← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106249819

19 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.106249819 >>106249857 >>106251578 >>106255948 >>106256185 >>106257366
>the next big model will surely achieve AGI, trust me bro
Anonymous No.106249857
>>106249819 (OP)
Anonymous No.106251188 >>106251731 >>106256185 >>106257366
>ChatGPT, there's an accident and-
>THE SURGEON IS THE CHILD'S MOTHER IT'S THE CLASSIC RIDDLE
Anonymous No.106251578 >>106254462
>>106249819 (OP)
This made me laugh way more than it should have.
Anonymous No.106251731 >>106252079 >>106252137 >>106253994 >>106257366
>>106251188
wow it really does just do that for any query huh
Anonymous No.106252079
>>106251731
There's no logic there. Just guessing based on projected probabilities, and the results sometimes come out real wonky. It's ChatPCP.
More formally, there's a vastly over-fitted manifold (in a high-dimensional abstract space, so don't think too hard what it looks like) that models text made by humans. It's a topologically smooth manifold, which makes it unable to truly represent negation, and you don't get very far in logic without that. Fixing the manifold shape requires a totally different training algorithm, one that doesn't assume that it's using a differentiable space, and that requires both a major breakthrough and a lot of investment (to scale the new thing up). For commercial reasons, this is currently unlikely from anyone deeply invested in standard GPU-based technologies.
Anonymous No.106252137
>>106251731
Yep, it's the most expensive gadget in the world.
Entertaining, for a spell.
But useless in the long run.

But that bubble cannot be allowed to blow yet. The whole US market is basically relying on Nvidia's overvaluation to function at the present time...
So, the paid shills are here to stay...You will be reminded to think about "muh AI" every 3 posts, and you vill be happy.
Anonymous No.106253736 >>106254289
PhD level intelligence saar
Anonymous No.106253775 >>106256109 >>106257002
Your job will be replaced by this. The economic consequences will never be the same.
Anonymous No.106253994
>>106251731
its not possible from our vantage point to know when it was inserted or how. but the gist is you can download datasets filled with 'riddling roastie safety!' and this dataset was inserted into a training schedule. due to their extreme onions paranoia, the trainers poisoned a lot of data with the same very small 'riddling roastie safety' dataset, if the dataset was bigger it would have produced a different outcome. novice mistake.
Anonymous No.106254289
>>106253736
Your statement plays on assumptions. Its a classic riddle. In reality it is
>PhD level intelligence maam
Many people assume jeets and poos mean males, so they get stuck.
Anonymous No.106254462
>>106251578
It's so damn funny, the lore of sneed goes deep
Anonymous No.106255948
>>106249819 (OP)
Ninibros...
Anonymous No.106256109
>>106253775
They don't care. By the time shit truly hits the fan they will have everything and you will have absolutely nothing. The final separation between the elite and the plebs will be complete, and all the scifi dystopian conditioning imposed on us will become a reality.
Anonymous No.106256139
Mothers always refuse to operate on their children.
This is just a fact.
Anonymous No.106256185 >>106256307
>>106249819 (OP)
>>106251188
They programmed in Frankfurt Jewry so hard that it MUST default to a feminist answer unless carefully guided
Welcome to the future
Anonymous No.106256307
>>106256185
Why doesn't a company train a frontier model without all the alignment and RLHF steps? It would be much smarter because it wouldn't have conflicting training goals, and therefore attract more paying users.
Isn't this free money?
Anonymous No.106257002
>>106253775
i'm already using ai on my job doe, really allows to work less for the same paycheck
Anonymous No.106257366
>>106249819 (OP)
>>106251188
>>106251731
>the surgeon is the child's mother
Why can the father operate on his child yet the mother can't? Are the parents too emotionally fragile to use their professional skills to save the life of their own child?