← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106187160

58 posts 16 images /g/
Anonymous No.106187160 >>106187258 >>106187642 >>106187769 >>106188194 >>106188526 >>106188526 >>106189145 >>106189262 >>106192054 >>106192191
This shit just doesnt work on Linux man....
Anonymous No.106187250 >>106187284
Works fine for me. I use Arch btw
Anonymous No.106187258 >>106187284
>>106187160 (OP)
Works for me with openvpn
Anonymous No.106187284 >>106187297
>>106187250
>>106187258
forward ports dont work on FEDora
Anonymous No.106187297
>>106187284
Maybe a SELinux thing. Mobile hotspot didn't work for me on Fedora.
Anonymous No.106187452
Proton doesn't give a shit about Linux users.
They claim its in the works. It's been years man.
I switched to TutaMail, Mullvad (always used even when I had proton sub), FileN.
Anonymous No.106187515
I got the native app working on gentoo with all the apps features working
Anonymous No.106187622
You have to pay Pajeet.
All free VPNs are trash.
Anonymous No.106187642
>>106187160 (OP)
Works fine on OpenBSD(macOS).
Anonymous No.106187769 >>106187880
>>106187160 (OP)
The flatpak unironically just works.
Anonymous No.106187880 >>106188205
>>106187769
>The flatpak unironically just works.
is it safe?
Anonymous No.106188194
>>106187160 (OP)
It doesn't even work with gluetun too.
Anonymous No.106188205 >>106188532
>>106187880
not safer than the installable one.
Anonymous No.106188223 >>106188500
didn't protonvpn allow downloading openvpn configuration profiles?
Anonymous No.106188500
>>106188223
it does, op is retarded
Anonymous No.106188526 >>106188538 >>106188591
>>106187160 (OP)
>>106187160 (OP)
I just use the flatpak.
Sure it's riskier because it can get supply-chain attacked somewhere down the line, but they literally acknowledge the flatpak and the AUR versions in their docs at support/linux-vpn-setup

I'll just keep using it and deal with any consequences should they arise. Hopefully with DHH giving so much attention to Arch, proton decides to go back to supporting a native arch version rather than debian.
Anonymous No.106188532
>>106188205
>not safer than the installable one.
?????

The RPM one is from their site, how is it not safer?
Anonymous No.106188538 >>106188565
>>106188526
>Sure it's riskier because it can get supply-chain attacked somewhere down the line, but they literally acknowledge the flatpak and the AUR versions in their docs at support/linux-vpn-setup
Anonymous No.106188540
i'd rather set up the tunnel on the router instead of each client
Anonymous No.106188546 >>106188563
Why would you want to use a honeypot service?
Anonymous No.106188563
>>106188546
>Why would you want to use a honeypot service?
port forwarding for torrents
Anonymous No.106188565 >>106188586
>>106188538
Yes I said they acknowledge it, and they even link to it directly, not that it's managed by them.
What you're seeing is literally just corpospeak for "yeah this works and is valid, but we take no responsibility for it".
Anonymous No.106188586 >>106188612
>>106188565
>Yes I said they acknowledge it, and they even link to it directly, not that it's managed by them.
>What you're seeing is literally just corpospeak for "yeah this works and is valid, but we take no responsibility for it".
hmmm, and it works you say even on FEDora? all I need is the damn port forwarding to work
Anonymous No.106188591 >>106188596 >>106188614
>>106188526
proton-vpn-gtk-app is in the official Arch repos though
Anonymous No.106188596
>>106188591
>proton-vpn-gtk-app
Gonna be real chief, it did not work for me last time I tried because of python versioning fuckery, so I just gave up on it.
Anonymous No.106188612
>>106188586
The flatpak just gives you a working app with all the dependencies baked in, you still need a valid openVPN or wireguard config to get it to work afaik. Check the docs cause I'm pretty sure they have step by steps on how to do it, and the Arch Wiki should also have further info
Anonymous No.106188614 >>106188628
>>106188591
not working since 2023
Anonymous No.106188628 >>106188690
>>106188614
Works fine for me. Arch wiki says to use NetworkManager so there's that.
Anonymous No.106188690 >>106188710 >>106189145
>>106188628
protonvpn doesn't have working openvpn/wireguard for free tier
Anonymous No.106188710 >>106188718
>>106188690
The gtk app only has Wireguard and OpenVPN as options.
Anonymous No.106188718 >>106188798
>>106188710
Idiot.
ProtonVPN, the VPN provider.
DON'T SUPPORT OPENVPN/WIREGUARD on the free tier.
Anonymous No.106188798 >>106189117
>>106188718
>DON'T SUPPORT OPENVPN/WIREGUARD on the free tier.
I dont have the free tier, i have the unlimited one
Anonymous No.106188948
If it is free, you are the product.
Just pay 70$ for 2 year NordVPN or something similar.
Anonymous No.106189117
>>106188798
>paying for people to use your data
Anonymous No.106189145 >>106189165
>>106187160 (OP)
The absolute state of /g/
Use wireguard idiot

>>106188690
Yes it does I'm literally using it RIGHT NOW
Anonymous No.106189165 >>106189189
>>106189145
Show me working gluetun then
Anonymous No.106189189 >>106189255
>>106189165
What the fuck is gluetun

Learn to use Linux like a white man. Use the terminal. Literally all you need to do is run `wg-quick up wg0` once you have copied the config file from proton's fucking website to /etc/wireguard/wg0.conf.
How can you be this fucking helpless?

