Thread 106343070

Steve movie about the GPU black market taken down by Bloomberg (government tentacle parading as (((private))) corporation) is being uploaded all over Youtube in protest against censorship. The pursuit of the truth cannot be silenced.

Why would Bloomberg want to take down a gpu video?

>>106343070 (OP)
I don't like him because he's fat.

Fuck fat people.

That's all

>>106343127
Is that why his hair is long?

>>106343127
That's not even fat, that's more like pudgy.

>>106343070 (OP)
i don't know what happen. tldw please

>>106343110
obviously he took footage from bloomberg and bloomberg dont want to be associated with his crusade. it isn't rocket science.

>>106343070 (OP)
4 Noctuas
>that would be $999999999999.9

>>106343235
ha, that's correct. you need permission to cited pretty normal in news businesses.
no wonder they rely on selling stuff and donation. lmao

>>106343195
steve n crew take a vacay to chinatown(s) and expose the fraud ban via expert journo skillz to appease u.s. investors who want the edge. didn't go so well for the investors. glad i got to see it before they pulled the plug.
>>106343235
rabbit hole goes way deeper.

gamers nexus winz again.

Why dont you change your profile pic to Clippy, you fucking fag?

>>106343413
>>106343235
shills on damage control.

>>106343235
>>106343413
I watched the whole video and I don't recall seeing any clips from Bloomberg. There were only a handful of news clips throughout.

Rumor going around is Bloomberg reported on it and included a clip from the video, then their bots crawled youtube and flagged the video because of the clip that they used in their own video.

>>106343422
pretty normal in businesses. take a look how china export ban mineral to amerimutt. amerimutt buying it through india. lmao

china threaten india. amerimutt "calling" russia for help.

russia also import a lot europe product through 3rd country. pretty normal businesses no fraud ban. just how country avoiding loss in economy.

>>106343436
same. marathoned all 3.5 hours. it was all original footage. maybe some stock drone shots, but i think they had that too. not sure on that. it blew the doors off the official narrative. it's all about the money. i wonder what jensen thought about it. he'd probably congratulate GN on superb journo work.

>>106343235
Not how it works when there's fair use laws

>>106343423
kek

>>106343110
Since it embarrasses the US establishment by exposing how pointless its sanctions are and the owner of bloomberg is in bed with the USG and their greatest ally

>>106343525
It actually shows that the sanctions are effective, but Nvidia is turning a blind eye to its partners who are circumventing the sanctions.

>>106343532
yeah well when u read between the lines, that means nviddy is letting cards go for the runners to resell. the corporate strategy is cyberpunk as hell and i love it. as GN showed, all the cards are made in china. everything is tracked, serialized and earmarked. nvidia knows where every card goes and they have reach to confirm it. so the sanctions don't mean shit because the US can't effectively enforce them when the physical products are never even in the US. only thing that comes from the US is what comes out of santa clara. not sure about nvidia's package assembly in the US, but i don't think they fab chips there afaik.

>>106343643
The US can enforce it, they just haven't yet. They could bar the partners that are participating in the black market from doing business in the US, and then if Nvidia continues to do business with them Nvidia could face sanctions.

>>106343655
Then there wouldn't be any GPU made in China.

>>106343655
The will not enforce it tho. Nvidia is doing all this money on an overhyped tech that is already deflated only kept alive by the very same government through (market forces) and the US will not under any circumstance going to stop it. At all. Not going to happen. It seems Trump was actually going to put his foot down on Nvidia but someone made him stop. Maybe it was his AIPAC person.

>>106343676
More likely what would happen is the US would make an example of the manufacturer who is the worst about breaking the export laws, and the rest would fall in line to avoid losing the US market.
But even if the end result was that GPUs were no longer able to be manufactured in China, that wouldn't be a bad thing.
>>106343689
You're talking about the guy who just a few months ago bombed Iran's nuclear facilities while everyone was screaming about nuclear war.

>>106343395
I tried to sell four of these NF-A20, new in box, for $60 on Craigslist.
No takers.

>>106343070 (OP)
Did someone shit in your brain?
The US government is fully behind the message of that movie, they have absolutely no incentive to ban it.

God, Just fucking delete the internet already so we are back at the 90s, this is getting so retarded

the next-gen stuff coming out of TSMC arizona is what this is mostly about. the feds can't do much about whatever is already made overseas. it's about the next-gen stuff coming out of US fabs not getting out. but i find it funny they put the fab in arizona so close to the mexican border. lol.

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-manufacture-american-made-ai-supercomputers-us/

>over 3 hours
I don't think I care about this topic that much.

>>106343715
Cragslist is pretty much dead in my area, have to use marketplace for any traction

>>106343717
>>106343689

>>106343774
dude tsmc is so far ahead is not even funny. you have no clue.

