Thread 106260092

Would Ubuntu Touch on something like a fairphone be better than graphene on a pixel?

>>106260092 (OP)
The devs of Graphene say no.

>>106260150
Can they actually be trusted though?

>>106260265
>He thinks glownigs and kikes aren't already in his flipmeme
Kekaroo

>>106260150
postmarketos?

>>106260150
>Trust the "only use google phones" bros about privacy.

LOL

>>106260266
Hey, they are the devs of the supposed most secure and private phone OS in the world! Are you questioning their authority or what?

>>106260522
And iPhones!

>>106260733
Yes, because I'd like to know if it's better than just getting a phone with an unlockable bootloader that runs lineage without google.

>>106260774
Dude, you can't just question the eternal wisdom of Graphene devs and our dear leader Daniel Micay (pbuh). You are spreading misinformation and you are contributing to the harassment campaign against our divine mission!

>>106260150
can;t these guys build their own OS if they get the funding, not just an Android fork, but full on linux or maybe BSD.

>>106260150
Murena actually does tell you in a way, since speech to text is a premium subscription feature and they tell you it does when you look up how to use it. Otherwise you can use Sayboard or something.

>>106261042
doesn't address what I said, retard.

>>106261061
They say it is an OS.

>>106261003
Money is not a magical device that turns into the shit you want.
You cannot build a new OS without the support from several other industry.
The shadow council of oligarch seems pretty satisfied with the current state of smartphone's ecosystem. So they have zero incentive to help create your new OS.
It won't happen.

>>106260896
but I have to know!!

>>106260150
>The devs of Graphene
Irrelevant. Check their Mastodon, they are anti-everything and (((Google))) cocksuckers whoreslaves. They should do the needful and take their meds already.

>>106260092 (OP)
Isn't this project dead?

>>106262670
no
its community driven

>>106260150
Isn't the dev of graphene a tranny

>>106260092 (OP)
Ubuntu touch at the moment is stable, works well and as expected on officially supported devices. There isn't anything (unless specifically mentioned in the device info) that does not work. It is intuitive but still takes a bit of getting used to coming from android. It isn't a resource hog, nothing crashes etc. Downsides at the moment are apps, there are quite a few and the ones that are there (which are maintained) work fine, I'm talking here about 3rd party apps, default apps as mentioned work 100% fine. The only issue is that a lot of the apps are not maintained. its not as bad as the sailfish clusterfuck but its still a bit of an issue. Of course you can install waydroid and use android apps, but this seems counter productive to me. Overall in the context of alternative phone OS options and having tried them all, I personally give it a 9/10 . Losing a point only to two issues which are font scaling which is there but isn't entirely worked out yet and the fact that autocorrect on the keyboard is not as good as on android. Thats pretty much it.

>>106260265
>>106260331
bots

>>106260150
Graphene is retarded.
>>106260092 (OP)
It's Ubuntu's wannabe Android OS. PostMarketOS is actual mobile Linux. Ubuntu touch is a complete waste of time. It used to have an Android graphics driver compatibility layer but they got rid of it because the entire android userspace is a dumpster fire of a monorepo and an absolute bitch to build literally anything against.

>>106263771
>I personally give it a 9/10
WTF do you do with your phone? Text messages and Reddit?
No Linux apps work without undoing the clusterfuck immutable OS mess and of course no Android apps work.