>>106341812
Bluetooth headphones aren't serviceable either. I have had several different Sony bluetooth headphones and when they break they're practically trash unless superglue works.
>>106341812 >airpods aren't serviceable and you can't even replace the batteries. people have slowly been conditioned to accept $200 disposable tech.
yfsgt
>>106344813
I buy like 20⬠anker throw away earbuds. I lose them long before they need service. Sound good enough, if i want really good audio quality i'm using something else anyway.
>>106340742 (OP)
Wireless is nice for the gym and stuff, but they did not have to get rid of the 3.5mm jack. That person (I assume a 2S transmap type since this is xitter and he has a dogshit take) is retarded. Why are these subhuman types always so anti-choice?
It was correct for one phone release cycle before people complained about battery life and the phones got thicker again. All that's left is to put the headphone jack back in.
>>106340742 (OP)
i fell for the wireless earphones meme. these things are expensive and last about a year.
i replaced them with wired usb-c earphones that last forever
>>106345352 >these things are expensive and last about a year.
mine have lasted for 4 years, replaced once in warranty because there was bad firmware that fucked up the battery within a year. new pair 3 years and still working.
Wireless is really good. I REALLY hate it when I'm walking and the headphones get ripped off my head because the cable got snagged. Wired is only for when I'm sitting at the computer now.
>>106340838
Reminder that it is physically impossible to have loud bass in an enclosure the size of a headphone. For bass, you need a resonance cavity that is roughly ~0.5m wide. Mediums and highs can get around much smaller cavities, but basses need a much larger space to properly reproduce the sound at desired levels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Anton_Hofmann#Hofmann's_Iron_Law