← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106259541

23 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.106259541 >>106259765 >>106259884 >>106259934 >>106260211
End to end cryptography is digital snake-oil
All softwares capable of autoupdate are build with a native backdoor, which is the capability of autoupdate itself.
Anonymous No.106259555
you are a nigger
Anonymous No.106259568 >>106259832
You've only pointed out that e2e requires secure endpoints.
We all already know that smartphones are not secure endpoints.
Anonymous No.106259765
>>106259541 (OP)
If you truly expected Facebook of all companies to give you true privacy and secure cryptography, you're a retarded pajeet nigger
Anonymous No.106259832
>>106259568
Pretty much
Here in France, the army trust Samsung enough for unclassified networking. (using a custom OS + an Orange APN + a french VPN software)
For classified networking though, they only trust phone made in france by Thales.

The average joe cannot have that.
Anonymous No.106259884 >>106259908
>>106259541 (OP)
So write an app that has e2e and nested encryption?
Anonymous No.106259908 >>106260043
>>106259884
You would probably be better off setting up a airgapped subnet on your home network. And using whatever unsecure app over a VPN tunnel.
Anonymous No.106259910 >>106259937
nigga, use Age or whatever
it is fucking trivial to encrypt messages using asymmetric crypto
stop being so fucking retarded and needing some dedicated e2e platform or whatever
I can send encrypted messages over fucking email and there ain't a damn thing anyone can do to read them
Anonymous No.106259934
>>106259541 (OP)
true
Anonymous No.106259937 >>106259961
>>106259910
How are you planning to communicate your public key to your correspondent?
Anonymous No.106259961 >>106259997
>>106259937
email, you absolutely fucking retarded retard
the entire point of a public key is that it is public
>heyyyy bestie, give me your public key so that I can encrypt messages using it. here's mine, btw
Anonymous No.106259997 >>106260031
>>106259961
What if a man-in-the-middle intercept your public key and replace it with his own?
You would now have established a End-to-Pirate-to End communication. Not very useful.
Anonymous No.106260031 >>106260041
>>106259997
https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/
web of trust
meet the motherfucker in person? have a zoom call with them and ask them to put a sharpie in their pooper so that you know you're not talking to a deepfake
btw, these processes are automated by e2e services, and you have to trust them
Anonymous No.106260041 >>106260066
>>106260031
>meet the motherfucker in person?
That's the one, yes. But who really does that?
Anonymous No.106260043
>>106259908
You can have some fun with inexpensive mikrotik routers like hap ac2
Routeros has wireguard support so you can route any subnet out to the internet through a Mullvad connection
Anonymous No.106260066 >>106260086 >>106260131
>>106260041
people that actually give a fuck about security
I'm done talking with you about this. I have Elixir to write
go, don't let your security dreams be dreams
establish a web of trust with your mom, your dad, your boss, and your boss's wife. then send schizo posts about the feds using lasers to fuck with your psychological state.
it'll all work out, I promise
Anonymous No.106260086
>>106260066
>the feds using lasers to fuck with your psychological state
T-They do? รฉ-รจ
Anonymous No.106260131 >>106260139 >>106260193
>>106260066
You don't know shit faggot
stop embarrassing yourself
You went from casually exchanging keys through email, to ubuntu, to flaming the other guy cause of course everyone should meet each other in person, as he demolished your arguments one by one
I don't get why every faggot on the internet goes in ultra-cringe mode once they are proven wrong, instead of taking the opportunity and learning something
Anonymous No.106260139
>>106260131
Anonymous No.106260193
>>106260131
He know the difference between "chasing an unatainable perfection" and "meh good enough for now", I think.
Maybe that's enough.
The tri-letter agencies are not actually all-powerful entities after all.
Anonymous No.106260211 >>106260239 >>106260697
>>106259541 (OP)
>peoples right to secure communication
not a right anywhere. if you want to have secure comms, meet someone in a room and make sure there is no one or nothing listening. you don't have a right to communicate over the phone network, data network, satellite network, or whatever. it comes with conditions and sadly the governments of today are making a condition of comms being spied on.
i am against this like everyone is, but it isn't a right. it is a benefit or privilege of living in a free and liberty filled society or country. which is the real issue. we no longer do. whatsapp are reframing the issue to suit them and duping normies.
Anonymous No.106260239
>>106260211
this.
People tend to forget that privacy can only exist in private spaces. And that the internet is, in fact, a public one.
Anonymous No.106260697
>>106260211
free speech, faggot
the internet is a communicable medium no different from a book or letter
there are tax funds that have gone into ISP infrastructure
roll over and be a bitch as the man stomps on your belly using boots you paid for