>>106241411
>NixOS seems like a massive headache and timesink
can confirm, I've tried it and went back to archlinux after two weeks., I use my computer too much, fighting against nix to get anything compiled, installed and running is a FUCKING NIGHTMARE.
>I actually use Linux every day at work, so I guess that might be why I have no interest in it.
or you just don't want to deal with yet another layer of abstraction that bring nothing but troubles for the desktop user.
>I can't see how it's worth it for my servers at work either since those get rebuilt way less than my desktop. I do use Docker a lot.
yeah, reproductibility and isolations are solved issues, nixos is just one convoluted way to replace some of the usual tools sysadmins have been using for decades and the new kids on the block like ansible, chef, docker, terraform, etc, it's not even working that well from what I've seen.
I've also tried to use nix on archlinux when I heard that valve was doing that with the steamdeck, it's basically a better AUR for weird software that aren't in arch repos, it's honestly the only thing they should focus on in my opinion.
the OS will never take off but I can see potential in nix the package manager ALONGSIDE a normal OS that won't be a fucking pain in the ass to use