Thread 106295854

Implications?

>>106295854 (OP)
i just looked at the site and it seems like you're a degenerate pedo. drink bleach

>yuropoors keep voting for the "ban harmless shit, censor all speech, and import more migrant" parties
>they ban harmless shit, censor speech, and import more migrants

>>106295868
>>106295854 (OP)
>just vote better next time

>>106295866
>not knowing what rule34 is
Fuck off newfag tourist.

>>106295854 (OP)
Why bother to comply with their regulations?

Rather than blocking UK users, let OfCom block you. They'll tell you that you owe them fines, but unless you have assets in the UK, it's an empty threat. They can't collect anything. They can't extradite you because they don't have dual criminality (extradition requires something be against the law in both countries). They can't do anything to you except order their ISPs to block you. Which has the same end result as you blocking them, but it forces them to go through lots of bullshit steps that cost them money.

Pre-emptively blocking jurisdictions that do this doesn't save you anything. They never had the power to touch you. You're only speeding up the process they want.

>>106295907
Okay but how much bleach are you about to drink? It should be at least a cup

>>106295910
This, blocking all UK users effectively hands Ofcom the win. They should simply ignore the empty threats and allow UK users on the site unrestricted.

>>106295910
rule34 is a garbage site and they only block people so they later can sell you a "premium" subscription that unblocks you

>>106295925
you're a dumb cunt, I drink bleach every day and it only makes me stronger
ever try it? no? didn't think so, faggot

>>106295984
if it makes you stronger then why aren't you drinking more?

>>106295854 (OP)
Just buy a VPN or kill your politicians for taking away your porn.

>>106295890
Guns are technology.

>>106296007
>Guns are technology.
They are, but there's a specific board for that, >>>/k/
>>106295948
This. Make them go after the users and it will backfire, bigly.

>>106296017
>This. Make them go after the users and it will backfire, bigly.
That would backfire as you say, but they'd probably just block it at the DNS level via ISPs and move on.

The age of trannydom is coming to an end
All they had to do was ban porn

>>106296007
Guns are redneck labubu. They didn't prevent shit.

>>106295854 (OP)
>Internet Censorship
Was always inevitable, because censorship just means upholding a standard. The only problem is the people upholding that standard worship at the altar of democracy, which means they have no standards.

>>106295907
newfag website

>>106295910
You can never visit or transit through the UK. To be fair, it's not much of a loss.

first the EU ruined the internet by requiring every website to annoy you with a fucking popup about cookies, and now they've ruined the internet by making IDs mandatory. It's time for the US to nuke Europe and kill all those fucking stupid cunts once and for all.

>>106298028
1. OSA requirements are not global. If you are not in the UK and a website asks you for a loicense, either your government passed a similar law or the website is choosing to violate your privacy.
2. The GDPR cookie notice requirement is not global. If you are not in the EU and see one, either your government passed a similar law or the website chose to annoy you.
3. The GDPR doesn't mandate cookie notices for "every website". Websites could simply choose to not livestream your interactions to 900 (((advertising partners))).
4. The UK is not part of the EU so these are completely unrelated events.

Do non-uk companies have to comply? What happens if they don't?

>>106295910
it's easier to just range ban the country than face personal penalties

>>106298135
>OSA requirements are not global
irrelevant. companies are lazy and if they are forced to roll it out for one country, they will role it out for all counties if not doing so would require extra work.
>The UK is not part of the EU
irrelevant. you're all the same to me, euronigger.

>>106298404
The point is that if you put the blame on the wrong party you will fail to solve the problem. This is not the UK forcing companies to demand your ID, this is companies desperately wanting your ID (because your interaction stream is more valuable to data brokers if it's tied to real ID, and also data brokers will just buy your ID scans and "lose" them in "data breaches" to identity thieves) and lobbying governments to make ID verification mandatory as a way of manufacturing consent for it.

