>>106339987 (OP)
This form factor doesnt play nice with my small wrists (6-6.5). I even consulted one of those sites thats gives you the measuire in milimeters of the adequate sizes for your wrist. For putting a name on them, the OP watch is like a "tall watch" (more height than width) and those looks awful on small wrists , so my options are square-ish ones or even "small ones" more width than height.
Right now im short on money, but I was thinking of a casioak, but the base model is too big for me. Casio released some smaller ones and they branded them as "female watches", come on man, I think its a big marketing fuckup, because the "smaller" casioaks are bigger than "unisex" ones, some models are ven bigger than the "baby-g's" which is the small g-shock for women.
>>106345932
>lolpoor
Well, many of us are poor by that definition, but there is also the fact that in many countries the thiefs would gladly rip your hand if that means they can get away with a Rolex. there are even guides for affluent people to dress in a modest way for not raise excessive attention towards them.
