>>106263572
C++: glacial compiles, insane complexity, impenetrable errors, laughable cross-platform compat, basically useless tools.
To me C++ seems to be a language that has sacrificed orthogonality and elegance for random expediency. C++ is a language strongly optimized for liars and people who go by guesswork and ignorance.
>>106263433 (OP)
I am pretty sure 99% of their systems is still written in C/C++
They may have jumped on the hype train, but I am sure it won't go that far.
>>106263638
In my experience, 90% of tech interviewers are unable to pass the interview themselves if the roles were flipped, and it's often an ego stroking exercise for them to feel better than the candidates when asking ridiculous questions
>>106263622
Linus sums it up well. Yes, our standards have fallen since then so C++ looks good in comparison to garbage like Java. Java is, in many ways, C++– https://lwn.net/Articles/249460/
>>106263710
he is wrong do, the linux kernel would have been a better place if they used C++ and limited them self to a subset of it, just classes and that's it.
They probably use class systems written in C that look like horror show rather that proper C++
>>106263493 >C++ has its place in the history of programming languages. Just as Caligula has his place in the history of the Roman Empire. – Robert Firth >C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg. – Bjarne Stroustrup >I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. – Alan Kay >Whenever the C++ language designers had two competing ideas as to how they should solve some problem, they said, “OK, we’ll do them both”. So the language is too baroque for my taste. – Donald E Knuth >I believe C++ instills fear in programmers, fear that the interaction of some details causes unpredictable results. Its unmanageable complexity has spawned more fear-preventing tools than any other language, but the solution should have been to create and use a language that does not overload the whole goddamn human. – Erik Naggum >C++ is more of a rube-goldberg type thing full of high-voltages, large chain-driven gears, sharp edges, exploding widgets, and spots to get your fingers crushed. And because of it’s complexity many (if not most) of it’s users don’t know how it works, and can’t tell ahead of time what’s going to cause them to loose an arm. – Grant Edwards
>>106263748
You're summing up how the Linux kernel devolved into the shitshow it is now. No half measures if you're going to demand perfection. You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself becoming Apple.
>>106263781
im making myself a micro browsers that uses litehtml+jerryscript and for the "network" it uses varlink, C/C++ code mixed all up, imposible to do with Rust or very hard when ever i tried
i wont post code i don't want to embarrass my self.
>>106263674
this is how i immediately knew op's picrel was made by a retard. and i say that as a rustancean.
i mean C/C++ is retarded already. but >C/C++23
and is that "C"/"C++23", or "C23"/"C++23", or maybe it's the super language "C/C++23" lol.
you just know that whoever did this just thinks bigger number equates applicably larger skill. lmao.
>>106263593
Ha! As much as I disagree with you I do appreciate the effort you have put into trying to decry C++. Fascinating. But why? What is it... exactly... that drives you to do this?
>>106263958
I'm sorry but you can't use an external reference.
You have failed the interview.
It appears you were unqualified for the position you have applied for.
>>106263855
it's okay. you provide enough "real" details.
i'm not aware of a rust-native litehtml alternative. so your reasoning is sound.
good luck with your project.
>>106264047
You seem to have anger issues.
It is fortunate that we decided against hiring you.
Perhaps regular visits to a psychiatrist or psych ward may assist you with your condition.
>>106264082
Only Anglos and Slavs can be trusted to program correctly. The problem with the troon is that they're fundamentally mentally ill, so they burn out and crash spectacularly.
>>106263638 >>106263674 >>106263689 >Filtered by time >Filtered by lamdas >Filtered by for (;;) *pIterator >Filtered by a question with many answers, just a generic history question >Filtered by a function with a universal reference
Thanks for confirming this board is full of nocoders script kiddies who are perpetually coping over their failures and shiny new play things
it's so sad the state of cpp. I love computer systems, but the fact that all c++ interviews seem to be about trivia about the 13 different version and way to do a thing mean I will probably never learn this shit.
>>106263433 (OP) >need low level GPU programming skills >the job is literally just processing data with beginner level python
No wonder the job market is fucked.
>>106263710
C++ is a nightmare, but honestly, the Linux kernel would be immensely better as C++. The amount of GNU C extension cope for things C++ just does is insane. The only thing even remotely good with it being C is it's easier to inject rust into the API then, but based on how that is going, it probably won't be substantial at all.
>>106264660
It's a vicious cycle. If you don't quiz people, you get shitters who wrote babby's first out of bounds read, or memory leak because they forgot to detach their threads they intended to background and more. I'd argue even when you do quiz them, these problems still somehow show up, they're just higher level wtfs in many cases. People bitch, but Rust honestly solves all of this shit since the language filters butthurt faggots who want to do *wrong thing* and make them write stupid shit instead. Either way, life sucks.
>>106265116
What, C++? Ya basically. The best of the best all either work somewhere better making a lot of money or they're just keeping some boomer trash written decades ago alive and running just relying on sheer luck and QA for a workable system.
>>106264965 >>106265009
What's the bet it's another H1B scam. >We looked everywhere in the local job market but couldn't find a suitable candidate >But this guy (my friend) in india is perfectly suited for the job!
>>106263593 >C++ is a language strongly optimized for liars and people who go by guesswork and ignorance.
Who was it that introduced argument-dependent lookup (ADL) to C++? Andrew Koenig, from the Bronx, New York? He might not be honest about his role in it, though neither might others.
>>106263773 >I believe C++ instills fear in programmers, fear that the interaction of some details causes unpredictable results. Its unmanageable complexity has spawned more fear-preventing tools than any other language, but the solution should have been to create and use a language that does not overload the whole goddamn human. – Erik Naggum
That is prevalent in more programming languages and to a greater degree than many may suspect, though some programming languages have much better track records on this point than others, and C++ is definitely on the worse end here, in large part due to backwards compatibility and size.
>>106265066 >People bitch, but Rust honestly solves all of this shit since the language filters butthurt faggots who want to do *wrong thing* and make them write stupid shit instead. Either way, life sucks.
I have fixed trash Rust code that others wrote that they were unable to fix themselves, and I am not a Rust developer. Rust absolutely does not solve this. It can instead make it even worse, since incompetent people can go "Rust is safe!" and proceed to introduce unsafe and UB and logic errors everywhere and fuck up their algorithms and introduce lots of code that panics frequently, etc.
>>106265038
C++ is a write-only language. Great for getting stuff done. But is utter hell for the next guy. Long lived software should not be written in c++.
>>106263638
I could answer all of these with the exception of what was new in C++14, and I would probably forget noexcept and remove refernce in move signature
>>106264082 >saar, chinks are the same as jeets, please focus on hating them instead of jeets saar, please stop giving us negative attention benchod
No.
