Thread 106289403

Yuri Kozukata edition

ITT We help anons in heavily restricted regions bypass censorship, network restrictions and so on.
>Where do i start?
Here: https://pastebin.com/FDegbbAR
>How do I access 4chan?
4chan blocks tor exit nodes and VPNs, you will need a residential IP outside of UK. Please refer to the guide on pastebin
>Will I got to jail 4 that?
Probably not, but if you are afraid of that, let me know so I will updoot this guide with more opsec info.

To all /pol/cels who are about to mumble how internet regulations are good because (insert cope here): Please don't waste our time and go back to your containment board.
To Hyphanet schizo and other darknet guys: This is NOT a thread focused on p2p and decentralized software. Please make your own thread for your fellow basement dwellers instead of trying to hijack someone else's general.

Previous thread: >>106179492

Suggestions from previous threads:

- Anti-DPI software
https://github.com/dovecoteescapee/ByeDPIAndroid
https://github.com/bol-van/zapret

- VPN on steroids. Supposedly more effective in censorship evasion than regular VPNs.
https://geph.io/en

- A huge VPN comparison spreadsheet
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ijfqfLrJWLUVBfJZ_YalVpstWsjw-JGzkvMd6u2jqEk/edit?gid=231869418#gid=231869418

- New web browser project that attempts to make information uncensorable by relying data between users in different locations.
https://ceno.app/en/about.html

- extension by tor project with which you can help people connect to the tor network (Note: Please read how this extension works before installing it)
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/torproject-snowflake/

Feel free to post your tips and suggestions!

upbumo
its a slow day

>>106289403 (OP)
pastebin is ugly. make a rentry.

>>106289403 (OP)
Another option which I honestly think should be added to the OP as far as DNS goes is using Unbound for DNS. It's quite easy to setup and skips having a 3rd party DNS like google in the first place.

bump

>>106289403 (OP)
Use ByeByeDPI, as ByeDPIAndroid is no longer maintained.
also BBD has additional features, like command tester to find better presets for your net.
https://github.com/romanvht/ByeByeDPI/

>>106289403 (OP)
>VPN on steroids. Supposedly more effective in censorship evasion than regular VPNs.
Oh my God, nigger

>>106289403 (OP)
I think one thing worth considering is a "worst case scenario" bunker for if 4chan and/or even altchans get hit by some worldwide UK level dystopian shit. Is the answer IRC? XMPP?

>>106289403 (OP)
>ITT we burn workarounds so normalfags aren't filtered by the politics they voted for and get to stay online
Yeah I don't think I'm gonna contribute

So we're tracing toward China style censorship seeing how UK is fucking arresting people for wrongspeak and sharing porn online. VPNs won't save you. GL techniggers

>>106289403 (OP)
I don't think I actually care about this topic. Until maids can freely discuss advanced Mathematics and Computer Science research without janny intervention, there is no reason to care about if the British can access videos of protests or whatever. I have a web protocol which would be hard to censor and I am going to decline to publish it. Let me be censored with the Philistines.

>>106289403 (OP)
I support banning all porn from the internet.

>>106295430
IRC isn't inherently censorship resistant, but there is an advantage to spreading out from centralized platforms. It's easy for them to go after a few proprietary apps with millions of users. It's much harder for them to go after a dozen smaller ones that don't have much legal exposure because they're run by volunteers out of pocket instead of big corporations. This is how the internet used to be set up.
The real bunker scenario stuff would be starting new communities on tor and i2p. i2p has a few chans but they're mostly Russian. Tor has stuff (endchan and Dread?) but it's hard to find, there aren't many good link lists

>>106289403 (OP)
>https://geph.io/en
The pitch seems good but how come I haven't heard of these guys before? Is it legit?

>>106289403 (OP)
>https://pastebin.com/FDegbbAR
> DNS, VPNs, Proxies, Tor

Tor is reasonable but that's all the suggestions?
What about Freenet/Hyphanet? I2P?

But at a bare minimum, I think anons need to at least connect to IRC. It's not anonymous or censorship proof but it's about the easiest internet tech that isn't the web which can still keep you connected to a core of technical users worldwide. If it was good enough for Russians during the 1991 coup, it should be good enough for the UK during the Starmer gulags. At least if Ofcom breaks something or US sites start cutting off the UK you will have some window out.

>>106297578

This is a list of the top IRC networks. It might not look like there are a lot of users, but these are some of the highest quality user groups you can find online.

https://netsplit.de/networks/top100.php

Libera.chat is the easiest network to get started on and they have a lot of guides. Once you get a client and used to the format, its easy to join other networks. Most anons will probably be interested in rizon but there are others.

https://libera.chat/guides/clients

>>106295430
> XMPP?
Once feature of XMPP/Jabber that was always interesting back in the day was its ability to link into other chat networks and systems. Might be work spinning up to take a look at.

