Thread 106335953

>HR question
>"more women should get into tech", do you agree with this statement?
wwyd

Do what the American prison system does when it labels everyone as white and just randomly label tech guys as women without their knowledge.
Not like they'll notice. It's just paperwork.

>>106335953 (OP)
cute troon

>>106335953 (OP)
laurie pls let me suck your feeeet
larie laurie pleeease
i beg you
yummy feeet pls
i dont care if they stink
laurie pls feet
pls laurie feeeeet

>>106335953 (OP)
It's pretty funny more women got into Tech yet what they did it was all but tech they became administrators, secretaries and all the typical woman jobs that have nothing to do with tech.

The only place where they actually shine is design and marketing.

But when it comes to actual work they're fucking useless.

>>106335953 (OP)
If this is an open question just reverse it: should we force women into tech who don't want to do it? Since they're naturally disinclined, should it be "Should we trick women into tech?"

>>106335953 (OP)
answer honestly
if they don't like that answer then I conclude it is not a company I wish to work for

>>106335953 (OP)
Yes. I identify as a womxn btw

>>106335953 (OP)
no

not because i don't think they're suited for it, but because the way the question is worded suggests some level of force. both men and women should be free to choose jobs that suit them personally.

it's a trick question, or a loaded one. it suggests there's something holding back women from a job in tech, but there's so such system in place, at least where i live.

>>106336000
You're fired. They want money for easy jobs only for women, and you have to support that.
But if you put them in a situation where they have to acknowledge this, they'd rather say you're not the right fit for the company.
What they want to hear is "Well women are definitely underrepresented in this kind of work, I think we should have more programs to make this kind of work more attractive for women to choose."

>>106335953 (OP)
Telling women what they should do is a little sexist in my opinion.

Realize I have already been icked and they're looking for an excuse to trash me. Leave.

>>106335953 (OP)
Sure, so long as they are qualified. Segregated from men, too, so smelly total loser virgins don't go and disturb them.

>>106335953 (OP)
As long as she does the work and avoids drama and espionage, then there's no issues. Stay in your lane.

>>106335953 (OP)
How would HR respond if I spoke their language against them?
>i believe women should have the right to choose; they shouldn't be pressured into any industry purely based on their gender; thus, I believe that to answer this question in the affirmative is misogynist and exploitative, depriving them of their autonomy and allowing them to miss out on abundant opportunities elsewhere. I think people who want to get into tech, who have the aptitude for it, should, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation or other factors. Anything else is inherently sexist, racist, homophobic, or otherwise bigoted.

Women (Goddesses) should not work in tech.
Filthy moids should break their backs to erect altar to the divine feminine, a fifth of the bounty of the harvest should be placed at the altar for women.

Do I get the job?

In my 35 year career in various IT positions, women are great developers and engineers but I never liked working for one.

>>106336453
You're objectifying them, women need to labor like slaves and die expendably in wars in order to be truly empowered.
Funny thing about feminism, it simultaneously dehumanizes men and posits that women are equal to men.

>>106336446
>thank you for your response
>we've scheduled you for an extra few rounds of diversity training

>>106335989
>the only place where they actually shine is design and marketing.
is that a joke?

>>106335953 (OP)
i want to impregnate this woman

>>106335953 (OP)
My real answer
>No, since the statement ignores merit or lack thereof. Sadly, a blind person who really likes flying still can't become a pilot.
My HR answer
>Yes, and anyone else that can bring a valuable perspective. The tech field is mired by the tradition fallacy, and the people within it need to stay current, dynamic, and adaptable.

>>106335953 (OP)
I responded with "Not interested." to questions like this during a post-interview survey and still got hired. I think about it from time to time, wondering if they were shit-testing to see if I was a political sperg as opposed to the fake "company values" shit. Maybe they didn't even read the survey. Who knows?

>>106335953 (OP)
I'm not interviewing here. I just needed some place to put my 22 gallons of gasoline and matches.
Can you show me to the janitors closet?

>>106335953 (OP)
Usecase of more women getting into tech?

Whats a woman?

respectfully who cares? i dont think gender, sex, race and whatnot makes any real difference

>>106335953 (OP)
Real answer:
>no, women should be getting married right after graduating HS, having kids, and being a stay-at-home mom.
HR answer:
>saying women excludes trans people, non-binary people, and all others that don't identify with your problamatic binary
I'd get hired on the spot and then get her fired

>>106337516
(((neomarxist troons))) are trying to turn society into a communist longhouse. The enemy is the White Straight, able bodied Man, therefore the more Pythagorean distance you have away from that, the better, because the point is to "destroy society" and "make it anew", putting the most "oppressed" on top.

These fucks absolutely believe a Black, Gay, disabled Woman is superior to White Straight Men.

