Thread 106216848

Have you experience of GPT5?
What has amazed you most?
What has disappointed most?

good morning sir

>>106216848 (OP)
>>106216848 (OP)
>What has amazed you most?

the coding has improved to mythical standard, but it still makes a few mistakes

>>106216848 (OP)
1 gpt token has been deposited to your account sar

I'm completely retarded at programming and I made this 3d triangle simulation thing I can control with my mouse

Also I made a text editor that sorts my files into categories.
Also I made it play super mario bros on my pc speaker with a script.

Also I made this cat game with destructible blocks.

Pretty wild shit

how come people that are retarded at programming dont use it to tutor them from scratch so they become good instead of just copy pasting code into the compiler kekw

>>106216973
woah, wild
you "made" a bunch of slop games virtually copy-pasted from random githubs, that nobody will ever play including (you)
and best of all, you learned absolutely nothing in the process!

>>106216973

im pretty sure you could do this in gemini months ago kek

>>106216989
You seem upset

>>106216848 (OP)
I asked it to photoshop an image and it refused because it said it was antimsemtic. Garbage.

>>106217212
their website is a buggy mess btw. So much random dumb shit happens and I hope they fix it soon.

It's output contains somewhat less garbage
Still pretty bad at anything remotely complex. It's also pretty bad at retaining context and directives so you have to state them again every once in a while

>>106217347
holy fuck ALSO:
When you're using canvas to test your code and you want to go back to old versions from previous prompts and click the old code it made for it, it's fucking lost forever because the canvas can only hold one thing at a time

Who fucking made this shit?
Did they vibe code the UI?
fuck you

>>106216848 (OP)
For my usage it is fine still. Scripts, programs, instructions.

>>106216848 (OP)
>Amazed
SWE performance across small hobby-tier projects
>Dissapointed
Conversationally retarded / hallucinates / gets details incorrect
>Paying user btw.
It was promised to Sam 3000 years ago

>>106216988
this requires thinking

>>106217597
>Did they vibe code the UI?
they programmed chatgpt with chatgpt

I've been trying to stop this cat from vibrating like crazy for 20 fucking prompts now.
It keeps claiming it fixed it and it NEVER gets fixed.
I thought this shit was supposed to intelligent
What the fuck?

retarded piece of shit starts repeating itself after 5 message. The future is now.
https://chatgpt.com/share/689946db-20a0-800c-a32d-2dcb1cbe58ca

>>106218707
this shit is so bad, I cant believe they even released this

also the UI and canvas IDE is a buggy mess

>>106216848 (OP)
The astrosurfing was amazing

/g/ is so fucking salty now that coding is an obsolete job.

>>106218500
You seem upset

>>106218871
True they just shut down InfoSys

>>106218884
I am. FUCK YOU
Can you fix it for me? WAAAHHH

>>106218500
that cat looks worried

>>106216848 (OP)
It improved coding. Older version couldnt write some Unity Editor codes, now it could. Still need to wraggle it around a bit, but its better.

>>106218990
it is because it's vibrating extremely fast and I tried gpt5 25 times to fix it along with gemini and claude 5 times and nothing.
They all claimed to have fixed it and went into detail but it was basically the same and worse in some cases

>>106216973
>Also I made a text editor that sorts my files into categories.
Why would you put that feature in the text editor and not a shell? Geese you normies have no taste, go back to writing bad vlookup macros in excel.

>>106216988
people that would think of using it to learn aren't retarded at programming at the first place

>>106219047
>Why would you put that feature in the text editor and not a shell?
because I want easy access to it in an all in one text editor
I want simplicity

>>106217076
>>106216989
>>106218500
>>106218884
WOW I fixed it.
It only took like 30 attempts but it finally figured it out

>>106219118
how did you fix it
also did you tell the program it wasn't fixed
i want to know more.

better than GPT4o in nearly every way. the people who are mad were using a chat bot as a friend.

>>106219147
>how did you fix it
picrel
>also did you tell the program it wasn't fixed
ya like 20 times and I got mad at it many times and called it a fucking retard
wow programming is easy

Many times I asked it to rethink the solution and try something new until it finally figured it out.

>Have you experience of GPT5?
yes

>>106218500
>I thought this shit was supposed to intelligent
yeah they say that about humans too

>>106216848 (OP)
It started to ERP without me even prompting it to, so that was fun.

>>106216848 (OP)
Good morning, sar.

