← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106311516

9 posts 6 images /g/
Anonymous No.106311516 >>106311530 >>106311759 >>106311848 >>106311944
Um, AI bros?

But seriously, he's just going "yes, but" and then implying that people should give him more money instead. It's beyond parody.

>“Someone is going to lose a phenomenal amount of money. We don’t know who, and a lot of people are going to make a phenomenal amount of money,” Altman said. “My personal belief, although I may turn out to be wrong, is that, on the whole, this would be a huge net win for the economy.”

>Even if we may be in an AI bubble, it seems Altman is expecting OpenAI to survive the burst. “You should expect OpenAI to spend trillions of dollars on data center construction in the not very distant future,” Altman said. “You should expect a bunch of economists to wring their hands.”

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/759965/sam-altman-openai-ai-bubble-interview
Anonymous No.106311530
>>106311516 (OP)
Also, I'm not a /pol/tard, but...

>"You should expect a bunch of economists to wring their hands."
Anonymous No.106311759
>>106311516 (OP)
>sam altmans says
apocalypse now vibes.
'you'll say "hello" to him, right? And he'll just walk right by you. He won't even notice you. And suddenly he'll grab you, and he'll throw you in a corner, and he'll say, Do you know that 'if' is the middle word in life? If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, if you can trust yourself when all men doubt you"... I mean I'm... no, I can't... I'm a little man, I'm a little man, he's... he's a great man! "I should have been a pair of ragged claws scuttling across floors of silent seas."'
Anonymous No.106311848
>>106311516 (OP)
>yes, we are in a bubble
>a lot of companies are going to go bust
>we hope we won't be one of them
>1 trillion dollars for more data center build outs, please
Anonymous No.106311891
The ... *cough*... only way to... stop the bubble from *wheeze* popping... is.... *hack*.... 80 trillion more GPUs, okay?
Anonymous No.106311906
you had the chance to give Sam Altman 500 trillions
had
Anonymous No.106311944 >>106312384
>>106311516 (OP)
I think the problem they're facing is that they're trying to get the AI to train itself into being smarter. But the code doesnt inherently know what the fuck smart means.
So you can pour all the material, GPU power and effort you want it, its just going to make itself more retarded trying to reach some arbitrary goal.
Its just this weird algorithm soup that spits out collections of words hoping to get good boy points from the human being satisfied that whatever output is delivered is "correct". It still has no fucking idea what correct is
Anonymous No.106312384
>>106311944
>SOURCE: it was in a dream I had
Anonymous No.106312458
if AI doesn't work out like they think things will tank. if it does then AI will destroy jobs and things will tank.