.
Anyone else find this incredibly creepy?
When you think about it this is worse than issuing a death threat against someone
Like perhaps we should jail people for wishing eternal torment on others?

>>106139290
porn is still going to be freely available, anon. no one cares about that

>>106139367
People talking about it and you addicts having access to porn is why paki rape gangs became a thing, dumb coomer.
Now that its getting censored paki rape will go down.

>>106139369
Convenient that you omitted the "if" that came before and everything else that came after...

>>106139406
people talking about immigrant protests online caused grooming gangs?

>>106139284
>Explain how.
I don't need to.
>>106139284
>Name said problems.
Addiction problems, brain degradation problems, societal degradation problems, relationship degradation problems... even spiritual degradation.
>Which shows theyre separate things.
No it doesn't. Only after we get rid of porn and they're still here can it begin to be confirmed that it was unrelated to porn.

>>106139346
So you got nothing? You just think it's gross, but have nothing when people point out correctly that countries that banned porn have worse sexual dysfunction.

You guys are such useful idiots.

Hey just an fyi anyone british saying anything bad about "pakis" will be getting a knock on the door soon!
>not happening
I literally just reported each post individually haha

>>106139406
Subcons rape all the time in their home countries where it's banned. It's not a porn thing. In fact, it's rural areas with the least access to it have the most frequent and brutal rapes. It's almost like you're wrong.

>>106137033
and youre doing FUCK ALL about it
faggot

>>106138195
will try - any other good ones.

>>106137033
>politicians say that they will use AI to detect if you are Australian
oiiii mate, cunt, gud morning, yaaaa blooody kengorooooo fucking snake fuckeer legend! ya cunt need muh alcohol drinkin mom and piss jar in your barbie arvo ta!

>>106139392
"you will go to hell" is not at all the same thing as saying "i hope you go to hell"

>>106139430
>Addiction problems, brain degradation problems, societal degradation problems, relationship degradation problems... even spiritual degradation.
Bro we are talking about porn not religion here. Maybe if you go get your prayer fix in you can concentrate.

>>106139416
The 'if' is irrelevant because it merely acts as a connective to the point I posted, and what comes after does not talk about the matter of porn.

>>106136741 (OP)
check out >>>/g/aca/

>>106139463
Oi, mate, I’ve been rackin’ me brain tryna figure out how to tell ya how bonza you really are. From the moment I first laid eyes on ya, I knew you were a total stunner—fair dinkum, no word of a lie. You’ve got me head over boots like a roo on a trampoline, and I can’t get enough of ya.

Every time I see ya, me heart does a lil’ happy dance like a drunken bluey at a barbie. You’re sweeter than a lamington smothered in jam, and hotter than a snag off the grill in mid-January. I’d walk barefoot across a paddock fulla bindis just to hear ya say “G’day” to me.

You’re me best mate, me missus, and me whole damn world. Life without ya would be like a meat pie without sauce—bloody tragic. So here’s the deal, ya flamin’ legend: I’m stuck on ya like a goanna up a gumtree, and I ain’t ever lettin’ go.

Let’s keep this thing rollin’—more snags, more laughs, more adventures, just you ‘n’ me, like true blue soulmates.

Yours tighter than a fish’s arse,
[Your Name]

P.S. – If ya reckon this letter’s sooky, just remember—you’re the one who stole me heart, ya little bewdy.

>>106139465
>"you will go to hell" is not at all the same thing as saying "i hope you go to hell"
In my religion(I just made it up then(its just as valid as yours btw)) its the same meaning and deeply offensive. In fact its a hate crime against my religion.

>>106139495
Wow you got that tax exemption that makes your religion officially recognized pretty damn quickly. Oh wait, you don't have it? then shut your fucking mouth homo

>>106139478
Thanks bro. this might actually be useful.

200 responses so far and unfortunately most are /pol/ type garbage. Just 5 seem to actually answer the OP query.

>>106139430
>Addiction problems, brain degradation problems, societal degradation problems, relationship degradation problems... even spiritual degradation.
None of these seem to actually be observable. Either porn consumption does nothing, or has a mildly positive effect.

https://blackfrancis.substack.com/p/a-critical-analysis-on-the-effects
Pick a claim, e-trads are full of shit.

