← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106330393

56 posts 12 images /g/
Anonymous No.106330393 >>106331024 >>106331025 >>106331028 >>106331304 >>106331386 >>106332163 >>106333269 >>106333425 >>106333614 >>106333622 >>106333722 >>106335390 >>106335703 >>106335998
GPT-5 ADVANCES MATHEMATICS
https://x.com/SebastienBubeck/status/1958198661139009862

Wow. Apple paper btfo. Haters thinking it was plateauing btfo. The future is here.
Anonymous No.106330487 >>106330989 >>106331082 >>106333722 >>106335118
This nigga literally works for OpenAI, buy an ad.
Anonymous No.106330973
assumed to be F&G
Anonymous No.106330989
>>106330487
Fibby bippy.
Anonymous No.106331024 >>106333722
>>106330393 (OP)
Fake and gay
Anonymous No.106331025 >>106331203 >>106333722
>>106330393 (OP)
Best case scenario, there was a better bound in another paper and it correctly copied it over. BFD

Probably just F&G thoughbeit.
Anonymous No.106331028
>>106330393 (OP)
AGI is confirmed now. A few more billions and it will be ready.
Anonymous No.106331045 >>106331070 >>106332231 >>106333563 >>106333611 >>106335285
>tunnel vision researcher uploads his paper to a chatbot
>it randomly points out something of interest
*taps chomsky*
Anonymous No.106331070 >>106331197 >>106332044
>>106331045
>altman is a jew
>chudsky is a jew
Anonymous No.106331082 >>106333722
>>106330487
yeah he's the "sparks of AGI" from gpt-4 guy
Anonymous No.106331197 >>106331210
>>106331070
i don't think Chumsky fucks kids or would genocide if that means anything
Anonymous No.106331203
>>106331025
I think there was a better bound in another paper, but it used a different proof. GPT supposedly came up with a novel proof.
Anonymous No.106331210
>>106331197
Jews are everywhere, and I'm getting tired.
Anonymous No.106331304
>>106330393 (OP)
>It made up a mathematically incorrect statement
It’s not smart, can’t do math, don’t create another number on top of the real one.
Anonymous No.106331386
>>106330393 (OP)
>The future is here.

