>>106298573
This. Decades of "artificial intelligence" and yet none of these scams is more intelligent than the last one. Still doesn't have the common sense of a 5 year old. Still no spatial awareness. Still not character or voice recognition except under perfect conditions. Still can't pass the Turing test. In the 80s computers were """driving""" cars at 2 mph and still they can't do it any faster than that because it's basically a glorified PID.
What can neural networks do that expert systems couldn't? Nothing, because it's just the same old ifs and loops as always except under a fancy name.
Intelligence requires quantum microtubules and no silicon based system will ever be able to achieve it. You need real biological neurons.