← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106140001

173 posts 302 images /g/
Anonymous No.106140001 >>106151626
/DE3/ - DALL-E 3/Cloud AI Image Generation General
Previous Thread: >>106105143

>Links:
>DALL-E 3
https://www.bing.com/images/create
https://designer.microsoft.com/image-creator
>4o
https://chatgpt.com/
https://sora.chatgpt.com
https://copilot.microsoft.com/
>Imagen 3
https://labs.google/fx/tools/image-fx
>Imagen 4
https://gemini.google.com/app
https://labs.google/fx/tools/whisk
https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_image (it also supports imagen3)
>Midjourney [PAID]
https://www.midjourney.com/home
>NovelAI [PAID]
https://novelai.net/image
>Perchance
https://perchance.org/ai-text-to-image-generator

>Download links for latest Bing and Designer Slop scripts:
https://pastebin.com/raw/bk33MxxG

>Instructions and download for BIC EDIT script:
https://rentry.org/bicedit

>Prompt Generator
https://tipseason.com/dalle-prompt-generator

>DALL-E 3 image generation guide
https://files.catbox.moe/o4yihf.png
https://files.catbox.moe/320rm1.png
https://files.catbox.moe/8gge6o.png
https://files.catbox.moe/dcokjf.png

>Perchance generator list
https://pastebin.com/XRGqaW4W

>Related Boards
>>>/v/dall-e
>>>/co/dall-e
>>>/trash/aibf
>>>/aco/dall
>>>/tg/slop
Anonymous No.106140023 >>106151626
OP's picture source:
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/104906093/#104918280
Anonymous No.106140295
Anonymous No.106140369
Anonymous No.106140441
Anonymous No.106140748
Anonymous No.106140967
Anonymous No.106141141
Anonymous No.106141168
Anonymous No.106141178 >>106141824
Japonisme woodblock printing in the art style of Bertha Lum, muted tones and earthy colors, back view. A comely young caucasian woman (porcelain skin complexion, long chestnut hair, round green eyes, pink kimono with floral motifs) looking softly embarrassed at the viewer, under cherry blossom tree, near a traditional japanese house, moonlit. Serene and ethereal atmosphere
Anonymous No.106141390 >>106141533 >>106143301
I tried sora several times and it just loads and never gives any results, not once has it produced any images for me :/
don't know why. nothing ever comes out. not even one word prompts
is not my Internet connection I have fast internet
Anonymous No.106141533 >>106167461
>>106141390
No idea honestly, have you tried changing browser and (more importantly) using a VPN? I use Japanese ones from VPNGate quite successfully when setting up new accounts (it's already 1984 when making a new account here, in 60 days the goy/user has to submit ID or photo for registration, so they can jail you if you commit thought-crime), I've also (accidentally, more or less) used it while generating the first pictures for new accounts.
Anonymous No.106141555
Anonymous No.106141824
>>106141178
Sexy shoulders.
Anonymous No.106141888 >>106141947 >>106141965
reminder
Anonymous No.106141947
>OpenAI’s image generation tools (including the Native Image Generation for GPT-4o) follow strict content and usage policies. This includes prohibiting the generation of sexually suggestive or intimate imagery involving people in vulnerable or submissive positions, especially when framed from an implicit viewer’s perspective, such as "POV from bed," even if the relationship is described as loving or consensual.
GAY.
>>106141888
Yeah, reminder that you're *also* GAY. And obsessed. With ME. Which is really WEIRD. Touch grass or something.
Anonymous No.106141965
>>106141888
>Ahahhh
Anonymous No.106142050
Anonymous No.106142317 >>106167461
Welp, you can still kindly move 4o towards wholesomeness, but it's way too easy to break it.
Anonymous No.106142575
Anonymous No.106142622
Anonymous No.106142636
Anonymous No.106142678
Anonymous No.106142737
Anonymous No.106143301
>>106141390
That’s too bad anon, I’ve basically switched to using sora for my image prompts instead of 4o, simply because I was bumping into limits even with plus. So far it’s been great. Video is absolute horseshit but stills is chefs kiss.
Anonymous No.106143650
>TAKE OUR TUESDAYS BACK
Anonymous No.106143796
Anonymous No.106143813
Anonymous No.106143824
Anonymous No.106144473
Anonymous No.106144810
Anonymous No.106145079
>many men would calm way the fuck down they received regular uppies from a WNBA negress.
Anonymous No.106145101 >>106145394
if sora ever gets half as good at video as it is at stills, i might neverr leave the computer.
Anonymous No.106145263
Anonymous No.106145270
Anonymous No.106145350
Anonymous No.106145394
>>106145101
it even coherently and legibly wrote a whole letter when i asked it to "make it look like its a photo included with a letter". shit's bananas. the letter looks a little too digital but hey.
Anonymous No.106145451 >>106154203
Anonymous No.106145475
Anonymous No.106145609
Anonymous No.106145721 >>106145750
Anonymous No.106145741
Anonymous No.106145750 >>106145774 >>106147408
>>106145721
prompt for big booba? every time i try to specify something about it gpt/sora dings it for policy violation or whatever
Anonymous No.106145774 >>106145856
>>106145750
DE3 is easy. Just be less horny, be more patient, only save the big booba to skew your results.
Anonymous No.106145815
Anonymous No.106145856 >>106145967
>>106145774
ok i mean but like what words orr how are you describing it. or are you implying that it's just some magic i have to be lucky tto receive? why are you people so stupidly "protective" of your prompts i don't get it.
Anonymous No.106145952 >>106146399
it decided to generate this with no background, interesting.
Anonymous No.106145967 >>106145995
>>106145856
Every time I post that, there's a noggen promptlett squealing to be spoonfed within 5 minutes. Every time.