>>106298599
>lobbying governments to make ID verification mandatory as a way of manufacturing consent for it
No, "manufacturing consent" looks like the Roblox scandal, where they fail to ban any actual predators and market ID checks as a "safety measure," and then that becomes ubiquitous enough to make signing it into law seem like no big deal.

>>106295854 (OP)
They're fucking retards, my VPN endpoint located in DE but ASN for that IP is located in GB so I get this fucking disclaimer even though neither I nor my VPN are from GB.

>>106296396
>The only problem is the people upholding that standard worship at the altar of democracy
Wrong, they're worshipping at the altar of Moloch

>>106298657
You use scandals to manufacture consent among lawmakers, then let the lawmakers manufacture consent in the general public, then ???, then PROFIT!

>>106295868
>import more migrant
Stop trying to sneak in your bullshit with unrelated crap, you retarded fat fuck. This is bad enough without your brain damage.

>>106298688
Democracy, yes.

>>106295984
Grok says that's god for mine inumane system

>>106296104
are euro and burger internal blocks actually effective? from a technical standpoint purely, i'd expect most sites to just not give a shit
it was a bit surprising how big of a kerfuffle uk caused, but then again hosters do still have to comply with laws of at least one country
ironically being in a place nobody respects mean the users gotta deal with our own feds only

>t. russkie

>>106295854 (OP)
I'll tell you what this is, this is from chapter one in leftwing dictatorship handbook.

>>106298738
Yes, when there's a competent moneyed interest pushing for blocks (e.g. in Spain) they are very effective.

>>106298692
>You use scandals to manufacture consent among lawmakers
Why? The lawmakers know what they're doing. Calling them "stupid" is giving them too much credit...

Let me introduce you britfags to my best friend known as Tor

your governments spy agencies rely on tor to function and rely on users like you to anonymize themselves

I dont want this site blocked
But loli/shota is a negative mark on its' reputation
There needs to be change

I disagree with the online safety act too. It's done nothing to stop abuse towards trans people or tackle online extremism, including that of the so-called Islamic State

>>106295854 (OP)
As for implications, britfags at least has a fucking spine

>>106295854 (OP)
ofcom can't do shit in china or the usa

Suck it

>>106298182
There are no personal penalties, other than maybe >>106298013

>>106298883

>But loli/shota is a negative mark on its' reputation
This site has never had positive reputation. There is no point in trying to fix that. If you want something else, use a different site.

Welp, I'm just going to have to give hiroshi his 30 bucks huh.

>>106298883
>But loli/shota is a negative mark on its' reputation
I think mass shooters explicitly writing that they were radicalized on /pol/ were discussed more frequently in the mass media lately.

>>106299076
moot got a notice and told ofcom to go fuck themselves apparently

>>106298709
>the jew cries out in pain as he strikes you
Kys shitlib

>>106295854 (OP)
It will just result in people going to other places that are less well known or regulated the whole idea is stupid and most less well known websites just pay lip service to it providing easy ways to circumvent the only ones that don't are the massive sites like porn hub or whatever and all the traffic from those went elsewhere.

The whole idea is just colossally stupid.

>>106298709
>unrelated
You mean "very related," since the UK law has a section describing a government task force on "hate speech" against immigrants.

>>106299111
>The whole idea is just colossally stupid.
It is until you remember what the point really is...

Funnily even the tories are talking about repealing it now. And they originally brought it forwards.

>>106298883
Most British post I've ever read in my life.
>a negative mark on 4chan's reputation
>a negative mark on 4chan's reputation
>a negative mark on 4chan's reputation
>a negative mark on 4chan's reputation
>a negative mark on 4chan's reputation
Make sure you read that slowly all five times, and do it again until the absurdity of the phrase starts to sink in.

>>106299296
I assumed they were talking about R34 desu

>>106295854 (OP)
Why does it feel like some insufferable troon wrote this disclaimer?
I dont think the site owner writes like that, no?

