>>106181746 (OP)
either the decoder algorithm is the same size as the original film divided by 8
or the algorithm generates random bytes and compare it to the 8kb hash until it finds the correct one
NEW AND IMPROVED compression algorithm, compressing to a fixed 128 bits!
Just crack the hash to uncompress it!
$ md5sum m.lua
(hash goes here FUCK YOU spamfilter) m.lua
>>106182682
hashes are never unique, you're trying to map a big amount of data to merely 128 bits, you're bound to have repetitions until your hash becomes as big as your file itself
>>106183450
wouldn't that be dope, and FPGA with every movie ever made on it, just so that it can decode a file thats encoded to react specifically to that LUT. well it would only take about a trillion transistors or so to save on physical data storage costs >>106182960
bro you can watch the entire movie of starwars through terminal in ascii, your concept of compression sucks dicks
>>106182318 >or the algorithm generates random bytes and compare it to the 8kb hash until it finds the correct one
You would hit a collision long before you hit the right combination of bytes for your movie.
