← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106238148

15 posts 6 images /g/
Anonymous No.106238148 [Report] >>106238448 >>106238472 >>106239166 >>106241574 >>106241578
I don’t like BigTech. I am interested in good, bullet proof privacy enhancing methods and solutions. I read alot of stuff and try to form my own opinion. And I came to the conclusion, that there are good reasons to distrust the established privacy priests. Edward Snowden recommended GrapheneOS. But he never audited the code and he doesn’t know what the proprietary chips are actually doing. He is an influential person in the privacy community, but his recommendation for GrapheneOS is based on BLIND BELIEF and not technical expertise. There are other reasons why I am sceptical of the Graphene organisation which I have mentioned earlier in this thread. But in the last two months or so, the Graphene devs made claims, which have strengthened my scepticism even more. They hate all privacy/security solutions (including desktop Pcs with Linux, Pinephone, lineage, /e/ etc.) They only recommend two products: Google Pixels and Apple iPhones. Just think about it: GOOGLE AND APPLE. The devs of the supposed most private and secure phone OS recommend exclusively Google and Apple products. And this is what privacy minded people should believe? This is why I think, this is just like these chinese “experts” who say, you should use Huawei for privacy and security reasons. Maybe this isn’t all about privacy and security. Maybe its all about geopolitics in the end.
Anonymous No.106238448 [Report]
>>106238148 (OP)
FUCK off braxman
Anonymous No.106238472 [Report] >>106238670 >>106240647
>>106238148 (OP)
from where are these anti graphene posts coming from? couple months ago and back graphene threads were about asking users questions about usability, Rosmann/Micay drama, anon complaining his banking app doesn't work, etc. not purely baseless attacks like faggot OP's wall of text
I guess some huge eceleb nigger covered the project and it's been getting attention from his brainlet fans
Anonymous No.106238604 [Report] >>106238999
does anyone know if grapheneos will get updated to android 16 or is it stuck on 15?
Anonymous No.106238670 [Report] >>106239049
>>106238472
From privacy minded people who distrust the established privacy priests.
Anonymous No.106238999 [Report] >>106239593
>>106238604
https://grapheneos.org/releases#2025063000
Android 16 is available since the 2025063000 release. Is your device still supported?
Anonymous No.106239049 [Report]
>>106238670
I trust Micay
Anonymous No.106239055 [Report]
>Only Google hardware is secure
>only Google Play is secure
>next best option is iPhone
>Old thinkpads running Linux are insecure
It may be counterintuitive, but this is what peak privacy looks like.
Anonymous No.106239166 [Report]
>>106238148 (OP)
https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/iphones-for-privacy/29939/74

They closed the thread. What a surprise.
Anonymous No.106239593 [Report] >>106239893
>>106238999
i was wondering because i heard android stopped being open source. i was gonna buy the 9a but i might wait for the next one
Anonymous No.106239893 [Report]
>>106239593
Android (AOSP) is still open source, Google just changed how they will publish source code since the Android 16 release.
Anonymous No.106239930 [Report]
The most private device is a Pentium III running Windows ME and you can't convince me otherwise.
Anonymous No.106240647 [Report]
>>106238472
It would help, if your dear leader Kim Jong... uh... Daniel Micay wouldn't post crazy shit like this. >>106211081
Anonymous No.106241574 [Report]
>>106238148 (OP)
I trust Graphene because they are schizos. All the people in power, inside or outside big tech, that are working very hard to make our life worse are psychopaths. Schizos are the natural enemies of psychos and the only ones that can defeat them.
Anonymous No.106241578 [Report]
>>106238148 (OP)
you havent felt the touch of a woman in a while have you