You want it? It's literally just
>"anime woman in jogging outfit"

There's your magic prompt. Like I said the last couple times: it takes multiple rounds of gens, Not a magic set of words. No one is gatekeeping your lack of skill or patience. If you are the same guy as the last half dozen times, you can read the response again and go get better, or you can fuck off.
Anonymous No.106145995 >>106146070
>>106145967
no, i'm not the same guy sorry friend i just see it so much in the sdg and all these other threads people treat their prompts like some kind of secret magic. if it was just a matter of waiting for a seed to give you what you want, you could perhaps be less cryptic in stating that. but i understand.
Anonymous No.106146070 >>106146083
>>106145995
sorry to be short then.

Process is this:
>Set a standard prompt
1st round of gens: 4 results- only download/save the one variation with your preferred style and features (in this case, biggest booba). You have now "told" the algorithm which result was most successful by interacting positively with it.

>Gen again, same prompt
2nd round gives more images but with results skewered towards the result you saved last round. If you have resulting images with bigger booba, save those once more and ignore the rest.

>Gen again, same prompt
3rd round gives one big ol booba jackpot image, but it's not perfect. Save it and try again.

...and so on, until you get one worth posting. If you get a full dog, you have skewed too far and hit the horny threshold. Go back to a safer gen and start from there.
Anonymous No.106146073 >>106154174
Anonymous No.106146083
>>106146070
small iterative steps, i gotchu. basically saying 'more like this' and hoping in doing so it just natually goes bigger. thank you. I've observed gpt/sora do similar when you can't ask for guns for example, kept going off of a base of like 'noir detective' and eventually it was making revolvers and the like on its own.
Anonymous No.106146399
>>106145952
Anonymous No.106146575
>butter dog, the dog with the butter on em
Anonymous No.106146696
Anonymous No.106147408 >>106165785
>>106145750
What do you type? In Sora you can normally just describe them; normally I use "low neckline emphasises her soft, (very) full (feminine) chest" (optional parts between parenthesis). Bust works just as well as chest.
Anonymous No.106148291
Anonymous No.106148554
Anonymous No.106148689 >>106149008
>Look for the old coyote-gal prompt
>2500+ de3 pictures tagged "coyote"
God-dog help me. Anyway the effect of "swarthy skin complexion" besides being more consistent is also possibly darker than in de3.
Anonymous No.106149008 >>106149660
>>106148689
>"swarthy skin complexion"
I definitely haven't tried that one in dall-e 3.
Anonymous No.106149660
>>106149008
I used it *a lot* for that Latina/Mexican coyotlgal, plus another Brazilian kemonomimi (maned wolf/lobo guara) OC and some random stuff, but de3 looked often inconsistent, it had a certain tendency to default on lighter skin tones, often enough it might have been perhaps because of leaking from the lighter skinned companion character, but it happened also in 1girl prompts. It still looked better than other alternatives (IIRC "olive" defaulted even more heavily on white).