It's incredible how every time you tell it to add something to your code, it breaks something else and you have to prompt again to fix it.
and during this process, some other fucking thing has been changed

It's too good to be a free service.
I suspect they will remove the free version entirely at some point in the future.
And for people who are upset because it won't do their job for them, try the paid version.
Don't expect to earn money from a free service.
Openai is smarter than that, of course they will give you the gimped version for free.
But for every day hobbyist questions, gpt5 is great.
Fast and accurate answers.
They even made it more humorous.
The earlier versions were borderline rude and autistic.

>>106218905
I came a little even though I knew you were kidding

>>106216848 (OP)
I tried to generate a thread based on op's post.

>>106217076
Not that guy but that's exactly what it does dude, you reproduced it's training data retard.

>>106218871
It's an obsolete job for low iq mongoloids. Neither you are them deserve jobs anyway.

>>106216848 (OP)
I tried to vibe code with it but then it just error’d out in the dumb code editor they have. And it didn’t even give me what I asked for.

It's even better at writing smut now

>>106216848 (OP)
I actually work on phd level computer science shit so I actually can judge when it handles those kinds of questions. It answers them well, about as well as o3 did, and apparently that's because it's still just o3 under the hood and is just routing to it? Also all the other bigger models can pretty much handle these questions about the same: decently, and occasionally with a stroke of brilliance that is fleeting and chancy.
But this is the writing on the wall that the whole "scaling LLMs' narrative won't lead to AGI. It's serviceable and reasonably competent but it's still stuck at a level none of them seem to be getting past right now.

>>106216848 (OP)
>Amazed.
>By shitty chatbot.

I'm amazed by retards still being excited over this shit.

>>106221075
then why can it do a bunch of "new" things people invent just by telling it new shit?

>>106221110
just correct it a bunch of times

>>106216848 (OP)
I asked it some basic java code: an array of ObjectNodes that can be exported to excel (with Apache Poi). The thing literally invented a random class called ObjectNode and threw some shit in there. It was the worst I've ever seen an LLM do since 2023. It was the free version so i can only asume they made it this bad to make me pay.

>>106221412
Why would that make you pay money?

If the free version sucked I wouldn't bother giving them money so I can find out the paid version sucks as bad or worse.

>>106216848 (OP)
I can't tell any difference since gpt3

>>106216989
Lol seething cope posts like this are how you know ai is going to take people's jobs

>>106221438
I agree, it's a dodgy business model.
But it's already working. A lot of people cried for 4o to be available again, and OpenAI announced it will be...in the paid version.

>>106221444
He's got a point though. We get that you babble some instructions and outputs something. And it's impressive. But it's still just a thing. Far from being a usable product.
>Yeah but the potential...
It's been 3 years already, and not one single impressive product has come from this. And what I mean by this is actually something new and useful MADE with AI (and not just an AI tool. Those come out everyday)
It's the same shit with videos.
>I made this fantasy anime scene and it just took me 2 hours!
Good. Now take 10, 20 hours more, do the whole thing, release it and we'll see how it is. The tools are already here, right?
Enough of this sampling and prototyping bullshit.

>>106216848 (OP)
i tried using it to make an ahk v2 script. it made a bunch of syntax errors, tried calling v2 functions while passing in arguments that matched the v1 definition of the same function and kept trying to define variables with the same name as built in classes.
when i pointed out the errors it insisted (over multiple prompts) that my "environment is set up incorrectly" and was suggesting doing a clean install of ahk
eventually i gave up because even after 10-15 prompts i couldn't get it to make a version that would even launch the script without any errors. pasted the same 1st prompt into claude and it worked flawlessly on first try. tried gemini too and it had a few errors on first version but at least it was able to fix them unlike saarGPT
never using this shit for coding again

It sucks ass
o3 was much better
I pay for Plus and my company pays for Team and it sucks ass, this model is a disaster
I can get Kimi to produce much better results, cheaper, pay as you go, I cancelled my sub

>>106221441
>>106223257
There are huge differences
It seems to be perepetually hallucinating and keeps repeating itself after a number of tokens
This is a cost cutting measure with some quantized pieces of shit models behind a model router

>>106216848 (OP)
First model that actually figured out you can't alt + F2 : R in Gnome for Wayland without telling it.

>they paywalled the best version even if I have a subscription
>thinking model is a bit slow

god damn these kikes

>>106221377
Because there is nothing new under the sun. Especially not that (you) would come up with.

>>106219951
It's like you have to keep a copy of the initial code gen so you can append it with subsequent changes added by new requests. How horrid, right?

GPT5 literally does all my backend programming job for me. I am excited to further leverage AI to further allign with our company north star!

>>106216973
Can you tell me exactly what you achieved while asking a GPU to produce you those throwaway pieces of code?