>>106205187
But that would maje the whole thing pointless, no?
The whole reason they'd be employing humans instead of having it be automated is that a human can give a much better handjob than a robot by constantly adjusting every little thing for the penis being stimulated.
If a customer were to get a remote-controlled handjob that moves based on another dick's sensation, it would be so much worse than simply having it mechanically move up and down.
Also, if it's not based on your dick, it doesn't have to be in real time. It can be recorded and played back at any moment, possibly from a library of "sessions", which I think could be an actually good idea.
Imagine watching a POV video (possibly in VR) of your favorite pornstar giving you a handjob, and have a pair of robot hands perfectly following her every movement.
There would actually be enough immersion to make you feel like you're being jacked off by the girl, it would work offline without the need for random dudes constantly jerking dildos off, and it would actually be desirable for customers.
The real-time thing could work if you're actually video-chatting with someone (one on one, or in some type of camgirl setting) and both of you have controller gloves + robot hands.