>>106299313
Wasn't it already illegal in the UK for hosting loli, then?
Fuck the Commonwealth for thinking they can enforce their stupid art bans on people who don't live within their borders. Fuck the people of the UK for accepting that their governments can put them in prison for using a paper and pen in a way that the government doesn't like in the privacy of their own homes.

>>106295868
a sudden wave of censorship comes from weimerica
>>>106297391

>>106298135
>The GDPR doesn't mandate cookie notices for "every website". Websites could simply choose to not livestream your interactions to 900
You shitskins keep repeating that lie, yet it doesn't make it true.
The GDPR and cookie laws have nothing to do with selling data, but with having data. And since an IP is a personal identifier, every website has relevant data.

The "everybody needs a cookie banner now" is a result of lobbying.
Big spying corpos didn't want to be the only ones who have to display them, so they bribed EU politicians to make it so retarded that everybody needs them.

>>106295910
That's all true, but how much does this preemptive blocking stop them if they want to claim it's still accessible using alternate methods, and so isn't good enough? Even better, what if two countries decide to have conflicting laws and someone can't follow both at the same time?

>>106295854 (OP)
Is this being served up with a proper 451 Unavailable for Legal Reasons?

>>106298883
are you retarded?
https://youtu.be/tb2Ct3yyB4g

>>106298028
The only reason every website needs a cookie popup is because they have a gazillion third party cookies tracking you. If you only have cookies that are required for functionality you don't even need the popup. Also the EU directive also says it should be as easy to decline all as it is to accept them, which most of them violate.

The EU age checking system that is coming relies on signed certificates that have nothing besides "the person holding this cert is above 18". The signing authority doesn't know where it is used and the site you're using it for doesn't know anything about you outside you being above 18.

The EU is actually trying to prevent jews tracking your every action and peddling porn to kids in the internet.

>>106299392
>The signing authority doesn't know where it is used and the site you're using it for doesn't know anything about you outside you being above 18.
What's stopping one person's from being used by anyone then?

>>106299392
And you believe that. From the same people who want to spy on your every text and are trying to kill encrypted messaging.

>>106298709
SAAAAAAAAAAAAR

>>106295868
We didn't vote for any of this. The jewropeean union comitee making these rules is not democratically elected.
t.yuropoor

>>106299366
I fail to see how you could read the GDPR or ePD this way. Just don't store my IP address and you're in the clear. Do you know of any case law saying otherwise?
>but muh security
Just rate limit based on ASN, /24, sufficiently small IP hash, or what have you.

>>106299392
>The only reason every website needs a cookie popup is because they have a gazillion third party cookies
False. Whether or not its a third party cookie or data is sold, is completely irrelevant.
>The EU age checking system that is coming relies on signed certificates that have nothing besides "the person holding this cert is above 18".
Again a lie. It is the website that can choose which data it wants. A porn website has to verify that the person visiting is the person the digital id is for, a simple "some person is 18+" doesn't do that, because a million people could share the same id.

>>106299458
go ahead and show me the section in the GDPR that says its only about selling data and third party cookies.
Pro tip: It does not exist.

>>106299458
>I fail to see how you could read the GDPR or ePD this way.
Almost every single website provider on the world read it "this way" and German courts read it "this way".
>hash the IP
Now the hash of this IP is a personal identifier that could theoretically track you.
Again: Whether or not it is used for tracking is irrelevant, but if it would be possible is.

>>106299404
Nothing, that's why the age check is valid for a maximum of 3 months. Nothing stops people from selling alcohol or porn to kids either. And some people are going to do it for sure. These laws are never about making sure absolutely no kid gets their hands on this stuff. But to make sure the majority don't.

>>106299408
This is /g/, you should be aware how zero-knowledge proofs work.

>>106299468
It's true. You're right in that selling the data doesn't matter. What matter is what you do with the cookies. If they're required for the functionality of the site, like login cookies, etc. you don't need the popup. If you've got any tracking cookies of any kind you need the banner. Basically if you only had the cookies you'd have when clicking the decline all/only required button on the popup you don't need the popup.

