Thread 106189040

the rat will run away in january

>>106189040 (OP)
the sister rapist can't hide. the sister rapist will never have power again

>>106189081
This

>Where's the money Altman?
>*gargling noises*
>Where's the money Altman?
>*gargling noises*
>Where's the money Altman?
>*gargling noises*

>>106189040 (OP)
I'm not even antisemitic but Ashkenazi are so uncanny looking.

>>106189040 (OP)
Elon won

>>106189040 (OP)
k

>>106189107
They're rightfully called the Synagogue of Satan.

>>106189040 (OP)
he is very unhealthy

>>106189116
He had to start over again with a new team and still caught up within a couple years. They’re not remotely the same caliber, Sam is a straight up scammer

>>106189040 (OP)
The Manhattan Project was an overwhelmingly Jewish endeavor which used American resources. This is no different.

>>106192305
for a fraction of the cost with a much clearer market niche

>>106189081
>laughs in blob

>>106189091
AI right now is a big poker game
the winner is going to take everything
that's all anybody is really playing for
not to pay their investors back in the event of losing

also I don't think this guy even cares about that
the AI winner is going to be more powerful than all the world countries combined
and whoever controls it will effectively be the new king of the world
and this dude is definitely running for antichrist

>>106189040 (OP)
him and SBF will be doing gay fag sex in the virgin islands. ghislane maxwell will be on speed dial to provide the little boys. diddling don will visit often

>>106194801
What about Bill Gates and Puffy?

>>106192305
His last project was literally World Coin. What did people expect?

You guys realize we could have had an entire 'nother year of 4o and nobody would have really complained? We're upset because 5 is worse than 4o, not because it's only marginally better. They could literally just rollback tomorrow if the situation got that dire. This is a PR disaster but that could be recovered from; they already were ahead of the competition with what they had before this.

>>106196208
why aren't you using grok or Claude instead? oai lost everyone of value like it was a speed run.

>>106197253
grok is memeshit and claude isn't generous

>>106197262
well you have to pick something from the remaining competitors in the next few months since sama is about to be anally raped by angry investors

>>106197270
Since I already have xitter and I don't want to pay $200 a month just to be able to access the model(s) I want, and also don't want to help enable them during this PR disaster, I am trying grok anyway in the meantime, without expectation or investment.

He is in trouble if it turns out these other models are better, because then even a rollback may not be enough to regain users' lost trust. The bottom-line is that he is going to very quickly discover that putting profit over having a large userbase and the foremost reputation was a disastrous exchange.

He's already backpedaled today by letting $20 a month have 4o access, but that's not going to be enough as many people have already publicly cancelled from the sheer audacity. He's going to be forced to capitulate even more over the weekend, because he literally cannot afford to shed users more than he can't afford to keep losing money to them. Even if you have what you call "the best model", what good does that do you if the consumers have gone elsewhere now? It's untenable.

>>106189040 (OP)
the WHAT

>>106197521
I have no idea what this is or does, sorry

>>106189091
KEK

>>106197509
the simple fact is serving these models to the public isn't viable without the ability to burn infinite venture capital
it's even worse than uber or doordash in that sense

>>106189040 (OP)
Sam has straight up only disappointed in delivery since Ilya left. He has zero talent in actually running a company and delivering imo

>>106197977
Tell me, does it make sense to you that they offer only two payment plans, which literally only differ in having an additional 0? Do you honestly believe that they are monetizing it correctly as is? Such that this move is the only one that makes sense and is worth enacting at the potential expense of reduction in marketshare.

>>106197993
In Sam's defense, the product's interface and options and offerings this year got progressively better, particularly with 4o, until this rollout of GPT-5.

sama pegs mark chen until he does what’s barely necessary. that strat will only work for so long

>>106189040 (OP)
Don't worry he will find a way to trick investors even more

>>106189040 (OP)
>>106189091
QRD???