>>106344083
we know they're moving to nanosheet from finfet. that's not a secret tho. do you have any insights on this, anon?

>>106343110
(((they))) are angry that somehow plebeian youtubers are starting to notice things, so they are lashing out

>>106344422
gamers nexus has reach. they don't care about people noticing things. they care when those who notice have influence and use that influence for the greater good.

>>106343070 (OP)
If you don't want to get taken down for copyright infringement, you shouldn't infringe on someones copyright.

>>106344422
Youtube is a censorship hotspot for over a decade now.
If you were ok with "covid misinformation" getting banned and with like counters getting hidden just because the White House got downvoted, you will be ok with Bloomberg copyright striking your little GPU doc.
>WE ARE WAKING UP NOW
You WILL take it up the ass and you WILL say Thank You.

>You can't do anything, you can't win blablabla
Okay Jensen.

>>106343532
>The sanctions are working, it's just that Nvidia turns a blind eye to the sanctions not working
/g/ posting never stops to amaze me

>>106344511
They've made it significantly harder to get high end GPUs in China. And there are enforcement options to significantly reduce the existing black market supply and punish those who are participating in it that they haven't yet exercised.

>>106343070 (OP)
PATRIOTS IN CONTROL

Did you know that GamersNexus dropped his honey lawsuit?

He took your money, filled a case, then dismissed it and run away :)

>>106344464
You have no idea what the fuck you are talking about. You are a complete retard. Shut the fuck up. You are the most retarded nigger in this thread without a shadow of a doubt. Do your family a favor and end yourself.

>>106343235
Steve crusade is the truth. Of course that jew Bloomberg hates people searching for the truth.

>>106344551
If the copyright infringement isn't just, you can sue.
Filling false DMCA claims is against the law.
It would be the easiest lawsuit imaginable.

No need to shout and cry, go to court and get your free shekels.

>>106343070 (OP)
Noone cares. This fat retard is peak Reddit and anyone who watches him needs to go back.

>>106344543
He also dismissed it with prejudice, which means that it is impossible to sue again.

He literally gave Paypal a free win, for no reason whatsoever, completely voluntary.

>>106344543
50 different lawsuits got merged into a class action, then the named plaintiffs that weren't needed dropped out.

>>106344619
And all of them dismissed.
WITH prejudice.
Meaning: You CAN NOT sue again and if some new party arrives to sue them, they are on a horrible bad start because the judge will ask them: "Ok, so if you have a case, why did all those people before you say that they don't have a case?"

Also why didn't he give your donation money back?

>>106344635
Why would they keep paying for a lawyer if they add nothing to the case?

>jewmberg is mad
Based fatso.

>>106344648
Because people donated and paid you money for that.

>add nothing to the case
well, they did add to the case now, by dismissing with prejudice, nobody else has a chance to succeed

>>106344657
>paid you money
Where would they get millions to continue the suit?
>by dismissing with prejudice, nobody else has a chance to succeed
That isn't a thing.

>>106344665
Will he give the donation money back?
Why did he never make a statement about dropping the case and how did he justify dropping it with prejudice?

>>106344665
>That isn't a thing.

>>106344635
not a legal expert, tho i thought it means you can't file in that same jurisdiction again.

what was that suit even about? i thought the honey scam was exposed a while ago.

>>106344678
A class action doesn't need 50 named plaintiffs.
You only need enough to represent the claims of the thousands of unnamed plaintiffs.

>>106344678
A class action doesn't need 50 named plaintiffs.
You only need enough to represent the claims of the thousands of unnamed class members.

>>106344703
Look, for your convenience, i marked all the dismissals that happend with prejudice, and the ones that happend without.
Maybe that clears things up.

>>106344686
With prejucide means that you admit that you were wrong and it goes on record as you being wrong.

And since you can't sue a second time after you lost your original case, with prejudice by extension means that you can't sue again.

>>106344710
So? If you're not planning to refile it doesn't matter if it's with prejudice or without.

>>106344716
fair. thanks for the explanation.

>>106344718
The US legal system is based on common law.
Meaning that the outcome of previous similar cases affect the outcome of a new case.
Which is in contrast to some continental European legal systems, where every single case has to be reevaluated based on law.

If you dismiss with prejudice - and admit that you were wrong - this will affect the outcome of the others.

>>106344736
>this will affect the outcome of the others
It won't.

>Did you know nvidia--
>YEAH BUT THE FATSO DROPPED THE HONEY LAWSUIT HAHAHAHEIEHIEHEHIEHE IN YOUR FACES CHUDS! NOW BUY MORE OVERPRICED GPU SLOP
What a way to derail the thread

>>106344736
NTA
Voluntary dismissal is not the same as admitting you were wrong to bring the case. It's standard in class action suits, once the class is approved, for the individual plaintiffs to drop their individual suits.