It's not a lie and you can check it yourself. Again, the EU age verification isn't based on showing your ID to the website. And to prevent abuse of selling the certificates or accounts they require re-checking periodically.

>>106299392
Refer to >>106233969

>>106299503
>What matter is what you do with the cookies.
Wrong.
Whatever you COULD do is relevant, not what you do.

>>106299434
The Commission is elected by Parliament, which is democratically elected by (You).
The Council is elected by national governments, which are democratically elected by (You).
The electoral system is a total fucking joke of course, but it's about as bad as any other democracy.

>>106299392
And also this >>106233999

>>106299477
Let me restate so you can't possibly misinterpret again: DON'T STORE OR SHARE MY PERSONAL INFORMATION and you can ignore the GDPR!! Hard for adtech shills to understand, I know.

>>106299503
>If they're required for the functionality of the site, like login
I can use a session cookie to track you. In fact, an ad tracking cookie is a session cookie.
So instead of "adsense-id" the cookie is now called "session-id".

That is why the law is about what is possible and not about what is done. Because you can't prove what the server does, it would be unenforcable.

Also all the big corpos violate multiple EU laws and they face zero consequences, despite EU shills repeating how they would have to pay gorillions of $$$.
Meanwhile the private wordpress website of some music orchestra in Germany gets sued.

>>106299531
The comission shouldn't exist at all. It's not a democratic institution in the slightest.

>>106299556
>*gets sued because you use fonts hosted on an european CDN that is owned by an american, despite there being no tracking, no cookie and no ip logs*

>>106299579
Webfonts were a mistake anyway.

>>106299535
Doesn't have to be government. Could be any party that can confirm your age. Your phone operator, bank, insurance company, etc. Also by design in the EU system the age verification is only valid for a short duration. This is to combat selling accounts and the certs. What OS or device you're using doesn't matter at all because you're getting the certs from an online service and sending them to an online service. If you can run a web browser on the device it's going to work. And you're expected to request multiple certs at once so you don't have to do it every time you're verifying your age to somewhere. Of course if you're requesting thousands per day someone might raise a flag.

>>106299526
>>106299564
Stop regurgitating adtech talking points. I've actually implemented these cookie popups and in the process we made sure that we don't need them if we only use necessary cookies, this is from in house lawyers and multiple sources in local and EU governments. The reason no one wants to go that route is because telling someone they get no analytics from their site is like telling them you're going to kill their mom.

If it was about what could be done then you couldn't use any cookies when the user clicks reject all. Stop being a retard.

>>106299531
It'd be fine if we had more information on their stances, what they are inclined to vote for, and if ((you)) had any ability to influence policy aside from this the level of abstraction. That and most people really don't think too much about who their MEPs are... hardly anyone mentions when its election time for the MEPs here, it's not treated anywhere on the same level as a nation election despite it potentially affecting us just as much.

>>106295910
>>106295948
You don't understand.
It's about turning the internet into something that CANNOT be accessed from ANY angle without an electronic ID that guarantees anything anti-gov/semetic/narrative that gets posted has a person that can be tracked.

Like how you can't take money out of a bank unless you are known to them via a form of ID

>>106299556
>DON'T STORE OR SHARE MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
That is not what the GDPR is about, though.
You can shout and whine and cry as much as you want. You can whine about how 99% of all website owners interpret the GDPR wrong and how you are the only person on this world who understands the high-IQ brilliance of the EU law. You can whine about how EU countries interpret EU law wrong. You can whine about how it is "malicious compliance" and how we all show cookie banners to you just to make the EU look bad.

You can do all of that, but it doesn't change the fact that everybody gives you cookie banners, even if they arent tracking you at all.

