← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106232395

24 posts 16 images /g/
Anonymous No.106232395 >>106232439 >>106233018 >>106233028 >>106233123 >>106238970 >>106241680 >>106241840
>brad spengler violating gpl
>glowmemeOS targeting open-source with FUDs and lying about its own security properties
>All of them and Signal (literally has an ex-glowie in its board) attacking PGP with FUDs again
where were you when foss is being killed?
Anonymous No.106232439 >>106232522 >>106233032
>>106232395 (OP)
>lust provoking image
Anonymous No.106232522 >>106232690 >>106233167 >>106234839 >>106240052
>>106232439
it's a fucking child
Anonymous No.106232525
4/10 wnb
Anonymous No.106232690
>>106232522
Exactly
Anonymous No.106233018
>>106232395 (OP)
details?
Anonymous No.106233028
>>106232395 (OP)
They can't kill FOSS because FOSS never really profited. People started it for curiosity and the will to hack. That's why the government is so afraid, they can't buy or sue them into closing, anyone can clone and follow the work.
What happened with Centos and Yuzu are the perfect example.
Anonymous No.106233032
>>106232439
excuse me?
Anonymous No.106233123
>>106232395 (OP)
>still posting this old hag
Anonymous No.106233167
>>106232522
suddenly
Anonymous No.106233346 >>106234232
>not 1 serious reply
Anonymous No.106233376 >>106233826 >>106234232
>posts deranged shit
>demands people take it seriously
Anonymous No.106233826
>>106233376
ok shill
Anonymous No.106234232
>>106233346
>>106233376
this thread was made to bait cp and jannies are leaving it up to get more for their collection
Anonymous No.106234839
>>106232522
Out of 10
Anonymous No.106236392
this is the thread
Anonymous No.106238970
>>106232395 (OP)
She looks like she's getting ready to call someone a lint-licker
Anonymous No.106240052 >>106241719
>>106232522
is she really fucking? doesn't seem like it
Anonymous No.106240784 >>106242336
>thread still up
Yup, jannies are gooning ITT
Anonymous No.106241597
Anonymous No.106241680
>>106232395 (OP)
>brad spengler violating gpl
unless there's been a new development, Spengler isn't violating the GPL
he distributes the sources to everyone to whom he distributes binaries
recipients are free to redistribute the grsec sources under the terms of the GPL
that's a violation of the contract with the grsec people and they'll lose further access to grsec, but that's a separate issue, that of their contract with Spengler
does what he's doing violate the spirit of the GPL? probably
but not the letter
face it, Spengler found a loophole to that parrot-fucker rms' fantasy of everyone working for free, forever
cope lol
Anonymous No.106241719
>>106240052
>is she really fucking?
Anonymous No.106241840
>>106232395 (OP)
i know what you are OP
Anonymous No.106242336
>>106240784
here's another