>>106138339
>Real answer is any VPN work
Yeah bro I sort of know that. which VPNs are best for someone who hasn't had to deal with this sort of garbage before.

>>106139490
>>106139463
>>106138498
>>106138512
>>106137869
cunt.

>>106139519
>religion is only real if daddy gov gives you tax breaks
I thought it was about faith. So before centralized government given tax breaks was a thing christianity, judaism and islam werent real I guess, better chop of the parts of it from those times away.

>>106139545
VPNs aren't a solution. They just move the point of logging from your ISP to the VPN provider, and they can also be forced to implement age verifications.

>>106139519
>>106139563
Anon btfo
The bible is no longer canon

>>106139545
Like the other poster said, the free ones are enough to get around those blocks. Use Jdownloader and download all the shit you want.

>>106137259
just use real encrypted chat mesage apps and do not comply.

>>106139519
>tax exemption that makes your religion officially recognize
So if I can get the gov to drop your tax exemption you'll admit that your religion isn't real?

>>106137831
China's "working authoritarianism" relies completely and entirely on outside countries buying their slave-labor plastic bullshit from "chinese territories".

>>106139519
So true, this is why scientology is 100% real and true and should be taken seriously as any other world view.

>>106139519
>zealot self owns
LMAO
You heard it here first boys. We just need to partition the gov to drop religion tax exempt status and all the zealots will melt away like the evil witches they are

>>106137592
so basically collaborators ( those that obey the law ) get the government mandated rope? BASED GIGA ULTRA BASED!!!! ZAZED!!

>>106139563
>>106139586
>>106139604
>>106139611
>>106139626
how the fuck can a tech board be bad at basic logic statement, this is embarrassing that you think your inability to understand this is a gotcha
>all correct religions have tax exemption
>not all tax exempt religions are correct
I think even a toddler could understand that. Many animals too.

in any case the point was
>(its just as valid as yours btw)
is ANYTHING but true due to the fact that we have an official way of validating religions, one that his does not pass.

>>106139688
>we have an official way of validating religions
>not all tax exempt religions are correct
Clearly not a good one by self admission.
Also define "correct religion", if you will.

>>106139688
>the fact that we have an official way of validating religions
No such thing

>>106139609
>went from starving backwater shithole which is only good for cheap slave labor to slowly contesting world supremacy with mutts in ~40 years (and mediocre pay slave labor)
>not good governance
kek
india was wallowing in shit 40 years ago and is still wallowing in shit today. same as 90% of latam and africa.
compared to that china might as well be from a scifi novel

>>106139477
>The 'if' is irrelevant
Then you're irrelevant.
>what comes after does not talk about the matter of porn
Okay, here: >>106139024

>>106136741 (OP)
Oh no sisters, what now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbLl7g5zqgw

>>106139880
>this cannot be stopped
>narrator: it was simply ignored
wall st didn't teach you much, huh

>>106139793
Even dumber argument than the previous non-argument
Lets take it with something else for example
>cannibal serial killers are known to do that even with meat available
>So what's the fucking point of making meat free and unrestricted?

>murderers are known to do that even with violent games available
>So what's the fucking point of making violent games free and unrestricted?

You dont ban things by default you troglodyte, you keep them free unless harm is caused by production or as consequence.

>>106139961
>unless harm is caused by production or as consequence
Like porn increasing erectile dysfunction and causing non-reproductive sexual habits?

>>106140101
>porn increasing erectile dysfunction
It doesn't, but okay.

>>106140150
>ED increasing in the male population over time is just a coincidence

>>106140182
Be sexier and faithful, not a cunt.

>>106140202
>Be sexier and faithful
What use is that to a man?

>>106140182
>ED increasing in the male population over time is just a coincidence
Its because of microplastics and cats. They found out the parasite cats have cause infertility in men

>>106140246
>infertility
Is not ED.

>>106140182
i mean there's literally and i mean literally, a million other things that changed in the past couple decades that could be a factor

>>106140253
Its linked for the parasite

>>106140182
Based on what? The Wery and Billeux paper that Wilson and the YBOP guys misinterpreted (but realistically just lied about)? The Janson and Bancroft paper they lied about?

Sorry, I don't buy the claims of liars. Once is an accident. Multiple times isn't.

>>106140345
>its
>for
Remedial English. Now.
>>106140363
>lied about
Show proof.

