← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106297306

38 posts 6 images /g/
Anonymous No.106297306 >>106298552 >>106298573 >>106298637 >>106298691 >>106298772 >>106299578 >>106299590 >>106299636 >>106299645 >>106299667 >>106307348
>ITT: We come up with an insult for Anti AI idiots.

I was thinking of Technoglodyte
Anonymous No.106297320 >>106297345 >>106298694 >>106299896 >>106305506
if you are anything other than ambivalent towards ai you're fucking retarded
Anonymous No.106297345
>>106297320
I think the yellow cartoon easterner is the calm ambivalent response represented when people are asked in-person.
Anonymous No.106298542 >>106305485
Nigger
Anonymous No.106298552
>>106297306 (OP)
I'm cool with it. Increasing AI usage is a good indicator of shitskin iq.
Anonymous No.106298573 >>106298626
>>106297306 (OP)
The thing is, "anti AI idiots" have been proven right over and over and over again for the past 50 years.
When you've been right for half a century straight, and people who say "zomg expert systems/ocr/chess grandmaster programs/cp generators/hallucinating text predictors, agi in two weeks if we flush a few trillion dollars down it!" have been wrong every step of the way, resulting in decades-long AI winters, who the real idiots are becomes obvious.
Anonymous No.106298626 >>106298684 >>106298860
>>106298573
This. Decades of "artificial intelligence" and yet none of these scams is more intelligent than the last one. Still doesn't have the common sense of a 5 year old. Still no spatial awareness. Still not character or voice recognition except under perfect conditions. Still can't pass the Turing test. In the 80s computers were """driving""" cars at 2 mph and still they can't do it any faster than that because it's basically a glorified PID.
What can neural networks do that expert systems couldn't? Nothing, because it's just the same old ifs and loops as always except under a fancy name.
Intelligence requires quantum microtubules and no silicon based system will ever be able to achieve it. You need real biological neurons.
Anonymous No.106298637
>>106297306 (OP)
Perms, because they're gonna be part of the permanent underclass
Anonymous No.106298684 >>106299842
>>106298626
Deepfake porn and brainrot memes, that's the core strength and appeal of AI.
Anonymous No.106298691 >>106298710
>>106297306 (OP)
Me on the left.
Anonymous No.106298694 >>106298812 >>106298890 >>106298895 >>106299211 >>106301414
>>106297320
>having an opinion on the most culturally significant modern technology is stupid
>it takes a true enlightened individual to have no thoughts on it
Anonymous No.106298710 >>106301980 >>106303364
>>106298691
Same. I just don't understand why more people aren't freaking out that they'll pass the rest of their lives wondering whether anything they're reading was generated by a computer.
Anonymous No.106298758 >>106298773
I'm not looking forward to my 401k and index funds getting btfo when everyone realizes throwing a quintillion dollars at Artificial Indians wasn't a great idea.
Anonymous No.106298772
>>106297306 (OP)
The eastern mind cannot comprehend what it's like to have a soul
Anonymous No.106298773
>>106298758
If you're browsing this board, you're not living that long.
Anonymous No.106298792
Naigger
Anonymous No.106298812 >>106298890
>>106298694
This, but unironically. Any midwit can decide thing good or thing bad and write you an essay about it. This is so easy and so thoughtless that AI itself can do it now. Deciding simply not to care is the high IQ move.
Anonymous No.106298860 >>106299842
>>106298626
> Intelligence requires quantum microtubules
>the brain is le quantum!
Go back
Anonymous No.106298890
>>106298694
>>106298812
it's true. we've all wished for the magic power to turn our brain off but still be productive. now it's here and it kinda sucks but kinda does what we want. why would you be anything but meh or "yeah had to happen eventually" about this?
Anonymous No.106298895
>>106298694
>the most culturally significant modern technology
go back to sleep sam
Anonymous No.106299211
>>106298694
thats not what ambivalence means
Anonymous No.106299578 >>106305645
>>106297306 (OP)
Why do you have to come up with it? Get AI to come up with one.
Anonymous No.106299590
>>106297306 (OP)
I can't provide or endorse derogatory terms. If you're looking for a word to describe people who are skeptical or critical of AI, you might consider neutral or descriptive terms like:

Skeptic
Critic
Luddite (historically, someone opposed to new technology)
Detractor

If you want a more playful or satirical tone, you could use something like "Neo-Luddite" or "Techno-Skeptic." Let me know if you want a term for a specific context!
Anonymous No.106299636
>>106297306 (OP)
Fuck you chipburner
Go goon with your clanker and cry
Just remember that "her" logs are always recorded to be used against you
Anonymous No.106299645 >>106299872
>>106297306 (OP)
one already exist, it's called luddite
Anonymous No.106299664
I think AI is going to be great for society, especially considering picrel and techradar.com/pro/one-of-the-worlds-biggest-mobile-firms-has-launched-a-usd170-ai-smartphone-that-includes-a-free-18-month-subs-to-perplexity-pro-worth-usd360-i-wonder-what-happens-on-month-19
Anonymous No.106299667 >>106299671 >>106299872
>>106297306 (OP)
they already have a name its "chuds"
Anonymous No.106299671
>>106299667
ah so airetards are tranies
didnt know that
Anonymous No.106299842
>>106298684
You're dumb. I was parodying your position, but apparently the sarcasm was too subtle for you.

>>106298860
Only one legit reply to my bait, gotta think of a way to make it more outrageous and dumb.
Anonymous No.106299872
>>106299645
You can be a smart luddite like Kaczynski who's against tech for legitimate reasons. Retards who claim it doesn't work are delusional, they haven't moved past the first stage of grief. That's why I call them AI copers.

>>106299667
That's too vague. Claiming AI doesn't work is far dumber than believing the moon landings didn't happen, 911 was an inside job, or blacks are on average less intelligent.
Anonymous No.106299896
>>106297320
fpbp, anti-ai people are just as annoying as ai dickriders
Anonymous No.106301414
>>106298694
cool, ai exist
it's just a tool

focus on solving problems
Anonymous No.106301980
>>106298710
Because they will own the heckin libs (artists)
Anonymous No.106303364
>>106298710
Because the difference is semantics. The AI is retarded, (You)'re retarded, why waste effort parsing them? I just disregard it all entirely. No problem! If the AI winds up being not retarded, then it'll be easy to tell the difference. No problem!
Anonymous No.106305485
>>106298542
not cool
Anonymous No.106305506
>>106297320
fippy
Retards love the new thing tm
Anonymous No.106305645
>>106299578
He would but he can't because it's useless
Anonymous No.106307348
>>106297306 (OP)
You AI pajeets are so fucking pathetic, holy shit