>>106198013
no, the whole approach was incredibly foolish. it's like they only have tech people working there. other than sam, whose only idea of marketing is manufacturing hype.
as to the payment scheme, didn't they say at one point that even the $200 plan was costing them money? and that only around 10% of their userbase were subscribed at all? I don't see how it's possible to ever make the financials work if that's the case

>>106198089
It all would seem to suggest that Sam and his team have no knowledge of how to market designer/luxury/premium goods and services to big spenders.

I believe they are also neglecting the *brand* here. Apple was a lifestyle under Steve Jobs for the affluent and aspiring, and became one of the topdogs of its industry. OpenAI is a first-mover and has 0 prestige or impulsion towards brand loyalty besides being the first one many people have used. It's Spartan, utilitarian, unhype.

The more you think about it the clearer it becomes there's a gaping hole and blindspot in the decisionmaking arm of the company when it comes to attracting more paying users, one that should be easy enough to solve by reference to precedence.

>>106198147
you're right, Jobs was able to talk about his product in a very human way
OpenAI's announcements are comparatively devoid of charisma

hell, even Bill Gates did a better job

AI is pretty useful, but the scale demanded by LLMs is absolutely unsustainable.

Especially since their entire strategy is to get people and organisations so hooked on the technology that they can eventually do the rug pull of "okay, now you are so dependent on us, you have to pay us THIS now" and I'm not sure they'll reach that point soon enough to get away with it.
Pretty much copying the strategy cloud employed in the 10s, but cloud is more affordable to deploy and they were able to raise costs slowly.

>>106189040 (OP)
You can see struggle to stay relevant on his face. If you want to be scam artist, stick to selling pots and medicine of questionable effectiveness.

>>106198690
The issue is that the cost-to-effectiveness ratio of LLMs is absolutely abysmal and the only thing proving any significant improvement of it are claims of people like Saltman and "scientists" hired by them to make theatrical show looking like a serious research in eyes of retarded mobs.

>>106198839
what scam exactly?

>>106198879
two more weeks until agi

>>106198860
>cost-to-effectiveness ratio of LLMs is absolutely abysmal
That's because these companies are operating at a loss to establish presence. Eventually they'll have to charge more for the service instead of $20 a month. But people are willing to pay far more than that.

>>106198879
Two more weeks to AGI, but first we gonna completely rewrite our definition of AGI, but first please give us one gazillion of dollars.
Look, the chatbot that was written by us called our scientist a faggot when we told it that we gonna close the application! I-I-It's learning!

>>106198839
Investors are getting skittish supposedly. But whenever thats brought up you get the usual 2 weeks and luddtard response.

>>106198893
They won't get AGI out of fucking sand.

>>106199048
But Investors are retarded and operate on mentality of throwing shit at random stuff till something will stick. They cope that if they will throw enough money on multiple AI start-ups, maybe one or two of them will become multi-billion successes generating revenue for them.

>>106198147
Its so hilarious when some obvious retard like you giving armchair "obvious" advice.
OpenAIs issue is that their product is already outrageously expensive and the premium tiers are already steep steps.
Youre going from 0, which is a lot better than even 1c, to 20$ for a product that does the same thing just a little better, then to TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS A MONTH for the same product again a little better.
Tell me how many people have ANY sort of subscription for 200$ a month, thats a very short list.
Ultra expensive SaaS with a free tier thats not ultra scuffed has never worked, and if it were ultra scuffed people will simply switch to another LLM, which is why there is no easy way out for them

>>106189040 (OP)
that $200M contract he just got from the US DOD is being partially used to identify any US residing person who has ever made antisemitic statements anywhere online with the express purpose of locking them up in FEMA camps and killing them (not even joking) and i was HPVAC before most of you were even born and my workstation costs more than the car you drive.

the new model is a nerf to save costs
how can AGI be reached when fucking LLMs are this expensive to maintain?

>>106197521
>rat

>>106196208
they've already brought it back

>>106189040 (OP)
The embarrassing presentation for GPT5 should tell you everything, we're at the top of the bubble.

>>106199663
I've already said this as well and it doesn't conflict with what you're replying to.

>>106200832
For Plus users and above. For a limited time only as of yesterday.

why does this guy drive schizos absolutely mad?