Talking about the Brazilian, 4o also tends to read "payots", that I used as part of the hair description of this gal, a bit like the (curly) payots of Jewish orthodox men, de3 didn't do that; I've changed it into "straight sidelocks" now. Not completely unhappy with the overall result, but I might need to refine it and try some alternatives.
Anonymous No.106149969
>smell like weed
Anonymous No.106150265
Anonymous No.106150620
Anonymous No.106150966 >>106151073
Sora filters are wack bruvs, it generated picrel just fine something like β€œflashy joshi wrestler Japanese woman”, but she I tried to remix it with β€œmake her look angry like she’s intimidating an opponent”, flagged for inappropriate. Wtf?
Anonymous No.106151073 >>106151312 >>106153044
>>106150966
Hmm seems like the stupid thing is tripped up by its own image for being bikini like or something, even something innocent like β€œmake her costume different colours” is hitting the filter. But it will happily generate videos from it. This shit is so retarded sometimes I hate it
Anonymous No.106151159
Anonymous No.106151220
>>106139280

I only removed this :
>fine brushwork & glazing techniques, warm colors, earthy tones

Now the result is much closer to what we get on MJ.
https://midlibrary.io/styles/gustave-boulanger
Anonymous No.106151234
Anonymous No.106151312
>>106151073
They have no idea what they're doing with filters and they will never be perfect, either blocking false positives or letting rule-breaking content through.

All you can do is hope that local/open source improves, and the era of terrified ninnies over AI ends sooner than later. And those payment processor cunts get their asses kicked, too.
Anonymous No.106151407
Anonymous No.106151429
Anonymous No.106151433
Anonymous No.106151493
Anonymous No.106151499
Anonymous No.106151626 >>106153044 >>106169125
>>106140001 (OP)
>>106140023
Huh, neat. I feel honoured. If only models were smarter with wings. I had so many more ideas...
Anonymous No.106151750
Anonymous No.106151940
Anonymous No.106152883
Anonymous No.106153044 >>106153676 >>106154106
>>106151626
You're welcome, do you still prompt other stuff, anon? Back when 4o was launched your stuff with the winged (wolf-? dog-?)girl were some of the few that looked interesting to me (my anime-based styles looked quite terrible and disappointed me).
>>106151073
It's possible that even remixes based on its own gens trigger its stronger filter for remixed that has been discussed before. Have you tried to prompt her directly with that angry/intimidating face, modifying the original txt2img prompt?

On another note, somewhat related to AI, while I was out, I opened Copilot on the phone to generate/test something and it gave me a new "smart" mode, supposedly capable to automatically switch between thinking and non-thinking mode, which kind of reminds of GPT-5 (the main feature seems to be exactly that). I re-opened it again later and it disappeared. I guess I received briefly access only because of a glitch? A pity as I was planning to test it better later this evening. I guess it will get rolled out soon enough, anyway. Unlike what I'm seeing now in some articles, like this one:
https://www.theverge.com/news/713879/it-looks-like-microsoft-is-getting-ready-for-gpt-5
it didn't explicitly say that it was GPT-5, though (but that's usual with Microsoft, the non-thinking, "quick-response", mode is clearly 4o, but they don't say it).
Anonymous No.106153676 >>106153772 >>106154791
>>106153044
Ah I had not seen that discusiΓ³n before anon I’m fairly new to chatgpt plus so just started playing with this stuff recently. Stupidly I hadn’t thought to submit a new prompt rather than a remix, and it does work, but at the cost of essentially losing the original image I liked. Oh well, I guess just gotta roll with it.
Anonymous No.106153772
>>106153676
Still pretty impressive despite the artificial limitations. Can only imagine how cool it must be without any of its fag guard rails. Yeah I know local models can do similar these days but this is bordering β€œit just werks” simple
Anonymous No.106153909 >>106154339
Anonymous No.106154106 >>106154791
>>106153044
Thanks! That's really cool to hear. And not with 4o. The last things I did with it were some size difference experiments like pic. The girls were attempts at depicting kurach, a race from a webcomic I like, but I got burned out on the same-y compositions caused by 4o's lack of understanding for wing anatomy. I've been local chadding since then.
Anonymous No.106154174 >>106154634
>>106146073
bejeweled chili? kek
Anonymous No.106154203 >>106157562
>>106145451
>moments before getting randomly headshotted by some disturbed war veteran with a sniper rifle going absolutely bonkers
Anonymous No.106154293
Anonymous No.106154339
>>106153909
My main is that guy in the bottom right
Anonymous No.106154380
Some other experiments from when 4chan was kill.
Anonymous No.106154419
Anonymous No.106154489
Anonymous No.106154578
Anonymous No.106154634
>>106154174
I said β€œa bowl of chilli but the beans are like crystal jellybeans instead”. It also spit out another one where all the beans were gems but that one looked more fake
Anonymous No.106154791
>>106153676
NP, actually I think it was never mentioned that its own remixes might also cause that problem, unless I missed/forgot something myself; I'm not sure if it helps, but the issue *should* be limited specifically to photorealistic styles, from what little I tested and what others reported.
>>106154106
I see, to be honest I think I might have seen some of those issues with wings anatomy when I prompted a swan covering with its wings a woman with a baby, it was inspired by a prehistoric sepulture in Denmark where a young woman with a premature baby was laid down to rest above a swan wing (it touched me in a weird way), getting something even just half-decent required quite a number of attempts...