>>106297640
>It might not look like there are a lot of users, but these are some of the highest quality user groups you can find online.
agreed

I don't really get the geph shilling in the op. Conceptually it's fine but the actual implementation relies on a tenuous CDN exploit that providers don't actually officially support and continue to patch out. I wouldn't take it seriously until they come up with something more sustainable. There are better more established protocols that do the same thing better.

>>106297578
Start setting up reticulum nodes. It’s pretty neat, transport agnostic protocol, so you can set up nodes that use the existing internet as a backbone, or LoRa, digital radio, satellite, whatever really, and they’ll all route through each-other. Undoubtedly it’ll have some issues in future, but it’s the most robust long-term solution I’ve run into.

>>106294308
allright , I will add it to the next general.
>>106295405
whats wrong with that?
>>106295430
I made this thread with less tech-literate anons in mind, so IDK if shilling this software is a good idea, at least for now.
>>106295687
Most of those workarounds are already somewhat known to the public, plus they are definetely known by the governments. Not every normal guy wanted internet to end up like this.

>>106296877
I don't think that we will ever reach that level of censorship, since our internet is built very differently, plus even Chinese people can bypass their firewall, so its not like this one is totally airtight.
>>106297052
Please make your own maid thread
>>106297426
No idea. I honestly added it to the general since a fellow anon recommended it before.
>>106297578
Again, I have clearly stated in the thread that this thread is not focused on this kind of software like hyphanet or i2p. Those are anything but user-friendly and for now I don't think we have a good reason to recommend this to people if other, more convenient solutions work.
>>106298162
Reticulum is a great piece of software, but imho for now its the case as with other decentralised software, its too hard to use for regular anons to shill it for now. I do appreciate that this is more than just a single way of communication, but as long as those bypassess mentioned in the general are easier to utilize, it will probably have to wait for its time to shine.

>>106297640
>>106298021

>>106289403 (OP)
>bro just use vpn to access porn
why are we pushing people towards honeypots? all vpn providers (mullvad aside) are fed controlled services

>>106298622
>Please make your own maid thread
When I do, janny just deletes it, and 90% of the people crying about censorship in this thread just clap and cheer. If the British clap and cheer when the maid thread is deleted from my venue, then I clap and cheer when British political speech is deleted from their venues. If I cannot discuss advanced Mathematics and Computer Science research on my Science Foundation, then I clap and cheer whenever someone gets deported from the US for writing an op-ed critical of the Israeli government. If I cannot discuss maid technology, then I clap and cheer when the government starts asking coomers for RealID. Let me be censored with the Philistines.

First they came for me, and you clapped and cheered. Then they came for you, and I clapped and cheered.

>>106300421
I have looked into your threads on desuarchive and they were mostly spam with no actual technology, so don't be suprised that it got deleted. Maybe bring actual technology to your threads and janny won't proon it.

>>106299467
Yes. It shrunk when discord siphoned users away, and those who remained are those unwilling to be discord fags.

>>106300964
Desuarchive also deleted my Maid Card threads. You look at my threads and decide they are not worth protection from censorship. I look at England and decide the same thing. What I have learned over the last ten or so years, is that nobody actually cares about speech. They like censorship, or at least tolerate it, when it happens for reasons they agree with, or when it targets people they don't care about or dislike, and dislike it when it happens for reasons they disagree with, or when targets people they care about or like. It is literally the Prisoner's Dilemma, and I am tired of always being the cooperative prisoner when the other player always chooses to fuck me over. Until the prisoners learn to cooperate, any effort at creating alt-tech for speech or privacy is wasted time and I would rather do something more productive than try to preserve the speech of people who would clap and cheer as I lose mine.

>>106301344
Unlike your shitty spam, my thread actually brings something positive to this board. Literally noone, apart from you, gives a single fuck about your shitty maid spam, that usually contains nothing but maid pictures and schizo mumbling. Take the L and ask one of the maids that live in your head to compute a perfect length of a rope to end a mysery of detached, terminally online 80lbs manlet like you.

>>106301344
Or maybe people don't care much because the /g/ jannies deleting your "maid thread" is less worth getting mad about than the entire cabal of western governments simultaneously cracking down on all online speech.
What's the problem anyway? Post them in any thread.

Can we have the opposite of this thread where we make it harder for Indians, South Americans, and SEAniggers to access 4chan?

>VPN comparison sheet
>mullvad no logs policy 4/5
>below nordvpn 5/5

Can someone explain?

>>106302695
I took it from reddit, since some anons in previous threads wanted to see something like this. I am too lazy to do that all by myself.

Good info in here
https://www.privacyguides.org/en/tools/

>>106300331
You really think the one VPN service being shilled by multiple 500k+ channels is not a honeypot?

>>106300331
>>106302835
Meds and BBC, NOW!

>>106289403 (OP)
You must mention shadowsocks as well. It is an effective solution for bypassing heavy internet censorship in countries like China.

>>106303524
No it isn't, Russia and China can already block it by disabling "everything not recognized by DPI systems as legit protocols". A better and more resillent solution is VLESS + Reality, a proxy that mimics real https connections to some "normal" website in your subnet, such as a jellyfin server or some file sharing shit.

bumo