>>106140374
Blame my autocorrect for not working

>>106137797
Not that anon, but I absolutely did care when it was about "misinformation." Censorship is always evil regardless of the justification, and freedom of speech should extend to all speech, including incitements to violence. I do think that platforms should have the ability to decide what content they host, but that only works if anyone is free to host a platform of their own without threats of legal attacks.

>>106140374
Wilson and the Your Brain On Porn guys take W&B conclusion that erectile dysfunction predicts "online sexual activity", and cite it as saying "OSA predicts ED." It's sloppy, but it could be a mistake. The Bancroft stuff is just lies. The 95 and 06 papers don't say anything about porn-induces ED. They just note that some people who watch a lot of porn have less vanilla tastes, with no mention of ED.

>>106140428
>Censorship is always evil regardless of the justification
Okay, enjoy your upscale bar turning into a gay S&M leather bar because you codified an "all people are hecking valid" policy...
>I do think that platforms should have the ability to decide what content they host
Nope, sorry, that a hecking "evil" censorship right there.
>without threats of legal attacks
Even if something illegal is posted, and nothing is done about it?

>>106140363
>>106140455
>dsm 95 to 06
You seem pretty knowledgeable on this anon
Do they have any ties k zucker?
It seems like the 90s to 10s had some really weird dudes in the dsm

This thread is a great example of why 4chan sucks now.

I got my answer on reddit.

thanks no thanks

And goodbye

>>106140647
I used to take the e-trad position until I started actually looking at the citations of Wilson and Your Brain On Porn, and they are just not good or they have these mistakes and stretches of the original paper that smell like the kind of thing an undergrad does where they have a conclusion and they just find stuff to support them, and stretch or misunderstand other research. The case that it's a public health crisis just isn't convincing; or inasmuch as it is, you have better arguments for banning booze and weed which have obviously bad health effects you don't need to mis-cite and misdirect people to demonstrate.

The other compounding problem is that we actually have A/B tests of countries that have banned porn, like India and South Korea. The effects trads claim would result haven't. "Well, that wasn't a real porn ban", doesn't count. If the dose response model were correct, you would observe increases in good stuff and decreases in bad stuff. It's a bunch of low effect size noise.

>>106140809
falseflag. take your meds, schizo.

>>106140878
That's good that you researched for yourself and changed your mind anon. I wish more people were capable of that

Good. Once every states have laws regarding age verification then the kikes running those porn sites will have to adapt.

>>106140938
The best argument I've seen that tries to bridge the claims with the research is what I call the "neurotic Christian Redditor" model. The people who do tend to experience negative effects from porn use are those who experience cognitive dissonance between porn use and their states values. There's a large overlap in members of r/nofap and various Christian and nerd hobby subreddits.

This paints a picture of broadly low-t men who are relatively sexually undesirable, cope with porn, and feel intensely guilty about it in a way that most people don't.

>>106141048
Recently I am finding out how much pain and suffering still happens in the world because of christians and the self hate they feel
Watched jasperdasper's latest video opened my eyes on how much anti-trans shit is fake and how much bad research was done by people that abused trans kids by trying to "help" them

>>106141048
>The people who do tend to experience negative effects from porn use are those who experience cognitive dissonance between porn use and their states values
So if your state values you jacking yourself into some terminal nutrient deficiency, you'll feel less guilty about doing that, got it.
>>106141099
>how much anti-trans shit is fake
What, like schools trying to sterilize children in hopes of conducting some sexual-reassignment experiment?
>abused trans kids by trying to "help" them
The "help" being what I described above, yes.

>>106141136
>What, like schools trying to sterilize children in hopes of conducting some sexual-reassignment experiment?
Did this actually happen?
Also Conversion therapy, pavlov conditioning, physical abuse. Rape, drugging.
Just about anything you can imagine they have done to trans kids to try and "fix" them
Some of the worst examples are where they convince the parents to essentially jail the child and beat them every day until they turn 18
>surpise they kill themselves and become a statistic

>>106141136
>So if your state values you jacking yourself into some terminal nutrient deficiency, you'll feel less guilty about doing that, got it.
I get that you're trying to dunk on me, but getting hung up on jerking off is one of those things that seems to need to be taught. For the neurotic Christian nerds, they probably would feel better if they would stop jerking off. However, quitting porn doesn't seem to address the reasons for their sexual frustration; so they "relapse", and vent about it on r/NoFap or Twitter.