Euro doesnt know about sadpanda lmao sadpabda stays supreme

>>106296017
>/k/
Those degenerates are as bad as /b/

>>106299604
I have made no such claims. I believe most website owners interpret the GDPR and ePD correctly. They choose to store and sell your data, and they show you the appropriate consent popups given that choice.
My claim is that they could choose NOT to store and sell your data and then NOT show you the banner. They don't do this for obvious reasons, but they could. You have given me no reason to doubt this is correct.

>>106299156
No, I mean "completely out of left field" you smarmy fat fuck. Go back to licking windows.

>>106295854 (OP)
usecase for allowing kids to use the internet?

>>106295868
When this law was passed a few years ago in the UK, there was literally nobody with a pro-privacy/anti-censorship stance you could vote for. Nigel the grifter is the only one claiming to be in support, but that's based more of a Trump-inspired contrarianism stance, than any kind of real sentiment in the population. The reality is the nation is cucked to the core.

>>106299604
How fucking hard is it for you to understand that 99.9% of websites have to show the popup because they do store or share personal information. And they're interpreting the law correctly. They could choose to not store or share personal information, when they wouldn't have to bother their users with the popup. But they literally all rather annoy their users when the other option would be to not store or share unnecessary personal information.

>>106299656
How is it "completely out of left field" when these governments are enforcing it with these laws?

>>106299686
What governments and what laws, you retarded fuck? How do you conflate retarded age restrictions with migration policies? You're either too stupid to breathe on your own or some retarded glavset drone.

>>106299709
>What governments and what laws
>>106299156
>the UK [Online "Safety"] law has a section describing a government task force on "hate speech" against immigrants
You only had to make one (1) click up the reply chain.
>How do you conflate retarded age restrictions with migration policies?
I don't know, how does the UK do it?

>>106299595
>Doesn't have to be government. Could be any party that can confirm your age. Your phone operator, bank, insurance company, etc.
Irrelevant
>Also by design in the EU system the age verification is only valid for a short duration. This is to combat selling accounts and the certs.
Again, what happens when for whatever reason said parties refuse to give you a Good Citizen™ certificate?
>What OS or device you're using doesn't matter at all because you're getting the certs from an online service and sending them to an online service. If you can run a web browser on the device it's going to work.
Oh really; wasn't there a mobile app that was/is being beta tested?
>And you're expected to request multiple certs at once so you don't have to do it every time you're verifying your age to somewhere.
Source?
>Of course if you're requesting thousands per day someone might raise a flag.
Thanks for beginning to understand what I'm saying; but keep going: now that you're a "suspicious individual", with no legal ability to aquire a pass (certificate), what can you do? How can you be verified? And did you know that critizing immigration policy is a crime in krautland? So you better be on your best behvaiour, lest you desire to be locked out. If THAT isn't cuckoldery, then I don't know what is.

>>106299666
grooming

>>106298709
Why are you in favor of a status quo that consists of maintaining foreign imports? Are you just a female university student or...?

>>106295868
every single party agrees with that, democracy is a meme

>>106295868
that's when you realise the problem isn't really political, but cultural. greek philosophers already understood this shortcoming millennia ago.

>>106295868
All available parties want this, there's no alternative
>inb4 don't vote anymore
You need to wait for all boomer to die for that to potentially happen on a significant scale and even if it will be too fucking late anyways.

>>106295868
>UK
>Europe

>>106299766
>the UK [Online "Safety"] law has a section describing a government task force on "hate speech" against immigrants
And you immediately correlated this with letting immigrants in to assist your shit for brains narrative.
Smelly, dumb, moskal scum.

>>106298883
sybau

>>106300088
...
How would you feel today if you didn't have breakfast yesterday?

>>106299378
The only time I've seen 451 used in the wild was cuckflare and they use it to censor things they don't like.

>>106295868
>Implying we voted for this

>>106300162
Who did, then?

>>106299901
Why are you building straw man arguments? Are you developmentally challenged?