>>106335953 (OP)
I plead the fifth.

>>106336820
Shokuba no hana

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2002/12/16/language/the-thorny-topic-of-office-flowers/

Managers have discovered that when they selectively hire women in tech, the other castrati fagot wagies start showing up in time, competing against each other and grooming more.

>>106337561
yall been on the internet so much yall think its the fall of man, wake the fuck up and go outside, unless you live in north america to which i say my condolences

>>106337598
I live in the USA. You have no idea how bad it really is. I have to plead allegiance to my judeohapa reptilian overlords every day.

>>106336248
>You're fired.
You can't get fired from an interview, stupid.

>>106337606
i can clearly tell you plead allegiance to a certain painter

>>106335953 (OP)
*raise eyebrow*
>"...should?!... I'm sorry but your question heavily implies a phallogocentric and patriarchal enforced behavior and this really makes me uncomfortable. I'm going to report you to your superiors."
*rise from the chair and leave the room*

Diversity just means fewer white men in lucrative comfortable positions. Diversity quotas aren't brought up for garbage, oil, or other hard labor positions. There aren't diversity campaigns against the female dominated education or nursing system.

>>106335953 (OP)
yes, as long as they're attractive and single

>>106335953 (OP)
Yeah I don't think its a bad think, tech is kinda unbalanced so its a good oppourtunity for men to meet their future partners if there are more women.

>>106335953 (OP)
Yes because if there were more women in tech it would be easier to find a wife for me.

>>106335989
They got into it solely to fire nerds.

Nerds are supposed to be poor & low status, like middle school.

>>106336446
>he thinks there's any way to win this game besides not playing
you are White, Male and Straight (probably), so as far are they're concerned your argument is invalid and can never be anything else

There's no point trying to argue with someone who argues in bad faith

>>106335953 (OP)
only if they sit on my face

develop esoteric first wave feminist take that sounds both more extreme utopian and more sexist than anything your coworkers believe

>>106335953 (OP)
yes
i refuse to elaborate further

>>106335953 (OP)
not my problem
unless you hire me and pay for my transition

>>106335953 (OP)
So the question is:
>Do I, a man, think you should hire women over me?
No, of course not.

>>106337581
This only works in Japan. In the West you will get called out for sexual harassment. Men are not allowed to compete for the intention of women at the office anymore.

>>106335953 (OP)
What if I say something like:
>Yes, as I identify as a woman, I know what adversities we face and the discrimination against us
What are they gonna do to prove I'm faking it?

Just like a told my manager, man, woman or performing monkey, I don't care, but it would be nice if they hired someone that wasn't a massive retard for a change.

>>106335953 (OP)
based laurie wired

>>106335972
>https://youtu.be/y-NOz94ZEOA
laurie is a real woman, chud

>>106335953 (OP)
Coincidentally I just decided to identify as a woman.

>>106335953 (OP)
Yes because I can't live in this sausage fest anymore (imagine the smell)

>>106335953 (OP)
You shill faggots are just as insufferable as women

>>106340735
Ruined.

>>106335953 (OP)
"No."
(I'm unionized)

>>106340735
why does she sound like a teenager? both as in her voice AND her explanations

>>106335953 (OP)
No

People interested in tech should get into tech.

>>106335953 (OP)
>wwyd

She's so pretty.

>>106337609
OP said HR question. It didn't stipulate it was a job interview. Nta btw

>>106343576
Why would HR be asking you random questions outside of hiring you? Just to chitchat?

It’s pretty amazing that we progresses as far as we did with half the humans being truly worthless at anything that isn’t sucking dick and being pregnant

>>106343672
Have you never had a job? I'm sure there are autists here that HR keep tabs on with weekly meetings.

>>106335953 (OP)
the woke fags are bad enough. I hate fuckin technobots.

Yes, but they may not be Anglo, German or Indian. Everything between Balkans and Kyrgyzstan is fine.

>>106335953 (OP)
>I identify as a woman
Ezpz

>>106335953 (OP)
tech is a curse, it is our cross to bear.
i do not wish this on anyone, and women should be thankful they aren't being led into this industry like mice to the pied piper.

>>106335953 (OP)
My Lauru..

>>106335953 (OP)
No I don't. I think they should get into whatever field they have a passion for. If that is tech then all the more power to them. However shaming them or trying to push them into something they do not have a passion for does not help anyone.

>>106335953 (OP)
Yes yes, in fact I think all women should at the very least work with digital content distribution. Give me your onlyfans link so I can contribute to women's inclusion in tech :)
When can I know more about my application?

>>106342508
she doesnt

It sucks that 4chan is so anti-trans. Trans women take better care of themselves than real women. They actually put in the work. Plus they love to get dicked down with the testosteroidal fervor of a dude.

