Thread 106316916

>>106316916 (OP)
Wrong math
Simple as.

I got the solution but won't give it out for free.
I want half of world's economy first.

>>106316916 (OP)
kek, our bing bing wahoo is used by 5%, go learn plumbing bros (all these 5% went all in on the wahoo? kekeke)

>>106316966
5 trilly and we replace hr depts

>>106316916 (OP)
Yeah so? That's how out entire economy has worked for the last 100 years?

>>106316916 (OP)
Why is this happening? I though AI was going to replace all programmers.

>>106317066
This article is referring to LLMs, not AI as a whole. AI used for surveillance or manufacturing is very effective, LLMs are basically only useful for writing brief summaries, and automating basic tasks.

>>106317101
I understand AI for manufacturing because it's useful for repetitive stuff (quality control) but what about programmers? Do they use it on a daily basis? (Professional programmers) and if they do, why would their bosses should hire more? I don't understand.

>>106317101
kek, no it isn't unless your surveullance means: 80% has to be reviewed by human anyway, and 20% has to be especially reviewed by human, manufactuingkek, yeah, we can hallucinate 20% of our production line as bosses went all in on AI, literally 0% manufacturing businesses use AI except their PR depts to manufacture more paragraphs in emails

>>106317144
LOLOLOLOL, yeah QC will use 20% hallucination rate, that's fucking quality 'control', jfc, imagine putting a rng machine as your quality control kekekek

>>106317183
I think it could be used for computer vision, but I have no experience in that area so I'm just guessing. What about the rest?

Dotcom bubble 2.0. Tons of startups working at loss, only a few will remain. Doesn't mean AI is going to go away.

>>106317199
until they remove hallucinations (=never) it's a fucking useless rng text generator gimmick in every production environment, bbbut just wait two weeks and it will conquer the world bro, just two more trilly

>>106317232
Yeah I'm starting to think that AI isn't as useful as planned. We've had it for what? Five years? The only thing I've seen improving is "ai art", for the rest It seems more like a Stackoverflow on steroids. I'm worried about the future of the internet with all the slop generated everywhere, though.

>>106317295
the 'stack overflow on steroids' is also bs, SO doesn't lie to you or make up answers based on your prompt, it's all fucking orange leddit astroturf, muh x1000 developers that can ship 1000 braindead scaffoldings in 5min, literally noone's job looks like this

>>106317375
>Stackoverflow
I mean AI doesn't lie 100% of times so it has its uses I guess.
I agree that those 100x developers sound fake as fuck. If that was true, we would have multiple new browsers, operating systems, and a shitton of exciting and complicated stuff being created by a small team of developers. Btw how do you use AI (if you use it, obviously)

>>106317295
>We've had it for what? Five years?
Not even

>>106317415
Copilot was launched in 2021

95% of ALL companies are failing. This is what happens when you consolidate all economics into 7 corporations.

>>106316966
based half-the-world chad

>>106317402
i asked it how to bake a potato and it gave me unironically the perfect cook time and temp
AI just werks if you know how to prompt

>>106317502
Nice. It's over for chefs I guess

>>106317295
It's stackoverflow on steriods + hallucinations. Sometimes you get good answers that are error free. Other times you get answers that can't be debugged because the references don't exist.