Thread 106336125

Now that intel is dead, what do amd do now?

Hopefully divert more resources into their GPU division

>>106336125 (OP)
They'll somehow claw defeat from the face of victory or however you're supposed to phrase that shit.

>>106336125 (OP)
The same thing Intel did

>>106336125 (OP)
Raise prices to increase margins and maximize value for shareholders.

>>106337547
>What do you need more then 8 core for?

>>106336125 (OP)
Stay on 8/16 cores the next 10 years. (they are already ~5 years in)

>>106336125 (OP)
They will make the new R10k series that has all CPUs idling at 80 degrees.

Start jewing you just as Intel did

>>106336125 (OP)
They will become the new intel until someone else kicks their asses and gives the users what they want

>>106337788
The jewing already started with the ryzen 7 series lets see just how bad it can get

>>106337574
To be fair it's Microsoft that dictates that. Windows won't support more than 16 physical cores without additional licensing. So if I have a CPU with 16cores and 32 threads due to hyper threading, I don't have to pay more. However if I have a CPU with 32cores and 64 threads then Microsoft wants a license for those extra 16 cores otherwise they won't be used by the os

>>106337565
This but with 32 cores after zen7

>>106336125 (OP)
Intel 2010s again.

>>106338387
Wait, so if you use Intel CPUs, Core 7/i7 or Core 9/i9, which have more than 16 cores thanks to E-coreism, those extra cores don't get used unless you have Windows Pro?

>>106337417
>snatch defeat from the jaws of victory

>>106338387
Why?

>>106336125 (OP)
buy intel

>>106338387
>>106338495
What are you talking about? Windows Server licensing?