I’m guessing no, especially with the way the world is heading.

>>106148556 (OP)
its over pedo. the net is being cleansed of your filth

>>106148556 (OP)
>video gen cant create 'p
>"Nooooo its le pozzed!!!!"
>"Nooooo muh heckin privoocy!!11"
>"Nooooo FAGMAN bad!!!!1"

>>106148634
>>106148573
I just want two adult women kissing while someone holds fistfuls of their hair.

>>106148644
>sorry Dave I can't do that. Sexual violence towards women is not acceptable. your prompts have been reported to the Authorities

>>106148556 (OP)
You can do it right now, if you have a spare $4000.

>>106148681
Ok what about stroking their hair?

>>106148573
Pedo detected yes it's you. Kill yourself.

>>106148721
I’m listening. Anything for custom spanking videos

>>106148644
It can do that already. wan 2.2 will do whatever the fuck you tell it to.

>>106148752
Then why isn’t the internet filled with screeching Collective Shouters wailing about all of the Ai generated BDSM porn?

>>106148752
>will do whatever the fuck

>>106148773
You want them to pass a law that says AI models that can generate nudity/sex are illegal? Good luck with that.

>>106148773
because the internet is filled with the same low iq brown tranimetard npcs like you who dont have the gpu to gen those videos and if they do they are too low iq to know how to

>>106148556 (OP)
>pozzed
I understand your frustration, but you can't bar antivaxxers from using image generation. It has to be for everyone, even those fucking subhuman dregs of society.