← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106332149

97 posts 32 images /g/
Anonymous No.106332149 >>106332196 >>106332236 >>106332275 >>106332343 >>106332373 >>106332541 >>106335297 >>106335764 >>106337152 >>106338073 >>106338265 >>106338269 >>106338704 >>106338930 >>106340437 >>106341407
INCOMINGGGGG
Anonymous No.106332164 >>106332230
TWO MORE WEEKS TILL THE BUBBLE POPS AND TRUMP INVADES CANADA
Anonymous No.106332170 >>106332201 >>106332212 >>106332221 >>106332318 >>106335399 >>106338729
Trillions of dollars have been spent on AI/ML in the last few years, and the only products are a couple useless chatbots

What a hilarious bubble this has been
Anonymous No.106332196
>>106332149 (OP)
They finally realized its dead end and real AI will likely not be possible anytime soon?
Anonymous No.106332201 >>106338488
>>106332170
idk i think NFTs were funnier.
Anonymous No.106332212 >>106332256 >>106333096 >>106335687 >>106335729 >>106338089
>>106332170
>never have to read or write an email again
>never have to go to stackoverflow or r*ddit for IT problems ever again
>"useless"
Anonymous No.106332221 >>106335172 >>106335520
>>106332170
The irony: most of that money was wasted on a failing idea (scaling) rather than actually making AI better.
Anonymous No.106332230
>>106332164
POP THE BUBBLE. STOP THE COUNT.
Anonymous No.106332235
Just a little more meme magick and the heckin AI bubble with pop, frens
praise KEK!
Anonymous No.106332236
>>106332149 (OP)
STOP HIRING HUMA-AAACK
Anonymous No.106332256 >>106335286 >>106335463 >>106338217 >>106338461 >>106340655
>>106332212
This. While the bubble is absolutely insane, reality is in the middle. These chatbots are insanely useful, yet cannot take humans out of the equation universally. The problem a lot of these AI companies are discovering though is that while people do find utility in the tool, they're not often willing to pay for it.
Anonymous No.106332275 >>106332439
>>106332149 (OP)
How can I contribute to hasten this situation even more?
Anonymous No.106332318
>>106332170
Their own fucking fault
I'm not a millionaire jew I live paycheck to paycheck buy a pack of ciggies and a monster white every day after work and even I could see this shit was a bubble
No altman is not tech jesus, agi not in our lifetime
Anonymous No.106332334 >>106332350 >>106332367 >>106332468 >>106332472
Can't wait for nvidya to come crawling back to gamers
AGAIN
Anonymous No.106332343
>>106332149 (OP)
>Just learn to AI

Hahahahhaha... I guess they'll start working as journalists now.
Anonymous No.106332350
>>106332334
I don't think they would as they seem to have fooled a lot of people into playing games on someone else's computer.
Anonymous No.106332367 >>106332388 >>106332472
>>106332334

Nvidia is selling shovels, not vaporware. they'll potentially be dinged by panic selloffs but they'll be fine considering they have zero meaningful competition.
Anonymous No.106332373 >>106332479
>>106332149 (OP)
AI coding is impressive at first, but it's a bit like a cute eceleb spouting niche political opinions. Amazing at first but then you realize there's nothing new and she's just echoing back your own opinions. It's a little bit silly how quick CEOs were to embrace the idea that they could fire most of their developers.
Anonymous No.106332388 >>106332394
>>106332367
Kinda true, but if the miners start selling their used shovels because they're getting out of the mining business, that does harm the shovel selling business.
Remember, line must go up.
Anonymous No.106332394 >>106332468
>>106332388
Can you even play games with their AI line of cards? at least with crypto it was consumer hardware like regular 2060s
Anonymous No.106332439 >>106332486
>>106332275
Unironically fuel the fire by making publicly visible posts explaining why AI is dead, preferably in places where boomer investor will read them.

