← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106336384

42 posts 20 images /g/
Anonymous No.106336384 >>106336564 >>106336579 >>106336646 >>106336840 >>106336904 >>106336935 >>106337344 >>106338139 >>106338537
The only reason GrapheneOS is blindly trusted is because it's a Western project. But what if the GrapheneOS project originated in China, Russia, or Iran? It would have exactly the same characteristics as the Western GrapheneOS:

- Decentralized: No single company controls the network
- Open Source: Source code publicly accessible – transparency and audibility
- Community-driven: Development by independent developers and users

The only difference being that instead of supporting Google Pixel devices, it would exclusively support specific Huawei models. Would you still trust GrapheneOS then?
Anonymous No.106336564
>>106336384 (OP)
Imagine if boot time firmware integrity keys are generated by chinese vendors instead of western ones. the only way to run highest priviliged code on your phone is now to get it signed by a company from China. They control ultimately what runs on your device, whether it be a genuine OS or a persistant malware
Anonymous No.106336579
>>106336384 (OP)
>Would you still trust GrapheneOS then?
"still"?
Are you eating up your own propaganda now?
Anonymous No.106336646
>>106336384 (OP)
If it was Chinese I would actively support the project from my own pocket. I'd rob a fucking bank, I'd kidnap the local crypto-kingpin just to make the money flow.
Anonymous No.106336766
I already trust vray and xray
Anonymous No.106336840 >>106336855 >>106336863 >>106336867 >>106336868
>>106336384 (OP)
Daily "please don't install GOS, please" thread no. 6
Anonymous No.106336855
>>106336840
Daily "please don't question GOS, please" comment no.673837338
Anonymous No.106336863
>>106336840
Daily "daily" "daily" daily
Anonymous No.106336867 >>106336942
>>106336840
"If it's shilled on /g/, it's shit". Simple as.
Good products don't need aggressive advertisement campaigns.
Anonymous No.106336868 >>106336883 >>106336903 >>106337328
>>106336840
As soon as the previous one was archived, dude recreated it.
You're fucking obsessed fagOP
Anonymous No.106336882
being made by chinks and spies is a pretty bad deal
Anonymous No.106336883 >>106336903
>>106336868
It's litterally his job, dude...
What would you expect of him? To half ass his job for the sake of moral & sanity?
Anonymous No.106336903 >>106336951
>>106336883
>>106336868
It is our tax dollars at work, so I'm glad he's this hard-working
Anonymous No.106336904
>>106336384 (OP)
There are already similar projects like for example Deepin. But they are considered "bad" simply because they are CHYNESE!!!
Anonymous No.106336914
still not buying a jewgle phone
still not using (((micay)))'s shitty os
it's that shrimple
Anonymous No.106336935
>>106336384 (OP)
Anonymous No.106336942 >>106336983
>>106336867
Yeah but its not shilled here. Only threads I see about it are from people against it like OP. If someone needs to aggressively advertise how bad it is, maybe I should give it a try
Anonymous No.106336951 >>106338636
>>106336903
He's a thirdie, from either China or India.
There's not a critical mass of glowie on /g/, to begin with.
Anonymous No.106336983
>>106336942
Negative advertisement is still a form of advertisement. (in the thirdie shill's mind at least)
Anonymous No.106337090 >>106337331 >>106337402 >>106337433
my pixel running graphene still has 100% battery capacity after nearly 4 years, I don't use it much outside of 6-8 daily phone calls, watching videos on the shitter and GPS usage 4-5 times a week
I wonder how the battery would have fared on the stock ROM sending all of my fart audio samples to google HQ every 500 ms
Anonymous No.106337310
Not buying a Google phone running Google software modified by some retard who is on an internet war against OpenSource.
Anonymous No.106337328 >>106337346
>>106336868
You are NOT allowed to make a thread about a subject that was previously successful!
Anonymous No.106337331 >>106337423
>>106337090
>100% battery capacity after nearly 4 years
That's not physically possible, retard.
Anonymous No.106337344
>>106336384 (OP)
The better equivalent is:
>Would you run Huawei Software on a Huawei phone with Huawei firmware blobs, but modified by a single angry person, and claim that this is now dehuaweied and private and secure with Huawei not being able to track you?
Anonymous No.106337346
>>106337328
It was not successful, though.
80% of /g/ traffic is bot activity. (or retarded thirdies behaving like bots)
Anonymous No.106337402 >>106337423
>>106337090
>still has 100% battery capacity after nearly 4 years
It's impossible, it mush be bugged.

I've looked up mine, check em.
Anonymous No.106337423 >>106337449 >>106337492
>>106337331
No, I still get a full day+ of battery life with heavy usage like when it was brand new, maybe the battery supplier over delivered capacity on this batch or the software goes down in 5% decrements and mine hasn't reached the threshold

>>106337402
which gen?
Anonymous No.106337433 >>106337449
>>106337090
>4 years
>223 cycle count
Anonymous No.106337449
>>106337433
>>106337423
>4 years
>223 cycle count
>still get a full day+
Anonymous No.106337492 >>106337726
>>106337423
>No, I still get a full day+ of battery life with heavy usage like when it was brand new, maybe the battery supplier over delivered capacity on this batch or the software goes down in 5% decrements and mine hasn't reached the threshold
Battery health degrades even if not used, 100% health after 4 years and 223 cycles is not possible.

>which gen?
Pixel 6 Pro, European SKU.
Anonymous No.106337498 >>106338104 >>106338166 >>106338654
Anonymous No.106337726 >>106337862
>>106337492
is there a better benchmark for phone batteries than the stock battery status? I had a feeling it was too optimistic but since the battery still lasts all they long I never completely dropped the notion of it being at least within margin of error
Anonymous No.106337862
>>106337726
To get the most accurate benchmark you should have done a 100% to 0% discharge while watching a video 20 hour long video on the first days you got the phone, measuring how many hours of screen on time it got.
Then repeat the same test when you want to compare it to your first benchmark.
Anonymous No.106338104
>>106337498
okay chinacel
Anonymous No.106338139 >>106338479
>>106336384 (OP)
I trust it because of deranged schizo shills like yourself trying to bad-mouth it without basis.
Anonymous No.106338166 >>106338654
>>106337498
Cool story, Chang.
Are you getting your organs harvested this week? Or the one after?
Anonymous No.106338479
>>106338139
>no critical thinking skills
Anonymous No.106338537
>>106336384 (OP)
If it's good enough for Pewdiepie it's good enough for me.
Anonymous No.106338636
>>106336951
>saar chinks and jeets are the same saar, please hate chinks instead of indians because you have to focus on them instead, saaaaaar
No.
Anonymous No.106338654
>>106337498
woahjacks are gay

>>106338166
+10 Reddit updoots
+10 Palantir good goy points
Good job goyim, keep shilling war with Russia and China, and remember Israel is your greatest ally!
Anonymous No.106338724
What the actual fuck... I almost bought a pixel 8a to try out graphmeme but then I found out these devices are made in India. Not even China or Vietnam, but fucking India?? Thanks but no thanks, I'll stick with my outdated pixel 6, maybe try lineage again
Anonymous No.106339328
>The only reason GrapheneOS is blindly trusted is because it's a Western project.
No, we trust it because it's FOSS and battle tested. This time you won't get a (You), Chang.