>>106345810
hi laurie

>>106335953 (OP)
Fuck no

>>106335953 (OP)
"I mean, i'm not stopping them."

>>106345810
>the testosteroidal fervor of a dude.
they ARE dudes

>>106335953 (OP)
they cute

>>106348682
>they
*she
don't be a faggot

>>106347779
i want to suck her toes while she codes

>>106335953 (OP)
>"women should be free to do what they want; tech would absolutely benefit from the inclusion of more women
an empty, moralizing, gameified question deserves an empty, moralizing, gameified answer

>>106347779
I do not trust her eyes. She looks manipulative and narcissistic

>>106336524
Me eat my poo poo. EAT MY POO POO ME NO LIKE EAT MY POO BUTT MUST EAT MY POO

Also BO is best lunguage

>>106337450
Me know me peepee get hard wen women near. Dat is a women. But also, the mysquirel dolphin also make me benis hard 4 dolfin.

Does the mysquirel fug the dolphin?

>>106349584
Yes da mysquirel does fug da mysquirel dolfin

>>106349510
>She looks manipulative and narcissistic
i mean, she's a woman

>>106350064
I like how they worked in that tautology without realising it

>>106349510
That wouldn't be the eyes. Its actually the testicles "she" has that's making you recoil

>>106335953 (OP)
The more egalitarian a country is the less likely women there are interested in tech. Northern europe has the least amount of women in tech while iran and india has the most. Women are simply not interested in tech if given a chance.

>>106335953 (OP)
>no, that's woke and illegal.
it's 2025 OP, not 2024. keep up.

>>106335953 (OP)
I agree as long as they suck my cock.

>>106342508
a general trend of infantilization has been going on for a while, much easier to control.

>>106340735
Disappointing :(

I've got competent and agreeable female developer coworkers

>>106335953 (OP)
>>"more women should get into tech", do you agree with this statement?
Why tho?
Why can't they study and work in whatever field they want?
And why shouldn't there be more women in garbage collection or mining?

>>106335953 (OP)
You have to out-woke them by saying: "yes but only transwomen because they are underrepresented, do you agree?"

>>106335953 (OP)
You say yes. It's what HR is required to hear from you or else they start making things difficult for you. Say yes or you risk being homeless.

>>106337753
>*dongle joke*
>REEEEEEeee you're fired

>>106335953 (OP)
>"no"
>spin 540 degrees and fly away

Laurie is so smart. In this thread she explains why uninterruptible power supplies don't use lithium ion batteries.
https://x.com/lauriewired/status/1958606207947886942

>>106335953 (OP)
"Of course! But why not just take existing male staff and transition them to women though? It'll save money in several key areas (retirement, training, etc)."

uh, why?

>>106351748
same
im not against them at all. my suspicion is why they wanted to get more women in the industry if it was selecting good women already... well anyways it is a moot point no one cares now that it is declining industry

>>106339408
>Unzips your dick.

>>106356996
cute. how do i get a super smart nerd gf?

looking at the ratio of male to female C developers says quite a bit

ive been programming in C for 1 1/2 years at this point im ok at it but ive notices nearly all C developers ive seen are men

no trannies no women all men
i dont think their mush brains can handle the low level operations C programming (such as pointers) has to offer (no offense)

>>106335953 (OP)
She's so cute I want to kill myself.

>>106360681
>ive been programming in C for 1 1/2 years at this point im ok at it but ive notices nearly all C developers ive seen are men
despite what leftists believe, men and women are not the same. womens brains generally don't work logically and analytically enough to be competent programers. are there exceptions like laurie? yes but they're rare

>>106335978
/thread and the only proper response

>>106361446
id rather suck her tits than her feet.
feet fetishists are weird

>>106360652
just bee yourself

>>106362591
im a piece of shit though

>>106335953 (OP)
"Yes."

>>106335989
Every single "modern rebrand" is the fault of women in marketing. Every retarded Advertising campaign is the fault of women. They actively ruin advertising.

>>106340735
what a fucking grating voice

>>106335953 (OP)
Why though?

>>106340735
wtf why doesn't she sound strong and manly like all these anons want

>>106362935
believe it or not that is not a deal breaker in itself

>>106349398
>>106349510
>>106350064
>woman (male)
eww

>>106350108
Maybe she recreates the female gaze very well

>>106335953 (OP)
Normal woman are not into computers or streaming/gaming only BDP whores or trannys who want to grift, if your partner wants to join your hobby tell her to fuck off building computers is for Men the tech sector was always male dominated and it should stay that way woman need to stay in their own fucking lane and stop invading mens spaces

>>106363584
I prefer the new logo to the old logo.