Finance runs on fear and opinions, not informed fact. These idiots sold nvidia stock when deepseek came out, for fucks sake.
Anonymous No.106332468
>>106332394
Technically, yes.
Their data center cards and graphics cards are built in the same technology. You're not going to resell the data center products to gamers, but in that case companies looking for data center capacity could be buying out unused capacity rather than buying new product from Nvidia.
And that's sorta the point of >>106332334, if data center demand falls through the floor, where will they go to move more product? Gamers. Cut orders for data center skus, order more GPU skus instead.
Of course, there's no way gamers will match the product movement and income of data center, but it's still about offsetting as much as possible.
Anonymous No.106332472 >>106336729
>>106332334
>>106332367
>Oh the AI bubble popped? Why not take your it easy between job interviews with our new price-reduced $999 RTX 5090 Super Ti?
Anonymous No.106332479 >>106332597
>>106332373
It all depends on the data that trains it.
Anonymous No.106332486
>>106332439
>Finance runs on fear and opinions, not informed fact.

True
Anonymous No.106332533 >>106332544
>board declares hiring freeze after zuck offers some gook 10 billion dollars
Anonymous No.106332541
>>106332149 (OP)
Recession indicator
L economy
Anonymous No.106332544 >>106335224
>>106332533
>spend 10 bill on chink fodder
>all they do is make shitty python scripts all day
Anonymous No.106332597
>>106332479
Yes, but eventually there's no new data to train it on. And then you get AI training on AI etc etc.
Anonymous No.106333096 >>106335090 >>106338992
>>106332212
>using a chat bot instead of participating in a helpful community
That's the gayest shit I've ever heard.
Anonymous No.106335090
>>106333096
>stackoverflow
>helpful
anon...
Anonymous No.106335172
>>106332221
Precisely this. American business didn't really do anything to make their AI technology more powerful, the just kept scaling the same technology by throwing money at it
Anonymous No.106335224
>>106332544
Still a better investment than when he burned billions to make second life but worse
Anonymous No.106335286 >>106335457
>>106332256
true they're useful, the best way to describe them is like a super advanced search engine. instead of returning some basic description or a web link they can return more advanced data. but end of the day, you have to know what to search to get the best results.
Anonymous No.106335297 >>106335425 >>106335799
>>106332149 (OP)
>1 month ago: $250M packages to grab as many big-name people as possible
>now: yet another restructuring + hiring freeze
what are those retards even doing? just spend it all on lobbying and blow like every other moneyed person
Anonymous No.106335399 >>106336184 >>106336643 >>106339110
>>106332170
I can literally buy a robot that would walk around do cartwheels and talk like a human being for 5k and /g/ needs to pretend nothing happened and we're stuck in 2005
Anonymous No.106335425
>>106335297
this is all part of the same restructure and the new team asserting control and getting rid of the old lama team.
i don't understand why people think this is zuck back-pedalling. this was inevitable.
Anonymous No.106335457
>>106335286
They're useful but not rape-the-power-grid useful. The only reason they're even marginally better than search results is entirely the fault of SEO making search fucking shit and they could have just spend 1% of the ai money fixing that
Anonymous No.106335463 >>106335632
>>106332256
>yet cannot take humans out of the equation universally
So, they are useless as far as anyone important is concerned.
They don't want to help you, they want to replace you.
They don't care about you, they hate you and want you gone.
Anonymous No.106335520 >>106335649
>>106332221
>actually making AI better
>what does that mean?
You do realize private entities are incapable of that.
All real innovation happens in publicly funded academia and government-associated R&D departments.
All that private industry can do is take the above and implement it and refine it and put it in a nice box and market it to you.
That's it.
Anonymous No.106335632
>>106335463
sure but so what? their dev replacement machine struggles with anything that's longer than 1k lines of code and needs to be tard-wrangled all the time. who's going to be doing the tard wrangling, the boomer ceo who can barely use email unassisted?
Anonymous No.106335649
>>106335520
which publicly funded academic is responsible for meta quest 3? Meta does a lot of its own research on top of what's already available
Anonymous No.106335687 >>106335722
>>106332212
>this is somehow worth trillions of dollars for Google, OpenAI, Meta, Nvidia, Amazon and more
Anonymous No.106335722
>>106335687
those companies are made up of people, and people who are forced to use google search in $current_year are going to go any length to make sure they won't have to repeat the experience
Anonymous No.106335729
>>106332212
>never have to read or write an email again
do low IQ retards really charge an LLM with "reading their emails"? kek.
Anonymous No.106335764
>>106332149 (OP)
SAAAAAR, LET ME FUCKING IN SAAR I PROMISE I AM THE LAST ONE SAAARR.
Anonymous No.106335799 >>106336103
>>106335297
what do you think normally happens when a bunch of new people are hired and new people are put in charge? oh a hiring freeze for the prior organizations that are going through a restructure since the new organization put on top has just been filled with new hires. wild that's insane. so many fucking NIGGER retards here lol
Anonymous No.106336103
>>106335799
>what do you think normally happens when a bunch of new people are hired and new people are put in charge?
There isn't a hiring freeze you know nothing retard. The reason why they have one is they have tons of worthless fodder with high salaries from Stability acquisition.
now kill yourself
Anonymous No.106336184 >>106339263
>>106335399
>I can literally buy a robot that would walk around do cartwheels and talk like a human being for 5k
