>>106273119 (OP)
He is not even autonomous, it's guy with tablet next to him. That little one completely stopped when accident occurred i bet you know why.
>>106273214
Could you explain the uses of robots that try, and badly, to run like in the video in OP?
Like, how much money am I going to make with that as a dirty communist?
>>106273794
Let's be realistic here.
Can you do 5% of the movements that a decent Acrobatic can?
Well, you can't.
Robots can't fasten like 99% of screws in a new building.
Actually, they probably even can't do the 1%.
That's where we currently are.
>>106273895
And you can scream around and express your displeasure with not currently having a robot wsifu all you want.
We are nowhere near that and unless actual AGI goes HARD, this will take another couple decades.
>>106273895 >>106273975
So, my friends.
You have nothing to say about this?
Does it urk you that opinions outside of the very real relationship with your virtual girlfriend exist?
Hello?
>>106274207
Pretty sure we have shills on this board that try to sell idea that this is some advanced tech when in reality we are dealing with remote controlled oversized toys.
>>106274297
Obviously.
But most guys here seem to have a distinct idea of this.
But they will not reply to anything actually challenging that.
Not even simple stuff.
>>106273149
It's trolley problem ethics subroutine was activated
>Do nothing, and crash into a small child (sized robot) >Change direction and crash into an adult male
It was never programed to take the middle path where nobody gets hurt, as this option does not exist in the original trolley problem.
>>106273429
Same. It's funny because everyone always defaults to calling you fat online as an insult. If only they knew I WISHED I was a fat fuck, at least then I'd have something to work with.