Buy an ad, c0cksucker
Anonymous No.106332044 >>106332301
>>106331070
chomsky is the least jewish person alive which you'd know if you'd even bothered to look into it briefly
Anonymous No.106332163 >>106332185
>>106330393 (OP)
3/2L is larger than 1/L dipshit A.I. yo momma wears size 55" waist, but she can also wear a 75" waist. Don't mean she skinnier.
Anonymous No.106332185
>>106332163
Not all analysis is looking for tighter bounds. For instance, I wasn't sure your mom could take my cock, but to both of our surprise she could go 1.5 times bigger than your father.
Anonymous No.106332231 >>106332288 >>106335833
>>106331045
how is the human mind not one big plagiarism machine
Anonymous No.106332288 >>106332305
>>106332231
Some of us have original ideas because we're not all bug people and parasites.
Anonymous No.106332301
>>106332044
he's a jew
Anonymous No.106332305 >>106332309
>>106332288
wow what an original post
Anonymous No.106332309 >>106335938
>>106332305
>NOU
Anonymous No.106333269 >>106333313
>>106330393 (OP)
I don't see the question, original proof, or chatgpt's proof, but, unless I don't understand this, the original proof bounds eta by 1/L, while the chatgpt's proof bounds it by 3/2 * 1/L. How is chatgpt's bound better?
Anonymous No.106333313 >>106333343
>>106333269
It is the interval on which the function f is convex, so a bigger interval is better. If you check the paper, the original authors have had a bound better than 1/L for a few months, so this isn't a new result as far as I can tell.
Anonymous No.106333332
>can advance mathmatics
>I ask it a simple coding question and it gets it wrong
monkey with a typewriter
Anonymous No.106333343 >>106333361
>>106333313
Do you have a link to the paper?
Anonymous No.106333361
>>106333343
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10138
Anonymous No.106333425
>>106330393 (OP)
>Still can't count the letters in a word
yehnah. someone will find where it found this "novel" proof.. just like the distilling/self training stuff which turned out to be hocus singularity bullshit too.
Anonymous No.106333563
>>106331045
>modifying them enough to escape copyright laws
KEK he is such a fucking kike. Why is he pushing that narrative. They don't "escape copyright" at all.
Anonymous No.106333601 >>106335840
no clue about advancing mathematics, but realistically that's 99.9th percentile hooman intelligence tier.
i'm not at that level but just applying known methods to maths problems is incredibly useful.
you probably need a 90th percentile iq to pass complex analysis and these reasoning llms just breeze through it.
Anonymous No.106333611 >>106335200 >>106335603 >>106336235
>>106331045
chomsky is a fucking rat. playing the good cop for israel so browns and lefties can pretend israel is bombing children for 'american imperialism' or oil
Anonymous No.106333614
>>106330393 (OP)
If true Zeilberger is shitting his diaper at how people are using computers to write natural language proofs.
I skimmed it and it doesn't look clear to me.
Also it's a nothing burger as the bound was already larger in a v2 paper.
Seems like he is just trying to kill interest so people ignore the claim and proof itself.
Anonymous No.106333622 >>106333643
>>106330393 (OP)
how do these people live with themselves on a daily basis? like, you clearly lying and misleading people. is having moral values really just for faggots?
Anonymous No.106333643
>>106333622
100s of millions of dollars help, probably
Anonymous No.106333650 >>106333991
Well?
Anonymous No.106333711
Can it do fifth grade math problems or even simple addition yet?
Anonymous No.106333722
>>106330393 (OP)
iTODDLERS BTFO
>>106330487
>>106331024
>>106331025
>>106331082
BTFO iTODDLERS
Anonymous No.106333991 >>106334094
>>106333650
why would i credit ai in my software? how does he know it isn't being used in everything to some extent now? even hard programmers will get stumped and throw a function in a text generative ai as a desperate attempt to save some hairs on their head
Anonymous No.106334094
>>106333991
There is no observed leap in software quality. So the 10x claim must be false.
Anonymous No.106335118 >>106335826
>>106330487
even if he works for openai its still a good thing if this is true though right? i cant read math though so idk if its true
Anonymous No.106335200
>>106333611
That is a good thing. Not only Israel should be hated, but America too. Especially America, since Israel is literally powerless without America (Putin would help Iran crush it)
Anonymous No.106335285 >>106337083
>>106331045
>lets have anarcho syndicalism! fuck the guv, fuck authority, we should freely exchange information in groups, here's my literal email, i WILL respond even if you're a nobody
>oh yeah btw copyright law is totally legitimate and stealing is bad mkay
Anonymous No.106335390
>>106330393 (OP)
why only one example? an AI can effortlessly generate infinite text. the grifting is unreal.
Anonymous No.106335603
>>106333611
He was asked once what he thought about 9/11
His words were to the effect "who cares"
Anonymous No.106335703
>>106330393 (OP)
Ok now make it cook me dinner or do something important and relevant to people's actual lives.
Anonymous No.106335826
>>106335118
>i cant read math though so idk if its true
Don't worry, the priests will listen to the divinations and tell you what God is saying. All you have to do is listen.
Anonymous No.106335833
>>106332231
Where did the things you believe it plagiarises come from, anon?
Anonymous No.106335840
>>106333601
You're not saying anything, you demagogue rat.
Anonymous No.106335938
>>106332309
Produce an original idea, now
Anonymous No.106335998 >>106336087 >>106336966
>>106330393 (OP)
ChatGPT can’t even parse a list of clearly defined values from a website without completely making up data that isn’t there. I’ve been trying to use it to do some data processing for me and every single time it’s given me a list with some kind of inaccuracy in it. It’s completely useless at any of the tasks that you’d think it would be useful for.
Anonymous No.106336087 >>106336152 >>106336966
>>106335998
I'm thinking about moving and asked about rent prices, for one hour it gave me nonsense links. Every time it got more and more sure that the links are correct this time.
Anonymous No.106336152
>>106336087
It always assumes your corrections are truth because ChatGPT intentionally flatters users as much as possible to keep them engaged.
Anonymous No.106336235
>>106333611
Jesus Christ calm down. Nobody's talking about some perpetual middle-eastern conflict. We are talking about what AI is and isn't.
Anonymous No.106336966
>>106335998
>>106336087
It is a random text generator. It has no internal concept of truth. Why would you try to use it in a way that the output matters, are you retarded.
Anonymous No.106337083
>>106335285
I hate copyright law but it's bullshit that Sam Pedoman and all of his pedo billionaire friends get to break it and I get my YouTube account suspended for using licensed music in a video.