>>106344751
>Voluntary dismissal is not the same as admitting you were wrong
This is why with or without prejudice exists.
With prejudice means to admit that you were wrong.
>It's standard in class action suits
All the others who dismissed did it without prejudice

Dismissal with prejudice happens when there was an out-of-court settlement.
If i come to you and say:
>drop this case and i give you a million shekels
I expect from you to dismiss with prejudice, because otherwise you could just fill it again, or let someone else fill it for you.

Basically, there are only two reason why he would do what he did:
>he accepted money to do it
or
>he is just a very spiteful person and wants the others to get fucked

>>106344750
There are anons here talking about how he will totally sue bloomberg and go to court.

So reminding them that he took your money and run away the last time you donated to him for a lawsuit, is important.
Otherwise you just get scammed yet again.

>>106344789
Nice try shill.

>>106344789
What he does with Bloomberg is irrelevant to the actual news being presented.

>>106343070 (OP)
>violate copyright
>get DMCA strike
>WAAAA, I WILL SUE YOU WAAAAA

>>106344736
>admit that you were wrong
Even if he made a sworn statement saying he's wrong it would still just be some dudes opinion. Precedent is made by the rulings of appeals courts.
Otherwise I could make any precedent I want by filing and dropping lawsuits.

>>106344782
You can file with prejudice without having to have some kind of arrangement for it. Maybe he just didn't want to be directly involved anymore.
But anyway, enough derailing the thread.

>>106344782
Steve figured out that as a party to these trials he can't farm them for content, so he decided to pull out of the suit and get that content rolling

That is the official reason that he gave in the video where he did hide the news of his dismissal 8 minutes in hidden within a different segment.

litigation is a waste of time. guerilla journo work and a crack team of ground crew is where it's at. always seems like the deck is stacked in the courts. maybe not always.

>>106344826
It would be "some dudes opinion" document under a court case that can be referred to in others.

Note how you don't even try to explain why he did it with preudice rather than without, while everybody else did it without.
>>106344832
>You can file with prejudice without having to have some kind of arrangement for it
Yes, like if you are spiteful and you don't want others to succeed. It was the second possible reason.
Otherwise, you don't gain anything from admitting that you were wrong.

>>106344854
It's not the same as admitting that you were wrong. You're not admitting anything at all by dropping the charges, with or without prejudice.

>>106344826
>Otherwise I could make any precedent I want by filing and dropping lawsuits.
You can, though, that's the problem with court law.
If you fill a lawsuit and you deliberately behave retarded and deliberately lose it, you steal the chance to sue from others.
It just costs you money. Steve still had to pay his lawyers for those months that he wasted everyones time.

It especially happens with class action lawsuits, where even with a win, the company only has to pay like 10 bucks per customer who claims it.... rather than getting fucked in an actual lawsuit where they could get completely wasted.

The benefit of common law is that you don't have contradictory rulings, which is what happens a lot e.g. in German courts.

>>106344866
Can you explain why he did it with prejudice?

>>106344886
See >>106344832

>>106344892
I don't see the reason.
Can you write it out again?
Why is GamersNexus the only party that dismissed with prejudice?

It is all about the SHEKELS, give me SHEKELS.
>fills Hones lawsuit because he personally feels like he lost shekels
>begs for money to do it
>settles, takes PayPals shekels and drops out
>doesn't inform his viewers appropriately, doesn't give donates back

>complain about NVIDIA putting conditions on GPUs they hand out BEFORE release FOR FREE to him
>demands that he should get more things for free
>when asked why he can't just buy it in a store, he whines about how many shekels he would lose by releasing his video two days later

>gets video taken down by DMCA strike
>refuses to simply upload it on his website
>but tells others to reupload it, as long as they take it down again when the original is back, because otherwise he would miss out on views and shekels
Just how many more times will idiots here get scammed by this eceleb?

>>106343110
>Why would (((Bloomberg))) want to take down a gpu video?

>>106344866
>It's not the same as admitting that you were wrong
It is, by the very definition of it.
A dismissal with prejudice is an adjudication on the merits and you can't fill again because that would be double jeopardy.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/with_prejudice
>Without prejudice:
Dropping out for reasons that have nothing to do with the actual subject of the case, like "i cant afford it", "someone else already runs it", "i made mistakes when filling it", etc.
>With prejudice:
Dropping out because of the actual subject of the case, like "i don't have a case", "i am wrong"

Of course you yourself saying that you are wrong, doesn't have the same weight as a court ruling that you are wrong.
But the fact is:
GamersNexus signed a legal valid document, where they declare that they are wrong.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.441974/gov.uscourts.cand.441974.178.0.pdf
Whatever he tells you on reddit or in a youtube video doesn't matter, he can lie as much as he wants there, if the actual legal document says something different.