>>106295868
Shut the fuck up jewish mutt

>>106299672
Unironically this. I've got no love for farage nor do I think he'll repeal this tyrannical bullshit but even I was outraged when the tech sec. called him and everyone that disagrees with this shit a nonce

>>106300162
Youre in a democracy, if the government does something you either voted for it or refused to vote against it.

>>106300292
No such thing with jews on this earth

>>106300292
There were no parties that were against this anon

>>106300292
What kind of waterhead take is this?

>>106300313
No, they were just silenced. To protect your Freedom™, of course...

>>106300363
It's more the fact that shit is unfortunately extremely popular with tech illiterate helicopter parents and boomers.

>>106295868
1. Pornhub lobbied for this
2. The government that imposed it is the single least popular government in modern British history. In 2024 they won with less votes than their party got in 2019 when they lost. Britain is a sham democracy like Russia where the votes don't tell you who people want in charge, they tell you what the people who are in charge want the votes to be.
(Not in the sense that the ballots were stuffed, but in the sense that the entire media spoke with one voice. First to destroy Labour in 2019 because they had a left-wing leader, then to elevate them in 2024 because they had a leader who wouldn't ruffle their feathers.)

>>106300292
Britain is not a democracy. Labour party staffers actively colluded with the press to sabotage their own party in 2017 (when it would've won the election otherwise) and in 2019 because they didn't like the leader that the members of the party democratically chose. The 'impartial' BBC aired a documentary by a giga-zionist arguing that Labour was antisemitic, including manipulative editing that made it look like Jewish members quoting things that neo-nazis had said to them were quoting things that Labour members had said to them. The 'impartial' broadcast regulator found that there was no problem with this.

Private messages from Labour staffers leaked confirming all of this and the press simply did not report on it, except in terms of violating the privacy of the people who's messages leaked. High ranking Labour staff were crying in 2017 because Labour did well in the election when it wasn't supposed to. That's your 'democracy'

various governments to websites:
>you're operating a porn website, much of it with rape-y and/or incestuous themes
>we know children are accessing it, and you're doing absolutely nothing about that
>from now on we need you to actually make a semi-serious attempt to check that your users are adults
websites:
>RRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>106300459
Yeah, they're really concerned about all the dark, perverse stuff on... Wikipedia.

>>106300459
Low effort shitpost. Try harder

>>106295868
Just VOOT differently!

>>106299503
Providing access to other people sounds like some process that could be automated when needed.

>>106300459
huh, didn't know know spotify was a porn website

>>106299348
>1748237527192703.jpg (101 KB, 612x1024)
Reporting from IL:
He has one chain tied around his boot as depicted;
The other one is supposed to be like a "golden chain" [sic?] going to an African American's collar, probably exactly like depicted in some of the Hollywood music videos...
There have been lots of problems with people being confused about things, or various groups having the technology and wealth and then tilting things rather than doing the optimal plays for their position.

Lots of situations where minor differences in tech lead to huge differences in prediction quality, lots of "illegal gambling" using STONKS improperly or in "unqualified areas"... I forget the financial term... "unsecured bonds"...?

>CAPTCHA: SPSMRJ
>I waited too long it changed KGWA2W

>>106295854 (OP)
I think it means I need to buy the "GOLD" pass thing

They've had those for some time, haven't they? why the thread?

>>106299348
>it's Americas fault or government censors us
Ok

>>106295854 (OP)
if you dont like my govt you can leave, simple as that

>>106298738
They block piracy sites at the ISP level, and that's just a DNS block, so it's trivial to circumvent.
They haven't yet blocked any sites under failure to comply with the Online Safety Act, so we're not sure what measures they'll take. It's usually on the ISP to actually implement it though, so they'll probably conclude that DNS is good enough to block most people like they have before.
A lot of our laws are intentionally vague and flimsily enforced. On the one hand you could see it as trust being placed in those smart enough to circumvent the laws without causing harm and unrest, or on the other it could be the government keeping everyone in a state of potential illegality for selective prosecution. I've heard some Russians say they feel similarly about their laws.

