How do you poorfags respond without sounding mad?

>>106145699 (OP)
>750 Ti in 2025
>couldn't run CS2
I'm pretty sure they move on to RTX 3060 at the very least.

Close, my LG 23'' LED monitor is from 2010.

>>106145699 (OP)
>diminishing returns don't exist
i doubt the retard who made this starterpack with a comic sans title even knows about the concept anyway

>>106145699 (OP)
i can run any aaa game maxed out with over 100 fps at 1440p and i think they all look marginally better (or in some cases worse) than 10 year old games. they sure as hell dont play any better either

>>106145738
Also, i may buy 2 more. I hope there's enough old-new stock out there. Luv me old LG.

>>106145857
> i can run any aaa game maxed out with over 100 fps at 1440p
clearly you never played stalker 2
in awe at the performance of this lad

What's a "game"? Is that like the things I had on my NES as a kid?

>>106146110
it's what the kids call nintendo tapes these days

>>106145699 (OP)
Wrong, my 2014 monitor is 27 inches.

>>106145699 (OP)
ayo hol up, how would windows 10 make games look worse than 11?

>>106145699 (OP)
exact same picture for
>why is Visual Studio so slow?

Does windows 11 magically make games look better, jeet post

>>106147688
graphics when using windows 11 on ssd goes crazy, gramps

>>106145857
I upgraded to a 9070xt from a 3060 and I'm still just playing day z and dota 2. I played cyberpunk for like 2 hours to see the raytracing but then lost interest.

>>106146086
Almost as bad as the OG trilogy "remasters." Looking the same with half the fps and half the aesthetic removed.

>>106146086
any UE5 game runs like dogshit on even top end hardware

>>106145699 (OP)
No hardware in the world is going to make this not look like absolute dogshit.

>>106146086
Monster hunter wilds blocks your path.

>>106145699 (OP)
It used to be as simple as:

Intel + NVIDIA = White
AMD + ATI = Shitskin

play heroes of might and magic 3

>>106148160
you truly have an inferiority complex

>>106148160
what about Intel + ATI and AMD + Nvidia

Literally all of those are enough for the games I play, except for the monitor, that contributes the most to the experience.

>>106145699 (OP)
I have a solid setup and I think that games akshually look worse than 10 years ago

>>106145699 (OP)
>How do you poorfags respond without sounding mad?
The only games I play are Nethack, OpenTTD, and Quake. The improved graphics set for OpenTTD even works on my computer. I'm happy with those games and I just don't need anything else.

>>106145699 (OP)
Why are you soo obsessed OP?
Are you trying to push an opinion or sell something?

>>106145699 (OP)
>750ti
If I lowered modern aaa games graphic setting low enough to be able to run 1080p60 on 750ti it would looks worse than game from 10 years ago.

>>106145699 (OP)
This build could run anything. You just need a GPU upgrade and to replace the HDD with an SDD.

>>106145699 (OP)
"Looking better" is not about numbers. Mirror's edge running on 2008 hardware will always look better than any new game running on any new hardware.

>>106148160
(You) = Good goy

>>106149103
Problem is the gaytracing makes it run like shit regardless of resolution.

>>106145699 (OP)
HDR looks like shit, always

>>106145699 (OP)
There are new games that looks great, but Witcher 3 is 10yo now and still looks good i comparison with some of the shit thats released nowadays.
A lot of games has started to look the same (ue5slop) and quite a lot of studios are filled with talentless activists that are unable to use the tools they have access to in the right way, resulting in poor graphics trough bad performance.
But as I said, there are still games that are coming out that looks good and are well made. One thing I would like though is less focus on realistic graphics and more visual experimentation.

>>106145699 (OP)
by only playing old/indie games?

>>106145736
go check the steam hardware survey

>>106148124
lmao wtf is that

>>106154748
Tekken 8

do you need to respond if you know you're being lied to? new games only require higher system specs because of engines being more resource intensive and denuvo

>>106145699 (OP)
I don't even have a dedicated graphics card lmao

>>106145699 (OP)
Idk, "mow some lawns and buy a better PC"

>>106145831
>he took the bait on the font
utterly predictable

>>106154780
jesus christ

>>106145831
>>106154922
We're solid in the negative returns by now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOQbEBcQ0bo

>>106145699 (OP)
>How do you poorfags respond without sounding mad?

The last good game was made 20 years ago

>>106145699 (OP)
HDR is actually fantastic but implementation is spotty and monitors with great HDR reproduction are rare.

Same with photography actually. I've got thousands of raw photo files and recently I've been converting some of them to .AVIF to take advantage of the HDR DCI-P3 color space. When done right, on the right photos, on a screen that is capable of reproducing HDR accurately, it's night and day. Swiping between a .jpeg and a .avif of the same base image is insane, the jpeg looks like a washed out gray piece of shit by comparison. .AVIF contains so much more color and light information and recreates the 'real life' feeling of a photo in ways that prints or SDR photography can't ever approach.

But retards push back against stuff like this as a gimmick (until it's standardized and retard-proofed) because of poor adoption and implementation. In about 5-10 years it'll be incredible. Picrel visualizes the extra stops in hdr as blue/teal/violet, this would just be flat white in a standard JPG but in HDR it contains extended color and gamut information.

>>106145831
>d-diminishing returns
got any other buzzwords to throw around?

>>106148124
>>106154748
Pretty sure heaps of hardware can make a game look worse than a blurry, blown up screenshot of a low bitrate youtube video.
>nu4chan is so low IQ it genuinely, seriously looks at low bitrate videos and believes that's how the games being shown actually look, including the compression artifacts