>>106141494
>Did this actually happen?
Yes, it's what you support when you say "protect Trans Kids™," translated into Common Sense as "let corrupt adults manipulate children, who have an undeveloped sense of self, into believing they can take special medication and become some 'truer' version of themselves, just like the 'trans adults' whose sense of self is terminally undeveloped for one reason or another."
>>106141603
>trying to quit a vice is worse than indulging into oblivion, so stop treating it like a vice
>"relapse"? what relapse? it's not a vice, dummy

>>106141651
>Yes, it's what yo
Oh my bad i thought you were the sane guy replying to me.
The amount of shit people have to do to prove they are trans is so lengthy and painful that anyone who isn't trans isn't going to get through the process
And even once you get through you can only get puberty blockers as a kid

I would tell you to go watch jasperdasper's video but you are too far gone

>>106141651
It doesn't behave like much of a vice to people who aren't devout Christians that feel a much stronger sense of guilt about it than the average man.

I'm not saying "abandon Christianity" or "the psychological distress you experience is fake". I'm saying that you feel intense guilt or self-loathing about anything, you should probably stop; but people who feel that intense distress are the exception, not the norm.

>>106141714
>jasperdasper's video
https://youtube.com/watch?v=JiOc0r31-Os
this one?

>>106141812
Yeah that's it. Its long but it changed my views on trans in general

>>106141714
>i thought you were the sane guy replying to me
Not sure who else you could be talking about, but yes, I am.
>The amount of shit people have to do to prove they are trans is so lengthy and painful that anyone who isn't trans isn't going to get through the process
Unless you're five, then it's straight to puberty blockers.
>you can only get puberty blockers as a kid
>only
You say that like it's not enough. To me, that's several steps too far, the first step too far being entertaining it when adults say they want to change their genitals.
>you are too far gone
I'm too sane, yes.
>>106141781
>"the psychological distress you experience is fake"
It actually is, because in my case at least, you're projecting it.

>>106141897
>Unless you're five, then it's straight to puberty blockers
Not a thing
>To me, that's several steps too far
It's funny because "normal" kids get FORCED onto puberty blockers if they are too manly or girly early
>child makes an active painful effort to determine what medication it wants
>that's wrong

You don't actually give a fuck about kids and just want to impose your will on them.

>>106141980
>Not a thing
>>106141714
>And even once you get through you can only get puberty blockers as a kid
Which is it?
>>child makes an active painful effort to determine what medication it wants
Yes, I'm sure the "trans kids" you work with absent every necessary restraining order are all saying, "Please block my body's natural processes to make me a parody of the sex you with to assign to me in your experiment, Great Beacon of the State."
>You don't actually give a fuck about kids and just want to impose your will on them.
Hope you were looking into a mirror while you typed that...

>>106142031
>Which is it?
Man talking with you is painful, you are obtuse on purpose
>Unless you're five, then it's straight to puberty blockers.
Trans kids do not get puberty blockers without huge effort from the child.
To say they get them instantly without effort at 5 is just facebook tier crazy shit
>the state is doing this!
Nigger the state is cockblocking everyone so hard they have to make diy hormones. If the state was pushing this shit then hormones would be cheap/free

>>106142168
>you are obtuse on purpose
You said children are capable of receiving puberty blockers, then that they're not. That's not me being obtuse, and certainly not on purpose; that's you saying one thing and later saying the opposite. So which is it?
>without huge effort from the child
Like a boy saying "I like dwesses" or a girl saying "I like twucks."

>>106142208
>You said children are capable of receiving puberty blockers, then that they're not. That's not me being obtuse, and certainly not on purpose; that's you saying one thing and later saying the opposite. So which is it?
>normal kids get forced blockers if they have "early puberty"
>trans kids get them if they do hundreds of hours of therapy sessions and paperwork
I don't get how you are having such a hard time with this
>Like a boy saying "I like dwesses" or a girl saying "I like twucks."
And again not how it goes. Go read the latest dsm if you want to see all the steps required(you won't of course)

But anyway thanks for proving my point from way back up here >>106141099
>christians trying to "help" trans kids because obviously they know better
This is my last reply. I hope one day you'll become a better person. I doubt it though