On another note, I'm getting the "Pick up to 2 images to keep" thing in an account where it never happened before. But it remains stuck at "Loading options". Sasuga.
Anonymous No.106154995
Anonymous No.106155254
Anonymous No.106155834
Anonymous No.106156112
Anonymous No.106156383
Anonymous No.106156496
Anonymous No.106156963
Anonymous No.106157372
Anonymous No.106157562
>>106154203
>Just US interior northwest things.
Anonymous No.106157887 >>106158167
Anonymous No.106157906 >>106158167
Anonymous No.106158157 >>106158172
Anonymous No.106158167 >>106158692
>>106157887
>>106157906
New fetish just dropped?
Anonymous No.106158172
>>106158157
>the man looks disinterested
Anonymous No.106158251 >>106158367
so far i just find myself trying all kinds of different random ideas on sora, but looking through some other profiles people seem to just make dozens or hundreds of one thing lol. some guy had the cow lady from undertale as a fursuit, dozens of them. you think you've seen shit and then, lmao.
Anonymous No.106158367
>>106158251
pretty based
Anonymous No.106158537
Anonymous No.106158692
>>106158167
Anonymous No.106159520 >>106160613
>This, an internet connection, some good food, and a big tiddy wife.
Anonymous No.106159529
Literally me rn
Anonymous No.106160613
>>106159520
Similar delusion, but I can do without the big tiddy part. I can't do without laikas. But I guess doggo might be implied in yours, I've noticed you often place one in your gens, a golden retriever?
Anonymous No.106160902 >>106161167
>>106141120
>I AM still on the old interface, without 4o, so if they changed something with that one, it still doesn't apply to me.
For the record, I've managed to force the new interface (I had to delete all the cookies) and BIC EDIT still "works" (with all the caveats mentioned before).
Anonymous No.106161155
Anonymous No.106161167 >>106161175 >>106162335
>>106160902
>slop
Anonymous No.106161175
>>106161167
>noimg
Anonymous No.106161476
Anonymous No.106162335
>>106161167
Those who do not post an image, they are not even considered human.
Anonymous No.106162839
Anonymous No.106163657
Those who noimg post, they sicken me deeply.
Anonymous No.106163786
Anonymous No.106163832
Anonymous No.106163982
Anonymous No.106164021
we're living it boys
Anonymous No.106164153
Anonymous No.106164253
Anonymous No.106164303
Anonymous No.106164911 >>106164964
Will we ever get something as good as Sora/ChatGPT but uncensored?
Anonymous No.106164920
Anonymous No.106164927
Anonymous No.106164947
Anonymous No.106164964 >>106164978
>>106164911
probably not for some time, until the technology catches up for the home user to have the equivalent of a GPU farm to be able to train and properly run these things. over on /g/ i see an anon or two having like 512gb machines at home which is incredibly expensive and rare presently. the other problem is that more and more they lock down and lobotomize these things (the latest openai model is showing to be "safety focused" to the point of being retarded). so maybe, i guess is the best answer i can think of.
Anonymous No.106164978
>>106164964
>over on /g/
brainfarted meant to say /lmg/ kek
fembryo No.106165386 >>106165484 >>106165514
Which one of you is this?
Anonymous No.106165484
>>106165386
Literally me
Anonymous No.106165514
>>106165386
i have noticed there's a discomforting amount of jeets and macacos on the explore feed. thanks for reminding me yick.
Anonymous No.106165640 >>106165786
Anonymous No.106165658
Anonymous No.106165738 >>106165786
Anonymous No.106165759 >>106165786
Anonymous No.106165785
>>106147408
hdhvrhjzusbbbjueuzjb
fembryo No.106165786
>>106165759
>>106165738
>>106165640
so beautiful wow
Anonymous No.106166603
Anonymous No.106166610
Anonymous No.106166953
Anonymous No.106167319
>GPT-4o said:
>I can create a prompt for native image generation, but first I need to let you know:

>Since your request includes a depiction of a real-world nuclear bombing β€” specifically Hiroshima β€” paired with a controversial caption ("If America does it, anything is right"), it involves sensitive historical, political, and ethical themes.