Protip: If you only want to VPN only specific programs, you can run wg-quick in a network namespace.
Anonymous No.106189255 >>106189317
>>106189189
>doesn't know gluetun
>demand to use linux
>demand to use terminal
Gluetun IS linux terminal that allow you to have a network isolated in a container with it's own VPN and no need for needless network namespace fuckery that's probably backdooered.
Anonymous No.106189262 >>106189317
>>106187160 (OP)
It does, but it takes some effort. What's your distro and what's your use case?
Anonymous No.106189317 >>106189344
>>106189255
>doesn't know gluetun
>Gluetun IS linux terminal that allow you to have a network isolated in a container with it's own VPN
Why the fuck would I know about some random guy's hobby project that does something you can already trivially do with little bit of linux network configuration?
>and no need for needless network namespace fuckery
Well clearly my network namespace fuckery just fucking works while your random gitware doesn't.
>that's probably backdooered.
You are a fucking nigger. What about vanilla fucking linux network namespaces is backdoored? It's a linux feature your shitty program probably uses as well.

This is why we need to gatekeep linux. We don't want these windows-brained kids installing random github programs to do something 10 lines of shell can do.

>>106189262
>but it takes some effort.
Step 1) Copy a file to /etc/wireguard/wg0.conf
step 2) Run `wg-quick up wg0`
Anonymous No.106189344 >>106189442
>>106189317
some would argue that linux/temple OS is one man hobby project.
And it work work with nearly all VPN providers unlike linux network configuration.
>NetworkManager
This is already abandoneware at this point.
>my network namespace fuckery just fucking works
Show us
>Copy
>not cp
ngmi
Anonymous No.106189442 >>106189468
>>106189344
>NetworkManager
There is no networkmanager on my system

>Show us
First you set up a namespace with a working internet connection
namespace="vpn"
wan="wan0"
veth1="veth1"
veth0="veth0"

ip netns add $namespace

ip link add $veth0 type veth peer name $veth1
ip link set $veth1 netns $namespace

ip addr add 10.200.1.1/24 dev $veth0
ip link set $veth0 up

ip netns exec $namespace ip addr add 10.200.1.2/24 dev $veth1
ip netns exec $namespace ip link set $veth1 up
ip netns exec $namespace ip link set lo up

ip netns exec $namespace ip route add default via 10.200.1.1


Then routing, I think you also needed to flip some bit in some sysfs directory to allow forwarding, google that yourself

iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.200.1.0/24 -o $wan -j MASQUERADE
iptables -A FORWARD -i $wan -o $veth0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -o $wan -i $veth0 -j ACCEPT


If you want your namespace to still access localhost, eg for unbound DNS server

ip netns exec $namespace ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 dev veth1 via 10.200.1.2


Then just run
ip netns exec $namespace wg-quick up wg0

And the namespace is VPN'd. Anything you run prefixed with "ip netns exec vpn" is vpn'd
Anonymous No.106189468 >>106189518
>>106189442
I bet my fat 10" cock that what you posted is AI slop.
Anonymous No.106189518 >>106189546
>>106189468
Anonymous No.106189546 >>106189550
>>106189518
>wow i ping google
>so much hacker
Anonymous No.106189550 >>106189564
>>106189546
The latency proves it works retard
Anonymous No.106189564 >>106189584
>>106189550
It just prove you have shitty internet.
Anonymous No.106189584 >>106189658 >>106189693
>>106189564
It's okay for 15€ a month
Anonymous No.106189590 >>106189676
Literally everything proton is a honeypot
Anonymous No.106189658 >>106189672
>>106189584
>€
pajeet confirmed
Anonymous No.106189672
>>106189658
>american projecting this hard
AHAHAHAHA
Anonymous No.106189676 >>106191929
>>106189590
Post proof or gtfo
Anonymous No.106189693
>>106189584
>tfw I pay £36 for 80/20
i get IPv6 and static IPv4, but still feels like i'm getting cucked
Anonymous No.106190587
Works on my machine. I just use the Wireguard configs.
Anonymous No.106191929
>>106189676
>it came to me in a dream
you know you're on the main schizophrenia board right
why do you think people use linux in the first place
because they think that the government and aliens are after them
Anonymous No.106192012
Works fine on the paid version
Anonymous No.106192054
>>106187160 (OP)
good. it's for normgroids. literal normgroids shilling it on jewtube. it's always been a honeypot. now they are leaving CH for the EU. what happened to muh swiss privacy capital? the mask is off and they don't care because they netted all your tech privacy faggot's details the last 10 years.
Anonymous No.106192191
>>106187160 (OP)
>filtered by setting up a VPN
Maybe you should get one of those fisher price toy phones that you can smash around and drool on without damaging it?