Thread 106290163

The algorithm said that people aren't interested so youtubers passed on it.
You think people actually care?

>>106290163 (OP)
No one who cares is still on Windows.

>>106290163 (OP)
As I've told you multiple times now, it's because you've been running Windows Timeline (basically Recall v1) on your machine for the last six years without bleating about it.
The only reason you care is because clickbait JewTube channels tells you to. People are figuring out that you're just NPCs trying to help some eceleb manufacture moral panics.

>>106290648
I remember like 3 years ago a full page thing popped up after a windows update talking recall and how it records everything you do and I was like what the fuck is this shit and went and turned it off. Then over a year later they started talking about how it's coming

>>106290193
Many

>>106291961
If someone tells you that they really care about what they eat while stuffing their gullet with mcdombles, do you actually believe that they care?

Cattle gonna be cattle, what the fuck do you expect?
I rather someone use a macbook over a jeeted edition of windows.

i know a windows user who literally has work-mandated spyware installed that accesses xyr microphone and camera

OP confirmed retarded.

>>106292132
I find it unlikely you know anyone who isn't on welfare.

When disabling features is as simple as literally clicking the off switch it's hard to get mad at defaults, especially since windows lets you define your own defaults to use during installation.
It boils down to this
>I don't really use or like this recall feature so I guess I'll turn it off
and that's it. Meanwhile the people who like it can keep it turned on.

>>106291997
McDonald's is also very widespread and successful. Many people eat there too.

>>106290163 (OP)
Because ARM PCs were the perfect opportunity for Microsoft to attempt to dodge scrutiny

>>106292361
Answer the question retard

>>106292748
Make a thread on /ck/ or /v/ if you want my opinions on McDonald's.
You can ask me relevant questions here if you want my opinion on them, not made analogies that are intentionally far removed from the actual topic. I assume you're doing this to cover your mistake on the popularity.

>>106292337
This is why they never get backlash about new "features." Because they wisely make it opt-in at first, and only later roll out making it on by default but easy to disable (except it might be reset to on by an update haha oops); then it's just a question of when they'll remove the switch and require you to go into the registry or use a group policy to disable it, and at the point you're able to configure things in the registry or group policy or run scripts to disable huge portions of the OS just to get rid of one feature you hate: you might as well be using Linux.

>>106292799
>and at the point you're able to configure things in the registry or group policy or run scripts to disable huge portions of the OS just to get rid of one feature you hate: you might as well be using Linux.
As far as I'm aware Linux doesn't have nearly the same level of ease that Windows has in regards to configuration like that.
Linux very much expects you to do the thing you describe, as in, all of those at once in various ways. There isn't just a single XML file where you set the feature flags you don't want to 0, you'd have to spend a decent amount of time constructing a custom Linux distro to match your preferences. Seems very unstable on top of that, it's all just multiple 3rd party devs cooporating, there is no single authority that will demand compliance through iterations of the OS like MS does with their very high value of compatibility.

>>106292852
>multiple 3rd party devs cooperating
Sorry I wrote that from the perspective of a Windows user. I'm sure Linux users and developers would not say companies like RedHat are "cooperating" in this regard, and in fact make this exact problem worse by fragmenting things further. How about a new init system and service configuatrion format that co-exists with other ones that may or may not be supported by XYZ.

>>106290163 (OP)
You could disable it, still can

Even Copilots PCs let you disable it

>>106290163 (OP)
If you are too dumb to filter out that kind of shit in your firewall, you deserve to be exploited.

>>106292337
That's the thing that shits me about autistic NEETs who bitch that Windows isn't configured the way THEY want out of the box. Hell, these fags make a big production about how they've never paid for Windows - so explain to me why Microsoft should EVER listen to their suggestions for it?

>>106293140
>Implying he can outsmart one of the most powerful corporations

>>106290163 (OP)
Let me remind you people wanted this feature

>>106293175
>im too stupid to do it
>so it cant be done
Don't ever change, /g/.

>>106290163 (OP)
Because they boiled the frog. They announced it, and then got backlash. Then they said OK we'll delay it. 90% of people declared victory not realizing "delay" doesn't mean "never release." The other 10% are now stuck in the classic cycle
>you can disable it with a simple toggle
>toggle gets re-enabled every single update/restart
>toggle disappears
>you can disable it in the services menu
>service disappears
>you can disable it in the group policy editor
>group policy disappears
>you can edit it in the registry
>does it actually work? Who the fuck knows, you're not going to install a packet sniffer to see what is and isn't being sent
BOILED.

>>106293236
>>106293185

>>106293236
Or :
>You block it in your firewall
>It works forever

retard.

because it's off by default (for now)

>>106293236
Group Policy is full of options that are "Windows 7 only" or "Windows 8.1 Update 4 to Windows 10 Redstone 3", because said feature was superseded or removed, but MS is just that committed to support, configurability and management.
This is something freetards don't (and can't) understand, which is why they hallucinate fantasies like this to cope. They're not joking when they say "AI" stands for "An Indian" - freetards prove this.

>>106293191
You failed in the past, but this time it will surely work. Good luck, buddy!

>>106293175
Airgapping your network is not rocket science.

There's plenty of organizations around the world that handle industrial secrets, or other kind of confidential data. We're talking about companies as big as M$, but also about armies, and government branchs.
Microsoft cannot afford to piss them off by compromising security in an underhanded way.

>>106290163 (OP)
it did have a lot of backlash, but microsoft has most by the balls and unless you're in the small minority capable of daily driving a linux distro there's nothing you can do about it

this recall thing isnt enabled on enterprise editions right, they couldnt get away with that

It was massive. What the FUCK are you talking about? Somebody needs to rape OP for wasting my time.

I don't even know what it is. The last windows version I've used was 7 though.

>>106290163 (OP)
because americans are too cucked already to care

>>106293121
It re-enables after every windows update though.

>>106295181
Re-enables or reinstall?
Because, a gpo will keep it disabled