Yeah but why would you? Is it useful as a tool for literally anything that generates revenue for you or letting you do less work. Is it just a toy you'll get bored with in a months time?
Anonymous No.106336504 >>106336543
The bubble can't pop fast enough. The M$ crashout will be epic.
Anonymous No.106336543 >>106337071
>>106336504
>The M$ crashout
???
all the AI startups will fold but m$ and google mostly use ai as a fig leaf to depress wages while still keeping their options open just in case the hype has some kernel of truth (which right now seems more unlikely by the month)
Anonymous No.106336643 >>106336664
>>106335399
ok?
Anonymous No.106336664
>>106336643
can you customize fleshlight size or are those asian-only models?
Anonymous No.106336729
>>106332472
They're ahead of the curve and will already have started underwriting the hype machine for an emerging market that uses their GPUs. Why do you think the timing was so perfect between when the crypto hype died down and when the hype for a product that was on very few people's radar suddenly exploded?
Anonymous No.106337071 >>106337086
>>106336543
M$ has made AI their whole brand. It gives off the vibe of a delusional gay boomer who thinks it's some futuristic technology. I've never seen M$ not double down so why should they start now?
Anonymous No.106337086
>>106337071
>M$ has made AI their whole brand.
it's like saying facebook made vr their whole brand
one day zuck decided they're not interested in vr and everybody forgot it instantly
copepilot and muh-ai-in-open-office will become mildly-useful clippy by 2027 and that'll be it.
Anonymous No.106337152
>>106332149 (OP)
WATCH OUT WATCH OUT WATCH OUT
Anonymous No.106338073
>>106332149 (OP)
Zuck is hilarious
Anonymous No.106338089
>>106332212
I love that it killed stackoverflow
Anonymous No.106338119
AGI in two weeks. We won't need to hire anyone when we can just have AI's writing their own code.
Anonymous No.106338142
that guy who didnt sign up for a 1bil 4 year contract must be feeling pretty goofy about now
Anonymous No.106338217 >>106338250 >>106338318
>>106332256
>Not willing to pay for it
This exactly. Why would I pay for chatgpt premium when I can use the free version, or chinas supposedly better AI for free, or any number of AI implementations across every service and product I interact with? For fucks sake even Snapchat has an ai chatbot I can utilize. If I really want to have a fast and good ai I can run it locally on my own home server. All the billions of dollars for companies to scale up and utilize ai are not going to return a profit because all the investment they put in to shove it in people's faces at every company for free, is backfiring because any company who starts to charge for it will lose customers because their competitors offer it for free still.
Anonymous No.106338250
>>106338217
Those are useful when you want to do your three homework assignments but that's about it. If you want codeslop then you'll need to pay up.
Anonymous No.106338265
>>106332149 (OP)
eat shit bubble niggers
Anonymous No.106338269
>>106332149 (OP)
What do you mean the ai engineers they were hiring weren't worth 100 million dollars
Anonymous No.106338293 >>106338331
Rationalists
NRxers
Substack pseuds
Investors
I'm sorry it didn't go your way.
Anonymous No.106338318 >>106338356 >>106338378
>>106338217
The money is probably in the enterprise business. AI summarising corporate emails, making PowerPoints for management, generating meeting minutes…
As for the free version of AI tools like ChatGPT 3.5 they’ll probably depreciate them in a couple of years. It will be like free email services and free cloud storage : companies were generous at the start but then they turned Jewish and started lumping in your email, your photos, your documents, your notes etc into the 5 GB they are giving you β€˜for free’ and then bugging you until you upgraded to the paid options.
Anonymous No.106338331 >>106338399
>>106338293
and I thought the GOMAD weirdos carrying milk jugs around were bad
rationalists are actually anti-AI, they advocate bombing data centers before AI becomes sentient and wipe out all humanity (it's a very rational point of view)
Anonymous No.106338356
>>106338318
My company is going to cross the billion dollar mark this year, we looked into cloud AI options(because they're cloud bucks) and the cost was greater than the return value so they decided against pursuing anything AI related. Free copilot is authorized in the company though
Anonymous No.106338378
>>106338318
So execs can do even less work for their $20 mil/year salary?
Anonymous No.106338399
>>106338331
Utilitarians against utilitarianism, I guess.
Anonymous No.106338461
>>106332256
It's because agents aren't as useful as they'd hoped. The interactive Google thing is great but when you ask AI to do real tasks they fuck shit up. The problem is the former isn't profitable unless you can inject ads into the responses.
Anonymous No.106338488 >>106338536
>>106332201
Fuck You, you'll only prise monkey.jpg out of my cold dead teflon grip. I know what I've got.
Anonymous No.106338536
>>106338488
Which bored ape do you have? I'd be willing to invest.
Anonymous No.106338704 >>106339238
>>106332149 (OP)
Meta has been dead last in the race for AI.
Not a big loss.
Anonymous No.106338729
>>106332170
don't forget the souless, humiliating AI Interviewers
Anonymous No.106338930
>>106332149 (OP)
>INCOMINGGGGG
AAAAAAAAAUEUEUEUEUUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Anonymous No.106338992 >>106340558
>>106333096
>Locking this post, already answered 3 years ago.
Anonymous No.106339022 >>106339138 >>106339232
The thing is these chatbots have been enormously useful. I think anyone talking about how this technology is "unimpressive" is comparing it to a fantasy technology in their minds ("AGI")
Anonymous No.106339110
>>106335399
Cool. You can buy a useless toy for $5,000. Great job.
That's gotta be the best analogy for this AI/ML hypetrain right there
Anonymous No.106339138
>>106339022
These language simulators have been useful for letting 75 IQ office workers pretend to be 95 IQ office workers

