Thread 106157565

Is IPS truly the greatest display panel technology?

What fucking retard made this shit? VA bad durability? TN having "thumbs up" quality? I would consider killing myself if I even posted such a retarded infographic.

could've been advanced SED/FED in another timeline

>>106157644
>The va quality face is mewing, look at the cheekbones.
>The two thumbs up indicates mid quality.
Bro you might need to get checked

I've stuck with IPS because its cheap, has good picture quality and is the only good color display that supports 1080p which I don't think I'll ever leave.

My pixio 144hz freesync 100% srgb monitor has better colors than my phones oled

>>106157565 (OP)
I'm doing graphic design, which one should I get? (Fuck OLED btw.)

>>106157565 (OP)
blud cooked with this one

>>106159499
faggot

the thing about va panels is the quality is all over the place, a good one has no black smear and is the best budget tier monitor tech you can get, a bad one is a smeary mess

not sure why you'd think they have less durability than ips and tn, I don't think I've ever seen a screen itself die, 90% of the time it's the psu and the rest of the time it's the backlights, those are going to have the same "durability" regardless of the panel tech

>>106159486
You want color accuracy. IPS.

>>106157565 (OP)
OP is braindead for this one.

>>106157565 (OP)
Everybody knows you go for 27", 1440p, Nano IPS, 1ms, 200 Hz+, Adaptive-Sync for best durability/quality/price ratio.

>>106157907
You don't know how to use greentext

>>106160387
>1440p

IPSissies broken for all later times.

>>106157907
Tha VA durability looks like it is questioning it, not reliable

>>106157907
They didn't like that one, boss.

>>106157644
Imagine being upset, or in the best case, pretending to be upset by a meaningless image presenting a subjective opinion of some random dude (who likely only did it to fish for replies of people like the guy mentioned).