>>106345131
Seems like you're getting a lot out of that law degree you got out of the back of a taco truck, anon.

>>106343110
>BloomBERG
You should be able to figure this one out by yourself

>>106345131
>Whatever he tells you on reddit or in a youtube video doesn't matter, he can lie as much as he wants there
ok, in theory, if you donated to him because of the lawsuit, you can sue GamersNexus because he obviously scammed you.

But nobody is going to do that, so who cares?
Enforcing consumer rights isn't important when it is about the consumers who consumed GamersNexus videos and spent money on him and got scammed.

>>106345131
>didn't even read the document he linked
lmao

>>106345159
see >>106344678

>>106344710
>The Latina Tradwife LLC
The things people will make content over these days.

>>106343110
you need to define what bloomberg. i consume a lot of bloomberg content and it is heavily partisan and heavily globohomo. but it is very useful.
they are very pro-US hegemony. they are working on many stories about how ChinaBad in regards to Chip Sanctions and i posit that this long haired guys story has ruined many many months of Bloomberg 'journalist' work trying to do the same.
bloomberg's position would be china is criminal, long haired guys is that USA is ineffectual.

>>106345503
makes sense. thats what i suspected too

>>106343423
Corpos fear him.

>>106343070 (OP)
Fuck this fat entitlted fuck sitrring up e-drama. No one actually cares.

>>106343070 (OP)
the video was 3 fucking hours long anyone give me the tldw? that length alone was probably more powerful than censoring /

>>106343070 (OP)
I recall it only had like 200k views 3 days after release.

I bet he DMCAd his own documentary, smearing it on Bloomberg in order to cause some more outrage and thus clicks.

200k for all that effort must have been a total downer. The "movie" is just way too long, nobody got time to watch 3h+ of a "water is wet" type of documentary

>>106346044
The number of viewers is secondary
As of today he has collected $560k in donations for this documentary and has made back the cost 20x over

>>106343110
bloomberg pumps nvidia stock. this video obviously damages nvidia stock.

Never fails to amaze me how much /g/ shills for this chink agent. He literally scammed people of donations and you defend him. Almost all of his reviews for a long time now have been purely sponsor based where he's given hardware that he praises and those who don't simply don't get reviewed or get absolutely shit talked when he talks the time to buy it himself to review.

>>106343110
Jeetposting? For an american he is alarmingly skinny, like he could sublimate into thin air at any moment

>>106343070 (OP)
There's a lot of money on the GPU black market, so it isn't far fetched to think that the video got by power that be. But on the other hand it wouldn't be far fetched to think that a media, who makes money on controversy, would deliberately do something that would get their video on the subject taken down

>>106343070 (OP)
>take someone elses copyrighted video and insert it into your own without any modification
>do this for a video that has an official copyright free version available from the government
>get mad when you get DMCAd

>>106344584
Sue who for what? Telling youtube that someone is infringing a trademark is not a crime. If youtube takes videos down for invalid trademark claims, that's their business. There's no obvious case agains them either

>>106343697
It's okay, though. The Iranians moved the enriched uranium days before going by footage. I have no doubt they're shifting their program to smaller and more hidden facilities and will have a nuclear weapon by 2028 the latest.

I'm not worried about it. Fuck pissrael. Lmao
>>106343689
There's probably backdoors in Nvidia gpus, too, just like there's backdoors in any AMD or Intel (lmao) cpu post-2007. So no reason to clamp down. The Chinese are just bringing in some Trojan horses

>>106344543
>As a result of the controversy, Honey lost roughly 3 million of its 20 million users within two weeks of the allegations surfacing.[31] In March 2025, Google updated their policies for extensions published to its Chrome Web Store, explicitly disallowing extensions that claim affiliate commissions without providing discounts. Subsequently, Honey updated their extension to stop claiming affiliate revenue in cases where they are not able to provide a discount.
I guess it had the desired effect

Blackmarket GPUs, modified for CN

Blackmarket raw earth metals for US

>>106343110
he used some stock footage of ships in the beginning I think mighte be that

wow I'm glad I downloaded the video when they warned it might get pulled down, I haven't watched it yet

>>106343110
>jews tell goyim 'we need tarifs to punish our enemies'.

>goyim dont realize, they are the enemies being punished.

>some fat nerd releases a video showing how the chinese get cheap as fuck gpus that cost you 3000 dollars + tariff + tip

>goyim start to notice billionare goldbergsheklestien is maybe not being completely honest

Does anyone have the full video in high quality Please?

>>106348077
i got it in 4k its 23.7gb I don't know where I could upload that for you anon any suggestions

>>106348101
Oh, maybe a torrent?

>>106348117
how do I make a torrent anon

>>106343070 (OP)
>jewtube
Somebody tell that groid to upload on Odysee.