A total game changer for the "email job" industry
Anonymous No.106339232
>>106339022
>The thing is these chatbots have been enormously useful
the only use anyone found for them is children cheating in school
Anonymous No.106339238 >>106340401
>>106338704
>Meta has been dead last in the race for AI.
What about Apple?
Anonymous No.106339263 >>106339330
>>106336184
Talking to it in the short term is indistinguishable from a human. It can fool 99% of people. Do people get bored of talking to other people? No they don't.
Anonymous No.106339330
>>106339263
So the entire industry is basically gonna be people buying androids so they have someone to talk to?
Anonymous No.106340401
>>106339238
Not even in the competition.
Anonymous No.106340437
>>106332149 (OP)
heh
Anonymous No.106340460
ANON GET DOWN
Anonymous No.106340491 >>106340566
they need to do sam altman llike they did the theranos lady. its only fair
Anonymous No.106340558
>>106338992
>track down the answer
>the answer is wrong
Anonymous No.106340566
>>106340491
>give me five hundred billion american dollars and I will cure cancer

That last part, about curing cancer, was something Larry Ellison actually said when the announced Project Stargate in the White House by the way.

https://youtu.be/Nw8oPm40jIY
>5:41
Anonymous No.106340655 >>106340755
>>106332256
I have a natural aversion to anything SaaS so I always did AI locally and I think open source practicioners recognize that smaller specialized models are often better, and AI is more effective when we turn the knobs and experiment with it in the backend. these mickey mouse, polished opaque smartphone apps with "guardrails" that make them dumb were never gonna save the world. like its some magic wand. lmao
Anonymous No.106340755
>>106340655
What are the best local models for each major purpose anon?
Anonymous No.106341407 >>106341496 >>106341518
>>106332149 (OP)
they are replacing ai employee with ai, holyfuck
Anonymous No.106341496 >>106341524
>>106341407
Yeah, Zuck said ASI was only 2 weeks or so away last week. He's obviously made a breakthrough and can fire the hired hands. It's just Zuck and The Machine now.
Anonymous No.106341518 >>106341524
>>106341407
>Zuck and The Machine
so 2 machines ?
Anonymous No.106341524
>>106341496
>>106341518