>>106302128
Yank response was kinda based tho

>>106296665
very sad state of affairs.

Is there any country as cucked as the UKuckdom?

>>106302128
The EU and UK always try to impose their censorship world wide.
That is why the EU doesn't ban twitter, but rather pushes laws like the DSA to try to censor globally.

They know that the European market is irrelevant, they don't want platforms to simply block Europe. And they don't want to block themselves.

>>106302347
Probably true, but I'm not sure what that has to do with my post about how it will be enforced in the UK and who is responsible for implementing it.
>>106302252
It's PR (for both 4chan and the lawyer), but it's PR that signals they're going to move in a direction I like, so I am pleased to see it.

>>106295910
>Why bother to comply with their regulations?
This.
It is not the job of a website to apply the laws in every jurisdiction on planet earth. We won't be able to run an internet if this becomes the case.

If the UK wants to block your site, that is their business. It is NOT your job to police their laws on your server. This is retarded.

The only reason the UK is getting away with this is because of their dwindling international clout. If France or Bulgaria pulled this shit websites wouldn't even pay attention.

The people in Parliament, don’t have to do this with their ID and there was an influx of toilet paper that came in to parliament too

>>106302552
I think the message of this post was lost in ESL

>>106300486
they do have some steamy pictures there
if jannies delete this it will only serve to prove my point, invalidating 4chan's stance against ofcom

>>106302346
So merely suggesting that your country's culture is being supplanted by immigrants means you go to jail for terrorist extremism. The country's capital is majority Islam, why are they doing this? Are Brits just bored of living?

>>106304063
thinking is not for plebeians

>>106302504
It's not only not a websites job that has no presence there, it can be impossible. Maybe A says verify age first, B requires a check of being a citizen first to ensure it's effective anywhere it the world, C says they have collect and store enough information to identify every user, D says collecting that is banned, E requires censoring of some topics and F forbids that censoring. It's impossible to follow all of those, and they don't have to accept a message saying it's banned in that country is enough.

>>106298883
pretty sure r34 bans lolishota

>>106295868
>glosses over rightoids are to blame for this shit

>>106295868
This is every party regardless if they say they're going to do it or not before getting in though

>>106306154
Asserting christian morality is completely different to internet censorship like the yuropoors are doing

>>106295868
>vote for it
Their vote means shit.
It's all controlled by anglo-jew cartels.

And freedom of information affects opsec.
This shits already being used to cover up the Gazan genocide.
It's already not even about protecting people. It's about thought control. Military strategy.

>>106298847
Not necessary, just change DNS.

>>106306822
Not really. It's the same group of "think of the children" busy-bodies. Same phenotype, different cult.

People will have local domestic infrastructure like they have cars.

>>106298883
>4chan
>reputation

>>106295854 (OP)
I'd say
>get better standards you newfag
but even the actually curated oldfag boorus are getting hit, somehow

>>106295854 (OP)
only pedophiles and porn addicts are angry about this

>>106302346
communism 101

>>106306154
It's not blocked. It's just requires you to provide ID. If they actually banned porn, they would actually ban it. Not give a verification process. Has nothing to do with kids.

>>106304063
hundred years of 'Keep calm and carry on' have done its job

>>106299366
you will notice that sites which do not save any personal information (not even IP addresses), nor use tracking cookies, don't have GDPR dialogs

>>106295854 (OP)
Loicense moment

>>106310012
*de yookay

VPNs going to banned in the UK soon too. I guess I'll eventually just have to buy a VPS and setup my own...

>>106310462
Link to article:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn438z3ejxyo

>>106310462
Good luck with that; china (who's infinitly more compenetent than britain when it comes to technology) has been trying for a decade, and they still have most of the population using VPNs. It's just like trying to ban torrents, pointless and absurd

>>106302681
I jerked it to Wikipedia articles when I was doing NNN

>>106295854 (OP)
you can always buy a cheap 3d printer, lathe and milling machine to make a gun and convince the government.

