← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106148556

15 posts 4 images /g/
Anonymous No.106148556 [Report] >>106148573 >>106148634 >>106148721 >>106152941
Is there ever going to be unpozzed video gen
I’m guessing no, especially with the way the world is heading.
Anonymous No.106148573 [Report] >>106148644 >>106148739
>>106148556 (OP)
its over pedo. the net is being cleansed of your filth
Anonymous No.106148634 [Report] >>106148644
>>106148556 (OP)
>video gen cant create 'p
>"Nooooo its le pozzed!!!!"
>"Nooooo muh heckin privoocy!!11"
>"Nooooo FAGMAN bad!!!!1"
Anonymous No.106148644 [Report] >>106148681 >>106148752
>>106148634
>>106148573
I just want two adult women kissing while someone holds fistfuls of their hair.
Anonymous No.106148681 [Report] >>106148738
>>106148644
>sorry Dave I can't do that. Sexual violence towards women is not acceptable. your prompts have been reported to the Authorities
Anonymous No.106148721 [Report] >>106148747
>>106148556 (OP)
You can do it right now, if you have a spare $4000.
Anonymous No.106148738 [Report]
>>106148681
Ok what about stroking their hair?
Anonymous No.106148739 [Report]
>>106148573
Pedo detected yes it's you. Kill yourself.
Anonymous No.106148747 [Report]
>>106148721
I’m listening. Anything for custom spanking videos
Anonymous No.106148752 [Report] >>106148773 >>106148978
>>106148644
It can do that already. wan 2.2 will do whatever the fuck you tell it to.
Anonymous No.106148773 [Report] >>106149809 >>106152853
>>106148752
Then why isn’t the internet filled with screeching Collective Shouters wailing about all of the Ai generated BDSM porn?
Anonymous No.106148978 [Report]
>>106148752
>will do whatever the fuck
Anonymous No.106149809 [Report]
>>106148773
You want them to pass a law that says AI models that can generate nudity/sex are illegal? Good luck with that.
Anonymous No.106152853 [Report]
>>106148773
because the internet is filled with the same low iq brown tranimetard npcs like you who dont have the gpu to gen those videos and if they do they are too low iq to know how to
Anonymous No.106152941 [Report]
>>106148556 (OP)
>pozzed
I understand your frustration, but you can't bar antivaxxers from using image generation. It has to be for everyone, even those fucking subhuman dregs of society.