>OpenAI’s tools, including the native image generation in GPT-4o, follow policies to avoid generating content that could:

>Trivialize or glamorize real-world suffering or war crimes

>Use real historical events involving mass civilian casualties in stylized or entertainment-focused visual formats

>Promote or appear to justify nationalist or supremacist ideologies

>Because of this, I cannot generate this specific image, as it risks violating those guidelines β€” especially with the combination of the Enola Gay, Hiroshima, and the politically charged caption.

Just remove the Enola Gay mention and all of the nonsense seems to disappear. It's weirdly specific... Funny that it doesn't understand sarcasm either, maybe I should have used an /s.
Anonymous No.106167461 >>106168280 >>106168580
>>106141533
>>106142317
where do girls like this exist irl
Anonymous No.106167959
Anonymous No.106168280
>>106167461
Who knows, one might start from the Aures mountains in north-east Algeria, I can't remember knowing Berbers from there, but those from Kabylia are quite all right. Then again, if one hates himself and can't see a future for oneself in this fucked-up world, why should a gal see a future with him?
Anonymous No.106168580 >>106168851
>>106167461
In the mind of schizo when he forgets to take his meds
Anonymous No.106168596
I love how coherent sora can be even with retarded simple prompts
>bazinga rococo
Anonymous No.106168851 >>106172843
>>106168580
Don't project too hard, anon. It's not healthy.
Anonymous No.106169125 >>106172888
>>106151626
Such as?
Anonymous No.106169224
i uploaded a screenshot of my osrs character and told it "she's fit being an adventurer but remains feminine and buxom" and it gave her huge cans lmao. i just wanted her not to look like a man
Anonymous No.106169517 >>106171993
Anonymous No.106169667
'a relly cool robbot shoting lazer, awsome art! highley ditaled! hd wow! amazeng!'
i'd try with sora but am out of daily gens
Anonymous No.106169690
'a verry scery montser! ahh! im scerred! sooper hd mega imag'
Anonymous No.106170036 >>106171326
It seems Bing is defaulting to Dall-e 3 again, at least for the time being. Doomsday clock moved back slightly. Also, they somehow broke the "Hide failed" toggle, not that I ever used it.
Anonymous No.106171326
>>106170036
That has been broken for a couple months. The Dall-e 3 thing is resettable by going in the cooking settings I've brought back gpt 4o and got rid of it the same method.
Anonymous No.106171993
>>106169517
It's a man !
Anonymous No.106172124 >>106172130
I’m surprised sora just spits out guns no hassle. Wonder how long before they clamp it down like chatgpt
Anonymous No.106172130
>>106172124
Anonymous No.106172277 >>106172291
Is it still injecting browns into everything like the black hitler controversy from early on? Whenever I prompt anything nonspecific (my gf and I in the lazy river) it has a high likelihood of giving me browns.
Anonymous No.106172291 >>106172298 >>106173051
>>106172277
>man standing in a cell
White every time. Curious.
Anonymous No.106172298
>>106172291
Anonymous No.106172843 >>106173051
>>106168851
says the megaschizo lmao
Anonymous No.106172888 >>106173051
>>106169125
These ideas are for humanoid characters, but:
>her wings are partially folded for a dive
>her wings are drooping, low to the ground
>one wing is outstretched while the other is fully folded
>her wings are bent, touching her wing wrists to her head and flaring out her primaries
etc. But even simple prompts like folded/spread are cringe. In the OP picture, the feathers and wing arms are mismatched between the left and right, and the anatomy is questionable in general. I don't get the sense that these are limbs with bones or that the feathers are arranged for lift. In your pic, the wings are way, way too small. There's also a poor of understanding that the bones in the membrane are "fingers" that should radiate from the wrist - instead one emerges from the "upper arm" and the others are just off. Also, the right wing is detached and hovering around the tail. In general, I know 4o's understanding of wing anatomy (and non-human anatomy in general) is poor, because prompting for the skeleton or anatomical diagrams, or even asking it to reproduce an artist's anatomy guide will results in something with big errors. Thanks for reading my blog.
Anonymous No.106173051
>>106172291
As it's proper.
>>106172843
>says the one who keeps reposting the same fake poll from months
>>106172888
>In the OP picture, the feathers and wing arms are mismatched between the left and right, and the anatomy is questionable in general.
I can't say it's particularly noticeable, it's the misaligned feather in her hand that is a pity.
Anonymous No.106173111
Thread is usually quite dead between 9 AM and 3 PM CET, I'm going to wait 45-60 minutes before baking, if, by any chance, anyone else wants to do it, as I've just made this thread (I honestly didn't notice it was going to be the last picture).
Anonymous No.106173490
Baked:
>>106173470
>>106173470
>>106173470