>>106299348
>redgifs
You normalfags sat your asses down because you thought they were going to stop at drawings of kids and despictions of animals.
Or that they'll simply block out the 12yos from online

You fags are fucking stupid i swear.

>>106311102
I imagine they can't use the standard normie IKE/Wireguard/OpenVPN especially to known vpn provider IP addresses though, don't they use weird shadowsocks obfuscated protocols?

>>106299348
>christlarpers
All their fault btw

>>106299332
Loli isn't hosted because of recent French law that forbades humanoid lolisho art (except for cub for obvious reasons, politicians are retarded)
Also XXX's rules fucking suck, any extreme class of fetishes on there gets deleted off there and it's always up to the feefees of the normalfag mod.

>>106311859
Your imagination is wrong. They just download a random vpn app, pay a few cents, and they're golden

>>106295868
Euro countries can be as draconian as they want. They just have to mention "yeah but the US" and their people become compliant and passive

>>106311885
Yes goy, porn addiction doesn't exist keep consuming!

>>106312043
Correct, but it can be changed to "yeah but Russia" as well.
As seen in Finland where some guy shouted during a Von der Leyen speech and he got arrested for it, while Von der Layen said that if this would be Russia, he would get arrested for it.

And if even that doesn't work, a "yeah but China" works as last resort.
Because the ordinary normie has no idea what is going on in China, you can insert whatever you want.

>>106295868
But America
But Israel/Jews
But Russia
But China
But Japan
But the other thing from other country
STOP NOTICING!!!!

>>106298709
>unrelated
>the whole law was created to suppress issues related to migrant protest as part of "misinformation" part of the bill

>>106295948
trve, same goes for louisiana

>>106312723
That sounds like something a misinformation terrorist world say.

>>106295854 (OP)
bongistan needed to please its local muslim population, please understand

>>106295868
I’ve never seen a people more willing to destroy themselves and vote for orwellian garbage over and over again. Their laws make americans look tame in comparison.

>>106312792
Bong MI5 agent detected

>>106312851
"didn't get the refference" award
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-gGLvg0n-uY

>>106298709
but it’s true, abdul

>>106295868
The UK voted against migration for like 15 years and saw no results.
Then they threw the last election by splitting the vote between the feckless conservatives and the feckless, but unproven reform party, so now communists are in power.

Not that we can blame labor for this censorious bullshit, the tories penned the law

>>106298883
retarded tourists are the biggest negative mark on its reputation

>>106310462
>ugh those nasty children are setting up wireguard, vless and v2ray to evade our protections
Lol, they're not hiding anymore

>>106298028
What's a cookie notice? Never seen one

>americucks can get fined for breaking a different countries laws
And you just sit and take that lmao?
Why doesn't Trump make a law for it to be illegal for British websites to contain the letter 'e'?

>>106312857
The funny thing is, they seemingly gave up on the AI angle because it actually kind of sucks, instead going for the good old fashion "think of the children". Despite this, they still push AI because of all the money tied up in it.
However bad you think things are, you're wrong, it's absurd.

>>106312857
Nothing to do with AI, everything to do with controlling the narrative of the domestic policy

>>106302252
frankly I want to see more platforms do this instead of bending the knee
People need to get more comfortable with giving governments like the UK the middle finger because they're now openly hostile entities.

>>106310462
I didn't realize just how much the BBC is pro government propaganda. Holy shit.
https://archive.ph/GGKOm

>They are all parents who believe the internet played a part in the death of their children: Brianna, Molly, Mia, Maia, Jools, Isaac, Archie and Frankie.
>And they've courageously told us their stories, sharing their pain, partly in the hope of pushing the authorities to regulate what happens on the internet more effectively.

>>106310462
>children

Can they stop pretending already?