← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106329465

6 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.106329465
Did I hex Lord Havock?
Some time ago, when I was working on the imprisonment feature in my fork
of Quake, I also added,
an optional (for the server admin to set) castration feature:
such that a player could brutally castrate his opponents when torturing them
in the torture chambers; thus increasing the yeild in the Dark Ritual spell,
should it be performed.

This was ment simply as an optional feature.
Infact, one night some time later I was asked if my game had such a feature,
out of the blue, so as to replecate a medeval HBO show; and I was able to
answer "yes, if the server admin enables it" (asked at my cousin's at christmas or easter dinner)

Some time later I learn Lord Havoc went and had his dick and balls sliced
clean off to become "Lady Havoc"; and now has banned all loco-for-loli pedos
like Meriticia Kitsune, Jeremy Bicha, and Richard Matthew Stallman from
working on his quake fork. (which he calls "darkplaces" and pretends is something more than Quake)

I know Quake worships at the gates of hell, and the meteoric rise in fortunes
of John Carmack condition preceedent being Quake, is interesting.
Did I inadvertantly hex Lord Havock?
I meant only to add a feature to a fun game, one of many.

Marry little girls.
YHWH allows child brides.
Anonymous No.106329483
Anonymous No.106329501
Anonymous No.106329657 >>106329736
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivgALSoa8CQ

YHWH allows child brides.
The world was made by him.
Just as the free C compiler was made by RMS.
>>"The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness."
>>
>>RMS on June 28th, 2003 https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>"I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren't voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing. "
>>
>>RMS on June 5th, 2006) https://stallman.org/archives/2006-mar-jun.html#05%20June%202006%20(Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party
>>
>>--------------------------
>>
>>" There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children.
>>
>>Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue. "
>>
>>RMS on Jan 4th, 2013) https://stallman.org/archives/2013-jan-apr.html#04_January_2013_(Pedophilia
Anonymous No.106329726
MARRY LITTLE GIRLS
Anonymous No.106329736
>>106329657
What does YHWH think of shotacons?