Thread 106202065

why wasn't this your face g?

>>106202065 (OP)
1. im retarded
2. im lazy
3. i do not smile
4. i refuse to work even when paid to work

>>106202065 (OP)
Im lazy and probably retarded, I just enjoy not giving a fuck and living a pseudo-neet life working from home and fucking my onahole until I can live off passive income

>>106202065 (OP)
I feel like all of it boils down to having incredible luck and connections

>>106202404
indeed, there is no such thing as IQ

>>106202065 (OP)
probably just wanted to hire someone less human looking than him

>>106202065 (OP)
So he accepted for $250M? Basically he negotiated his offer. I fucking hate headlines.

>>106202508
It says exactly that in slightly different wording though. It’s not even deceptive. What’s wrong with it?

I thought all tech workers could be replaced by AI? If so why pay a human such a large amount of money? I saw on /g/ that gpt-5 has an iq of 1600. Did /g/ lie to me?

>>106202065 (OP)
im not top 0.00001% of humans

>>106202544
The headline is framing it as a rejection. It's meant to be clickbait "whoa a young kid turned down millions of dollars" vs the more accurate "24-year-old accepts $250M offer from Meta."

But you're surrounded by so much clickbait headlines you don't even realize when you're looking at one.

>>106202508
nope, he refused.
so Zuck doubled his offer.
which tells us two things:
>#1 - The kids smart (but probably not $250m worth of smart)
>#2 - Zuck is desperate, retarded and playing desperate catchup. At any cost.

>>106202596
>#1 - He's jewish
See: >>106200865 in the other pointless thread

>>106202596
Except that's exactly what the clickbait headline wants to frame this as. Which is an assumption on your part that the writer is leveraging to make you click by playing into your biases. That's the whole mechanism of clickbait.

Meanwhile if I look up Matt Deike I see a NY Times article with the headline "A.I. Researchers Are Negotiating $250 Million Pay Packages" which doesn't have the same clickbait effect, because offer negotiations are normal part of getting a new job. Instead it's the large number that's more interesting.

>>106202654
Kids definitely not a con, know of him from some of the stuff he was doing at Allen AI. But $250m, thats maybe stretching it some.

I wouldn't work for zuck out of principle even if he offered 50 trillion dollars

I'm not evil.

I would work for zuck for 30k just so I could have meta on my resume

linear algebra is hard

>>106202065 (OP)
So based. He can work a year and then retire to kentucky living like thomas massie

>>106202786
This, I would suck a dick

>>106202065 (OP)
What does he even do? Ai is just made up

>>106202852
He creates the ai metaverse and ai facebook. Then we can finally put boomers into vr where they can quietly watch ai generated fox news and cnn.

they're not buying an "ai prodigy", whatever that even means, they're buying a usb stick filled with billions of dollars worth of stolen training data from their current employer

Can't they just use AI to develop new AI?

>>106203000
This is the point
current LLMs approach to AI is not real AI.

>>106202065 (OP)
I'm too smart for AI

>>106202701
You could be retarded for all I know.

>>106202813
Would you take a 13 inch BBC in your bussy though? Bet you would, fag.

>>106203202
AI is vaporware and pipe dreams. Nothing like that exists and there's no indication it will any time soon.